• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
ARML Lecture VII - Number Theory
ARML Lecture VII - Number Theory

Building explicit induction schemas for cyclic induction reasoning
Building explicit induction schemas for cyclic induction reasoning

... of induction hypotheses representing ‘not yet proved’ formulas. The induction hypotheses can be defined before their use, by explicit induction schemas that can be directly embedded in inference systems using explicit induction rules. On the other hand, the induction hypotheses can also be defined b ...
Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 4
Math 3000 Section 003 Intro to Abstract Math Homework 4

pp 5_5_5_6
pp 5_5_5_6

Formal methods: lecture notes no
Formal methods: lecture notes no

... model we can express -calculus then we are actually saying quite a lot. And here is why: every computer program is expressible in -calculus. We will try to show that operations which are most common to all computer languages can be expressed in the language we just have built. ...
Pythagorean Theorem
Pythagorean Theorem

Philosophy of Logic and Language
Philosophy of Logic and Language

29 APPROXIMATION EXPONENTS FOR FUNCTION
29 APPROXIMATION EXPONENTS FOR FUNCTION

... of a polynomial, we can use the same definition as above for the exponent in this situation. Mahler proved analogues of Dirichlet and Liouville bounds by essentially the same proofs. An analogue of Khintchine’s theorem giving the behaviour of “almost all” functions can also be proved similarly. D. Fe ...
Using Existential Graphs for Automated Theorem Proving
Using Existential Graphs for Automated Theorem Proving

Linear Hashing Is Awesome - IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
Linear Hashing Is Awesome - IEEE Symposium on Foundations of

(pdf)
(pdf)

Infinity and Diagonalization
Infinity and Diagonalization

... •While (the number 2n can be written as the sum of two primes) ...
Belief closure: A semantics of common knowledge for
Belief closure: A semantics of common knowledge for

RISES, LEVELS, DROPS AND - California State University, Los
RISES, LEVELS, DROPS AND - California State University, Los

... sum is n. A palindromic composition (or palindrome) is one for which the sequence reads the same forwards and backwards. We derive results for the number of “+” signs, summands, levels (a summand followed by itself), rises (a summand followed by a larger one), and drops (a summand followed by a smal ...
pdf
pdf

english, pdf
english, pdf

... (ii) 2kFn . Then n = 3m, where m is odd. Since 2kFn and d(Fn ) can be a multiple of 2 but not of 4, it follows that Fn = 2. Thus, n ∈ {3, 6}, of which only the solution n = 3 is convenient. (iii) There is no n such that 4kFn . (iv) 8kFn . Then d(8) = 4 divides d(Fn ), a number which may be divisibl ...
Reducing the Erdos-Moser equation 1^ n+ 2^ n+...+ k^ n=(k+ 1)^ n
Reducing the Erdos-Moser equation 1^ n+ 2^ n+...+ k^ n=(k+ 1)^ n

... there is no solution. (r = 6, 7, 8). For the numbers K in Table 1 with r = 6, 7, 8 prime factors, conditions (i) and (ii) k require + 1 ≡ −p (mod p2 ), for p = 2, 3, 2, respectively. But the requirement is violated in each p case, and so no solution exists. (ii). Part (i) implies that the only possi ...
On the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub
On the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub

On the existence of a connected component
On the existence of a connected component

... It is easier to build a connected component when the graph has only finitely many components. Theorem RCA0 proves that if a countable graph G has a finite set of vertices V0 such that every vertex in G is path connected to some vertex in V0 , then G can be decomposed into components. In particular, ...
Ideas of Newton-Okounkov bodies
Ideas of Newton-Okounkov bodies

CHAP02 Numbers
CHAP02 Numbers

... But how can we prove that something will always work? We can’t check every instance! The answer is that we can often use an argument that works in every case. But sometimes we can only do it by climbing up a ladder, going from one instance to another. This is the Principle of Induction. We prove tha ...
exam review
exam review

(A  B) (A  B) (A  B)  (A  B)
(A B) (A B) (A B) (A B)

... Proof: We must show that when AB  AB is true then A=B is true. (Proof by contradiction) Assume that AB  AB is true but AB. If AB then this means that either  xA but xB, or  xB but xA. If  xA but xB, then x  AB but x  AB so AB is not a subset of AB and we have a contradiction t ...
(A  B) (A  B) (A  B)  (A  B)
(A B) (A B) (A B) (A B)

Number Theory II: Congruences
Number Theory II: Congruences

... techniques you’ve learned earlier in this course, and you should be able to carry out such proofs. Some examples will be given in class or on worksheets; others will be assigned as homework. • Notes. • Congruences to different moduli can NOT be added, multiplied, etc. In the above properties, the mo ...
< 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report