* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download - ePrints Soton - University of Southampton
Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Brand equity wikipedia , lookup
Customer experience wikipedia , lookup
Market segmentation wikipedia , lookup
Sales process engineering wikipedia , lookup
Customer relationship management wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
1 1 How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The New 2 Marketing DNA as a model for marketing education 3 4 5 Paul Harrigan, Lecturer in Marketing, University of Southampton ¹ * 6 Bev Hulbert, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, University of Southampton ¹ 7 8 9 * corresponding author 10 ¹ School of Management 11 University of Southampton 12 Room 4040 13 Building 2 14 Highfield 15 Southampton 16 UK 17 SO17 1BJ 18 19 Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7361 20 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3844 21 E-mail: [email protected] 22 23 24 25 Keywords: Marketing, Higher Education, Technology, Marketing DNA 2 1 Abstract 2 3 This paper seeks to address how marketing academics can best serve marketing practice 4 through marketing education. It is contended that, where technology is driving marketing in 5 practice, it is afforded significantly less attention in both theory and education. Thus, the 6 marketing graduates that are being produced from universities are often lacking in the skills 7 that 21st century marketers require. Where the focus of the paper is on marketing education, a 8 broad analysis of the content of marketing textbooks and degree programs is presented and an 9 ‘old Marketing DNA’ presented. The study also adopted an inductive approach to data 10 collection where the aim was to investigate the exact nature, constituency and role of 11 marketing in organizations. Qualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken with senior 12 marketing managers and executives in UK organizations. Findings are organized into the 13 areas of customer-led marketing, value-driven strategic marketing, channels, data-driven 14 marketing, and online and offline integrated marketing communications. The paper concludes 15 that there is a disconnect between marketing education and marketing practice, and goes some 16 way to recommending what the response of marketing academia should be through the ‘new 17 Marketing DNA’. This paper aims to inspire a holistic response from marketing educators to 18 bring their practice more in line with what is actually being practiced by marketing 19 practitioners in the 21st century. 20 3 1 Introduction 2 3 This paper seeks to address how marketing academics can best serve marketing practice 4 through marketing education. It is contended that, where technology is driving marketing in 5 practice, it is afforded significantly less attention in both theory and education. Thus, the 6 marketing graduates that are being produced from universities are often lacking in the skills 7 that 21st century marketers require (Walker et al., 2009). 8 9 Marketing in practice in the 21st century has been almost entirely permeated by technology, particularly Internet-based technologies (IBTs) such as web communications, 10 websites, databases, and analytics tools. Previously, it could have been asserted that the 11 different technologies (e.g. television and email) were most definitely tools that enabled 12 traditional marketing principles and strategies, such as the marketing mix and branding. 13 However, it is proposed that newer 21st century technologies have been far more disruptive to 14 the marketing landscape and transformed not only the way marketing is done, but the very 15 role of marketing in the organization. 16 The Internet is now a completely interactive (‘Web 2.0’) tool that requires marketers 17 to actually practice two-way marketing between themselves and customers. Tools such as 18 Facebook and Twitter are perfect examples, but the stories of failure are more common that 19 the success stories, where marketers continue to view these new communication media as 20 broadcast, rather than narrowcast, interactive channels. As well as communications, IBTs 21 have also transformed market research, where organizations can gather, mine and turn into 22 actionable insight the vast amounts of data that is naturally created with each customer 23 communication and interaction. Link the power of data with the new forms of communication, 24 and organizations really do have the ability to deliver value to customers that will yield 25 mutually-beneficial relationships, and ultimately higher profitability. Still, technology is only 4 1 enabling traditional marketing theories and principles, but it is doing it to such an extent that 2 marketing graduates need an extensive grounding in the range of enabling technologies tools 3 and how they link intrinsically with marketing strategy. 4 However, more authors have recently questioned the link between marketing theory 5 and marketing practice. Authors such as Verhoef, Reibstein and Rust have pointed to 6 marketing’s lack of impact on other disciplines and on marketing practice (Brownlie et al., 7 1994; Hunt, 1994; Reibstein et al., 2009; Rust et al., 2010; Verhoef and Leeflang, 2009). It is 8 asserted that more research should actually focus on what marketers in different contexts 9 actually do (Brownlie et al., 1994; Hunt, 1994; Reibstein et al., 2009). Where academics are 10 under more pressure to increase the practical ‘impact’ of their research, more emphasis must 11 be placed on current practical and managerial problems (Reibstein et al., 2009; Verhoef and 12 Leeflang, 2009). Based on this brief introduction to the powerful enabling role of technology 13 in marketing, this paper seeks, through empirical research, to uncover what form marketing 14 takes in organizations and to propose a new framework for marketing education. Thus, the 15 paper seeks to impact marketing theory, but also provide actionable takeaways for marketing 16 educators. 17 The paper begins by discussing marketing and the tenuous relationship between theory 18 and practice it inspires. The importance of technology in business and in marketing is also 19 introduced. Where the focus of the paper is on marketing education, a broad analysis of the 20 content of marketing textbooks and degree programs is presented and an ‘old Marketing 21 DNA’ presented. The study adopted an inductive approach to data collection where the aim 22 was to investigate the exact nature, constituency and role of marketing in organizations. The 23 findings present qualitative data from an in-depth interview process and point to a disconnect 24 between marketing education and marketing practice, and conclusions recommending what 25 the response of marketing academia should be - a ‘new Marketing DNA’. 5 1 2 Background 3 4 Marketing 5 6 ‘Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, 7 communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, 8 clients, partners, and society at large’ (Approved by the American Marketing 9 Association, October 2007) 10 11 It is cautioned that marketing academia, which has traditionally been one of the main sources 12 of marketing knowledge, is coming under greater pressure to make itself relevant to 13 marketing practice (Brownlie and Saren, 1995; Reibstein et al., 2009). This is particularly true 14 in marketing education, where often the provision of 21st century marketing skills is the remit 15 of industrial bodies, rather than academic institutions. Thus, it is the contention of this paper 16 the marketing curriculum has been left behind by advancements in marketing practice, 17 particularly with regard to the enabling power of technology in marketing. 18 The response of this paper is to adopt an inductive research design to uncover exactly 19 what is happening in marketing practice and to compare to what is being delivered in 20 marketing higher education. If we are to bridge this gulf (Reibstein et al., 2009; Verhoef and 21 Leeflang, 2009) between marketing academics and senior marketing managers we need to go 22 out with an open mind and a listening ear in our research, rather than going out with set 23 questions and hypotheses. As Brown (1996:13) aptly sums up, ‘experienced fishermen know 24 as much, if not more, about piscine habits and behavior than a shoal of academically inclined 25 biologists’. In short, we are at a stage where marketing academia has a lot to learn from 6 1 marketing practice. The problem in this case is that marketing academia, through its education 2 of students, is not reflecting what is happening in marketing practice, and thus not delivering 3 marketing graduates with the skills to actually work in marketing (Walker et al., 2009). 4 This paper focuses on the role of technology in marketing as the main area through 5 which marketing practice has sped ahead of marketing theory and education. The following 6 section will present a brief overview of the different influences of technology on marketing in 7 the 21st century, while the next section will present an overview of the current state of play in 8 the marketing curriculum. 9 10 Technology in Marketing 11 12 It is apparent, in the 21st century, is that technology has a significant role in most 13 organizations’ innovation activities (Zhang et al., 2008). Although it is unlikely that 14 technology itself has any inherent value, value and competitive advantage emanate from the 15 integration of technology into business strategy. Thus, a form of innovation may comprise the 16 innovative use of technology for business purposes (Peppard and Ward, 2004; Zhang et al., 17 2008). Furthermore, innovation can occur in almost any business process, such as marketing. 18 In marketing, technology has driven new approaches and techniques, such as developing 19 customer insight, web analytics, dashboards, search engine optimization, and social media 20 marketing. Practical examples of this irreversible trend are the use of social media such as 21 Facebook and Twitter in two-way, interactive marketing communications where control of the 22 ‘marketing message’ is in some ways relinquished to the customers. This was most widely 23 popularized by Barack Obama in his 2008 Presidential campaign. Other examples are the use 24 of advanced analytics software to track consumer behavior online and to target advertisements 25 based on behavior, and thus relevance. This ‘web analytics’ domain, though, is dominated by 7 1 IT professionals in practice. A final, and most up-to-date example of the pervasive role of 2 technology in marketing lies in the area of mobile technology, where the challenge of 3 understanding mobile marketing communications and analyzing mobile Internet behavior is a 4 significant ‘market’ for marketing. In all, technology has infiltrated both the front-end 5 communications and back-end analytics of marketing. 6 Specifically to marketing performance, Internet-based Technologies (IBTs) have the 7 potential to strengthen online connections with customers, disseminate product information, 8 facilitate transactions, improve customer service, and manage stakeholder relationships 9 (Bartezzaghi and Ronchi, 2005). IBTs also have the potential to develop a firm’s existing 10 markets, facilitate entry into new, international markets, and even create new products and 11 services (Chaffey et al., 2003). Nonetheless, these potential successes are wholly dependent 12 on how the business uses IBTs to leverage its processes as technology itself does not provide 13 a competitive advantage (Chen and Ching, 2007). 