* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Fuzzy topology, Quantization and Gauge Fields
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Brownian motion wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Matrix mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Oscillator representation wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Analytical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Mean field particle methods wikipedia , lookup
Quantum potential wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Four-vector wikipedia , lookup
Relational approach to quantum physics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum tunnelling wikipedia , lookup
Hamiltonian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Wave packet wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup
Dynamical system wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Fuzzy Topology, Quantization and Long-distance Gauge Fields SSss S.Mayburov Hep-th 1205.3019 Quantum space-time and novel geometries: Discrete (lattice) space-time – Fundamental Plank length lp ( Snyder, 1947; Markov,1948) Noncommutative geometry (Connes, 1991) Supergeometry (Rothstein,1986) Hypothesis: Some geometries can induce also novel formalism of quantization (S.M.,2008) of List of Quantization Formalisms: SSss i) Schroedinger quantization: S state Ψ is vector (ray) in Hilbert space H ii) Operator algebra (C* algebra) : S observables constitute nonassociative operator algebra U ( Segal, 1948) iii) Symbols of operators (Berezin, 1970) … etc., …) Geometric Formalism - why not ? Possible applications : Quantum Gravity S Sets, Topology and Geometry Example: Fundamental set of 1-dimensional Euclidian geometry is (continious) ordered set of elements x, i x j X = { xl } ; xl - points x xo .x x i j. r j i xi xj X pPPppPartial ordered set – P u B Beside x i x j , it can be also: xi ~ xj - incomparabilty relation u1 D Dx u1 xxi X = { x l } - ordered subset; - incomparable point X ST - total set; ST = X P u P u = { uj } - partial ordered subset X Example: let’s consider interval - Dx i x Dx Fu1 ~ xk , k u1 ,xk are incomparable (equivalent) ST elements Partial ordering in classical mechanics Beside geometric relations between events there is also causal relations t e2 events - causal set: { e j} e3 Their time ordering corresponds to : e1 t1 ≤ t3 ≤ t2 x Partial ordering in classical mechanics Beside geometric relations between events there is also causal relations t e2 events - causal set: { e j} e3 Their time ordering corresponds to : e1 t1 ≤ t3 ≤ t2 x if one event dynamically induces another : e1 → e2 If to describe also causal relations between events: e1 ≤ e2 ; e1 ~ e3 ; e2 ~ e3 So e3 is incomparable in causal terms to e1 and e2 Partial ordering in special relativity The causal relations acquire invariant, principal meaning due to light cone t e2 event set: { e j } e3 Their time ordering is : e1 ≤ e3 ≤ e2 e1 Let’s describe also causal relations between events, then: x e1 ≤ e2 ; e1 ~ e3 ; e2 ~ e3 if e3 is outside the light cone, then other causal relations between e3 and e1,2 can’t exist Fuzzy ordered set (Foset) - F ={ fi } (Zeeman, 1964) If f j - fuzzy points, then: if Ffi ~ fk Ffi , fk , wi,k >0 , F ={f i} - set of fuzzy points; Σ wjk =1 EExample: ST - total set ST = X F; w1i F={ f1 } X – ordered subset f1 . _ . . xi . . . X Ffi ~ xk , wi,k >0 , Σ wjk =1 Continuous fuzzy sets EExample: ST - total set ; ST = R1 F; F={ f1 } – discrete subset of fuzzy points X – continuous ordered subset; X = { xa } fi , x ; w(x) > 0; xa w( x)dx 1 w ~ x is fuzzy parameter ST is fuzzy space x w(x) dispersion characterizes f coordinate uncertainty Classical mechanics: In 1 dimension the