* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ON TARGET 1 : UNIT 9
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Compound (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
American Sign Language grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Comparison (grammar) wikipedia , lookup
Determiner phrase wikipedia , lookup
Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup
Bound variable pronoun wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Vietnamese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish pronouns wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
IN CHARGE 1 : UNIT 7 (pp. 1-7) GRAMMAR TARGETS 1. Adjective Clauses 2. Identifying & Non-Identifying Adjective Clauses 3. Adjective Clauses with Whose * See also: Advanced Grammar in Use, pp. 140-149. 1. ADJECTIVE CLAUSES 1.1. Revising Adjective Clauses Notes: 1. In most grammar books adjective clauses are called relative clauses. 2. The discussion and examples in this sub-section are adapted from EL111 Online ( Grammar Notes : On Target 1 : Unit 9) Let us begin by considering the following examples from English Structure II (by Lewis Mukattash, al-Quds Open University, 1996: p. 191): (1) a. A [person] who reads the news is a newsreader. b. A novelist is a [person] who writes novels. c. A killer disease is a [disease] which kills people and animals. d. A museum is a [building] in which objects illustrating art, history, science, etc. are displayed. As you can see from the examples in (1) above, a relative clause serves to define the noun it modifies. Without it, the meaning of the sentence will be abrupt and odd: cf. (2) a. ? A person is a newsreader. b. ? A novelist is a person. In addition to its use in defining words/concepts/ideas, etc., a relative clause may be used to describe how things (objects) are made , the purpose they serve , or the functions they perform: cf. 1 (3) a. A saw is [a tool] that has a blade with sharp teeth along one edge. b. A drill is [a tool or machine] that is used for making holes. c. A tool-box is [a metal or plastic box] which contains general tools that you need at home. Now consider the following examples which illustrate another use of relative clauses: (4) a. [Drivers] who don't care for the safety of the public should be punished. b. [A person] who cannot be kind understanding should not become a doctor. and c. The university administration has decided to sack [all students] who were caught cheating in the final exam. The relative clauses in (4) above are, as you can see, essential to the sentences within which they are contained. Without them, the examples in (4) will be odd and will make little sense. Notice the oddity of the following examples: (5) a. ? Drivers should be punished. b. ? A person should not become a doctor. c. ? The university administration has decided to sack all students. NOTE: An adjective clause is called a relative clause because it is introduced by a relative pronoun which relates the information in the clause to the noun which the clause defines or describes. 1.2. Relative Pronouns as Subjects Like other pronouns, the relative pronoun may be the subject or the object in the adjective clause. The following examples illustrate the use of the relative pronoun as subject IN THE ADJECTIVE CLAUSE: 2 NOUN DESCRIBED/ ADJECTIVE CLAUSE S MODIFIED Predicate 1. I know a man who speaks five languages. 2.I cannot respect a researcher who plagiarizes. Consider further the following examples used in a different context: NOUN A person S who Drivers who 1.3. CLAUSE Predicate deceives his own people don't care for the safety of the public is not worthy of respect. should be punished. Relative Pronouns as Objects The relative pronoun in the examples cited below functions as an object (O) [IN THE ADJECTIVE CLAUSE]. MODIFIED The man CLAUSE S –V – O A. You met the man. is a linguist. BECOMES: The man B. whom O you S met V 3 is a linguist. NOTE If the relative pronoun functions as an object in the adjective clause, it can be left out: e.g. a. The man [whom you met yesterday] is a linguist. b. The man [------ you met yesterday] is a linguist. 2. IDENTIFYING & NON-IDENTIFYING ADJECTIVE CLAUSE 2.1. Identifying Adjective Clauses (IAC); All the adjectives clauses in the examples in Section 1 above are IDENTIFYING. An IDENTIFYING Adjective Clause (IAC) defines, identifies, and describes a preceding (antecedent) noun, commonly known as the head noun (HN), and is , as pointed about above, essential for meaning. The sentence in which it is contained would be odd and –quite often- nonsensical if the identifying clause is deleted . This can be clearly seen in the following pairs of examples from Section 1 above which we repeat here for convenience . NOTE: The head noun is placed between square brackets [Drivers] who don't care for the safety of the public should be punished. ?? [Drivers] should be punished. A novelist is a [person] who writes novels. ?? A novelist is a [person]. 