
On the Reciprocal of the Binary Generating Function for the Sum of
... We conclude the paper with a few observations about the indices of elements of Σ corresponding to certain well-studied integer sequences. p ...
... We conclude the paper with a few observations about the indices of elements of Σ corresponding to certain well-studied integer sequences. p ...
Factoring - SLC Home Page
... Assume that p(x) is of degree 3. If a number c is such that p(c) = 0, then p(x) = (x − c)(second-degree expression) with the missing second-degree expression found by using long division. ...
... Assume that p(x) is of degree 3. If a number c is such that p(c) = 0, then p(x) = (x − c)(second-degree expression) with the missing second-degree expression found by using long division. ...
On perfect and multiply perfect numbers
... (a(n), n) > f (x) is less than c ;xl(f(x)lcs for some c, > 0 and c, > 0. The same result hold if a ; n) is replaced by Euler' s :p function . We are not going to give the proof of Theorem 3. It can further be shown that Theorem 3 is best possible in the following sense : Let f (x) = o((log x), ) for ...
... (a(n), n) > f (x) is less than c ;xl(f(x)lcs for some c, > 0 and c, > 0. The same result hold if a ; n) is replaced by Euler' s :p function . We are not going to give the proof of Theorem 3. It can further be shown that Theorem 3 is best possible in the following sense : Let f (x) = o((log x), ) for ...
MATH/EECS 1019 Third test (version 1) – Fall 2014 Solutions 1. (3
... Consider the question: “Prove that if n > 4 is composite, then n divides (n − 1)!.” and the following “proof”. What is the biggest flaw in the argument given in the proof? Fix the problem so that you get a correct proof. “Proof:” Since n is composite, it has two factors n1 , n2 that are each smaller ...
... Consider the question: “Prove that if n > 4 is composite, then n divides (n − 1)!.” and the following “proof”. What is the biggest flaw in the argument given in the proof? Fix the problem so that you get a correct proof. “Proof:” Since n is composite, it has two factors n1 , n2 that are each smaller ...
For a pdf file
... The above equation implies that b2 is even and hence b is even. Since we know a is even this means that a and b have 2 as a common factor which contradicts the assumption that a and b have no common factors. ...
... The above equation implies that b2 is even and hence b is even. Since we know a is even this means that a and b have 2 as a common factor which contradicts the assumption that a and b have no common factors. ...
Right Triangles
... Using what you know about the Pythagorean theorem, explain how you could tell if, given the lengths of three sides of a triangle, that triangle was a right triangle. SAMPLE RESPONSE: The Pythagorean theorem says that the sum of the squares of _________________________________________________________ ...
... Using what you know about the Pythagorean theorem, explain how you could tell if, given the lengths of three sides of a triangle, that triangle was a right triangle. SAMPLE RESPONSE: The Pythagorean theorem says that the sum of the squares of _________________________________________________________ ...
calamity lesson #1
... Set up the Pythagorean Theorem as rs+s2=t2 and plug in the given values. 112+s2 = 612 Then solve like in the examples above. 121 +s2 = 3721 s2 = 3600 s =60 Section 9.3 Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem Used to determine what type of triangle is formed by three given sides. Steps: 1. First make sur ...
... Set up the Pythagorean Theorem as rs+s2=t2 and plug in the given values. 112+s2 = 612 Then solve like in the examples above. 121 +s2 = 3721 s2 = 3600 s =60 Section 9.3 Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem Used to determine what type of triangle is formed by three given sides. Steps: 1. First make sur ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.