particle m is ordered point x(t) its state: | m } = { x(t), vx(t), … } describes m x(t) trajectory x(t0) Fuzzy mechanics: w(x,t0 ) w(x,t ) x Massive particle is fuzzy point m(t), its coordinate ~ x (t) is fuzzy parameter its state: |g} = {w(x,t), …. ? } Fuzzy evolution in 1-dimension Fuzzy state | g } : | g}= {w(x), q1 , q2 … } v w(x,t0 ) X Beside w(x,t), another we shall look for |g} parameter is v(t) - | g} free parameters assuming represented as real functions qi(x,t) average m velocity that they can be Fuzzy Evolution Equations Let’s consider free w(x,t) evolution : Suppose that w(x,t) evolution is local and so can be described as: w where f - arbitrary function f(x ,t) t then from w(x) norm conservation: w ( x , t ) dx w ( x , t ) dx 0 f (x)dx t t hhh Fuzzy Evolution Equations Let’s consider free w(x,t) evolution : Suppose that w(x,t) evolution is local and so can be described as: w where f - arbitrary function f(x ,t) t then from w(x,t) norm conservation: w ( x , t ) dx w ( x , t ) dx 0 f (x)dx t t if to substitute : J f(x) then: x J ( , t ) J ( , t ) 0 If this condition is fulfilled, then : w J ( x ,t) - 1-dimensional flow continuity equation t x hhh v(x1) w (x,t) x1 in 1-dimension m flow can be expressed as: X J ( x )v ( x ) w ( x ) where v(x) is w flow velocity, it is supposed to be independent of w(x) m state g(x) = { w(x), v(x)} – it’s observational g state representation for m state g = { w(x), v(x)}, we substitute v(x) by related parameter: ; ( x ) k v ( ) d c x k is theory constant c is arbitrary real number so m state is: g = { w(x), α(x)}, then g ~ g(x) = g1 (x) + ig2(x) we suppose that g(x) is normalized, so that g(x)g* (x) = w(x), yet g(x) is still arbitrary complex function: i ( , w ) g ( x ) w ( x ) e where ( , w) is arbitrary real function for any ( , w) the set of g(x) constitutes complex Hilbert space H We suppose that observables Correct Q̂ are linear, self-adjoint operators on H g(x) ansatz should give all Q values to be independent of c value To derive it it ‘s enough to consider flow (current) operator Jˆ ( x ) Then : i g * * g J ( x) (g g ) 2k x x J (x ) It follows that the only g(x) ansatz which give independent of c value is written as : g ( x) w( x) ei ( x) This is standard quantum-mechanical ansatz value to be Evolution Equation for Fuzzy state i g(x) g ˆg H t We start with linear operator Ĥ for fuzzy dynamics, later the nonlinear operators will be considered also For free m motion H should be invariant relative to space shifts so: [ Hˆ , d ]0 dx i ˆ ci i It means that H can be only polinom: H x i2 n j can be only even numbers, j = 2,4,6,… because noneven j contradict to X -reflection invariance Equation for operator From flow equation: Ĥ w ( wv ) and t x 1 v (x ) k x 2 w 1 w 1 it follows: w 2 t k x x 2 k x ffr i g w i g ( x ) w ehence: i ( i w ) e t t t Equation for operator From flow equation: Ĥ w ( wv ) and t x 1 v (x ) k x 2 w 1 w 1 it follows: w 2 t k x x 2 k x ffr i g w i g ( x ) w ehence: i ( i w ) e t and: g ˆ i H g t t t i ig n i ci c (w e ) i i i x i x i2 2 n 2 n g i w i i i i i ( w w ) e ˆw 2 H e ... ic w ) e n n t t k x x 2 k x x 1 From comparison of highest α derivatives it follows n=2; c2 2k fuzzy state g(x,t) obeys to free Schroedinger equation with mass m = k ! Nonlinear evolution operator Bargman - Wigner theorem (1964) Û : t g(t0 ) → g’(t) If arbitrary pure state evolves only into the pure state and module of scalar product for all pure states |< ψ|φ >| is conserved, then the evolution operator is linear. Jordan (2006): If for all g(t0 ) : Û t g(t0 ) → g’(t) i.e. if all pure states evolve only to pure ones, and Uˆ t1 is defined unambiguously, then Û t is linear operator Yet fuzzy pure states g(x,t) evolve