• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
On Rosser sentences and proof predicates
On Rosser sentences and proof predicates

2.3 Weakest Preconditions
2.3 Weakest Preconditions

Complete Sequent Calculi for Induction and Infinite Descent
Complete Sequent Calculi for Induction and Infinite Descent

Construction of Composite Numbers by Recursively
Construction of Composite Numbers by Recursively

Congruent numbers with many prime factors
Congruent numbers with many prime factors

... positive integer is called a congruent number if it is the area of a right-angled triangle, all of whose sides have rational length. The problem of determining which positive integers are congruent is buried in antiquity (ref. 2, chap. 16) with it long being known that the numbers 5, 6, and 7 are co ...
Math 318 Class notes
Math 318 Class notes

9. “… if and only if …”
9. “… if and only if …”

... topic about which we claim to have knowledge. Suppose that we did not get this knowledge from experience or logic. Written in English, we can reconstruct his argument in the following way: We have knowledge about T if and only if our claims about T are learned from experimental reasoning or from log ...
PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK
PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK

... proved for the n-level. The conjecture have been solved for n=1, 2 levels, which include all of the LCM semiclassical principles. It is still open for the higher levels. ...
Proof Issues with Existential Quantification
Proof Issues with Existential Quantification

Intellectual Aesthetics Of Scientific Discoveries
Intellectual Aesthetics Of Scientific Discoveries

... Some years ago, we worked out a multi-media system of Cognitive Reality based on the so-called Cognitive Computer Graphics (CCG) conception [1] which 1) is a quite non-trivial version of the well-known today Scientific Visualization, 2) is based on a semantical visualization of scientific abstractio ...
Hybrid Interactive Theorem Proving using Nuprl and HOL?
Hybrid Interactive Theorem Proving using Nuprl and HOL?

Math 323 - Arizona Math
Math 323 - Arizona Math

A CHARACTERIZATION OF ALL EQUILATERAL TRIANGLES IN Z3
A CHARACTERIZATION OF ALL EQUILATERAL TRIANGLES IN Z3

Monday, August 8: Samples of Proofs
Monday, August 8: Samples of Proofs

... Let a  b = a + b + 4. Then a  k = a + k + 4 and if a + k + 4 = a, then k = -4. Consider k = 4. a  4 = a + 4 + 4 = a for all real values of a, and 4  a = 4 + a + 4 = a for all real numbers a. Hence if a  b = a + b + 4 , then a  4 = 4  a = a for all a  Reals. Proof by Induction: (Set up ...
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning

A GENERALIZATION OF FIBONACCI FAR
A GENERALIZATION OF FIBONACCI FAR

First-order logic;
First-order logic;

Three Transcendental Numbers From the Last Non
Three Transcendental Numbers From the Last Non

DIOPHANTINE APPROXIMATION OF COMPLEX NUMBERS
DIOPHANTINE APPROXIMATION OF COMPLEX NUMBERS

arXiv:math/0511682v1 [math.NT] 28 Nov 2005
arXiv:math/0511682v1 [math.NT] 28 Nov 2005

The Logic of Provability
The Logic of Provability

The “coefficients H” Technique - PRiSM
The “coefficients H” Technique - PRiSM

Irrational Numbers Study Guide
Irrational Numbers Study Guide

On the parity of poly-Euler numbers
On the parity of poly-Euler numbers

Triangle inequalities Objective: To use inequalities
Triangle inequalities Objective: To use inequalities

< 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report