• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof
The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof

Trees
Trees

Chapter One {Word doc}
Chapter One {Word doc}

... problem. In fact, that is one of the reasons for using symbolic logic – to eliminate the ambiguity inherent and widespread in natural language. Read the examples below to see how prevalent ambiguity and subtlety are in our use of "the king's English." Everyone goes No, everyone does not Everyone sta ...
MC302 GRAPH THEORY Thursday, 11/21/13 (revised slides, 11/25
MC302 GRAPH THEORY Thursday, 11/21/13 (revised slides, 11/25

... . A perfect graph G is one with the property that, for every induced subgraph H of G (including G itself), ...
2.9.2 Problems P10 Try small prime numbers first. p p2 + 2 2 6 3 11
2.9.2 Problems P10 Try small prime numbers first. p p2 + 2 2 6 3 11

... The condition in the problem is the same as saying that every prime number p divides m. This can happen only if m = 0, that is, only if n = 1. Hence n = 1 is the only positive integer with the given property. P15 We try to find a pattern. ...
The Number of t-Cores of Size n
The Number of t-Cores of Size n

DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 20 1. Chapter 9.2 Possibility Trees
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 20 1. Chapter 9.2 Possibility Trees

Full text
Full text

Juba
Juba

... a distribution over masked examples M(D) if Prρ∈M(D)[ψ|ρ=1] ≥ 1-ε Observation: equal to “ψ is a tautology given ρ” • We will aim to succeed whenever there exists in standard cases where this is tractable, e.g., a (1-ε)-testable formula that completes a CNFs, intersections of halfspaces; remains simp ...
A Pisot number (or P.V. number) is an algebraic integer greater than
A Pisot number (or P.V. number) is an algebraic integer greater than

PPT printable - Simpson College
PPT printable - Simpson College

... S(N) = Σ 2i = 2 (N+1) - 1, for any integer N ≥ 0 i=0 to N 1. Inductive base Let n = 0. S(0) = 20 = 1 On the other hand, by the formula S(0) = 2 (0+1) – 1 = 1. Therefore the formula is true for n = 0 2. Inductive hypothesis Assume that S(k) = 2 (k+1) – 1 We have to show that S(k+1) = 2(k + 2) -1 By t ...
Summation methods and distribution of eigenvalues of Hecke operators,
Summation methods and distribution of eigenvalues of Hecke operators,

Real Analysis: Basic Concepts
Real Analysis: Basic Concepts

... An important feature of compact sets is that any sequence de ned on a compact set must contain a subsequence that converges to a point in the set. – This important result is known as the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem. Theorem 11 (Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem): Let C be a compact subset in
1 Lecture 1
1 Lecture 1

Assignment 2
Assignment 2

Intersecting Two-Dimensional Fractals with Lines
Intersecting Two-Dimensional Fractals with Lines

... In the present paper, we shall study the intersection of certain plane fractals with lines, especially the first coordinate axis. The famous result due to J. M. Marstrand [33] reads that if a set X ⊂ R2 has Hausdorff dimension d > 1 and finite positive d-dimensional Hausdorff measure, then for almos ...
Variations on a Montagovian Theme
Variations on a Montagovian Theme

on numbers equal to the sum of two squares in
on numbers equal to the sum of two squares in

... 1. Many natural numbers cannot be written as the sum of two squares. These include 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, … . Now 4 = (12 + 12 )(12 + 12 ) , but the other numbers we listed cannot be expressed as a product of factors each of which is the sum of two squares. When is this true for this set of numbe ...
DENSITY AND SUBSTANCE
DENSITY AND SUBSTANCE

... This result may seem counterintuitive, since the event that a random natural number is prime, while unlikely, is certainly not impossible. However, one must consider the impracticality of choose a truly random natural number out of ALL natural numbers, and we recall that in such infinite contexts, ...
Infinity and Diagonalization - Carnegie Mellon School of Computer
Infinity and Diagonalization - Carnegie Mellon School of Computer

Full text
Full text

Section 4.3 - math-clix
Section 4.3 - math-clix

Intersecting Two-Dimensional Fractals with Lines Shigeki Akiyama
Intersecting Two-Dimensional Fractals with Lines Shigeki Akiyama

PROOFS BY INDUCTION AND CONTRADICTION, AND WELL
PROOFS BY INDUCTION AND CONTRADICTION, AND WELL

... Proofs which utilize this property are called ‘proofs by induction,’ and usually have a common form. The goal is to prove that some property or statement P(k), holds for all k ∈ N, where the property itself depends on k. First one proves the base case, that P(1) holds (or sometimes P(0) if one takes ...
Learning Objectives: A Find the Square Root of a
Learning Objectives: A Find the Square Root of a

< 1 ... 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 170 >

Theorem



In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report