• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Section 3. Proofs 3.1. Introduction. 3.1.1. Assumptions.
Section 3. Proofs 3.1. Introduction. 3.1.1. Assumptions.

Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Versus Deductive Reasoning

14002: Proportions in a right triangle
14002: Proportions in a right triangle

... • Theorem 1: The altitude to the hypotenuse of a right triangle forms two triangles that are similar to each other and to the original triangle. In the following example 4ABC is a right triangle with altitude BD to hypotenuse AC. Then by Theorem 1 we have that 4ADB ∼ 4BDC ∼ 4ABC. B ...
On simultaneous rational approximation to a real
On simultaneous rational approximation to a real

Full text
Full text

Which Truth Values in Fuzzy Logics Are De nable?
Which Truth Values in Fuzzy Logics Are De nable?

Direct proof
Direct proof

Random geometric complexes in the thermodynamic regime
Random geometric complexes in the thermodynamic regime

euler and the partial sums of the prime
euler and the partial sums of the prime

... On the other hand, it seems clear that Euler’s proof does not yield a quantitative form of (1) in any obvious way. Euler’s (amended) argument gives us information about limiting behavior as s # 1, while to make (1) precise requires knowing about limiting behavior as x ! 1. To have any hope of provin ...
Ratio and Proportion
Ratio and Proportion

A Combinatorial Interpretation of the Numbers 6 (2n)!/n!(n + 2)!
A Combinatorial Interpretation of the Numbers 6 (2n)!/n!(n + 2)!

... that starts at (0, 0), ends at (2n, 0), and never goes below level 0. It is well-known that the number of Dyck paths of semilength n equals the Catalan number Cn . The height of a path P , denoted by h(P ), is the highest level it reaches. Every nonempty Dyck path R can be factored uniquely as U P D ...
Thompson`s Group F is not SCY
Thompson`s Group F is not SCY

1 Algebra - Partial Fractions
1 Algebra - Partial Fractions

Math 8: Prime Factorization and Congruence
Math 8: Prime Factorization and Congruence

... mod p. Multiplying both sides of this equation by a yields ap ≡ a mod p.  Corollary 2 Let p be a prime number. If [a] is any non-zero number in Zp , then there exists a number [b] in Zp such that [a][b] = 1. (In other words, there exists an inverse of the number [a] in Zp !) Proof: If [a] 6= [0], t ...
userfiles/SECTION F PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
userfiles/SECTION F PROOF BY CONTRADICTION

Biconditional Statements
Biconditional Statements

The Perfect Set Theorem and Definable Wellorderings of the
The Perfect Set Theorem and Definable Wellorderings of the

Discrete Mathematics I Lectures Chapter 4
Discrete Mathematics I Lectures Chapter 4

The Intermediate Value Theorem DEFINITIONS Intermediate means
The Intermediate Value Theorem DEFINITIONS Intermediate means

... It too produces a smooth graph with no holes, tears, or rips. It too is continuous. Just for fun, let’s look at two y-values. Let’s look at y = 76 and y = 13. In this case, if you knew y = 76 then there had to be an “x” that produced it. If you wanted to find “x”, all you’d have to do would be to se ...
On a strong law of large numbers for monotone measures
On a strong law of large numbers for monotone measures

... [2] Chen, Z. Wu, P., Li, B., 2012. A strong law of large numbers for non-additive probabilities. Internat. J. Approx. Reason. In press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2012.06.002. [3] Choquet, G., 1954. Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295. [4] Denneberg, D., 1994. Non-additive ...
4 The semantics of full first
4 The semantics of full first

9-2 Dividing by Monomials
9-2 Dividing by Monomials

Teacher Guide-Rational vs Irrational
Teacher Guide-Rational vs Irrational

Direct proof and disproof
Direct proof and disproof

... way: noticed that something had the form required by the definition and then asserted that it must be a rational. Notice also that we spelled out the definition of “rational” but we just freely used facts from high school algebra as if they were obvious. In general, when writing proofs, you and your ...
c2 = a2 + b2
c2 = a2 + b2

< 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report