Download Full text

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Large numbers wikipedia , lookup

Law of large numbers wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Sequence wikipedia , lookup

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Series (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup

Hyperreal number wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Arithmetic wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Representation theory wikipedia , lookup

Oscillator representation wikipedia , lookup

Deligne–Lusztig theory wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
THE ZECKENDORF REPRESENTATION AND THE GOLDEN SEQUENCE
Martin Bunder and Keith Tognetti
The University of Wollongong, N.S.W. 2500, Australia
(Submitted August 1989)
Preamble
In what follows, we have
/S - 1 = 0.618.. . .
The Golden section:, x = ———Fibonacci numbers:
FQ = 0, Fl
= 1, Fi
= Fi_l
+ Fi_2,
i > 2.
The Zeckendorf representation of a number is simply the representation of
that number as the sum of distinct Fibonacci numbers. If the number of terms
of this sum is minimized, that representation is unique, as also is the representation when the number of terms is maximized. (See Brown [1] and [2].)
A general
Zeckendorf representation will be written as
h
£ Fk. , where kx
J= 1
> k2 > > •• > kh > 2.
J
Thus, 16 can be represented as
F7 + Fi+, F6 + ^5 + * V F7 + F3 + F2,
and Fe + Fs + F3 + F2.
The first is the unique minimal representation; the last is the unique maximal
representation.
The others show that representations of any intermediate
length need not be unique.
It is easy to show that only numbers of the form Fn - 1 have a unique Zeckendorf representation (i.e., one that is maximal and minimal).
From here on, we will refer to the minimal Zeckendorf representation and
the maximal Zeckendorf representation as the miwimai and maximal.
We define
Beta-sequence: {3j}5 J = 1, 2, 3, ..., 3j = [ U + 1)T] - [JT].
This takes on only the values zero or unity.
Golden sequence: Any sequence such as abaababa. . . which is obtained from the
Beta-sequence $i» 32' $33 •••» where "2?" corresponds to a zero and "a" corresponds to a unit.
We will prove that the final term of each maximal representation is either
F2 or F3 and show the pattern associated with the final terms in the representations of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ..., namely: F2, F3i F2> F2, F 3 , F2s ... is a Golden
sequence with the term F2 corresponding to a unit and the term ^3 corresponding
to a zero.
More specifically, we will show that the last term in the maximal representation of the number n is ^3-3n = 2 - 3n»
We note a similar result for the "modified" Zeckendorf representation which
may include F± as well as F2.
Main Results
Theorem
1: The maximal ends with F2 or F3.
Proof: We note that F3 cannot be replaced by F2 + F^ in a Zeckendorf expansion
as F2 = Fi . If Fk with k > 3 is the smallest term in an expansion of a number
1991]
217
THE ZECKENDORF REPRESENTATION AND THE GOLDEN SEQUENCE
n, then Fk can be replaced by ^ - i + Fk^2 an& s o t n e expansion is not maximal.
Thus, if an expansion is maximal, it must end in F^ or F3.
Lemma
1:
[ (j + ^ ) x ] = Fi-l
+ [JT] if t > 2
and
0 < j <
Fi+l.
Proof: Fraenkel, Muchkin, and Tassa proved in [3] that if 0 is irrational,
0 < «7 < tfi anc^ Vil^i
i-s t n e ^ t h convergent to 0 in the elementary theory of
continued fractions, then
[(j + qi-i)Q]
As F^-i/Fi
= pi_l
+ [j'0], £ > 1.
is a convergent to T, our result follows.
h
Lemma
h
2: If ^T Fk . is a Zeckendorf expansion, then J] Fk. < ^
h
+1
- 1.
n
Proof: E \ .
* ^-1
+ ^-2
+ ••• + ^2 - **1 + i " 2, since £ ^
= ^n+ 2 - 1-
