* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Hand out - WebLearn
Survey
Document related concepts
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Long non-coding RNA wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Imaginal discs of Drosophila as a model for development of large fields of cells. [email protected] We have discussed how the mode of development in the Drosophila embryo switches from a non-cellular, transcription factor driven process to a cell-cell signalling mode. The gene products that are coordinating both of these processes were all discovered in mutagenesis screens. The phenotypes of the segment polarity mutants (encoding the signalling mode proteins) are all similar: in each and every segment a patterning defect is seen (four classes of phenotypes). The underlying genes were cloned. Two genes, hedgehog and wingless were shown to be expressed in a small subset of cells in the segment, while they seemed to influence many neighbouring cells: as secreted proteins. Most of the other known segment polarity genes were cloned and are required in a signalling pathway downstream of either signal (i.e. same mutant phenotype: proteins encoded by the genes work to common end). The anterior limit of expression of hedgehog and engrailed in the anterior of the parasegment (=posterior of segment) defines the middle of the later arising segment (pair rule genes are responsible for this parasegment set up by precisely setting up anterior boundaries of engrailed and hedgehog expression). The action of the hedgehog and wingless signals is then required to set up the final segment using the parasegment boundary as a reference point (organiser). This double “segment” system (first division of the future segment into compartments whereafter the segment is formed) is also seen in vertebrates. The adult fly arises from the pupa. In the pupa, structures called imaginal discs (imago means adult form) metamorphose into the adult structures. These imaginal discs are prepatterned by the time metamorphosis takes place (a clear fate map can be drawn up as well as clear molecular evidence in the form of gene expression is visible in mature discs). During larval stages, discs are therefore patterned (and grow). Discs are formed during embryogenesis from about 5 to 10 cells, ending up with about 5000 at the end of the third instar larval stage. In fact, initial patterning in the discs has taken place during embryogenesis. In the mini discs of 5-10 cells, expression of hedgehog and engrailed (posteriorly), wingless anteriorly and decapentaplegic (dpp) dorsally are already present. The expression of hedgehog, wingless and engrailed has been discussed above and in previous lecture (so patterning of the discs which will eventually form the legs, wings and most of the external of the fly, is derived from the original embryonic segment!); expression of dpp is set up by dorsal ventral mechanisms that as with anterior-posterior systems rely initially on maternal contributions. Dpp expression is visible in a stripe of cells running perpendicular to the wingless/hedgehog stripes. Dpp is a fly homologue of a large family of secreted signalling proteins, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, BMPs. The intersection of dpp, wingless and hedgehog defines the site where the discs will form, culminating in the expression of the distalless gene in the cells defined by the intersection (distalless encodes for a homeobox containing transcription factor; and no surprise here, its mutant phenotype is no distal elements, i.e. legs/wings). How are the imaginal discs patterned? Mathematical models for patterning of simple 3D systems have been proposed on the basis of experimental (regeneration) and molecular data. Both aim to generate a 3-D model of development. What in reality takes place in fly imaginal discs, we know now depends on the signalling processes by hedgehog, wingless and dpp; the expression of these signalling proteins has been established in the discs from the time they arise. Hedgehog signalling is required to keep the expression of dpp and wingless on, in a narrow stripe of cells just anterior to the hedgehog expression domain (hedgehog domain remains overlapping with the engrailed expression domain in posterior compartment cells). So the boundary that separates hedgehog expressing cells and the cells immediately adjacent (in embryos, parasegment boundary), expressing wingless, hh or dpp, is maintained in the discs. The narrow band of cells expressing the signalling molecules defines a source of morphogenetic activity (in both dorsal/ventral and anterior/posterior directions). These signals work together to pattern the disc. Other complex molecular mechanisms are in place to assist the system. For instance, the stable expression of hedgehog and engrailed in the posterior cells leads to the inhibition of hedgehog expression in the cells more anterior to the dpp/wingless stripe (through a transcriptional repressor). Mixing of cells between all of these different areas is made impossible by (less understood) repulsion and attraction mechanisms. As in the segments, the narrow band of cells expressing wingless and dpp is stable in its position and will not move despite cell division and growth, because it is maintained by hedgehog signalling (this is all anterior-posterior). The dorsal-ventral division in the mature disc is determined by the intersection of the wingless stripe and the dpp stripe as defined in the embryonic disc. A third dimension is added: the cells that see all three molecules (at the intersection of the three signalling factors (ie at the A/P and D/V boundary) define the most distal cells, and thus the third axis, the proximal distal axis (high point of activity of all morphogens). Remarkably, gene homology as well as conserved gene interactions between this patterning system and the patterning of vertebrate organs is seen in the case of the vertebrate limb. Here we see sonic hedgehog (vertebrate hedgehog homologue) expressed in posterior cells, where it acts as a signal to drive anterior-posterior patterning. It induces expression of similar target genes: a dpp homologue, BMP2. In addition, dorsal-ventral patterning driven in fly imaginal discs by the expression of wingless, is replicated in the vertebrate limb bud (Wnt gene). Text books: Chapter 5, Wolpert, Principles of Development; pages 320-327 (1st edition), 351-355 (2nd edition). Chapter 11, Wolpert, Principles of Development, pages 449-450 (1st edition), 335-339 (2nd edition). Chapter 14, Gilbert, Developmental Biology; pages 746-753 (5th edition), 557-561 (6th edition), 584-587 (7th edition). Chapter 14, Gilbert, Developmental Biology; pages 716-721 (5th edition), 513-514 (6th edition), 534-536 (7th edition). Literature: Méthot and Basler (1999) Hedgehog controls limb development by regulating the activities of distinct trancriptional activator and repressor forms of cubitus interruptus. Cell, 96, 819-831. Teleman and Cohen (2000). Dpp gradient formation in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. Cell, 103, 971980. Shubin, N., Tabin, C., Carroll, S. (1997) Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature, 388, 639648.