14 Critically, there are two theories regarding the nature of technology in society and 15 business. The first; substantive theory can be defined as technological determinism, in which 16 technology is presented as an autonomous force. Expanding this notion, technology is viewed 17 as being neither outside society nor an integral part of it; rather technology is an independent, 18 self-controlling, self-determining, self-generating, self-propelling, self-perpetuating and self- 19 expanding force (Feenberg, 1991; Chandler, 1995). The second; instrumental theory can be 20 defined as technological instrumentalism and directly opposes substantive theory, asserting 21 that all technology is a tool, largely under human control, that can be used for either positive 22 or negative purposes (Feenberg, 1991; Surry, 1997). Instrumentalists cite the knife as the 23 prime example, as a tool that can be used to kill, cook or cure (Levinson, 1996). Although it 24 immediately becomes obvious that instrumental theory offers the most widely accepted view 25 of technology in practice, and is the dominant view of modern governments and the policy 8 1 sciences on which they rely (Feenberg, 1991), it is the contention of this paper that the 2 marketing discipline is being driven and led by technology, rather than taking the lead and 3 reclaiming its influence. The practical examples lie in the areas of data mining, CRM, and 4 consumer behavior, where software companies and IT departments lead the way and 5 marketing obediently follows (Rust et al., 2010). This should not be the case where 6 technology should be seen as an enabling tool of marketing practices. It is the role of 7 marketing education to reflect the disruptive and pervasive nature of technology in marketing 8 practice, and to prepare students to put marketing back in its place. 9 10 Marketing Education 11 12 This section will provide a brief account of the current curriculum being delivered in the 13 majority of higher education institutions in the UK, and review relevant marketing education 14 literature. Previous research in the domain of marketing education has provided some useful 15 commentary on the state of marketing education as a system for providing marketing practice 16 with suitable graduates. Principally, there is continuing debate that the gap between marketing 17 education and marketing practice is too wide (e.g. Kelley and Gaedeke, 1990; Lamont and 18 Friedman, 1997; Smart et al., 1999; Lamb et al., 1995; Gray et al., 2007; Treleaven and 19 Voola, 2008; Tregear et al., 2010). 20 21 Based on a review of previous research in journals, either with an educational focus or 22 devoting special issues to educational issues, common themes appear to be the need to 23 respond to the role of technology in marketing (Lamont and Friedman, 1997; Baker et al., 24 2003), the global nature of marketing (Lamont and Friedman, 1997; Koch, 1997), the 25 quantitative and analytical nature of marketing (Floyd and Gordon, 1998; Mitchell and 9 1 Strauss, 2001), the softer skills required to practice marketing (Kelley and Gaedeke, 1990; 2 Lamb et al., 1995; Kaplan et al., 2010), and the general need to be closer and more responsive 3 to the changing needs of practitioners (Boddy, 2007; Gray et al., 2007; Tregear et al., 2010). 4 5 Examining the marketing curriculum, there is some useful research by Helgesen et al. (2009), 6 which proposes the underlying philosophy of marketing education. Fundamentally, marketing 7 education has tended to be based on two distinct approaches; ‘instrumental’ and ‘intrinsic’ 8 (Clarke et al., 2006). The intrinsic approach is concerned with the ‘development of individual 9 potentialities or the development of intellect and character’ (Peters, 1970:27), and implies that 10 education provides people with the capability to make their own choices in live. Thus, 11 ‘education has value in and of itself’ (Clarke et al., 2006:192). Conversely, the instrumental 12 approach focuses on skills, implying ‘business schools should teach students so they can hit 13 the employment world fully trained’ (Clarke et al., 2006:191). Thus, education is not 14 perceived as an end in itself, but as the mean to an end (Helgesen et al., 2009). This paper 15 adopts the position that marketing education must respond to the needs of its stakeholders 16 who, in the main, are marketing practitioners. Thus, we must teach the skills that are required 17 of marketing practitioners in the 21st century (Bruce and Schoenfeld, 2006; Southgate, 2006; 18 Warren and O’Toole, 2005). 19 20 Returning to the themes identified as being required in the marketing curriculum, the principal 21 one appears to be the integration of technological skills (e.g. Spiller and Scovotti, 2008; 22 Mitchell and Strauss, 2001). Where digital marketing is growing exponentially in practice, it 23 tends to remain ‘boxed’ in to individual modules in the marketing curriculum (Spiller and 24 Scovotti, 2008). Mitchell and Strauss (2001) and Benbunan-Fich et al. (2001) highlight the 25 importance (which has only increased since 2001) of developing an understanding of web 10 1 page and site design, web site marketing, server-side programming and management, and 2 information and social networking strategies. A key cautionary point in advocating the 3 centrality of technology in the marketing curriculum is to make the customer the focal point 4 of marketing, and technology the enabler. With this in mind, Baker et al. (2003) propose 5 designing the marketing curriculum around the concept of customer value. 6 7 Focusing on the skills required by marketing graduates to enable them to be competent 8 practitioners, it is reported that marketing managers find marketing theory and published 9 research to be abstract and of little relevance to their work (Ankers and Brennan, 2002). 10 Where university teaching is meant to be based on this research, this raises potential concerns 11 about the relevance of formal marketing education to marketing practice (Gray et al., 2007). A 12 principal concern appears to be that employers perceive marketing and education to be too 13 theoretical and not practical enough (Beamish and Calof, 1989; Phillips and Zuber-Skerritt, 14 1993; Neelankavil, 1994), meaning that conceptual discussions take precedence over the 15 development of softer or transferable skills (Gray et al., 2007; Catterall et al., 2002). Based on 16 research carried out among marketing managers (and students) in New Zealand, the skills 17 required to be an effective marketing manager are strategic thinking, leadership and 18 management, and a knowledge of strategic planning, product and brand management, 19 communication and promotion, and consumer behavior (Gray et al., 2007). Marketing 20 managers also emphasized the importance of business-to-business and services marketing, 21 which students tended to view as less important. A final point is that manager considered a 22 willingness to learn and interpersonal skills as important as marketing knowledge that is 23 lacking in many graduates (Gray et al., 2007; Kelley and Bridges, 2005). Other research has 24 emphasized the need to integrate key employability-related skills into marketing modules 25 (Davis et al., 2002). Approaches such building employability skills development into 11 1 assessment (Treleaven and Voola, 2008), introducing separate ‘professional/career skills’ 2 modules (Kelley and Bridges, 2005) and making students study more modules outside the 3 business school to broaden horizons (Pharr and Morris, 1997). 4 5 Recently, the marketing curriculum has been analyzed by several researchers (e.g. Kuster and 6 Vila, 2006; Stringfellow et al., 2006). Kuster and Vila (2006) found that market research was 7 the most commonly delivered marketing subject, followed by marketing strategy and 8 consumer behavior. The ‘core’ modules that were offered by more than 75 per cent of the 9 institutions surveyed in both America and Europe consisted of strategic marketing, principles 10 of marketing, marketing research and marketing communications (Kuster and Vila, 2006). 11 Further ‘standard’ modules offered by more than 50 per cent of institutions consisted of 12 international marketing, consumer behavior, product/brand marketing, services marketing, 13 retail marketing, B2B marketing and e-marketing (Kuster and Vila, 2006). Other modules 14 delivered by more than 25 per cent of institutions consisted of contemporary marketing issues, 15 small business marketing, supply chain/logistics, simulation/project/consultancy and direct 16 marketing. 17 18 This paper complements this previous research and details what is being delivered in the 19 marketing curriculum in the UK. Table 1 delineates the structure of 9 mainstream marketing 20 (‘introduction to marketing’, ‘strategic marketing’, ‘marketing management’) textbooks in use 21 in undergraduate and postgraduate marketing education across the UK. 22 23 24 Table 1 – Marketing Textbook Structure 12 1 Expanding on each of the topics listed in Table 1, each of the marketing texts reviewed devote 2 a section to the role of marketing in the wider organization. This tends to be situated at the 3 beginning of the book, where the marketing concept is explained, internal marketing 4 introduced and the notion of marketing as a holistic concept in the organization is proposed. 5 Sections focusing on marketing planning detail the development of marketing plans. 6 Implicitly, this involves setting achievable marketing objectives and goals. The emphasis is 7 that marketing is seen as a key component of organizational strategy. The section on the 8 marketing environment discusses the importance of the internal and external environments in 9 marketing. Internally, a marketing audit serves the purpose of reviewing the current 10 objectives, strategy and performance. Externally, it is important to learn about the customer 11 environment, as well as the wider macro-environment. Analyses such as SWOT and PEST are 12 explained. The buyer behavior section tends to be divided into business-to-customer (B2C) 13 marketing and business-to-business (B2B) marketing. Regarding B2C marketing, 14 understanding the consumer buying process is underlined. The psychology of marketing is 15 introduced in some texts. Regarding B2B marketing, the distinct stages in the buying process 16 are outlined and the significant differences from B2C illustrated. Marketing research is 17 introduced as an important concept in all texts. Although it is linked to developing, 18 maintaining and utilizing insight on customers as the basis for marketing, it remains a 19 relatively distinct section in the majority of texts. Techniques such as questionnaires and 20 focus groups are explained. A section on segmentation, targeting and positioning introduces 21 the core marketing concept of segmentation; namely geographic, demographic, 22 psychographic, and behavioral segmentation. These traditional means of segmenting are 23 explained in turn, and tend to be followed by a section on differentiation and positioning. The 24 status of the ‘4Ps’ of marketing is enhanced by the texts under review. In most cases, different 25 sections are reserved for the range of marketing decisions occurring under product, price, 13 1 promotion and place. Regarding product, texts tend to cover issues such as product levels and 2 branding which, without focusing on it, actually resembles the more holistic concept of the 3 value proposition (Anderson et al., 2006). A separate section is often devoted to services 4 marketing, which in today’s competitive world of competing on added-value is often 5 inseparable from product marketing. Moving on to price, texts focus on the various pricing 6 strategies and tactics, based on geography, competitors, discounts, promotions. There is little 7 discussion on pricing based on actionable customer insight, and the power of the customer in 8 pricing decisions. A section on promotion typically introduces issues such as setting the 9 advertising objectives, media decisions, sales, PR and direct marketing. In reality, with 10 technology playing a predominant role in ‘promotion’ today, almost all marketing is direct 11 marketing. Sections on the final ‘P’, place, typically discuss channel decisions and the 12 evaluation of each channel’s strengths and weaknesses. There is relatively little on multi- 13 channel integration, which is commonplace for most large organizations in the 21st century. 