
2. Primes Primes. • A natural number greater than 1 is prime if it
... The study of primes is one of the main focuses of number theory. As we shall prove, every natural number greater than 1 is either prime or it can be expressed as a product of primes. The prime numbers give us a world of questions to explore. We will prove that there are infinitely many primes, but h ...
... The study of primes is one of the main focuses of number theory. As we shall prove, every natural number greater than 1 is either prime or it can be expressed as a product of primes. The prime numbers give us a world of questions to explore. We will prove that there are infinitely many primes, but h ...
On the Number of False Witnesses for a Composite Number
... Lagrange's theorem gives F(«)|<|>(«), whereis Euler's function.
There are composite numbers « for which F(n) = («),such as « = 561. Such
numbers are called Carmichael numbers and probably there are infinitely many of
them, but this has never been proved. It is known that Carmichael numbers ar ...
... Lagrange's theorem gives F(«)|<|>(«), where
Formal Proof Example
... from hprime p i have p: 1 < p by (simp add : prime-def ) assume sqrt (real p) ∈ Q then obtain m n where n: n 6= 0 and sqrt-rat: |sqrt (real p)| = real m / real n and gcd : gcd (m, n) = 1 .. have eq: m2 = p ∗ n2 proof − from n and sqrt-rat have real m = |sqrt (real p)| ∗ real n by simp then have real ...
... from hprime p i have p: 1 < p by (simp add : prime-def ) assume sqrt (real p) ∈ Q then obtain m n where n: n 6= 0 and sqrt-rat: |sqrt (real p)| = real m / real n and gcd : gcd (m, n) = 1 .. have eq: m2 = p ∗ n2 proof − from n and sqrt-rat have real m = |sqrt (real p)| ∗ real n by simp then have real ...
The Critical Analysis of the Pythagorean Theorem and of the
... 1. The problem of the criterion of truth is the central point of science. There are two criteria of truth of theory: the dialectical criterion, i.e. “criterion of external justification of theory” (Einstein); and the logical criterion, i.e. “criterion of internal perfection of theory” (Einstein). As ...
... 1. The problem of the criterion of truth is the central point of science. There are two criteria of truth of theory: the dialectical criterion, i.e. “criterion of external justification of theory” (Einstein); and the logical criterion, i.e. “criterion of internal perfection of theory” (Einstein). As ...
THE E.IRREGULAR PRIMES
... is called irregular if it divides the numerator of at least, one of the Bernoulli numbers B, , 8a,..., Bb-g (in the even suffix notation); see e,g. F, pp. 367-3391. carlitz l2l has given the simplest proof of the fact that the number of irregular primes is infinite. Metsänkylä [5] has proved that fo ...
... is called irregular if it divides the numerator of at least, one of the Bernoulli numbers B, , 8a,..., Bb-g (in the even suffix notation); see e,g. F, pp. 367-3391. carlitz l2l has given the simplest proof of the fact that the number of irregular primes is infinite. Metsänkylä [5] has proved that fo ...
TRUTH DEFINITIONS AND CONSISTENCY PROOFS
... criterion of soundness (or validity) for 5 according to which all the theorems of 5 are sound. In this way we obtain in S' a consistency proof for 5. The consistency proof so obtained, which in no case with fairly strong systems could by any stretch of imagination be called constructive, is not of m ...
... criterion of soundness (or validity) for 5 according to which all the theorems of 5 are sound. In this way we obtain in S' a consistency proof for 5. The consistency proof so obtained, which in no case with fairly strong systems could by any stretch of imagination be called constructive, is not of m ...
M(n)
... To make 2i+1 at stage i+1 requires that some number of size at least 2i be present at stage i. By previous result such a number could not be larger than 2i, and thus equals 2i. By the assumption, 2i can only be constructed by repeated doubling. The only possible final move was to double 2i. Thus 2i+ ...
... To make 2i+1 at stage i+1 requires that some number of size at least 2i be present at stage i. By previous result such a number could not be larger than 2i, and thus equals 2i. By the assumption, 2i can only be constructed by repeated doubling. The only possible final move was to double 2i. Thus 2i+ ...
NOTE ON 1-CROSSING PARTITIONS Given a partition π of the set
... The goal here is to generalize Bóna’s result to count 1-crossing partitions by their number of blocks, and also to examine a natural q-analogue with regard to the cyclic sieving phenomenon shown in [8] for certain q-Catalan and q-Narayana numbers. The crux is the observation that 1-crossing partiti ...
... The goal here is to generalize Bóna’s result to count 1-crossing partitions by their number of blocks, and also to examine a natural q-analogue with regard to the cyclic sieving phenomenon shown in [8] for certain q-Catalan and q-Narayana numbers. The crux is the observation that 1-crossing partiti ...
Preliminaries()
... product of prime numbers. This fact implies that, if there is no prime number greater than 2, any natural number n should be equal to 2i for some integer i. However, we know that there exist natural numbers that are not power of 2, which contradicts to a know fact. It follows that there exists a pri ...
... product of prime numbers. This fact implies that, if there is no prime number greater than 2, any natural number n should be equal to 2i for some integer i. However, we know that there exist natural numbers that are not power of 2, which contradicts to a know fact. It follows that there exists a pri ...
lecture notes
... proof by contradiction, vacuous proof, trivial proof, and proof by cases. We start with a direct proof. Such a proof shows, using the rule of inferences that we just learned, that if p is true, then q must be true. Any established mathematical fact proved before, axioms (facts assumed to be true at ...
... proof by contradiction, vacuous proof, trivial proof, and proof by cases. We start with a direct proof. Such a proof shows, using the rule of inferences that we just learned, that if p is true, then q must be true. Any established mathematical fact proved before, axioms (facts assumed to be true at ...
prr, ba - The University of Texas at Dallas
... Cashwell and Everett [1] showed that the semigroup G of arithmetic functions of a single argument under Dirichlet convolution has the unique factorization property. One can extend their arguments and show that the same property in fact holds for every ( k >_ 1. However, it fails to hold for ( for ev ...
... Cashwell and Everett [1] showed that the semigroup G of arithmetic functions of a single argument under Dirichlet convolution has the unique factorization property. One can extend their arguments and show that the same property in fact holds for every ( k >_ 1. However, it fails to hold for ( for ev ...
TEICHIB`S STRONG LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS IN GENERAL
... I. Introodnctiom. Let (3,)I 1)) be a real-separable Banach space. Acosta [I], CBoi- and Sung [Z] and Kuelbs and Zinn [ 5 ] have shown that many classical strong laws of large numbers (SLLN) hold for random variables taking values in a general Banach space under the assumption that the weak law of Ia ...
... I. Introodnctiom. Let (3,)I 1)) be a real-separable Banach space. Acosta [I], CBoi- and Sung [Z] and Kuelbs and Zinn [ 5 ] have shown that many classical strong laws of large numbers (SLLN) hold for random variables taking values in a general Banach space under the assumption that the weak law of Ia ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.