
2. First Order Logic 2.1. Expressions. Definition 2.1. A language L
... In other words, the finite list of axioms above implies that the model is infinite. However no single formula involving only equality can imply that the model is infinite. Theorem 2.32 (Herbrand’s Theorem). Suppose Fc ` ∃xφ where φ is quantifierfree. Then there are terms t1 , . . . , tn such that Fc ...
... In other words, the finite list of axioms above implies that the model is infinite. However no single formula involving only equality can imply that the model is infinite. Theorem 2.32 (Herbrand’s Theorem). Suppose Fc ` ∃xφ where φ is quantifierfree. Then there are terms t1 , . . . , tn such that Fc ...
eprint_4_1049_36.doc
... then 3 = 2 + 1, then 4 = 3 + 1, and so on. The principle makes precise the vague phrase “and so on.” Principle of Mathematical Induction: Let S be a set of positive integers with the following two properties: (i) 1 belongs to S. (ii) If k belongs to S, then k + 1 belongs to S. Then S is the set of a ...
... then 3 = 2 + 1, then 4 = 3 + 1, and so on. The principle makes precise the vague phrase “and so on.” Principle of Mathematical Induction: Let S be a set of positive integers with the following two properties: (i) 1 belongs to S. (ii) If k belongs to S, then k + 1 belongs to S. Then S is the set of a ...
binary digit distribution over naturally defined sequences
... ABSTRACT. In a previous paper the first author showed that multiples of 3 prefer to have an even number of ones in their binary digit expansion. In this paper it is shown that in some general classes of naturally defined ...
... ABSTRACT. In a previous paper the first author showed that multiples of 3 prefer to have an even number of ones in their binary digit expansion. In this paper it is shown that in some general classes of naturally defined ...
Natural deduction
... Why natural deduction? • After all, we just found this nice method of truth-tables, which can be used to determine the validity or invalidity of any argument in truth-functional logic! • But there are some problems with truth-tables – They can be very inefficient. The reason is that if you have an a ...
... Why natural deduction? • After all, we just found this nice method of truth-tables, which can be used to determine the validity or invalidity of any argument in truth-functional logic! • But there are some problems with truth-tables – They can be very inefficient. The reason is that if you have an a ...
On the difference of consecutive primes.
... pn log pn , namely (i) the prime numbers lying between j p. and c4 pn log pn/(loglog pn ) 2 and not congruent to -1 to any modulus r, (ii) the integers not exceeding p n log pn whose prime factors are included only among the r . Some of the a's may be Vs . LEMMA 4 . The number of the is is greater t ...
... pn log pn , namely (i) the prime numbers lying between j p. and c4 pn log pn/(loglog pn ) 2 and not congruent to -1 to any modulus r, (ii) the integers not exceeding p n log pn whose prime factors are included only among the r . Some of the a's may be Vs . LEMMA 4 . The number of the is is greater t ...
Unit 2 Math 116 Prime numbers, Rational Numbers, and the
... 3 divides 90 since the sum of digits (9+0=9) is divisible by 3 5 divides 90 since 90 ends in a 0 6 divides 90 since 2 and 3 divide 90 9 divides 90 since the sum of digits (9+0=9) is divisible by 9 10 divides 90 since last digit is a 0 b) 135 5 (Last digit is a five) ...
... 3 divides 90 since the sum of digits (9+0=9) is divisible by 3 5 divides 90 since 90 ends in a 0 6 divides 90 since 2 and 3 divide 90 9 divides 90 since the sum of digits (9+0=9) is divisible by 9 10 divides 90 since last digit is a 0 b) 135 5 (Last digit is a five) ...
Definability properties and the congruence closure
... dividing a structure by a congruence relation [Fe, Ma]. In other words, these logics are not congruence closed in the sense of [MeSh2]. The counterexample for A-interpolation is transformed in one for Beth property using a tree technique due to Friedman [Fr], and later generalized in [MaSh1, 2]. Rec ...
... dividing a structure by a congruence relation [Fe, Ma]. In other words, these logics are not congruence closed in the sense of [MeSh2]. The counterexample for A-interpolation is transformed in one for Beth property using a tree technique due to Friedman [Fr], and later generalized in [MaSh1, 2]. Rec ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.