14 Following on from the 4Ps, marketing communications as a section focuses on the range of 15 communication channels available to marketers. Ranging from mass to one-to-one 16 communication channels, the emphasis is on an integrated marketing communications 17 strategy. Analysis shows that less attention is paid to interactive marketing communications, 18 than to more traditional direct marketing techniques. Similar to the previous section on 19 marketing communications, the emphasis with regard to marketing channels is the adoption of 20 an integrated and strategic approach. Thus, vertical and horizontal marketing channels are 21 explained and issues of conflict and cooperation between channels discussed. The creation of 22 value along the channel is also given attention. Sections on implementation and control of 23 marketing tend to focus on the need for marketing to be viewed strategically within the 24 organizations. Focusing on control, there is a recognition that marketing should be able to 25 justify itself through financial analysis. Thus, the range of marketing metrics in use is given 14 1 some attention. A number of texts choose to devote a separate, and often final, section to the 2 different contexts in which marketing is employed. Contexts explained are services 3 marketing, electronic(e)-marketing and international marketing. This is a particular issue of 4 concern in this paper, where contexts such as services marketing and e-marketing are so often 5 integral elements of an organization’s marketing strategy and tactics, independent of the 6 product or market type. 7 Table 2 presents the ‘typical’ modular structure of undergraduate and postgraduate 8 marketing programs, based on an analysis of 17 marketing programs from across the UK. The 9 ‘typical’ structure of these programs serves to succinctly present how marketing education is 10 currently framed, even boxed, into certain modules or subjects and thus illustrating the view 11 of the different building blocks that, together, constitute marketing. 12 13 Table 2 – Marketing Degree Structure 14 15 There is a clear link between these two elements of marketing academia, which at least 16 illustrates some consistency in what is being delivered in the marketing curriculum. To best 17 illustrate this marketing curriculum, Figure 1 presents what marketing researchers at the 18 author’s university have coined ‘the old Marketing DNA’. Although the title of the model 19 may be provocative, its content merely represents what is being delivered in the majority of 20 marketing education in the 21st century. Where previous authors in the marketing education 21 domain have criticized marketing degrees for their poor ability to equip graduates with the 22 practical skills necessary for industry employment (Pearce and Bonner, 2000; Davis et al., 23 2002; Evans et al., 2002), and where academic marketing is criticized for being irrelevant 24 (Ankers and Brennan, 2002; Rieger and Wong-Rieger, 1996; Brennan et al., 2006), this paper 25 goes on to investigate, through an inductive qualitative approach, whether ‘old’ is a valid 15 1 descriptor; in other words whether marketing education reflects what’s going on in marketing 2 practice. 3 4 Figure 1 – The ‘Old Marketing DNA’ 5 6 Methodology 7 8 ‘In-depth interviews should provide the means to understand why persons act 9 as they do, and to understand the meaning and significance they give to their 10 actions, in such a way that they can tell the interviewer in their own terms’ 11 (Jones, 1985:45) 12 13 The qualitative method adopted by this study is an in-depth interview technique as part of an 14 inductive research design. The research assumed an inductive approach due to the nature of 15 the research question which sought to gain a broad yet in-depth understanding of what is 16 happening in marketing practice, without the development of hypotheses or a conceptual 17 model as such to test based on the extant literature. This approach lends itself to in-depth 18 interviews, which are useful for providing in-depth information through probing and 19 interpretation (Tashakkori and Teddlie, 2003). Important considerations around an in-depth 20 interview research design are sampling strategy and interview structure and execution. 21 22 Sample 23 24 In this study, a relatively large sample size was adopted, where 70 in-depth interviews were 25 carried out. This is well beyond the 20-30 persons that Creswell (1998:113) recommends 16 1 should be interviewed in order to achieve ‘data in the theory’. The reason for such a large 2 sample was based on the nature of the research, which sought a general understanding of the 3 broad marketing discipline in practice. It was concluded that, due to the breadth of the 4 research question, reliability would be improved with a larger sample. The selection criteria 5 for the sample was broad, where the researcher sought to gather data from senior marketing 6 practitioners in UK business organizations. Specifically, the sample was constructed with 7 assistance from the Academy of Marketing and the Chartered Institute of Marketing in the 8 UK, who provided lists of company details. A stratified random sampling technique was 9 adopted to ensure that a representative sampling frame was constructed (Teddlie and Yu, 10 2007). Where the purpose of the study was exploration, the importance of randomness in the 11 sampling frame was underlined. In the same vein, the breadth of the sampling frame 12 necessitated that strata (particularly industry sector and size) were recognized. 13 14 Interview Structure and Execution 15 16 This study adopted semi-structured interviewing, where the interview protocol was rigorous 17 enough to ensure validity while also facilitating flexibility and encouraging respondent 18 interaction (Patton, 2002). For example, a typical interview included prompts such as ‘what is 19 your role in the organization?’, ‘what do you think marketing’s role is?’, and ‘who does the 20 marketing jobs in your organization?’. 21 22 The interviews were all carried out on a face-to-face basis, by the author and an academic 23 colleague. This allowed for in-depth interpretation through the observation and recording of 24 verbal and non-verbal communication, as well as audio recording (Clarke, 2001b; 25 Parameswaran, 2001). The setting was consistently at a venue of the respondent’s choosing, 17 1 typically their office or a nearby café. Interviews were typically one to two hours in duration, 2 and all took place between January 2007 and August 2008. 3 4 Validity and Reliability 5 6 ‘The challenge of legitimacy refers to the difficulty in obtaining findings and making 7 inferences that are credible, trustworthy, dependable, transferable, and/or 8 confirmable’ (Onwuegbuzie and Johnson, 2006:52) 9 10 Validity is a concept that traditionally has been viewed as quantitative (Campbell, 1957). 11 However, it is also a contentious issue for qualitative researchers (Onwuegbuzie and Johnson, 12 2006), principally due to its unclear and ambiguous nature in qualitative research (Dellinger 13 and Leech, 2007). Prominent qualitative researchers have argued for a ‘serious rethinking of 14 such terms as validity, generalizability, and reliability’ (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005:17). 15 Alternative terms such as ‘trustworthiness’ (Lincoln and Guba, 1986), ‘inference quality’ 16 (Tashakkori and Teddlie, 2003) and ‘legitimation’ (Onwuegbuzie and Johnson, 2006) have 17 been proposed to apply rigor to qualitative research. For the purposes of this study, the 18 researcher has assumed the term ‘legitimacy’, as the qualitative equivalent to the inherently 19 quantitative terms of validity and reliability. Legitimacy was ensured through measures such 20 as prolonged engagement with and persistent observation of the sample population, gaining 21 informant feedback, weighting the evidence, rich and thick description, and peer debriefing, 22 (Onwuegbuzie and Leech, 2007). 23 24 Prolonged engagement is where the researchers conduct a study for a sufficient period of time. 25 In this study the in-depth interview process took place over a twenty month period. Where 18 1 prolonged engagement provides scope, persistent observation provides depth. The researchers 2 maintained the role of observers throughout the entire process. Gaining informant feedback is 3 recommended by Guba and Lincoln (1989), who advocate systematically obtaining feedback 4 about one’s data, analytical categories, interpretations and conclusions from the study group. 5 As well as the inductive nature of the research design, which enabled respondents to 6 ‘construct’ the data themselves, the researchers also provided each respondent with the 7 opportunity to read the transcript of their interview (though none took this offer up). The 8 transcripts of interviews, typed by the researchers based on audio recordings, provided rich 9 and thick description and formed important bases for analysis (Becker, 1970; Patton, 2002, 10 Peters and Wester, 2007. Regarding weighting the evidence, the researchers employed 11 analytical tool such as noting word repetitions, cutting and sorting key words and phrases, 12 searching for metaphors and analogies, and constantly comparing across cases. Finally, where 13 there were two researchers involved in data collection and analysis, a ‘devil’s advocate’ 14 scenario was created. This is where each individual can keep the other one honest and pose 15 difficult questions about every element of the research. In addition to the two researchers, 16 other colleagues at the institution were asked for feedback on the data. 17 18 Findings 19 20 Findings present the qualitative data gathered and analyzed from 70 in-depth interviews. A 21 general consensus on the nature of marketing in organizations is followed by a presentation of 22 data on specific areas that have been inferred from the data. See Appendix A for a summary 23 of the findings. As part of the inductive nature of the research design, the structure of the 24 findings has been guided by the data. In analyzing and coding the qualitative data, it became 25 clear that five main domains were predominating and, actually ‘coming out of the data and 19 1 just hitting the researcher between the eyes’ (Bernard, 2000:445). Qualitative quotes were 2 then coded into each of these domain were appropriate. The five specific domains, delineated 3 based on commonality of inferences and themes with the data, are marketing, customer-led 4 marketing, value-driven strategic marketing, channels, data-driven marketing, and online and 5 offline integrated marketing communications. Having presented findings relative to these five 6 domains, a descriptive model provides the holistic summary to the range of findings. 7 8 Marketing 9 A large number of respondents provided insights into the role of marketing in organizations. 10 As one senior marketing manager asserted, ‘marketing is about us telling the customer what 11 we can do, but also the customer telling us what they want’. Another manager stated that; ‘for 12 us, marketing begins during production. It’s not about ‘selling’ as such – it’s about involving 13 the customer from the off’. 14 15 Regarding technology, respondents emphasized its importance but cautioned that it is only an 16 enabler of marketing. For example; 17 18 ‘Technology has made communication and managing information easier – it’s all 19 about getting closer to customers’. 20 21 ‘I think technology has just given marketing the ability to do what it always sought to 22 – understand customers and make business easier’ 23 24 However, respondents did seem to query the role of marketing education in producing 25 graduates that understood the newer marketing technologies and how they facilitate marketing. 20 1 For example; ‘there is no point in us employing a graduate who knows all the marketing 2 principles but hasn’t got the knowledge of the technology to put them into practice’. Other 3 respondents provided the following opinions: 4 5 ‘We are a big fan of employing graduates but unfortunately we aren’t seeing the skills 6 we need in marketing graduates – we’re employing a lot of stats and IT graduates to 7 do our marketing roles’. 8 ‘Universities seem to provide students with a knowledge of why marketing is 9 important, but fall short of explaining and teaching how to actually make it happen’. 10 11 12 Based on an analysis of the data, a number of distinct yet inter-linked areas of marketing have 13 been derived. These are delineated in the following sub-sections and supported with relevant 14 data. 15 16 Customer-led Marketing 17 18 Findings show that marketing does tend to be led by the customer, where a key term is 19 ‘customer insight’. A senior marketing executive stated that ‘marketing is about building 20 customer insight’. Thus, the role of gathering, managing and analyzing information on 21 customers was reported as a predominant marketing activity in organizations, as the following 22 quotes exemplify; 23 24 ‘Customers are our most valuable asset. It’s only natural that building an insight on 25 them is one our most important activities’ 21 1 2 ‘We track everything a customer does. Yes, that’s do make sure they have a good 3 experience with us, but it’s also to make sure we know everything we can about them 4 to make and save us money in the future!’ 