2.2. Non-Identifying Adjective Clauses (NIAC) In addition to being IDENTIFYING, Adjective clauses can be also NON-IDENTIFYING. A NON-IDENTIFYING Adjective Clause (NIAC) adds additional information about the head noun that precedes it but it does not identify or define it. 4 Let us begin our discussion of the NIAC by comparing the first and second sentence in the following pair, which exemplify the use of the IAC and the NIAC respectively: 1. I have two brothers who study linguistics. (Identifying) 2. I have two brothers, who study linguistics. (Non-Identifying) Apart from superficial difference in punctuation, the two sentences look the same in print. However, if we reflect for a moment on the meaning of the two sentences, we realize the following: The second sentence tells us that the speaker has two brothers only and that the two brothers study linguistics, whereas the first sentence conveys quite different information. The first sentence tells us that the speaker has more than two brothers but the two brothers whom he is speaking about are those identified/defined by the adjective clause (i.e. who study linguistics). Out of context, the first sentence sounds abrupt. The listener expects the speaker to continue and say, for instance, : 3. I have two brothers who study linguistics and one who is a doctor. Sentence (2) seems quite simply to be an answer to the question: 4. How many brothers do you have? The listener expects, and is primarily interested in, the information carried by the main clause (i.e. I have two brothers), rather than the information carried by the relative clause, which in this particular case seems to be an omissible element. The speaker’s intention , on the other hand, is not to convey the idea that his two brothers study linguistics so much as to tell that he has two brothers. Sentence (1), on the other hand, cannot be understood as an answer to the same kind of question. It is more likely to be an answer to such a question as: 5. What kind/type of brothers do you have? 5 The following are some more examples of NIACs from English Structure II by Lewis Mugattash, Al-Quds Open University, 1998: p.203: 6. I spoke to [ Dr Owen ], who had examined me before. 7. [Vitamins], which are essential for health, occur naturally in many kinds of food and are also sold in the form of pills. 8. Here is [John Smith], whom I mentioned the other day. 9. [Mary], who lived next door, called the police. 2.3. Differences Between IACs & NIACs: The examples cited above in this section and in Section 1 show that, in addition to the difference in meaning discussed above, NIACs differ from IACs in three distinct ways with regard to: (i) Head Noun , (ii) Punctuation Marks preceding and/or following the adjective clause, and (iii) Relative Pronouns. Below is a brief discussion of each of these differences. (i) Head Noun (HN) An IAC is not used to identify/define a HN that is a proper name (e.g. John, Ali, Egypt, Damascus, The Nile, The Arab Open University etc.) because a proper noun has a unique reference and requires no further identification or definition and thus it is commonly followed by a NIAC as in examples 6-9 above. (ii) Punctuation Marks: Unlike an IAC, which immediately follows the HN it modifies, a NIAC is separated from its HN by a comma. It is also followed by a comma if it comes within the sentence . Punctuation marks are shown in the examples cited in this section and in Section 1 above. In addition, a NIAC may be marked off by means of dashes or placed in parentheses: cf. [Edward Said ] - who is a well-known Arab thinker - died in America last month at the age of 67. 6 Edward Said (who is a great Arab thinker ) died in America last month at the age of 67. (iii) Relative Pronouns: The relative pronoun that cannot be used in non-identifying adjective clauses whereas it is frequently used in identifying relative clauses with all types of head nouns ( i.e. human, animate, inanimate) as in the following examples: The [man] that made these doors no longer lives in this city. This is the new [book] that deals with pollution. 3. ADJECTIVE CLAUSES WITH WHOSE Let us begin by considering the first and second sentences in the following pair: 1. This is the lady. 2. You met the lady’s daughter yesterday. Supposing we want to combine the preceding two sentences into one . One way of doing that is by changing the second sentence into an adjective/relative clause. In doing so, we have to choose/use an appropriate pronoun. In this case, it should be the possessive pronoun whose simply because the noun it replaces (i.e. the lady’s) is in the possessive case: 3. This is the lady whose daughter you met yesterday. Clauses introduced by whose can be identifying and non-identifying as in the following two examples respectively ( from In Charge 1: Teacher’s Guide, 2003:p.67): 4. [The person] whose book is on my desk is Linda. ( identifying) 5. [Jimi Hendrix] , whose guitar playing was inspirational, was left-handed. (non-identifying) 7