
p q
... • Basic idea is to assume that the opposite of what you are trying to prove is true and show that it results in a violation of one of your initial assumptions. • In the previous proof we showed that assuming that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is rational and showed that it re ...
... • Basic idea is to assume that the opposite of what you are trying to prove is true and show that it results in a violation of one of your initial assumptions. • In the previous proof we showed that assuming that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is rational and showed that it re ...
Computing Default Extensions by Reductions on OR
... of O R that is axiomatized. Although this is, from the point of view of theoremhood, a stronger system than the rewriting system that we propose, it gives an indirect route to the Modal Reduction Theorem. The system in (Lakemeyer and Levesque 2006) is formulated as a Hilbert-style axiom system, whic ...
... of O R that is axiomatized. Although this is, from the point of view of theoremhood, a stronger system than the rewriting system that we propose, it gives an indirect route to the Modal Reduction Theorem. The system in (Lakemeyer and Levesque 2006) is formulated as a Hilbert-style axiom system, whic ...
Sample Chapter
... ILLUSTRATION 2.16: Consider the statement “If n ≥ 8 then n can be written as sum of 3¢s and 5¢s” and prove using the strong principle of induction. i. Basis Step: The minimum value for which the statement is given to be true is 8, and 8 can be written as 8 = 3 + 5 hence S is true for base case. ii. ...
... ILLUSTRATION 2.16: Consider the statement “If n ≥ 8 then n can be written as sum of 3¢s and 5¢s” and prove using the strong principle of induction. i. Basis Step: The minimum value for which the statement is given to be true is 8, and 8 can be written as 8 = 3 + 5 hence S is true for base case. ii. ...
Characterizing the number of coloured $ m $
... Recently, Andrews, Fraenkl and Sellers [AFS15] found an explicit expression that characterizes the number of m-ary partitions of a nonnegative integer n modulo m; remarkably, this expression depended only on the coefficients in the base m representation of n. Subsequently Andrews, Fraenkel and Selle ...
... Recently, Andrews, Fraenkl and Sellers [AFS15] found an explicit expression that characterizes the number of m-ary partitions of a nonnegative integer n modulo m; remarkably, this expression depended only on the coefficients in the base m representation of n. Subsequently Andrews, Fraenkel and Selle ...
Geodesics, volumes and Lehmer`s conjecture Mikhail Belolipetsky
... setting, the volume would have to grow much faster. It is unknown if for n ≥ 4 there exist hyperbolic n-manifolds M with Syst1 (M ) → 0 and Vol(M ) growing slower than a polynomial in 1/Syst1 (M ). Let us also remark that an alternative proof of part (A) of Theorem 1 can be given using the original ...
... setting, the volume would have to grow much faster. It is unknown if for n ≥ 4 there exist hyperbolic n-manifolds M with Syst1 (M ) → 0 and Vol(M ) growing slower than a polynomial in 1/Syst1 (M ). Let us also remark that an alternative proof of part (A) of Theorem 1 can be given using the original ...
A remark on the extreme value theory for continued fractions
... Next we estimate the gaps between the same order level intervals. For any n ≥ N and two distinct level intervals J(τ1 , · · · , τn ) and J(σ1 , · · · , σn ) of En , we assume that J(τ1 , · · · , τn ) locates in the left of J(σ1 , · · · , σn ) without loss of generality. By Proposition 2.2, we know t ...
... Next we estimate the gaps between the same order level intervals. For any n ≥ N and two distinct level intervals J(τ1 , · · · , τn ) and J(σ1 , · · · , σn ) of En , we assume that J(τ1 , · · · , τn ) locates in the left of J(σ1 , · · · , σn ) without loss of generality. By Proposition 2.2, we know t ...
attached worksheet
... Observe the evident patterns in Figure 1. Each fraction a/7 (in the box on the left) has the same cycle of digits in its decimal expansion, but with different starting points. Thus, to compute a/7, don't think of multiplying the decimal for 1/7 by a; rather, apply a cyclic permutation to the digits ...
... Observe the evident patterns in Figure 1. Each fraction a/7 (in the box on the left) has the same cycle of digits in its decimal expansion, but with different starting points. Thus, to compute a/7, don't think of multiplying the decimal for 1/7 by a; rather, apply a cyclic permutation to the digits ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.