5 6 ‘Market research is just so expensive, but technology has made it possible for us to do 7 our own ‘research’ using the data produced by customer interactions. Making sense 8 of that data, due to its sheer amount, is the challenge though’. 9 The notion of managing the experience that the customer has with the organization is also 10 reported to be prominent. In this regard, a marketing manager stated that ‘the Internet has 11 opened up the whole area of managing the customer experience across channels, and it isn’t 12 easy’. 13 14 Value-driven Strategic Marketing 15 16 The second component of marketing that was deemed significant from the data was the notion 17 of organizations selling value propositions, not just products, to customers. According to a 18 senior marketing executive, ‘our core product is a key selling point yes, but there is much 19 more that helps us compete’. This focus on marketing’s role in providing added-value to 20 customers is reinforced by a marketing director, who stated that ‘if we want to be successful 21 we have to offer the full package to customers – if we relied solely on our product we’d be 22 dead’. 23 24 This infers a strategic and long-term approach to marketing, based on relationships with 25 customers, as the following quotes illustrate; 22 1 2 ‘Ok, we want value from our customers as in loyalty and sales, but we understand that 3 to do that we have to give them value in return. Value can be anything, a good price, 4 convenience, after-sales service etc. etc.. 5 6 ‘We let customers pick and choose what they want for their money, even within one 7 product – we have to or we’d be left behind’ 8 9 10 ‘For us, marketing is about relationships with good customers’. It’s the only way to do things efficiently really. 11 12 Note the word ‘good’ in the last quote, which infers that relationships are maintained with 13 profitable customers, not all customers. This raises the issue of customer lifetime value, which 14 is underlined in the following quotes; 15 16 ‘Part of our marketing strategy is to work out the value of our different customers and 17 market to them accordingly’. 18 19 ‘Of course building a brand is important, but we like to try to do that at the individual 20 customer level – just by providing a good service’ 21 22 Channels 23 24 Channels to market was inferred from the data as another important and distinct domain of 25 marketing. In the multi-channel age, it was unsurprising that respondents spoke about this as a 23 1 key issue in marketing. One senior marketing manager stated that ‘there are so many ways for 2 customers to get our product now, we don’t know whether we’re coming or going!’ The 3 differences in managing different channels was also underlined, as these quotes infer; 4 5 ‘Online is one channel and requires certain skills to manage, face-to-face is another 6 that requires different skills, yet we have to present a united front across both’. 7 8 ‘We struggle to integrate what we do across channels, so it’s a real problem for us as 9 we know the customer could be getting a better service’. 10 11 ‘We know that online affects offline and vice versa so if we have an offer in-store we 12 know that it will drive customers to our website and to have it ready for that’. 13 14 Data-driven Marketing 15 16 Many respondents spoke about marketing and ‘information’ or ‘data’ in the same sentence. 17 Again, the term ‘customer insight’ came up, where for example one marketing director 18 asserted, ‘information on customers that we gather and analyze in-house drives all our 19 marketing decision’. This domain of marketing came through strongly in the data, and covers 20 areas such as CRM, CEM, data mining and analytics. Again, one executive asserted, ‘our 21 marketing is built solely on data we have on the market and on customers’. Building on this 22 notion, organizations seem to be using CRM and CEM to gather, manage and analyze data on 23 customers. The following quotes underline the important, yet varied, roles of CRM and CEM; 24 24 1 ‘Yeah, CRM is important for spotting trends in customers’ behavior. It’s just another 2 tool in building up a database of customer data’. 3 4 ‘CRM has been around for a long time in our organization, but I suppose now it’s 5 becoming a more central part of our marketing decision-making’. 6 7 ‘CRM and CEM…..I suppose CEM is more about us managing the experience 8 customers have with us across channels. To be honest we find that difficult and we 9 know we have to use the information we record on customer interactions better to 10 improve on this’. 11 12 The issue of data-overload comes through from the qualitative data, as the following excerpts 13 illustrate; 14 15 ‘Yeah, of course customer data, and data on the market and competitors, is important 16 in our marketing, but we just find that there is so much to manage and bring together 17 from different areas’. 18 19 ‘In our business it’s all about the long-term. We just have to track every contact a 20 customer has with us. Technology has helped us to do that and bring it all together. Of 21 course, it’s not perfect, but we know that any slip ups and the customer will feel let 22 down’. 23 24 Another relatively recent development in marketing is the increase in use of ‘dashboards’, 25 which present data to marketing managers in a coherent, actionable manner. As one manager 25 1 states, ‘there is just so much data, we had to go down the route of paying for some software to 2 make sense of it and make it real for us’. A marketing director also states; that ‘dashboards 3 have been essential for us in making sense of a mass of data’. It appears that the invaluable 4 nature of data combined with the amount of data available has created this phenomenon. ‘Just 5 knowing what customers are doing isn’t enough any more – you need to be able to predict 6 what they’re going to do and we need data mining software skills to do that’, according to a 7 senior marketing manager. The analytical skills are difficult to find, according to a marketing 8 director, who asserts that ‘there is so much data, but very few people have got insight. To get 9 that you have to spend about 2/3 times on analysis people than on software’ 10 11 Online and Offline Integrated Marketing Communications 12 13 The final area of marketing that has been derived from the data corresponds to the nature of 14 marketing as the function at the interface between organization and customer. For example, 15 ‘the whole point of us gathering and analyzing data on customers is so that we can 16 communicate more effectively and efficiently with them’. In the same vein, another marketing 17 professional states that ‘communications with customers are vital, but are far more effective 18 when based on reliable customer-data, which can be very complex actually’. 19 20 The multi-channel nature of marketing communications is also recognized. The following 21 quotes serve to illustrate the importance of digital channels of marketing communication: 22 23 ‘We communicate in so many different ways with customers, usually it depends on 24 what the issue is – complicated issues are face-to-face or phone, simpler ones are the 25 Internet or email’. 26 1 2 ‘We have to be ready for any customer at any point in time to contact us through any 3 communication channel – that is a challenge. Obviously online has different roles 4 than offline but it is defining these and then getting them to complement each other. 5 Not easy’ 6 7 Another issue derived from the data is the increased interactivity that online communications 8 permit, and thus force organizations into. The following quotes from two marketing directors 9 underline this point; 10 11 ‘More and more, we’re finding that it’s taking more effort to manage our online 12 presence. We got some advice on how to make it more ‘social’ and how important that 13 is, and we’re currently thinking about where to go on that’. 14 15 ‘We communicate with customers across the range of channels, and are actually 16 finding the push for interaction no matter what the channel is a challenge. I mean, 17 how can we actually use Twitter to do marketing?!’ 18 19 It is also emphasized that integrating online and offline communication channels is vital as 20 part of strategic marketing. For example, ‘online affects offline and offline affects online – 21 we’ve tried hard to makes these different departments in our business talk to each other so 22 that there is a chance for it to feel that way for the customer’. 23 The findings derived from this study have presented a general overview on marketing 24 and its constituent parts. This is summarized and presented as the ‘new Marketing DNA’ in 25 Figure 2. The ‘DNA’ metaphor was chosen due its applicability to marketing, where 27 1 marketing is different in each and ever organization, yet the constituent strands and or 2 components may be similar and mutually dependent. Likewise, for research purposes it allows 3 components to be taken for specific in-depth investigation, which serves to improve the DNA 4 as a whole. Rather than debating the specific content of this proposed descriptive model of 5 marketing, this paper will go on to discuss whether marketing academia and education is 6 delivering graduates with the appropriate skill set to play a role in 21st century marketing, as 7 defined by the data gathered and analyzed in the current study. 8 9 Figure 2 – The ‘New Marketing DNA’ 10 11 Discussion 12 13 This paper presents the ‘new Marketing DNA’ as a new model of marketing education. The 14 DNA metaphor was adopted to reflect the fluid nature of marketing’s constituent parts; how 15 they contribute to another in inextricable ways but how each can also be taken out and 16 investigated or taught in their own right. This paper adopts a different structure to traditional 17 research papers, where the crux of each element of the new DNA will be discussed and 18 examples of previous literature introduced in the following sections. Ultimately, though, 19 findings and conclusions are linked to the educational literature that was reviewed earlier in 20 the paper. 21 22 Customer-led Marketing 23 In the strategic marketing literature, one of the most topical issues is the concept of market 24 orientation and its pervasiveness in organizations (Deshpande, 1999). Market orientation 28 1 implies a customer-focused organization engaging in activities designed to meet customer 2 needs (Kohli and Jaworski, 1990). 3 4 ‘Communication in marketing means keeping in touch with valued customers, 5 providing timely and trustworthy information on service changes, and communicating 6 proactively if a problem occurs’ (Ndubisi, 2007:100) 7 8 When there is effective communication between an organization and its customers, a better 9 relationship will result and customers will have a tendency to display greater loyalty (Ndubisi, 10 2007). Quality in communication centers on its timeliness, accuracy, usefulness, and 11 credibility of information exchanged (Frone and Major, 1988). Therefore, to facilitate and 12 improve relationship marketing, organizations must improve the conduits of communication 13 from customers (Dwyer et al., 1987). There are two principle and inter-linked drivers behind 14 maintaining communicative relationships with customers. First, organizations often seek a 15 trusting relationship between themselves and their customers (Dwyer et al., 1987). According 16 to Macmillan et al. (2005), trust is dependent on three variables; shared values, 17 communication, and opportunistic behavior. Thus, by facilitating open communication with 18 customers, there is the potential for increased interdependence, trust, joint satisfaction, and 19 risk-taking (Dwyer et al., 1987). Second, and dependent on trust, organizations often seek a 20 level of commitment from their customers (Sin et al., 2005). There are two types of 21 commitment; affective (Buchanon, 1974) and calculative (Geyskins et al., 1996). Affective 22 commitment is the most difficult to achieve and is summed up by Scanzoni (1979:87), who 23 states that, ‘in a committed relationship the participants maintain their awareness of 24 alternatives without ‘constant and frenetic testing’. This sense of stability in business 25 relationships may lead to a situation in which the organization and the customer collaborate in 29 1 the mutual creation of value (Dwyer et al., 1987). Consequently, organizations experience 2 efficiencies in production, advertising and customer service (Dwyer et al., 1987). The other 3 form of commitment (calculative commitment) occurs where switching costs are the principal 4 reason for the continuance of a relationship, instead of trust and satisfaction (Jackson, 1985). 