
No Matter How You Slice It. The Binomial Theorem and - Beck-Shop
... in Chapter 5. Now, however, we take a break and discuss the binomial and the multinomial theorems, as well as several important identities on binomial coefficients. The proofs of these identities are probably even more significant than the identities themselves. They will consist of showing that bot ...
... in Chapter 5. Now, however, we take a break and discuss the binomial and the multinomial theorems, as well as several important identities on binomial coefficients. The proofs of these identities are probably even more significant than the identities themselves. They will consist of showing that bot ...
Sums of triangular numbers and $t$-core partitions
... The theory of t-core partitions has played a role in a variety of areas. For example, when t = p is prime they characterize p-modularly irreducible representations of the symmetric group Sn . Due to this connection, they have been studied by representation theorists such as in [8, 9, 14, 17]. They a ...
... The theory of t-core partitions has played a role in a variety of areas. For example, when t = p is prime they characterize p-modularly irreducible representations of the symmetric group Sn . Due to this connection, they have been studied by representation theorists such as in [8, 9, 14, 17]. They a ...
how to write indirect proofs
... 1. Start off by saying that you're going to write a proof by contradiction. For example, you could write “Assume for the sake of contradiction that ...” or “By contradiction; assume that ….” Then, explicitly write out the negation of the statement you're trying to prove. As with a proof by contrapos ...
... 1. Start off by saying that you're going to write a proof by contradiction. For example, you could write “Assume for the sake of contradiction that ...” or “By contradiction; assume that ….” Then, explicitly write out the negation of the statement you're trying to prove. As with a proof by contrapos ...
Rationality and power
... and Reznick credit Flechsenhaar [3] as the first author to determine all positive rational solutions with proof. An industry has since developed to study equations of this type [1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10]. Our only addition to the historical discussion in [1] is to remark that Ko and Sun worked on similar p ...
... and Reznick credit Flechsenhaar [3] as the first author to determine all positive rational solutions with proof. An industry has since developed to study equations of this type [1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10]. Our only addition to the historical discussion in [1] is to remark that Ko and Sun worked on similar p ...
The Degree-Sum Theorem
... Is this also true for non-simple graphs, i.e., graphs with parallel edges and loops? ...
... Is this also true for non-simple graphs, i.e., graphs with parallel edges and loops? ...
Local deduction, deductive interpolation and amalgamation in
... DEFINITION P is said to be a Z-retract if the MValgebra M(P) is projective ...
... DEFINITION P is said to be a Z-retract if the MValgebra M(P) is projective ...
Formalizing Basic First Order Model Theory
... mainly in Mizar [14, 11], it is perhaps hardly noteworthy to formalize yet another fragment. However, we believe that the present work does at least raise a few interesting general points. – Formalization of syntax constructions involving bound variables has inspired a slew of research; see e.g. Cha ...
... mainly in Mizar [14, 11], it is perhaps hardly noteworthy to formalize yet another fragment. However, we believe that the present work does at least raise a few interesting general points. – Formalization of syntax constructions involving bound variables has inspired a slew of research; see e.g. Cha ...
Solution
... Composite numbers satisfying (B) are known as Carmichael numbers. We have known that there are infinitely many such numbers. (D) is false because of Fermat’s Little Theorem. ...
... Composite numbers satisfying (B) are known as Carmichael numbers. We have known that there are infinitely many such numbers. (D) is false because of Fermat’s Little Theorem. ...
Proof Methods Proof methods Direct proofs
... Proof by contradiction example 1 • Theorem (by Euclid): There are infinitely many prime numbers. • Proof. Assume there are a finite number of primes • List them as follows: p1, p2 …, pn. • Consider the number q = p1p2 … pn + 1 – This number is not divisible by any of the listed primes • If we divide ...
... Proof by contradiction example 1 • Theorem (by Euclid): There are infinitely many prime numbers. • Proof. Assume there are a finite number of primes • List them as follows: p1, p2 …, pn. • Consider the number q = p1p2 … pn + 1 – This number is not divisible by any of the listed primes • If we divide ...
Mathematical Proofs: Where to Begin And How
... notation to cut down on excess words; for example, instead of writing "let x be an element of the set of natural numbers", simply write "let x N". Just like in other classes, you should avoid empty phrases such as "it can be seen that..." or "we are able to show that..." and statements in which you ...
... notation to cut down on excess words; for example, instead of writing "let x be an element of the set of natural numbers", simply write "let x N". Just like in other classes, you should avoid empty phrases such as "it can be seen that..." or "we are able to show that..." and statements in which you ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.