• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Bernoulli Law of Large Numbers and Weierstrass` Approximation
Bernoulli Law of Large Numbers and Weierstrass` Approximation

Theories.Axioms,Rules of Inference
Theories.Axioms,Rules of Inference

... Here is a pictorial proof, that starts from the axioms or other known theorems and applies Rules of Inference to eventually obtain the formula we need to prove. And hence by definition, the above is a theorem. I show this proof format only to explain the formal definition of a proof, but its sometim ...
2.7 Proving Segment Relationships
2.7 Proving Segment Relationships

Formal Methods Key to Homework Assignment 6, Part 3
Formal Methods Key to Homework Assignment 6, Part 3

IUMA Máster MTT, Métodos, 2015-2016 Examen 22 febrero 2016
IUMA Máster MTT, Métodos, 2015-2016 Examen 22 febrero 2016

... 3. Comentar: A1, . . . ,An ⊨ B means that formula B is valid: it is true in all situations in which A1, . . . ,An are true. It implies the use of semantics. However a theorem is a formula that can be established (‘proved’) by a given proof system. We write A is a theorem as ⊢ A, A is a theorem. A pr ...
Full text
Full text

If…then statements If A then B The if…then statements is a
If…then statements If A then B The if…then statements is a

Kurt Gödel and His Theorems
Kurt Gödel and His Theorems

Gödel`s First Incompleteness Theorem
Gödel`s First Incompleteness Theorem

Keiichi Komatsu
Keiichi Komatsu

... Theorem 1. The class number of (  m ) is odd. In our lectures, we prove the above theorem not using class field theory. After 50 years, Iwasawa proved the following theorem using class field theory: Theorem 2 [2]. Let k be an algebraic number field, K a finite Galois extension of k and the Galois g ...
5 Famous Math Conjectures
5 Famous Math Conjectures

25.4 Sum-product sets
25.4 Sum-product sets

ON REPRESENTATIONS OF NUMBERS BY SUMS OF TWO
ON REPRESENTATIONS OF NUMBERS BY SUMS OF TWO

Calcpardy Double Jep AB 2010
Calcpardy Double Jep AB 2010

Full text
Full text

Gödel`s First Incompleteness Theorem
Gödel`s First Incompleteness Theorem

Advanced Topics in Mathematics – Logic and Metamathematics Mr
Advanced Topics in Mathematics – Logic and Metamathematics Mr

... 1. Consider the following theorem: Suppose n is an integer larger than 1 and n is not prime. Then 2n  1 is not prime. (a) Identify the hypotheses and conclusion of the theorem. Are the hypotheses true when n = 6? What does the theorem tell you in this instance? Is it right? (b) What can you conclud ...
The Mean Value Theorem (4.2)
The Mean Value Theorem (4.2)

... Actually, if we assume that the position function (distance vs. time) is continuous and differentiable at all times, then there must have been at least one time during the trip when Paula was traveling at 143 km/hour. Why? ...
Fermat`s Last Theorem for regular primes
Fermat`s Last Theorem for regular primes

... Supervisors Project Submission Form Supervisor: ...
PDF
PDF

... theorem, and the only if part is the completeness theorem. We will prove the two parts separately here. We begin with the easier one: Theorem 1. Propositional logic is sound with respect to truth-value semantics. Proof. Basically, we need to show that every axiom is a tautology, and that the inferen ...
On three consecutive primes
On three consecutive primes

College Geometry University of Memphis MATH 3581 Mathematical
College Geometry University of Memphis MATH 3581 Mathematical

< 1 ... 166 167 168 169 170

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report