
Two Irrational Numbers That Give the Last Non
... (Again, calculations were performed by Maple.) Despite this striking similarity between P and N , it turns out that P , like F , is irrational: Theorem 2. Let P = 0.d1 d2 d3 . . . dn . . . be the infinite decimal such that each digit dn = lnzd(nn ). Then, P is irrational. Before we begin with the (s ...
... (Again, calculations were performed by Maple.) Despite this striking similarity between P and N , it turns out that P , like F , is irrational: Theorem 2. Let P = 0.d1 d2 d3 . . . dn . . . be the infinite decimal such that each digit dn = lnzd(nn ). Then, P is irrational. Before we begin with the (s ...
5-7 Reteaching answers
... What is the expansion of (3x 1 2)3 ? Use the Binomial Theorem. Step 1 Determine a, b, and n. a 5 3x, b 5 2, n 5 3 Step 2 Use the formula to write the equation. (3x 1 2)3 5 3C0(3x)3 1 3C1(3x)2(2) 1 3C2(3x)(2)2 1 3C3(2)3 Step 3 Simplify. 5 1(27x3) 1 3(9x2)(2) 1 3(3x)(4) 2 1(8) 5 27x3 1 54x2 1 36x 1 8 ...
... What is the expansion of (3x 1 2)3 ? Use the Binomial Theorem. Step 1 Determine a, b, and n. a 5 3x, b 5 2, n 5 3 Step 2 Use the formula to write the equation. (3x 1 2)3 5 3C0(3x)3 1 3C1(3x)2(2) 1 3C2(3x)(2)2 1 3C3(2)3 Step 3 Simplify. 5 1(27x3) 1 3(9x2)(2) 1 3(3x)(4) 2 1(8) 5 27x3 1 54x2 1 36x 1 8 ...
BINARY SEQUENCES WITHOUT ISOLATED ONES al = I 32 = 2, a
... s(p ) t s(p) for all p up to 10,000; however, we cannot yet prove that s(p2) = s(p) is impossible.The question is closely related to another one, "can a number x have the same order mod p and mod p2?," for which rare cases give an affirmative answer (e.g., x = 3, p = 11;x = 2,p = 1093); hence, one m ...
... s(p ) t s(p) for all p up to 10,000; however, we cannot yet prove that s(p2) = s(p) is impossible.The question is closely related to another one, "can a number x have the same order mod p and mod p2?," for which rare cases give an affirmative answer (e.g., x = 3, p = 11;x = 2,p = 1093); hence, one m ...
EE005_fhs_lnt_001_Sep09 - EE005-Calculus-UCSI
... Use calculators and computers Try writing your own notes and short descriptions Rewrite definitions etc to increases persistency in ...
... Use calculators and computers Try writing your own notes and short descriptions Rewrite definitions etc to increases persistency in ...
File
... 8.EE.7 Solve linear equations in one variable. a. Give examples of linear equations in one variable with one solution, infinitely many solutions, or no solutions. Show which of these possibilities is the case by successively transforming the given equation into simpler forms, until an equivalent equ ...
... 8.EE.7 Solve linear equations in one variable. a. Give examples of linear equations in one variable with one solution, infinitely many solutions, or no solutions. Show which of these possibilities is the case by successively transforming the given equation into simpler forms, until an equivalent equ ...
A characterization of all equilateral triangles in Z³
... This paper is a continuation of the work started by the second author in a series of papers. We extend to the general case the characterization previously found for those equilateral triangles in R3 whose vertices have integer coordinates. In this earlier work, we made use of the hypothesis that (a, ...
... This paper is a continuation of the work started by the second author in a series of papers. We extend to the general case the characterization previously found for those equilateral triangles in R3 whose vertices have integer coordinates. In this earlier work, we made use of the hypothesis that (a, ...
View slides
... For all integers n we have ˆ ( n ) C 0 uniformly for n N . Taking y n , we obtain ˆ ( y ) 0 as y , and hence L1 (R). ...
... For all integers n we have ˆ ( n ) C 0 uniformly for n N . Taking y n , we obtain ˆ ( y ) 0 as y , and hence L1 (R). ...
Mathematical Logic. An Introduction
... A closer analysis of circularity in logic leads to the famous incompleteness theorems of Gödel’s: Theorem. Formal theories which are strong enough to “formalize themselves” are not complete, i.e., there are statements such that neither it nor its negation can be proved in that theory. Moreover such ...
... A closer analysis of circularity in logic leads to the famous incompleteness theorems of Gödel’s: Theorem. Formal theories which are strong enough to “formalize themselves” are not complete, i.e., there are statements such that neither it nor its negation can be proved in that theory. Moreover such ...
Section 2.5 Midpoint Formulas and Right Triangles
... A number that has a whole number as its square root is called a perfect square. The first few perfect squares are listed below. ...
... A number that has a whole number as its square root is called a perfect square. The first few perfect squares are listed below. ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.