
1 Deductive Reasoning and Logical Connectives
... of the object. For example, to express that a number is prime, we can use x to represent the number. To express the statement “x is prime”, so far we have been using some Boolean variable such as p. However, such a notation does not stress that p is a statement about x. Therefore, we sometimes use p ...
... of the object. For example, to express that a number is prime, we can use x to represent the number. To express the statement “x is prime”, so far we have been using some Boolean variable such as p. However, such a notation does not stress that p is a statement about x. Therefore, we sometimes use p ...
Writing Mathematical Proofs
... notation to cut down on excess words; for example, instead of writing "let x be an element of the set of natural numbers", simply write "let x N". Just like in other classes, you should avoid empty phrases such as "it can be seen that..." or "we are able to show that..." and statements in which you ...
... notation to cut down on excess words; for example, instead of writing "let x be an element of the set of natural numbers", simply write "let x N". Just like in other classes, you should avoid empty phrases such as "it can be seen that..." or "we are able to show that..." and statements in which you ...
Prime Numbers
... A mathematical proof is as a carefully reasoned argument to convince a sceptical listener (often yourself) that a given statement is true. Both discovery and proof are integral parts of problem solving. When you think you have discovered that a certain statement is true, try to figure out why it is ...
... A mathematical proof is as a carefully reasoned argument to convince a sceptical listener (often yourself) that a given statement is true. Both discovery and proof are integral parts of problem solving. When you think you have discovered that a certain statement is true, try to figure out why it is ...
the prime number theorem for rankin-selberg l
... A remarkable feature of this corollary is that it describes the orthogonality of a π (n) and aπ0 (n) in three cases with different main terms. It is thus in a more precise form than Selberg’s Conjecture 1.2. Moreover, one can see from the last case of Corollary 3.3 that the Dirichlet series on the r ...
... A remarkable feature of this corollary is that it describes the orthogonality of a π (n) and aπ0 (n) in three cases with different main terms. It is thus in a more precise form than Selberg’s Conjecture 1.2. Moreover, one can see from the last case of Corollary 3.3 that the Dirichlet series on the r ...
Proof methods and Strategy
... So, the inequality (x+y)r < xr + yr is the same when (x+y=1) and (x+y=t). ...
... So, the inequality (x+y)r < xr + yr is the same when (x+y=1) and (x+y=t). ...
Document
... An argument in propositional logic is a sequence of propositions. All but the final proposition in the argument are called premises and the final proposition is called the conclusion. An argument is valid if the truth of all its premises implies that the conclusion is true. ...
... An argument in propositional logic is a sequence of propositions. All but the final proposition in the argument are called premises and the final proposition is called the conclusion. An argument is valid if the truth of all its premises implies that the conclusion is true. ...
Fibonacci numbers at most one away from a perfect power
... The bounds available for linear forms in two logarithms are substantially better than those available for linear forms in three logarithms. Applying [17] we deduce that p ≤ 733. A serious improvement! (vi) We reduce the equations Fn = y p to Thue equations; these are equations of the form G(u, v) = ...
... The bounds available for linear forms in two logarithms are substantially better than those available for linear forms in three logarithms. Applying [17] we deduce that p ≤ 733. A serious improvement! (vi) We reduce the equations Fn = y p to Thue equations; these are equations of the form G(u, v) = ...
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
... b. : Z R under addition given by = the greatest integer x. c. : Z6 Z2 given (x) = the remainder of x when divided by 2. ...
... b. : Z R under addition given by = the greatest integer x. c. : Z6 Z2 given (x) = the remainder of x when divided by 2. ...
Unit 7 (Part 1) - Peoria Public Schools
... MP1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Students have the opportunity to make sense of more complicated, multistep Pythagorean problems. For example, consider a rectangular prism where the length, width, and height are known. Students can determine the interior diagonal length. To ...
... MP1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Students have the opportunity to make sense of more complicated, multistep Pythagorean problems. For example, consider a rectangular prism where the length, width, and height are known. Students can determine the interior diagonal length. To ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.