Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
CHAPTER 2 – PREJUDICE CHAPTER OBJECTIVES To understand and become familiar with the concept of hate crimes To understand how prejudice plays a role in perceptions of people seen as racially “different” To become familiar with the similarities and differences between prejudice and discrimination To explore various theories and explanations of prejudice, including exploitation theory, scapegoat theory, authoritarian personality theory, and normative theory To identify some possibilities that lead to a reduction of prejudice between groups To understand on how potential employers respond to ethnic-sounding names To understand and evaluate the concept of racial profiling and the role it may play in prejudice and discrimination To evaluate and explore the extent of prejudice in our society To evaluate and understand the overall mood of the oppressed To understand research findings dealing with intergroup hostility To become familiar with possible ways to reduce prejudice in our society To identify and understand the ten ways to fight hate CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Hate Crimes A hate crime is defined by the government as a criminal offense committed against a person, property, or society which is motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against a race, religion, ethnic/national origin group, or sexual orientation group. Recent legislation has added physical and mental disabilities as factors that could be the basis of hate crimes. II. Prejudice and Discrimination Prejudice is a negative attitude toward an entire category of people. Discrimination involves behavior that excludes all members of a group from certain rights, opportunities, or privileges. A. Merton’s Theory • Robert Merton developed a typology that points out that attitudes should not be confused with behavior. He identified four different categories illustrating the relationship between attitudes and behavior: all-weather liberal, reluctant liberal, timid bigot, and all-weather bigot. B. LaPiere’s Study • This research exposed the relationship between racial attitudes and social conduct. From 1930 to 1932, LaPiere traveled throughout the United States with a Chinese couple, and despite the alleged climate of intolerance of Asians, LaPiere observed the couple being treated politely at hotels, motels, and restaurants. III. Theories of Prejudice A. Scapegoating Theory • Scapegoating theory says that prejudiced people believe they are society’s victims. B. Authoritarian Personality Theory • The authoritarian personality theory attempts to detail the prejudiced personality. According to Adorno, the basic characteristics of the authoritarian personality are adherence to conventional values, uncritical acceptance of authority, and concern with power and toughness. 9 C. D. IV. V. Exploitation Theory • Exploitation theory is part of the Marxist tradition in sociology. According to this view, racial prejudice is often used to justify keeping a group in a subordinate position, such as a lower social class. Normative Approach • The normative approach takes the view that prejudice is influenced by norms and situations that encourage or discourage the tolerance of minorities. The Content of Prejudice: Stereotypes A. What are Stereotypes? • Stereotypes are unreliable generalizations about all members of a population that do not take individual differences into account. B. Listen to Our Voices: National Media Should Stop Using Obscene Words C. Trends in Stereotypes • The mass media, particularly television, portray stereotypes along racial and ethnic lines in numerous ways. The labeling of individuals has strong implications for the self-fulfilling prophecy. Stereotypes are held by both members of the dominant and subordinate groups. D. Stereotyping in Action: Racial Profiling • According to the Department of Justice, racial profiling is any police-initiated action based on race, ethnicity, or national origin rather than the person’s behavior. Racial profiling persists despite overwhelming evidence that it is misleading. Talk of legislating against it has however met with firm resistance. The Extent of Prejudice A. The Social Distance Scale • Social distance has been defined as the tendency to approach or withdraw from a racial group. Emory Bogardus has developed an empirical measure of social distance, often referred to as the Bogardus scale. The scale asks people how willing they would be to interact with various racial and ethnic groups in seven specified social situations. Each situation describes a different degree of social contact or social distance. B. Trends in Prejudice • Is prejudice decreasing? The evidence is mixed, with some indicators of willingness to give up some old prejudices while new negative attitudes emerge. Attitudes are important as a change in attitude may create a context in which legislative and behavioral change can occur. VI. The Mood of the Oppressed Over the years researchers have seemed to be more interested in white attitudes on racial issues than they have been on the attitudes of subordinate group members. Recent research has offered insight into sharply different attitudes between the dominant and subordinate groups. Assessment on self-esteem of minorities has been misleading. VII. Intergroup Hostility A national survey revealed that, like whites, many African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and Asian Americans held prejudiced and stereotypical views of other racial and ethnic minority groups. At the same time, the survey also revealed positive views of the major racial and ethnic minorities. Curiously, we find that some groups feel they get along better with whites than with other minority groups. 10 VIII. Reducing Prejudice Focusing on how to eliminate prejudice involves an explicit value judgment: prejudice is wrong and causes problems for those who are prejudiced and for the victims. For most encouraging research findings as to how to change negative attitudes towards groups of people point to the mass media, education, intergroup contact, and workplace training programs. A. Education and Mass Media Most research studies show that well-constructed programs do have some positive effect in reducing prejudice, at least temporarily. Studies have also consistently shown that increased formal education, regardless of content, is associated with racial tolerance. B. Equal-Status Contact An impressive number of studies have confirmed the contact hypothesis, which states that the intergroup contact between people of equal status in harmonious circumstances will cause them to become less prejudiced and to abandon previously held stereotypes. A key factor in reducing hostility in addition to equal-status contact is the presence of a common goal. C. Corporate Response: Diversity Training Workplace hostility can lead to lost productivity and even attrition. It can also lead to the development of a reputation of having a “chilly climate,” which