The result is now obvious.
h
Lemma
3: I f j * has a Zeckendorf e x p a n s i o n XI ^ • 5
i= 1
(a)
[ J T ] - Fki.x
(b)
[(j +
Proof:
(a)
+ ^ 2 _ ! + ... +F^_i_1+ [ T ^ J
- Fk
1)T]
! + Fk
l
+ ... + K
i- 2
i
-
[ ( ^
+ 772) T ]
[JT] = ^ - l
-
Ffcl_l
^k • ' t7721]
Similarly, if n = £
+
=
[777T].
F
+
k2-l
DT]
so
eventually
+i),
- [{Fki
+ . . . + (Fkh
+
- Fki.x
+ ... + ^ _
-l+
x
4: I f j has a maximal
1))T]
l(Fkh
+ Fkh-l
= F k l - 1 + . . . + F^^-l
+ 1)T]
by Lemma 1.
Y\ FT. . , t h e n
l
i-1
(a)
[ J T ] = Ffei_! + . . . + ^ _
(b)
B,- - 2 - Fkfc .
Proof:
(a)
tnT]>
+ *•"•* + V i " l + [ T F k J .
As i n (a) ( t h i s time w i t h ?77+ 1 < F^
[U +
Lemma
! + F,
h
Let 7?z = X ^ . » t h e n by Lemma 2, m < F^ +i and so by Lemma 1,
[JT]
(b)
tnen
*
x
-i
+ ^
- 1.
I f kh = 2 , t h e n UFkh]
= 0 = Fk
- 1.
I f fcfc - 3 , t h e n [TFkh]
= 1 - Fkh
- 1,
so t h e r e s u l t f o l l o w s by Lemma 3 ( a ) .
(b)
By Lemmas 4 ( a ) and 3 ( b ) ,
Bj - [ ( J + D T ] - [ J T ] - Fkh.Y
as ^
Theorem
218
- Fkh
+ 1 = 2 - F fcfc ,
= 2 or 3 and so Fk _ ]_ = 1.
2: The l a s t term i n t h e maximal f o r j * i s ^3-3--
=
2
[Aug.
THE ZECKENDORF REPRESENTATION AND THE GOLDEN SEQUENCE
Proof:
By Lemma 4(b), if Fk
S—
is the last term in a maximal for j , then
2 - Fkh .
If kh = 3, then &j = 0 and F3„$.
= F3 = 2 - Bj.
If fefe = 2 5 then Bj = 1 and F 3 _ 3 j = F 2 = 2 - Bj We now see that the last term of the maximal for any integer j is either 1
or 2. It also follows immediately that the sequence of the last terms for the
maximals for 1, 2, 3, 4, ... form a Golden sequence 1211212112..., where a unit
is unchanged but a zero is replaced by 2.
Suppose we form the modified maximal from the maximal by forcing the last
term to be unity; that is, the last two terms are F3 + i^?' F3 + Fi, or F^ + F\.
Then it follows easily from the above that the second last terms of the
modified maximals for 2, 3, 4, ... correspond to the same golden pattern as the
last terms in the maximals for 1, 2, 3, ... .
References
1.
2.
3.
J. L. Brown. "Zeckendorf's Theorem and Some Applications." Fibonacci
Quarterly
2.2 (1964):163-68.
J. L. Brown. "Z New Characterization of the Fibonacci Numbers."
Fibonacci
Quarterly
3.1 (1965):1-8.
A. S. Fraenkel, M. Mushkin, & U. Tassa. "Determination of [nQ] by Its
Sequence of Differences." Can. Math. Bull.
21 (1978):441-46.
Applications of Fibonacci Numbers
Volume 3
New Publication
Proceedings of 'The Third International Conference on Fibonacci Numbers
and Their Applications, Pisa? Italy, July 25-29, 1988.'
edited by G.E. Bergtim, A.N. Phllippou and A.F. Horadam
This volume contains a selection of papers presented at the Third International Conference on Fibonacci
Numbers and Their Applications. The topics covered include number patterns, linear recurrences and the
application of the Fibonacci Numbers to probability, statistics, differential equations, cryptography, computer science and elementary number theory. Many of the papers included contain suggestions for other
avenues of research.
For those interested in applications of number theory, statistics and probability, and numerical analysis in
science and engineering.
1989, 392 pp. ISBN 0—7923—0523—X
Hardbound Dfl. 195.00/ 65.00/US $99.00
A.M.S. members are eligible for a 25% discount on this volume providing they order directly from the
publisher. However, the bill must be prepaid by credit card, registered money order or check. A letter must
also be enclosed saying " l a m a member of the American Mathematical Society and am ordering the book
for personal use."
KLUWER
ACADEMIC
PUBLISHERS
P.O. Box 322, 3300 AH Dordrecht, The Netherlands
P.O. Box 358, Accord Station, Hingham, MA 02018-0358, U.S.A.
1991]
219