
7 Sequences of real numbers
... The next question is whether boundedness and an additional property of a sequence can guarantee convergence. It turns out that such an property is monotonicity defined in the following definition. Definition 7.3.3. A sequence {sn }+∞ n=1 of real numbers is said to be non-decreasing if sn ≤ sn+1 for ...
... The next question is whether boundedness and an additional property of a sequence can guarantee convergence. It turns out that such an property is monotonicity defined in the following definition. Definition 7.3.3. A sequence {sn }+∞ n=1 of real numbers is said to be non-decreasing if sn ≤ sn+1 for ...
propositional logic extended with a pedagogically useful relevant
... Anderson and Belnap. The language being W 1 , there is no need for index sets; the star will be sufficient to recall whether the hypothesis of the subproof is or is not relevant to the conclusion of the subproof. If it is, an arrow can be introduced. An important restriction is that no subproof can ...
... Anderson and Belnap. The language being W 1 , there is no need for index sets; the star will be sufficient to recall whether the hypothesis of the subproof is or is not relevant to the conclusion of the subproof. If it is, an arrow can be introduced. An important restriction is that no subproof can ...
Full text
... We let Fn represent the nth Fibonacci number. In [2] and [3] we find relationships between the Fibonacci numbers and their associated matrices. The purpose of this paper is to develop relationships between the generalized Fibonacci numbers and the permanent of a (0,1)-matrix. The kgeneralizedFibonac ...
... We let Fn represent the nth Fibonacci number. In [2] and [3] we find relationships between the Fibonacci numbers and their associated matrices. The purpose of this paper is to develop relationships between the generalized Fibonacci numbers and the permanent of a (0,1)-matrix. The kgeneralizedFibonac ...
lecture notes in Mathematical Logic
... carried out by a mechanical procedure; for example, to verify that one formula is an instance of another, or that a given sequence of formulas constitutes a formal proof. Finding a proof, on the other hand, is usually far from being routine, and to decide provability is in general not even possible. ...
... carried out by a mechanical procedure; for example, to verify that one formula is an instance of another, or that a given sequence of formulas constitutes a formal proof. Finding a proof, on the other hand, is usually far from being routine, and to decide provability is in general not even possible. ...
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 4 1. Chapter 3.1 Predicates and
... • This is why the negation of statements with the quantifiers ”for all” and ”there exists” are analogous to the De Morgan’s Laws. 2.5. Vacuous Truth of Universal Statements. • In general, a statement of the form ∀x in D, if P (x) then Q(x) is called vacuously true or true by default if, and only if, ...
... • This is why the negation of statements with the quantifiers ”for all” and ”there exists” are analogous to the De Morgan’s Laws. 2.5. Vacuous Truth of Universal Statements. • In general, a statement of the form ∀x in D, if P (x) then Q(x) is called vacuously true or true by default if, and only if, ...
Rational Functions With Nonnegative Integer Coefficients
... M n. Then n=0 anxn is rational. If the entries of M are nonnegative integers, it is reasonable to say that the an have a combinatorial interpretation. More generally, if M is a matrix whose entries are polynomials with nonnegative coefficients and with no constant term then the entries of (I − M )−1 a ...
... M n. Then n=0 anxn is rational. If the entries of M are nonnegative integers, it is reasonable to say that the an have a combinatorial interpretation. More generally, if M is a matrix whose entries are polynomials with nonnegative coefficients and with no constant term then the entries of (I − M )−1 a ...
Pseudoprimes and Carmichael Numbers, by Emily Riemer
... namely using the Geometric Series formula to draw conclusions about divisibility. [It is also worth mentioning that Rosen’s proof of infinitely many pseudoprimes to the base 2 is very similar to Silverman’s derivation of the form of Mersenne primes from the general form an − 1]. The process of the p ...
... namely using the Geometric Series formula to draw conclusions about divisibility. [It is also worth mentioning that Rosen’s proof of infinitely many pseudoprimes to the base 2 is very similar to Silverman’s derivation of the form of Mersenne primes from the general form an − 1]. The process of the p ...
Balancing sequence contains no prime number
... o Sub case 1: (a − 1) = 2 2 and (a + 1) = 2 p 2 . Solving this sub case we get p 2 = 3 , which is an absurd. o Sub case 2: (a − 1) = 2 p and (a + 1) = 2 2 p . Solving this sub case we get p = 1 , which is an absurd. o Sub case 3: (a − 1) = p 2 and (a + 1) = 23 . This sub case is not possible, since ...
... o Sub case 1: (a − 1) = 2 2 and (a + 1) = 2 p 2 . Solving this sub case we get p 2 = 3 , which is an absurd. o Sub case 2: (a − 1) = 2 p and (a + 1) = 2 2 p . Solving this sub case we get p = 1 , which is an absurd. o Sub case 3: (a − 1) = p 2 and (a + 1) = 23 . This sub case is not possible, since ...
Chapter 2 Propositional Logic
... wff. That’s why we use the metalinguistic variables “φ” and “ψ”.2 The practice of using variables to express generality is familiar; we can say, for example, “for any integer n, if n is even, then n + 2 is even as well”. Just as “n” here is a variable for numbers, metalinguistic variables are variab ...
... wff. That’s why we use the metalinguistic variables “φ” and “ψ”.2 The practice of using variables to express generality is familiar; we can say, for example, “for any integer n, if n is even, then n + 2 is even as well”. Just as “n” here is a variable for numbers, metalinguistic variables are variab ...
CSE 20 - Lecture 14: Logic and Proof Techniques
... B is 12. How many functions are there from A to B. A B C D E ...
... B is 12. How many functions are there from A to B. A B C D E ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.