5 In summation, by fostering trust and commitment among customers, organizations are able to 6 enhance customer loyalty (Sin et al., 2005; Ndubisi, 2007; Ryals and Humphries, 2007). This 7 is the central thesis of marketing, where the most effective way to improve firm profitability 8 is customer retention, not customer acquisition (Reinartz et al., 2004). 9 If communication is one facilitator and requisite capability of marketing, information 10 management is another one. According to Dwyer et al. (1987), marketing is improved by 11 obtaining, unobtrusively, high quality information about the customer. There are two main 12 drivers behind obtaining, managing and analyzing customer information. First, as the 13 company gains experience with its customers, it can serve them more efficiently (Reichheld 14 and Sasser, 1990). By recognizing the importance and role of data collection, processing and 15 analysis, firms are able to adapt their offerings to the specific needs and wants of individual 16 customers, thereby increasing customer satisfaction and loyalty, which represent the bases for 17 long-term business relationships (Payne and Frow, 2005). 18 Technology has radically assisted the process of building customer insight, where it 19 assists in the administration, storage and processing of customer data. Technology (e.g. CRM 20 and customer experience management (CEM)) facilitates the integration of dispersed 21 customer data from different data sources in order to create a coherent picture of the 22 customers and their interaction with the organization (Bradshaw and Brash, 2001; 23 Padmanabhan and Tuzhilin, 2003). Technology further allows for the capture of customer- 24 details, background information and the sharing of this customer information within the 25 organization (Chen and Ching, 2007; Jayachandran et al., 2005). Information integration is 30 1 much easier with the employment of technology, which provides seamless integration 2 capabilities (Padmanabhan et al., 2006). Advanced systems also provide analytical 3 capabilities which facilitate the identification of customers’ behavioral patterns. Such an 4 information management capability is becoming more important as the ‘engine’ of marketing 5 (Payne and Frow, 2006). Ultimately, by integrating technology into marketing processes, the 6 potential exists to provide a single, unified view of the customer (Plessis and Boon, 2004). 7 We posit that a better understanding of the plethora of ways that organizations today are 8 gathering data, managing data and analyzing data through complex analytical tools and 9 dashboards is required so that marketing academics are better equipped to talk about and 10 teach the strategies and tactics underpinning the new practical domain of customer insight 11 (Baker et al., 2003; Helgesen et al., 2009). 12 13 Value-driven Strategic Marketing 14 It is proposed that relationships are at the centre of marketing. They are difficult for 15 competitors to imitate, and by providing efficient repeat exchanges and synergies, 16 relationships can give partners financial and operational advantages (Eyuboglu and Buja, 17 2007). Where organizations and even markets are themselves complex networks (Webster, 18 1992; Gummesson, 1997), organizations and customers become co-producers of mutual value 19 (Ravald and Gronroos, 1996). This principle of mutual value creation draws on the Nash’s 20 equilibrium, which posits that each participant’s strategy is an optimal response to the 21 strategies adopted by other participants, and nobody has an incentive to deviate from their 22 chosen strategy (Palmer, 2000). As Gummesson (1994:17) aptly asserts on opportunistic 23 marketing; 24 25 ‘Manipulative marketing can be compared with the use of artificial fertilizer and 31 1 pesticides which increase short-term harvests but impoverish not only the soil where 2 the crops grow, but the whole of nature, for short-term greed’. 3 4 ‘Value proposition’ has become one of the most widely used terms in marketing in recent 5 years (Anderson et al., 2006). Yet, there is little understanding of what actually constitutes a 6 value proposition (Anderson et al., 2006). What is certain is that a real value proposition is 7 not created solely by the marketer, but created by both the marketer and the customer in 8 congruence (Anderson et al., 2006). By competing on value, organizations are able to more 9 clearly differentiate themselves and build sustainable competitive advantage (Wallman, 2009; 10 Payne et al., 2008). A value proposition may include the core product plus a range of add 11 benefits and services on which organizations can properly and individually compete, rather 12 than price-based competition (Lanning, 1996; Anderson et al. 2006). It is the contention of 13 this paper that more research is required around the developing and delivery of value 14 propositions. For example, Payne et al. (2008) state that relatively little is known about how 15 customers engage in the co-creation of value. If we, as marketing academics, are to educate 16 the marketing practitioners of tomorrow, we must be producing more research to understand 17 how organizations are building value and competitive advantage for themselves, while also 18 delivering value for customers (Baker et al., 2003). 19 20 Channels 21 The diffusion of the Internet into both business organization’s and consumer’s daily lives 22 has led to a particular and obvious excitement around e-marketing. Initially, speculation 23 suggested that the Internet would dramatically transform the marketing landscape and 24 would lead to superior business performance (Brodie et al., 2007). The only place this 25 optimism led was to the dotcom boom and bust of the 1990s (Brodie et al., 2007). Since 32 1 then, there has been a more cautious and considered approach to the marriage between the 2 Internet and marketing in an attempt to figure out exactly where and how they can create 3 value (Brodie et al., 2007). 4 Still, the use of online marketing channels is increasing exponentially while the other, 5 traditional marketing channels are experiencing decline (Barwise and Farley, 2005). It has 6 been stated that the role of the Internet in most organizations today is to complement 7 traditional marketing channels (Day and Ben, 2005), but while technology is infiltrating every 8 area of marketing, likewise the dominance of online channels is growing. Where online 9 channels such as Facebook, Twitter and blogs permit a level of interactivity not previously 10 experienced by either marketers or consumers, more rigorous research is required to build an 11 understanding of how to best manage these two-way media. Online channels can enhance an 12 organization’s customer orientation, improving sophistication, interactivity, and real-time 13 practice (Brodie et al., 2007). They can facilitate new, international market entry by 14 improving customer communication and customer information management (Brodie et al., 15 2007). However, that does not mean that offline channels are redundant. Rather, the question 16 is how traditional channels complement new online channels? For example, it has been found 17 that as many as 76 per cent of retailers are unable to track their customers across channels 18 (Axciom, 2002). More research in these practical areas of marketing will enable a better 19 theoretical understanding, which should enable a more relevant marketing education, and 20 perhaps even let marketing theory contribute to marketing practice (Spiller and Scovotti, 21 2008; Mitchell and Strauss, 2001; Helgesen et al., 2009). 22 23 Data-driven Marketing 24 CRM is one example of data-driven marketing. CRM is defined as the ‘cross-functional 25 integration of processes, people, operations, and marketing capabilities that is enabled 33 1 through information, technology and applications’ (Payne and Frow, 2005:168). Although the 2 term CRM is relatively new, the principles behind it are not (Payne and Frow, 2006). Rather it 3 is the power of technology to acquire, manage and analyze customer data that is the disruptive 4 force in marketing. 5 Through communications and interactions with customers comes valuable information 6 (Jayachandran et al., 2005). Therefore, the key capability of CRM is the management of 7 customer information and the creation of customer insight (Payne and Frow, 2006). In fact, 8 according to Tan et al. (2002), every business is becoming an information business. 9 Jayachandran et al. (2005) note the importance of information reciprocity, capture, 10 integration, access and use. Ultimately customer insight has the potential to be a key asset in 11 sustaining competitive advantage (Hogan et al., 2002). CRM, by definition, is about 12 leveraging customer knowledge (Payne and Ryals, 2001; Hansotia, 2002). This is because 13 CRM implies understanding who one’s customers are and what they really want (Todman, 14 2001); impossible without information. CRM is concerned with the collection and collation of 15 customer information from all points of customer contact and, in combination with other 16 relevant data, developing customer insight (Payne and Frow, 2006). Although it may seem 17 bizarre to question the purpose of gathering customer information, organizations do need to 18 see the potential for a return on investment from collating and storing significant amounts of 19 customer data. A brief justification is that CRM is about learning about customers (Yim et al., 20 2004; Mithas et al., 2005). Information on customers can be used for various analytical 21 processes to create customer intelligence to better profile and classify customers, predict 22 customer behavior, conduct target marketing, and cross and up sell; and that’s just into the 23 existing customer base (Chan, 2005). There is another important justification; not all 24 customers are equally desirable and thus profitable (e.g. Ryals and Knox, 2001; Parvatiyar 25 and Sheth, 2001). In fact, it has been put forward that 20 per cent of customers are responsible 34 1 for 80 per cent of the revenues for the majority of firms (Parvatiyar and Sheth, 2001). This 2 has been referred to as the Pareto 80/20 rule (Ryals and Knox, 2001). The role of managing 3 customer information, therefore, lies in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of 4 marketing where only the most valuable customers can be offered personalized offerings 5 (Malthouse and Blattberg, 2005). 6 One final point on the subject of customer information management is that information 7 processes must comprise a human element (Boulding et al., 2005). Currently, it appears that 8 the technology is driving the marketing rather than vice versa. For example, the whole domain 9 of web analytics is revolutionizing the understanding online consumer behavior, but it tends 10 to be the remit of IT departments (Burby and Atchison, 2007; Phippen et al., 2004). More 11 research in such an area is required to build an understanding from a marketing perspective, 12 so that we are able to teach it properly (Floyd and Gordon, 1998; Mitchell and Strauss, 2001). 13 14 Online and Offline Integrated Marketing Communications 15 It is of vital importance that organizations integrate all their marketing communication 16 activities, online and offline, to convey a single message toward an agreed objective. 