only to pure ones, so their evolution should be linear g(x,t) are normalized complex functions, we obtained free particle’s quantum evolution on Hilbert space H Origin of the results : w(x,t) flow continuity is incompatible with the presence of high x - derivatives in g evolution equation We didn’t suppose that our theory possesses Galilean invariance, II in fact, Galilean transformations can be derived from fuzzy dynamics, if to suppose that any RF corresponds to physical object with m Assuming the formalism extension to relativistic invarince, Let’s assume that the formalism can be extended to relativistic invariance In this case the flow continuity equation is fulfilled: w J ( x ,t) t x Starting from it and demanding that w(x,t)>0 It results in the linear equation for 4-spinor which is i ( p m ) Dirac equation : t Its fuzzy space: F = { ~ ~ r3 sz } is double (entangled) fuzzy structure Fuzzy space: F = { ~ x} generates Hilbert space H of complex functions g(x,t) which describe particle’s evolution in F Observables Q̂ are linear, self-adjoint operators on H particle’s momentum: ˆ x , xˆ] i [p px i d dx commutation relations follow from geometrical and topological properties, so in this approach fuzzy topology induces such operator algebra What about [ xˆ, yˆ ] and [ pˆ x , pˆ y ] ? Modified fuzzy space them F supposedly can be underlying structure for Fuzzy States and Secondary Quantization Example: Fock free quantum field { nk } in 1-dimension e n~k - particle numbers can be regarded as fuzzy values each particle possesses fuzzy coordinate ~ ~ n x - double fuzzy structure k ~ x Interactions in Fuzzy Space Free Schroedinger equation: g i Hˆ g t is equivalent to system of two equations for real and imaginary parts of g t 2 w 1 w 1 - flow continuity equation I) w 2 t m x x 2 m x II ) 2 1 w 1 2 ( ) 2 tm w x2 m x here I) is kinematical equation, it describes w(x,t) balance only Interactions in Fuzzy Space Free Schroedinger equation: i g ˆ Hg t is equivalent to system of two equations for real and imaginary parts of g t 2 w 1 w 1 - flow continuity equation I) w 2 t m x x 2 m x II ) 2 1 w 1 2 ( ) 2 tm w x2 m x+ Hint here I) is kinematical equation, it describes w(x,t) balance only Hence particle’s interactions can be included only in II) But it supposes their gauge invariance, because ( x, t ) is quantum phase Particle’s Interactions in Fuzzy Space - Toy model 2 w 1 w 1 I) w 2 t m x x 2 m x II ) 2 1 w 1 2 ( ) ( ) free H int + Hint 2 tm w x 2 m x t Let’s consider interaction of two particles m1 , m2 , g1 their states: g1,2 (x,t) g2 x In geometrical framework it assumed that m1 react just on m2 presence i. e. if , then p 0 1 ,2 term in Hint = H 0It means that int there is Q1 Q2 F(r 12 )= Q1 Ao (r12 ) , where Q1 ,Q2 are particle charges. ( ) Q A ( r ) free 1 012 t t Hence: Q A ( r ) t H t 0 1 0 12 0 int ttt t Ht H (t+2Δt ) H (t+Δt ) H (t) α Hence this is shift of α(x,t) subspace of So that each H Et = H T- (ti ) is flat but their connection fiber bundle C(ti , tk ) depends on Hint (Non)locality of interactions on fuzzy space We supposed that in our model the interactions are local, yet such theory is generically nonlocal, two particles with fuzzy coordinates ~ x12 can interact nonlocally; Fermions with fuzzy coordinates can nonlocally interact with bosonic field. Conclusions 1.1. Fuzzy topology is simple and natural formalism for introduction of quantization into any physical theory 2. Shroedinger equation is obtained from simple assumptions, Galilean invariance follows from it. 3. Local gauge invariance of fields corresponds to dynamics on fuzzy manifold Fuzzy Topology, Quantization and Gauge Fields S. Mayburov hep-th 1205.3019 To explore quantum space-time