discourages both qualified people of color or women from applying for jobs and potential clients seeking products or services. In an effort to improve workplace relations, most organizations have initiated some form of diversity training. The effectiveness and the content of diversity programs vary tremendously. IX. Ways to Fight Hate Ways to fight hate include the following: act, unite, support the victims, do your homework, create an alternative, speak up, lobby leaders, look long range, teach tolerance, and dig deeper. A. Research Focus: What’s In a Name? IDENTIFICATION ITEMS Items marked by a plus sign (+) are in addition to those listed in the chapter’s “Key Terms” section. +all-weather bigot (p. 42) +all-weather liberal (p. 42) authoritarian personality (p. 45) Bogardus Scale (p. 51) +chilly climate (p. 60) contact hypothesis (p. 59) discrimination (p. 41) ethnocentrism (p. 39) ethnophaulism (p. 41) exploitation theory (p. 45) hate crimes (p. 39) +intergroup hostility (p. 55) +labels (p. 47) +LaPiere, Richard (p. 42) +Marx, Karl (p. 45) +Merton, Robert (p. 41) normative approach (p. 46) prejudice (p. 41) racial profiling (p. 50) +reluctant liberal (p. 42) 11 scapegoat +scapegoating theory social distance stereotypes +timid bigot (p. 43) (p. 43) (p. 51) (p. 47) (p. 42) LECTURE SUGEGESTIONS/CLASSROOM DISCUSSIONS How can childhood socialization increase or decrease negative attitudes toward racial, ethnic, and religious groups? Rebecca Bordt in "Only Some Are Dead Men Walking: Teaching About Race Discrimination and the Death Penalty," Teaching Sociology 32 (October 2004): 358-373, discusses an experiment that teaches racial discrimination in her classes. The results of the exercise can be used as a basis for class discussion. Ask the class how many of them have worked with and for whites, African Americans, Hispanics, Latinos, Puerto Ricans, Cuban Americans, Arab and Muslim Americans, Native Americans, Japanese and Chinese Americans. You can have a nice class discussion based on the results of your class survey. Critique LaPiere’s classic study of the reception given to Chinese traveling in the US nearly a half century ago. Design a study based on the same questions LaPiere asked. What do you predict about the relationship between (prejudiced) attitudes and (discriminatory) behavior? Have students reflect on times when they knew their behavior did not reflect their attitude in a particular situation. How would they explain this discrepancy? How much do attitudes tell us about behavior? How can childhood socialization increase or decrease negative attitudes toward racial, ethnic, and religious groups? Have students reflect on their childhood and what they learned about groups different from the ones to which they belonged. What were the sources of this information? ACTIVITITES, HANDOUTS, DEMONSTRATIONS Have students record all the adjectives that characterize given groups. Include whites and groups like ex-convicts, doctors, plumbers, etc. Then ask the students whether they hold any of these images of minority groups and how they came to believe in them. Find more applications of the social distance scale in Marietta Morrissey, “Exploring Social Distance in Race and Ethnic Relations Courses,” Teaching Sociology 20 (April 1992): 121-124. Using the guidelines found at http://www.fdl.uwc.edu/windian/harvey1.htm, have students consider the ways that education may reinforce prejudice towards American Indians. 12 Using this (or a modified version) of the Bogardus Social Distance Scale, have students fill in and discuss their decisions. What factors, including historical context, might influence the way people respond? Directions. If you willingly admit members of a group in the specified situation, place a check mark in the blank under the group label. Blacks Jews Whites Muslims To close kinship by marriage To my club as personal chums To my street as neighbors To employment in my occupation To citizenship in my country As visitors only to my country Would exclude from my country STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS AND PROJECTS Look up the following two books: Leonard Reissman's Inequality in American Society, (Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1973) and Irwin Deutscher's What We Say/What We Do, (Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1973). Students can choose whether to write a short essay over to what extent is race best considered as a social class, or do our attitudes measure our behavior or even tell us anything about behavior. Have students visit the children’s section of the local library and, using the criteria found in the article at http://www.4children.org/news/9-97mlit.htm, review a sampling of books for stereotypes based on race and ethnicity. Students can diagram their personal social networks, noting the race and ethnicity of members. For simple instructions and an example of social network analysis go to: http://www.orgnet.com/sna.html. Are their networks hetero or homogenous? When there is diversity, what is the nature of the tie? Using the General Social Survey data “Quick Tables” provided at http://sda.berkeley.edu:7507/quicktables/quickconfig.do?gss02, examine attitudes on racial issues by race, gender, education, and other variables of interest. Using the “Ten Ways to Fight Hate on Campus”(http://www.tolerance.org/campus/), have students develop an action plan for your campus. 13 Research Navigator KEYWORD: prejudice Find five current events that deal with issues of prejudice. Compare and contrast the five events. What similarities and differences exist between the five issues? Are any solutions given for the problems encountered with prejudice? How does the information presented compare with the discussion of prejudice presented in chapter 2? KEYWORD: contact hypothesis Pick any two articles that deal with the contact hypothesis. How do the research articles support or not support the validity of the contact hypothesis? What has been your own personal experience with the contact hypothesis? Have you seen it work in your own life? Why or why not? MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES "Them and Us: Cultural Awareness," (2007, 25 min.). DVD available from Insight Media. "The Roots of Prejudice and Intolerance," (2002, 25 min.). DVD available from Insight Media. "Prejudice, Discrimination, and Stereotypes," (1993, 22 min.). VHS available from Insight Media. "Cultural Diversity: Ethics and Prejudice," (1992, 24 min.). VHS available from Insight Media. "Hate," (2002, 26 min.). DVD available from Insight Media. "The Truth About Hate," (1999, 32 min.). DVD available from Insight Media. "Race and Sex: What We Think (But Can't Say)," (2006, 41 min.). DVD available from Films for the Humanities & Sciences. "A Question of Identity: What Is Race?," (2003, 23 min.). DVD available from Films for the Humanities & Sciences. "Casting Calls: Hollywood and the Ethnic Villain," (2003, 46 min.). DVD available from Films for the Humanities & Sciences. 14