17 Ultimately, technology should only act as a support to an underlying customer focus, so 18 online channels should not be driven by the power of the technology, rather the organization’s 19 customer orientation (Nielsen, 2002). This is difficult when the IT department is the only ones 20 with the expertise to execute online marketing activities. However, the effective use of 21 technology should actually lead to higher quality face-to-face contact. Often, a lack of 22 traditional communication in favor of overly virtual communication is a symptom of a poorly 23 implemented e-marketing strategy (Chen and Ching, 2007). This is another area that, in light 24 of recent technological advances such as Web 2.0 and social media, requires further research 35 1 to identify the roles for the range of offline and online communication media, and how best to 2 integrate them in a single strategy. Then, we can teach it properly. 3 4 Conclusions and Implications 5 6 This paper has presented the ‘new Marketing DNA’ as a new model of marketing 7 education. Regarding the content and structure of the ‘new Marketing DNA’, it is contended 8 that it better represents and caters for the disruptive and pervasive nature of technology in 9 marketing (Maklan et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2008; Rust et al., 2010). This paper has 10 presented some of the extant research in the constituent parts of the new DNA, and while this 11 is extremely valuable there are two weaknesses. First, previous research has tended to be 12 theoretically- and inward-focused rather than taking cognizance of the radical developments 13 in marketing owing to technology. Second, previous research has tended to be piecemeal. We 14 conclude that the time has come for marketing academics to take a more holistic view of 15 where their discipline is at, in both theory and practice, and try to apply some structure. This 16 is particularly important in marketing education. 17 Thus, rather than e-marketing being a mere context of marketing in marketing 18 education, in the new DNA technology is infused throughout the marketing curriculum 19 (Spiller and Scovotti, 2008; Kaplan et al., 2010). As the findings illustrate, organizations are 20 using technology to take their marketing to an almost utopian level, where customer can 21 really be understood, customer service made real-time, and offers really personalized 22 (Bartezzaghi and Ronchi, 2005; Rust et al., 2010). In actual fact, technology is only enabling 23 many historical aspects of marketing such as customer personalization, loyalty, and the 24 measurement of marketing effectiveness, thus the authors do not propose in any way the 25 dismissal of valuable marketing history (Petkus, 2010). Rather, the authors recommend that 36 1 technology is recognized as the disruptive enabler of marketing that it is, and that this is 2 reflected in the marketing curriculum (Spiller and Scovotti, 2008; Mitchell and Strauss, 2001; 3 Kaplan et al., 2010). 4 The educational takeaway of this paper is, first and foremost, that we as marketing 5 educators stop for some critical reflection of our marketing curriculums. We just need to 6 question the fundamental and philosophical purpose of marketing education, because if it is to 7 produce marketing graduates and thus contribute to marketing practice through education, this 8 paper has shown a significant dissatisfaction with the current state of play. At the University 9 of Southampton in the UK, we have acted on this research and appointed an advisory board of 10 marketing practitioners to ensure that our education is ‘grounded’ in both theory and practice. 11 We have introduced modules, that when put together in a holistic curriculum, constitute the 12 ‘new Marketing DNA’ (see Table 3). This new curriculum draws heavily on current and 13 seminal marketing theory, but along with repackaging it into a more integrated and 14 overlapping structure, also delivers many of the new technology-related skills in digital 15 marketing communications and marketing analytics that employers are crying out for. 16 Other marketing educators could start by getting more input from marketing 17 practitioners into the structure and content of their curriculums, bearing in mind the dynamic 18 nature of many marketing-related roles today. The next step might be to change some of the 19 content of current modules, perhaps even introducing some new electives that focus on web- 20 based or analytical skills. Taking a more strategic view, it is recommended that the ‘new 21 Marketing DNA’ be considered as a framework for the broader marketing curriculum, which 22 requires changes in the content of modules and the way they are delivered. At the University 23 of Southampton, we have now based a whole new Bachelors in International Marketing on 24 ‘the new Marketing DNA’, which is due to launch in 2011. 25 37 1 Table 3 - Postgraduate and Undergraduate Marketing DNA Modules at University 2 3 Another key takeaway from this paper draws on the notion that research and teaching 4 are mutually dependent academic activities. Thus, we propose that marketing research can 5 contribute to the ‘new Marketing DNA’, where researchers in niche areas can understand how 6 their area of expertise contributes to the wider marketing framework by viewing the DNA as a 7 framework to link tactical and niche elements of marketing to strategic and holistic 8 components of marketing. In summation, this paper recommends that for marketing theory 9 and education to inform practice in the longer term, academics need to ensure that practice 10 does not get any further ahead of or even further away from the marketing discipline than it 11 already is. We need to embed practitioner knowledge in our curriculums and understand that 12 marketing is now so broad, those practicing it may not even see themselves as marketers. 13 Future research in this area is encouraged and is achievable through investigating real 14 marketing problems that are being raised by practitioners (Reibstein et al., 2009). This paper 15 was borne out of one such concern, where a number of prominent marketers queried the role 16 of marketing education in providing adequately skilled marketing graduates (Verhoef and 17 Leeflang, 2009; Walker et al., 2009; Treleaven and Voola, 2008). Other such problems, both 18 on a smaller and larger-scale exist with the components of the new Marketing DNA. The 19 limitations of this study are that it is at a general, holistic level and lacks in-depth research in 20 the constituent parts of the DNA model. However, the authors are currently pursuing a larger- 21 scale, international quantitative investigation to empirically test the model introduced in this 22 paper, and to impact on marketing theory, education and practice on a global scale. 23 24 Acknowledgement 38 1 The author would like to acknowledge the Academy of Marketing in the UK, and the Higher 2 Education Academy’s Business Management, Accountancy and Finance Teaching, Research 3 and Development group for their support in the research underpinning the ‘new Marketing 4 DNA’. 5 6 39 1 References 2 3 American Marketing Association. Retrieved January 21 2010, from 4 http://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx. 5 Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A. and van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer Value Propositions 6 in Business Markets. Harvard Business Review, March, 1-11. 7 Ankers, P. and Brennan, R. (2002). Managerial relevance in academic research: an 8 exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20(1), 15-21. 9 Axciom (2002). Customer Recognition: Using Customer Data Integration to Optimize 10 Every Customer Interaction. Retrieved March 14 2008, from www.acxiom.com. 11 Baker, S. M., Kleine, S. S. and Bennion, M. (2003). What Do They Know? Integrating 12 the Core Concept of Customer Value into the Undergraduate Marketing Curriculum and 13 Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 79-89. 14 Bartezzaghi, E. and Ronchi, S. (2005). E-sourcing in a buyer-operator-seller perspective: 15 Benefits and criticalities. Production Planning and Control, 16(4), 405-412. 16 Barwise, P. and Farley, J. U. (2005). The State of Interactive Marketing in Seven Countries: 17 Interactive Marketing comes of Age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 67-80. 18 Beamish, P. W. and Calof, J. L. (1989). International business education: a corporate view. 19 Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3), 553-564. 20 Benbunan-Fich, R., Lozada, H. R., Pirog, S., Wisenblit, J. and Priluck, R. (2001). Integrating 21 Information Technology into the Marketing Curriculum: A Pragmatic Paradigm. Journal of 22 Marketing Education, 23(1), 5-15. 40 1 Bernard, H. R. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2 CA, USA: Sage Publications 3 Boddy, C. (2007). Academia marketing myopia and the cult of the PhD. Marketing 4 Intelligence & Planning, 25(3), 217-228. 5 Boulding, W., Staelin, R., Ehret, M. and Johnston, W. J. (2005). A Customer Relationship 6 Management Roadmap: What Is Known, Potential Pitfalls, and Where to Go. Journal of 7 Marketing, 69(4), 155-166. 8 Bradshaw, D. and Brash, C. (2001). Managing customer relationships in the e-business world: 9 how to personalize computer relationships for increased profitability. International Journal of 10 Retail and Distribution Management, 29 (11/12), 520-529. 11 Brennan, R., Baines, P. and Gill, M. (2006). Perceptions of research in marketing: 12 perspectives from the academic and professional marketing research communities. Paper 13 presented at The Academy of Marketing Annual Conference 2006. Middlesex University 14 Business School, London, July. 15 Brodie, R. J., Winklhofer, H., Coviello, N. E. and Johnston, W. J. (2007). Is e-marketing 16 coming of age? An examination of the penetration of e-marketing and firm performance. 17 Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 2-21. 18 Brown, S. W. (1996). Life begins at 40? Further thoughts on marketing’s mid-life. Marketing 19 Intelligence and Planning, 13(1), 4-17. 20 Brownlie, D. and Saren, M. (1995). On the Commodification of Marketing Knowledge: 21 Opening Themes. Journal of Marketing Management, 11(7), 619-627. 22 Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Whittington, R. and Wensley, R. (1994). The New Marketing 23 Myopia: Critical Perspectives on Theory and Research in Marketing – Introduction. European 24 Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 6-12. 41 1 Bruce, G. and Schoenfeld, G. (2006). Marketers with MBAs: bridging the thinking-doing 2 divide. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(3), 257-282. 3 Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in 4 work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546. 5 Campbell, D. T. (1957), “Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings, 6 Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297-312. 7 Catterall, M., Maclaran, P. and Stevens, L. (2002). Critical Reflection in the Marketing 8 Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(3), 184-192. 9 Chaffey, D. Mayer, R., Johnston, K. and Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2003). Internet Marketing, UK: 10 Financial Times, Prentice Hall. 11 Chan, J. O. (2005). Toward a Unified View of Customer Relationship Management. Journal 12 of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 6(1), 32-38. 13 Chandler, D. (1995). Technological or Media Determinism. Retrieved January 21 2010, from 14 www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tecdet.html. 15 Chen, J. and Ching, R. K. H. (2007). The effects of Information and Communication 16 Technology on Customer Relationship Management and customer lock-in. International 17 Journal of Electronic Business, 5(5), 478-498. 18 Chen, J. and Ching, R. K. H. (2007). The effects of Information and Communication 19 Technology on Customer Relationship Management and customer lock-in. International 20 Journal of Electronic Business, 5(5), 478-498. 21 Clarke, I. (2001b). Management “intuition”: an interpretative account of structure and content 22 of decision schemas using cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 147-172. 42 1 Clarke, P., Gray, D. and Mearman, A. (2006). The marketing curriculum and educational 2 aims: towards a professional education? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(3), 189-201. 3 Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five 4 traditions. CA, USA: Sage Publications. 