
1 Basic Combinatorics
... not require this formulation here. We will return to this topic later. It is instructive to do another example involving the multiplication principle. Example. Call a sequence (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn−1 , xn ) of integers smooth if |xi − xi+1 | ≤ 1 for all i ∈ [n − 1]. We determine the number of smooth ...
... not require this formulation here. We will return to this topic later. It is instructive to do another example involving the multiplication principle. Example. Call a sequence (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn−1 , xn ) of integers smooth if |xi − xi+1 | ≤ 1 for all i ∈ [n − 1]. We determine the number of smooth ...
The Least Prime Number in a Beatty Sequence
... where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x. If α is rational, then B(α, β) is a union of residue classes and, if at least one of them is a prime residue class, we may apply Linnik’s theorem to bound the least prime (see the concluding remarks, § 5). Otherwise, if α is irrational, ...
... where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x. If α is rational, then B(α, β) is a union of residue classes and, if at least one of them is a prime residue class, we may apply Linnik’s theorem to bound the least prime (see the concluding remarks, § 5). Otherwise, if α is irrational, ...
2. Primes Primes. • A natural number greater than 1 is prime if it
... • A natural number greater than 1 is prime if it cannot be expressed as the product of two smaller natural numbers. • A natural number greater than 1 that is not prime, and therefore is the product of two smaller natural numbers, is composite. The study of primes is one of the main focuses of number ...
... • A natural number greater than 1 is prime if it cannot be expressed as the product of two smaller natural numbers. • A natural number greater than 1 that is not prime, and therefore is the product of two smaller natural numbers, is composite. The study of primes is one of the main focuses of number ...
Let`s Use Logic Geometry Investigation – Part 1 Deductive
... EXAMPLES: Show the conjecture is false by finding a counterexample. A) All odd numbers are prime. B) All prime numbers are odd. C) The sum of two numbers is always greater than the larger number. D) If the product of two numbers is positive, then the two numbers must both be positive. E) The absolut ...
... EXAMPLES: Show the conjecture is false by finding a counterexample. A) All odd numbers are prime. B) All prime numbers are odd. C) The sum of two numbers is always greater than the larger number. D) If the product of two numbers is positive, then the two numbers must both be positive. E) The absolut ...
Notes on logic, sets and complex numbers
... The domain of the function f , denoted by D ( f ), is the set of all possible inputs, so the domain of the function f above is D ( f ) = A = { a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 }. The range of the function f , denoted by R( f ), is the set of all outputs of the function f , that is R( f ) = {b1 , b2 , b4 }. Note th ...
... The domain of the function f , denoted by D ( f ), is the set of all possible inputs, so the domain of the function f above is D ( f ) = A = { a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 }. The range of the function f , denoted by R( f ), is the set of all outputs of the function f , that is R( f ) = {b1 , b2 , b4 }. Note th ...
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Section 1.7
... Assume by way of contradiction that 3n + 2 is even and n is odd. Then n = (2k +1) for some integer k and so 3n+2 = 3(2k +1)+2 = 6k +5 = 2(3k + 2) + 1 So 3n + 2 is odd. So 3n + 2 is odd and even. Contradiction! Q.8. Prove that if n is a perfect square, then n + 2 is not a perfect square. Solution: B ...
... Assume by way of contradiction that 3n + 2 is even and n is odd. Then n = (2k +1) for some integer k and so 3n+2 = 3(2k +1)+2 = 6k +5 = 2(3k + 2) + 1 So 3n + 2 is odd. So 3n + 2 is odd and even. Contradiction! Q.8. Prove that if n is a perfect square, then n + 2 is not a perfect square. Solution: B ...
Unit Overview - The K-12 Curriculum Project
... A-APR5. (+) Know and apply the Binomial Theorem for the expansion of (x + y)n in powers of x and y for a positive integer n, where x and y are any numbers, with coefficients determined for example by Pascal’s Triangle. A-APR6. Rewrite simple rational expressions in different forms; write a(x)/b(x) i ...
... A-APR5. (+) Know and apply the Binomial Theorem for the expansion of (x + y)n in powers of x and y for a positive integer n, where x and y are any numbers, with coefficients determined for example by Pascal’s Triangle. A-APR6. Rewrite simple rational expressions in different forms; write a(x)/b(x) i ...
On Weird and Pseudoperfect Numbers
... for every k but have not been able to find a proof . For primitive abundant numbers, the analogous results and much more is true [4] . Now, consider weird and pseudoperfect numbers . An integer is primitive pseudoperfect if it is pseudoperfect but all its proper divisors are not pseudoperfect. It se ...
... for every k but have not been able to find a proof . For primitive abundant numbers, the analogous results and much more is true [4] . Now, consider weird and pseudoperfect numbers . An integer is primitive pseudoperfect if it is pseudoperfect but all its proper divisors are not pseudoperfect. It se ...
Lesson 6 Chapter 5: Convolutions and The Central Limit Theorem
... concrete. The height (in inches) of a randomly selected segment is uniformly distributed in (35.5, 36.5). A roadway can be laid across the two towers provided the heights of the two towers are within 4 inches. Find the probability that the roadway can be laid. Solution: The heights of the two towers ...
... concrete. The height (in inches) of a randomly selected segment is uniformly distributed in (35.5, 36.5). A roadway can be laid across the two towers provided the heights of the two towers are within 4 inches. Find the probability that the roadway can be laid. Solution: The heights of the two towers ...
Theorem
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems—and generally accepted statements, such as axioms. The proof of a mathematical theorem is a logical argument for the theorem statement given in accord with the rules of a deductive system. The proof of a theorem is often interpreted as justification of the truth of the theorem statement. In light of the requirement that theorems be proved, the concept of a theorem is fundamentally deductive, in contrast to the notion of a scientific theory, which is empirical.Many mathematical theorems are conditional statements. In this case, the proof deduces the conclusion from conditions called hypotheses or premises. In light of the interpretation of proof as justification of truth, the conclusion is often viewed as a necessary consequence of the hypotheses, namely, that the conclusion is true in case the hypotheses are true, without any further assumptions. However, the conditional could be interpreted differently in certain deductive systems, depending on the meanings assigned to the derivation rules and the conditional symbol.Although they can be written in a completely symbolic form, for example, within the propositional calculus, theorems are often expressed in a natural language such as English. The same is true of proofs, which are often expressed as logically organized and clearly worded informal arguments, intended to convince readers of the truth of the statement of the theorem beyond any doubt, and from which a formal symbolic proof can in principle be constructed. Such arguments are typically easier to check than purely symbolic ones—indeed, many mathematicians would express a preference for a proof that not only demonstrates the validity of a theorem, but also explains in some way why it is obviously true. In some cases, a picture alone may be sufficient to prove a theorem. Because theorems lie at the core of mathematics, they are also central to its aesthetics. Theorems are often described as being ""trivial"", or ""difficult"", or ""deep"", or even ""beautiful"". These subjective judgments vary not only from person to person, but also with time: for example, as a proof is simplified or better understood, a theorem that was once difficult may become trivial. On the other hand, a deep theorem may be simply stated, but its proof may involve surprising and subtle connections between disparate areas of mathematics. Fermat's Last Theorem is a particularly well-known example of such a theorem.