it can be important to describe Quantum physics and space-time within the same mathematical formalism Proposed approaches: i) To extend quantum operator algebras on space-time description: Noncommutative Geometry (Connes, 1988), etc.; Applications to Quantum Gravity (Madore, 2005) ii) To extend some novel geometry on quantum physics: Possible approach: Geometry equipped with fuzzy topology (S.M., 2007) Fuzzy Correlations We exploit fuzzy state: i ( x ) g ( x ) w ( x ) e Yet more correct expression is : here: g { w ( x ), k ( x , x ' )} k ( x , x ' ) ( x ) ( x ' ) Correlation of g(x) state between its components x, x’ appears due to particle fuzziness on X axe, it defines g(x) free evolution: k (x ,x '} v (x ) x Such ansatz corresponds to quantum density matrix More complicated correlations can appear in fuzzy mechanics. Particle’s Interactions on fuzzy manifold let’s suppose that two identical particles m1 , m2 repulse each other Deflections of m1 motion induced by m2 presence at some distance, 2 p 0 even if p ; H 0yet for H0 1 1 ,2 int 2m 1 and p 0 2 H Q Q F ( r ) Q A ( r ) int 1 2 12 1 0 12 2 1 w 1 2 ( ) 2 tm w x 2 m x+ Hint ( ) Q A ( r ) Hence: free 1 012 t t this is deformation of m1 fiber bundle H T Particle’s Interactions in Fuzzy Space suppose that m1 is described by Klein-Gordon equation with E>0 and m2 is classical particle, i.e. m2 If in initial RF: p 0 2 then: 2 g 2 i m g Q A ( r g 1 1 0) 2 t r For Lorenz transform RF to RF’ with velocity v g ' 22 i [ i Q A ' ( r ' )] m g ' Q A ' ( r ' ) g ' 1 1 1 0 t r ' v 1 A ' A A ' A where : and 0 0 0 2 2 1 v 1 v only such vector field A makes g g' transformation consistent So this toy-model is equivalent to Electrodynamics if Aμ is massless field Fuzzy state for fermion (iso)doublet Consider D fermion SU 2 (iso)spin doublet of mass m0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Fuzzy parameters: x ; particle’s state : g ,y ,z,s (r,sz) z z Fuzzy representation: g = w ( r ), ( r ), ( r ), ( r ) 1 g r ) - linear representation s( 2 i s H s t from Jordan theorem ψs s - (iso)spin vector s evolution should be linear Nonabelian case: Yang-Mills Fields Consider interaction of two femions m1 , m2 of SU 2 doublet and suppose D 0 p 0 that their interaction is universal, so that at 1 it gives H ,2 int 1 s(r) 2 s1, 2 - isospin vectors To agree with global isotopic symmetry, two isospin vectors in nonrelativistic limit can interact with each other only via this ansatz: s1 s2 H k s sf(r ) in t 12 1 ,2 Hence: A ( r ) s f ( r ) 0 12 2 12 A ( r ) and so :H - Yang-Mills int 1 0 1 , 2 For nonrelativistic QCD limit it gives: But it supposes that local gauge invariance follows from global isotopic SU 2 symmetry : g f (r) 2 r Yang-Mills Interactions Suppose that m1 is described by Klein-Gordon equation with E>0 and m2 is classical particle, i.e. m2 ; and so m2 generates classical SU 2 Yang-Mills field in initial RF: p 0 1 ,2 A0(r) 2 g 2 i 2 m g Q A ( r ) g 1 1 0 j t r j For Lorenz transform RF to RF’ with velocity v g ' 2 2 i [ i Q A ' ( r ' )] m g ' Q A ' ( r ' ) g ' 1 j j 1 1 0 j t r ' j 1 v j A '0 A A where : A and 0 j' 0 2 2 1 v 1 v only such vector field Aj makes g g' transformation consistent So we obtain standard Yang-Mills Hamiltonian for particle-field interaction We derived free particle’s dynamics from some geometrical and set-theoretical axioms. Is it possible to describe particle’s interactions in the same framework ? We exploited m states: g = { w(x), α(x)} defined in flat Hilbert space H Analogously to general relativity, in geometry euipped with fuzzy topology the interactions induce the deformation of H and H T fiber bundle Fuzzy Mechanics and Gauge Invariance In QFT local gauge invariance is