5 Davis, R. Misra, S. and van Auken, S. (2002). A Gap Analysis Approach to Marketing 6 Curriculum Assessment: A Study of Skills and Knowledge. Journal of Marketing 7 Education, 24(3), 218-224. 8 Day, G. and Ben, K. (2005). Capitalizing on the internet opportunity. Journal of Business & 9 Industrial Marketing, 20(4/5), 160-168. 10 Dellinger, A. and Leech, N. (2007). Toward a Unified Validation Framework in Mixed 11 Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 309-332. 12 Deshpande, R. (1983). Paradigms Lost: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing. 13 Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 101-110. 14 Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, H. P. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. 15 Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27. 16 Evans, M., Nancarrow, C., Tapp, A. and Stone, M. (2002). Future marketers: future 17 curriculum: future shock? Journal of Marketing Management, 18, 579-596. 18 Eyuboglu, N. and Buja, A. (2007). Quasi-Darwinian Selection in Marketing Relationships. 19 Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 48-62. 20 Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. NY, USA: Oxford University Press. 21 Floyd, C.J. and Gordon, M.E. (1998). What skills are most important? A comparison of 22 employer, student, and staff perceptions. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(2), 103-109. 43 1 Frone, M. R. and Major, B. (1988). Communication quality and job satisfaction among 2 managerial nurses. Group Organizational Studies, 13(3), 332–347. 3 Fullerton, A. R. (1988). How Modern is Modern Marketing? Marketing’s Evolution and the 4 Myth of the “Production Era”. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 108-125. 5 Geyskins, I., Steenkamp, J. B., Steemkamp, E. M., Scheer, L. K. and Kumar, N. (1996). The 6 effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: A transatlantic study. 7 International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 303-317. 8 Gray, B. J., Ottesen, G. G., Bell. J., Chapman, C. and Whiten, J. (2007). What are the 9 essential capabilities of marketers?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(3), 271-295 10 Gummesson, E. (1994). Making Relationship Marketing Operational. International Journal of 11 Service Industry Management, 5(5), 5-20. 12 Gummesson, E. (1997). Relationship marketing as a paradigm shift: Some conclusions from 13 the 30R approach. Management Decision, 35(3/4), 267-273. 14 Hansotia, B. (2002). Gearing up for CRM: Antecedents to successful implementation. 15 Journal of Database Marketing, 10(2), 121-132. 16 Helgesen, O., Nesset, E. and Voldsund, T. (2009). Marketing perceptions and business 17 performance: implications for marketing education? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 18 27(1), 25-47. 19 Hogan, J. E., Lemon, K. N. and Rust R. T. (2002). Customer Equity Management: 20 Charting New Directions for the Future of Marketing. Journal of Service Research, 5, 26- 21 38. 22 Hollander, S. C. (1986). The Marketing Concept: A Déjà vu”, in Marketing Management 23 Technology as a Social Process (pp. 3-29), ed. George Fisk. NY, USA: Praeger. 44 1 Hunt, D. S. (1976). The Nature and Scope of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 40(3), 17- 2 28. 3 Hunt, D. S. (1994). On rethinking marketing: Our discipline, our practice, our methods. 4 European Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 13-25. 5 Jackson, B. B. (1985). Build customer relationships that last. Harvard Business Review, 6 63(6), 120-128. 7 Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P. and Raman, P. (2005). The Role of Relational 8 Information Processes and Technology Use in Customer Relationship Management. 9 Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 177-192. 10 Kaplan, M. D., Piskin, B. and Bol, B. (2010). Educational Blogging. Journal of 11 Marketing Education, 32(1), 50-63. 12 Kelley, C. A. and Bridges, S. (2005). Introducing Professional and Career Development 13 Skills in the Marketing Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 212-218. 14 Kelley, C. A. and Gaedeke, R. M. (1990). Student and employer evaluation of hiring criteria 15 for entry-level marketing positions. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(3), 64-71. 16 Koch, A. J. (1997). Marketing Curriculum: Designing its New Logic and Structure. 17 Journal of Marketing Education, 19(3), 2-16 . 18 Kohli, A. K. and Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research 19 Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. 20 Kotler, P. and Levy, J. S. (1969), “Beyond Marketing: The Furthering Concept”, 21 California Management Review, 12(2), 67-73. 22 Kuster, I. and Vila, N. (2006). A comparison of marketing teaching methods in North 23 American and European universities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(4), 319-331. 45 1 Lamb, C. W., Shipp, S. H. and Moncrief, W. C. (1995). Integrating Skills and Content 2 Knowledge in the Marketing Curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 17(2), 10-19. 3 Lamont, L. M. and Friedman, K. (1997). Meeting the Challenges to Undergraduate Marketing 4 Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(3), 17-30. 5 Lanning, M. J. (1996). An introduction to the market-focused philosophy, framework and 6 methodology called Delivering Profitable Value. Retrieved February 10 2010, from 7 www.dpvgroup.com. 8 Levinson, P. (1996). On behalf of humanity: The technological edge. The World & I, March, 9 301-313. 10 MacMillan, K., Money, K., Money, A. Downing, S. (2005). Relationship marketing in the 11 not-for-profit sector: an extension and application of the commitment–trust theory. 12 Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 806-818. 13 Maklan, S., Knox, S. and Ryals, L. (2008). New trends in innovation and customer 14 relationship management. International Journal of Market Research, 50(2), 221-240 15 Malthouse, E. C. and Blattberg, R. C. (2005). Can we predict customer lifetime value?. 16 Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(1), 2-16. 17 Mitchell, T. and Strauss, J. (2001). Practitioner and Academic Recommendations for 18 Internet Marketing and E-Commerce Curricula. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 19 91-102. 20 Mithas, S., Krishnan, M.S. and Fornell, C. (2005). Why Do Customer Relationship 21 Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 22 201-209. 46 1 Ndubisi, N. O. (2007). Relationship marketing and customer loyalty. Marketing 2 Intelligence and Planning, 25(1), 98-106. 3 Neelankavil, J. P. (1994). Corporate America’s quest for an ideal MBA. Journal of 4 Management Development, 13(5), 38-52. 5 Nielsen, J. F. (2002). Internet technology and customer linking in Nordic banking. 6 International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(5), 475-495. 7 Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. 8 Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63. 9 Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and Qualitative Research: An 10 Oxymoron? Quality and Quantity, 41(2), 233-250. 11 Padmanabhan, B. and Tuzhilin, A. (2003). On the Use of Optimization for Data 12 Mining: Theoretical Interactions and eCRM Opportunities. Management Science, 49(10), 13 1327 – 1343. 14 Padmanabhan, B., Zheng, Z. and Kimbrough, S. O. (2006). An Empirical Analysis of the 15 Value of Complete Information of eCRM Models. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 247-267. 16 Palmer, A. (2000). Co-operation and competition: a Darwinian synthesis of relationship 17 marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 687-704. 18 Parameswaran, R. (2001). Feminist media ethnography in India: Exploring power, gender, 19 and culture in the field. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(1), 69-103. 20 Parvatiyar, A. and Sheth, J. N. (2001). Customer Relationship Management: Emerging 21 Practice, Process, and Discipline. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 3(2), 1-34. 22 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. CA, USA: 23 Sage Publications. 47 1 Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2005). A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship 2 Management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167-176. 3 Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2006). Customer Relationship Management: from Strategy to 4 Implementation. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(1/2), 135-168. 5 Payne, A. and Ryals, L. (2001). Customer relationship management in financial services: 6 towards information-enabled relationship marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9(1), 3- 7 27. 8 Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. 9 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 83-96. 10 Pearce, J. and Bonner, P. (2000). The views of marketing faculty on the major controversies 11 in collegiate business education reform. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 779-791. 12 Peppard, J. and Ward, J. (2004). Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS 13 capability. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(2), 167-194. 14 Peters, R. S. (1970), Ethics and Education, Oxford: Allen & Unwin. 15 Petkus, E. Jr. (2010). Historical Perspectives in Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing 16 Education, 32(1), 64-74. 17 Pharr, S. J. and Morris, L. J. (1997). The Fourth-Generation Marketing Curriculum: 18 Meeting AACSB's Guidelines. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(3), 31-43. 19 Phillips, E. M. and Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1993). Perceptions of educators and potential 20 employers of the research training needs of postgraduates in business and management. 21 Journal of Management Development, 12(5), 12-20. 48 1 Plessis, du. M. and Boon, A. J. (2004). Knowledge management in eBusiness and customer 2 relationship management: South African case study findings. International Journal of 3 Information Management, 24(1), 73-86. 4 Ravald, A. and Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept and relationship marketing. 5 European Journal of Marketing, 30(2), 19-30. 6 Reibstein, D. J., Day, G. and Wind, J. (2009). Guest Editorial: Is Marketing Academia 7 Losing Its Way? Journal of Marketing, 73, July, 1-3. 8 Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, J. W. E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. 9 Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 105-111. 10 Reinartz, W., Krafft, M. and Hoyer, W. D. (2004). The Customer Relationship 11 Management Process: Its Measurement and Impact on Performance. Journal of Marketing 12 Research, 41(3), 293-305. 13 Rieger, F. and Wong-Rieger, D. (1996). Doing relevant research: the essential role of the 14 research model. in Punnett, B.J. and Shenkar, O. (Eds), Handbook for International 15 Management Research. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell 16 Rust, R. T., Moorman, C. and Balla, G. (2010). Rethinking Marketing, Harvard Business 17 Review. January-February, 1-9. 18 Ryals, L. (2005). Making Customer Relationship Management Work: The Measurement 19 and Profitable Management of Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 252- 20 261. 21 Ryals, L. and Knox, S. (2001). Cross-Functional Issues in the Implementation of 22 Relationship Marketing through Customer Relationship Management. European 23 Management Journal, 19(5), 534-542. 49 1 Ryals, L. J. and Humphries, A. S. (2007). Managing Key Business-to-Business 2 Relationships: What Marketing Can Learn From Supply Chain Management. Journal of 3 Service Research, 9(4), 312-326. 4 Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social Exchange and Behavioral Interdependence. in Social 5 Exchange in Developing Relationships, eds. R. Burgess and T. Huston, NY, USA: 6 Academic Press. 7 Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, 8 Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard 9 University Press. 10 Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Yau, O. H. M., Chow, R. P. M. and Lee, J. S. Y. (2005). 11 Market Orientation, Relationship Marketing Orientation, and Business Performance: The 12 Moderating Effects of Economic Ideology and Industry Type. Journal of International 13 Marketing, 13(1), 36-57. 