postulated. We shall argue that in Fuzzy mechanics it can be derived from global isotopic invariance Such formalism need only three axioms, whereas standard QM is based on seven axioms i) Particles are points of fuzzy manifold, their states are characterized by two parameters |g } = { w(x,t), v(x,t) } ii) Observables Q are supposed to be linear, self-adjoint operators on H iii) Reduction (Projection) postulate for result of Q measurement In this model Plank constant is just coefficient, which connects x and px scales, so Relativistic unit system gives its natural description c 1 1 e2 137 Content 1. Geometric properties induced by structure of fundamental set 2. Partial ordering of points, fuzzy ordering, fuzzy sets 3. Fuzzy manifolds and physical states 4. Derivation of Shroedinger dynamics for fuzzy states 5. Interactions on fuzzy manifold and gauge fields For simplicity only 1+1 geometry will be considered Particle’s Interactions in Fuzzy Space - Toy model I) II ) 2 w 1 w 1 w 2 t m x x 2 m x H 2 1 w 1 2 ( ) + 2 tm w x2 m x Let’s consider interaction of two particles m1 , m2 , int their states: g1,2 (x,t) g2 g1 x In geometrical framework it’s natural to assume that Hint is universal, i. e. if , then p 0 1 ,2 there is term in Hint ~ Q1 H 0 It means that int Q2 F(r 12 ), where Q1 ,Q2 are particle’s charges. Relativistic Evolution Equation we suppose that fuzzy state: i (x ) 0 g ( x ) e w ( x ) f (,) 1 J ( x ) f (,) 2 and: || w || =1 If we look for 1st order evolution equation: i g ˆg H t 2 i c c where: H 0 2 i 2 i x i 2 n If twIII then for n the unique solution is: n=2 , i.e. Schroedinger evolution Fuzzy evolution and linearity We don’t assume that w(x,t ) is linear function of w(x’,t0 ) which is standard assumption of classical kinetics w ( x , t ) G ( x x ' , t t ) w ( x ' , t ) dx ' 0 0 w(x,t0 ) w(x,t ) Δ1 X Example : Boltzman diffusion Clocks, proper times and partial ordering In special relativity each dynamical system has it is its own proper time, there is no universal time, so proper time connected with clock dynamics of given reference frame (RF) ta w div j t tb Constraint: each event time t1 in one RF is mapped to the point on time axe in other RF t’1 e1 ~ e 3 It can be transformed to symmetric complex g representation in H It can be proved that only such g(x) representation corresponds to consistent dynamics g(x) → { w(x), v(x)} is unambiguous map α(x) is analogue of quantum phase 1 k d dx m particle’s state |g} = { w(x), α(x) } The problem : to find dynamical |g} representation g(x,t) : g ˆ i Hg t Ĥ is dynamical operator (Hamiltonian) We have two degrees of freedom: g = { w(x), α(x) }, it can be transferred to: g(x) = g1 (x)+ ig2 (x) such that g1 (x), g2 (x) = 0, if w(x) = 0 This is symmetric g representation example: i ( x ) g ( x ) w ( x ) e Generalization of event time mapping one can substitute points by δ-functions ta ~ e3 FuzzFuzzy dynamics – space symmetry restoration as the possible fundamental low of dynamics E Global symmetries are important in quantum physics Free particle m: w0 w0(x): space shift symmetry is broken w(t) X Low of fuzzy evolution : space symmetry of m state |g} is restored as fast as possible : So free m evolution U(t) : w0(x) const at very large t Interactions: to restore space symmetry two identical particles e1 , e2 should repulse each other m motion can be described as the space symmetry violation for |g} fffffff α(x) X w(x) X m velocity: <Vx> = < d d dx α(x) is analog of quantum phase > henchence w flow equation can be written as: w j dw dv v w t x dx dx v(x1 ) v(x2 ) Δ1 X Δ2 w div j t 1x w v ( x ) () d w ( x ) t FuzzFuzzy mechanics – space symmetry restoration as the general low of free motion hello ggggggkggghggghfh