14 Smart, D. T., Kelley, C. A. and Connant, J. S. (1999). Marketing Education in the Year 2000: 15 Changes Observed and Challenges Anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(3), 206- 16 216 17 Southgate, N. (2006). The academic-practitioner divide: finding time to make a difference. 18 Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(6), 547-551. 19 Spiller, L. D. and Scovotti, C. (2008). Curriculum Currency: Integrating Direct and 20 Interactive Marketing Content in Introductory Marketing Courses. Journal of Marketing 21 Education, 30(1), 66-81. 22 Steward, M. D. and Lewis, B. R. (2010). A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal 23 Rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(1), 75-92. 50 1 Stringfellow, L., Ennis, S., Brennan, R. and Harker, M. J. (2006). Mind the gap: the relevance 2 of marketing education to marketing practice. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(3), 245- 3 256. 4 Surry, D. W. (1997). Diffusion Theory and Instructional Technology. Retrieved January 21 5 2010, from www2.gsu.edu/~wwwitr/docs/diffusion. 6 Tan, X., Yen, D.C. and Fang, X. (2002). Internet Integrated Customer Relationship 7 Management - A Key Success Factor for Companies in the E-Commerce Arena. Journal 8 of Computer Information Systems, 42(3), 77-86. 9 Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral 10 Research. CA, USA: Sage Publications. 11 Todman, C. (2001). Designing a Data Warehouse: Supporting Customer Relationship 12 Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall 13 Tregear, A., Dobson, S., Brennan, M. and Kuznesof, S. (2010). Critically divided? How 14 marketing educators perceive undergraduate programs in the UK. European Journal of 15 Marketing, 44(1/2), 66-86. 16 Treleaven, L. and Voola, R. (2008). Integrating the Development of Graduate Attributes 17 Through Constructive Alignment. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 160-173. 18 Verhoef, P. C. and Leeflang (2009). Understanding the Marketing Department’s 19 Influence Within the Firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14-37. 20 Walker, I., Tsarenko, Y., Wagstaff, P., Powell, I., Steel, M. and Brace-Govan, J. (2009). 21 The Development of Competent Marketing Professionals. Journal of Marketing 22 Education, 31(3), 253-263. 51 1 Wallman, J. P. (2009). An examination of Peter Drucker’s work from an institutional 2 perspective: How institutional innovation creates value leadership. Journal of the 3 Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 61-72. 4 Warren, B. and O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business 5 Review, 83(5), 96-104. 6 Webster, E. F. Jr. (1992). The changing role of marketing in the corporation. Journal of 7 Marketing, 56(4), 1-17. 8 Yim, F. H. K., Anderson, R. E. and Swaminathan, S. (2004). Customer Relationship 9 Management: Its Dimensions and Effect on Customer Outcomes. Journal of Personal 10 Selling & Sales Management, 24(4), 263-278. 11 Zhang, M., Sarker, S. and McCullough, J. (2008). Measuring Information Technology 12 Capability of Export-Focused Small or Medium Sized Enterprises in China: Scale 13 Development and Validation. Journal of Global Information Management, 16(3), 1-25. 52 1 Table 1 Marketing Textbook Structure Chapters Overview of Contents Marketing in the context of the wider Organization the marketing concept is explained internal marketing introduced the notion of marketing as a holistic concept in the organization is proposed Marketing planning detail the development of marketing plans this involves setting achievable marketing objectives and goals emphasis is that marketing is seen as a key component of organizational strategy Marketing environment discusses the importance of the internal and external environments in marketing internally, a marketing audit serves the purpose of reviewing the current objectives, strategy and performance externally, it is important to learn about the customer environment, as well as the wider macro-environment analyses such as SWOT and PEST are explained Buyer behavior tends to be divided into business-to-customer (B2C) marketing and business-to-business (B2B) marketing regarding B2C marketing, understanding the consumer buying process is underlined the psychology of marketing is introduced in some texts regarding B2B marketing, the distinct stages in the buying process are outlined and the significant differences from B2C illustrated Marketing research marketing research is introduced as an important concept in all texts although it is linked to developing, maintaining and utilizing insight on customers as the basis for marketing, it remains a relatively distinct section in the majority of texts techniques such as questionnaires and focus groups are explained Segmentation, targeting and positioning introduces the core marketing concept of segmentation; namely geographic, demographic, psychographic, and behavioral segmentation these traditional means of segmenting are explained in turn, and tend to be followed by a section on differentiation and positioning. 4Ps of Marketing – Product texts tend to cover issues such as product levels and branding which, without focusing on it, actually resembles the more holistic concept of the value proposition (Anderson et al., 2006) a separate section is often devoted to services marketing, which in today’s competitive world of competing on added-value is often inseparable from product marketing. 4Ps of Marketing – Price texts focus on the various pricing strategies and tactics, based on geography, competitors, discounts, promotions there is little discussion on pricing based on actionable customer insight and the power of the customer in pricing decisions 53 4Ps of Marketing – Promotion a section on promotion typically introduces issues such as setting the advertising objectives, media decisions, sales, PR and direct marketing in reality, with technology playing a predominant role in ‘promotion’ today, almost all marketing is direct marketing 4Ps of Marketing – Place typically discuss channel decisions and the evaluation of each channel’s strengths and weaknesses there is relatively little on multi-channel integration, which is commonplace for most large organizations in the 21st century Marketing communications focuses on the range of communication channels available to marketers ranging from mass to one-to-one communication channels, the emphasis is on an integrated marketing communications strategy analysis shows that less attention is paid to interactive marketing communications, than to more traditional direct marketing techniques Marketing channels the emphasis with regard to marketing channels is the adoption of an integrated and strategic approach thus, vertical and horizontal marketing channels are explained and issues of conflict and cooperation between channels discussed the creation of value along the channel is also given attention. Implementation and control tend to focus on the need for marketing to be viewed strategically within the organizations focusing on control, there is a recognition that marketing should be able to justify itself through financial analysis thus, the range of marketing metrics in use is given some attention Contexts of Marketing (e.g. Services, E-Marketing) a number of texts choose to devote a separate, and often final, section to the different contexts in which marketing is employed contexts explained are services marketing, electronic(e)-marketing and international marketing this is a particular issue of concern in this paper, where contexts such as services marketing and e-marketing are so often integral elements of an organization’s marketing strategy and tactics, independent of the product or market type 54 1 Table 2 Marketing Degree Structure 2 Modules Marketing to Business and the Organization Understanding of Marketing Strategic Marketing Brand management New Products to Market Buyer Behavior Market Research Data Collection and Analysis 3 4 5 International Marketing Direct and E-Marketing Service Management Ethics and Sustainability Marketing and Society Marketing Communications Channel Management Marketing and Finance 55 1 Table 3 Postgraduate and Undergraduate Marketing DNA Modules at University 2 Module Code Module Name Undergraduate MANG****1 Delivering the Value Proposition MANG**** Data-driven Analytical Marketing MANG3050 Strategic Marketing Intelligence MANG3053 Customer Insight MANG**** Marketing Communications and Media Management MANG3052 Digital Marketing: Engaging with the Customer MANG**** Measuring Marketing Effectiveness Postgraduate 1 MANG6184 Introduction to Marketing MANG6184 Introduction to Marketing MANG6175 Strategic Marketing Intelligence MANG6131 Strategic Marketing Decisions MANG6095 Dissertation MANG6230 Data-driven Marketing MANG6146 Consumer Insight MANG6227 Measuring Marketing Effectiveness MANG6228 Digital Marketing Communications MANG6040 Information Systems Strategy MANG6176 Delivering the Value Proposition MANG6079 Accounting and Control MANG6047 Analytic Skills MANG6003 Quantitative Methods MANG6054 Credit Scoring and Data Mining MANG6229 Multivariate Statistics for Data Mining Modules approved, to be launched in 2010/11. 56 1 MANG6231 Software for Data Analysis and Modeling MANG**** Web Analytics MANG6180 Web Applications MANG**** Innovation and Creativity 57 1 2 3 Figure1 Conceptual Model - The Old Marketing DNA 58 1 2 3 Figure 2 Descriptive Model – The New Marketing DNA 59 1 Appendix A Summary of Findings from the Qualitative Data Topic Marketing Customer-led Marketing Value-driven Strategic Marketing Channels Data-driven Marketing Online and Offline Marketing Communications 2 Findings Marketing is about reacting to customer needs and wants Technology is a key enabler of marketing – communications and data management Marketing education tends not to produce adequately qualified graduates, with knowledge of the key technologies that are used to enable marketing in organizations Statistics and IT graduates tend to take up marketing roles A key term in marketing is ‘customer insight’, thus gathering, managing and analyzing information is a key marketing activity Organizations tend to be tracking their own customer’s behavior to better predict and tailor marketing offerings Technology has made ‘market research’ more feasible and more specific to individual organizations, as they can do it themselves. Managing the customer experience across channels is a key challenge. Marketing’s role is providing added-value to customers, not competing solely on the core product The term ‘value’ is a key term; developing and delivering value propositions to customers Personalization and customization are also raised as key issues ‘Marketing is about relationships with customers’ Customer profitability and lifetime value are raised as key marketing issues Branding seems to be about building relationships with customers, at an individual level The multi-channel nature of marketing was emphasized as a challenging reality The different means of using and managing online and offline channels were found as a real marketing challenge Integration of channels is also a challenge, where online affects offline and customers expect seamless interaction ‘Marketing’, ‘data’ and ‘information’ were often used together by respondents Information on customers drives a lot of marketing decisions in some organizations Areas such as CRM, CEM, data mining and analytics came through strongly as central marketing tools, even heavily informing strategy The issue of too much data was mentioned as a challenge in marketing, but technology, although creating it can also help make sense of it ‘Dashboards’ were mentioned as key marketing tool Data mining and analytical skills tend to be in short supply among marketing graduates The analysis of data, and thus customer insight, should drive marketing communications Letting data and insight drive communications can be quite complex, but technology acts as a real enabler Different communication channels are used by the same customers for different issues and different times Getting different (online and offline) communication channels to complement each other is a marketing challenge Online communications need to be interactive, and that can be time and resource intensive to manage There is some lack of understanding of the real interactive, two-nature of online communications – they are not a new type of old medium