Download The meaning of product placement: An interpretive exploration of

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup

Brand equity wikipedia , lookup

Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup

Brand ambassador wikipedia , lookup

Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising wikipedia , lookup

Infomercial wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Celebrity branding wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Brand awareness wikipedia , lookup

Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup

Online shopping wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Advertising management wikipedia , lookup

Touchpoint wikipedia , lookup

Marketing wikipedia , lookup

Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup

Target audience wikipedia , lookup

Planned obsolescence wikipedia , lookup

Pricing strategies wikipedia , lookup

Audience measurement wikipedia , lookup

Visual merchandising wikipedia , lookup

Target market wikipedia , lookup

Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup

Brand loyalty wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Targeted advertising wikipedia , lookup

Product lifecycle wikipedia , lookup

Emotional branding wikipedia , lookup

Food marketing wikipedia , lookup

Green marketing wikipedia , lookup

Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup

Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Predictive engineering analytics wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup

Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup

Product planning wikipedia , lookup

Product placement wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The meaning of ‘product placement’: An interpretive exploration of consumers’
experiences of television programme product placement in
the United Kingdom and Thailand
Abstract
Product placement and television programmes could be considered as sites of
meaning. The very richness of these meanings, including consumers, television programmes
and placed brands are interrelated in a network of meaning construction, and transfer. This
research study uses an interpretive approach to qualitative data to explore television product
placement from the subjective perspective of young consumers in the UK and Thailand.
Findings suggest that consumers bring to product placement, along with the media brands are
embedded in, a network of meanings that they can interpret, engage with and respond to.
There is also some evidence that consumers do not engage with embedded brands in the
obviously contrived setting of promotion, but in a far more powerfully suggestive way in an
entertainment environment, which has been chosen by consumers for viewing because it
concords with their identities.
The meaning of ‘product placement’: An interpretive exploration of consumers’
experiences of television programme product placement in the United Kingdom and
Thailand
Extended abstract
Television programme product placement is increasing in significance from both a
managerial and a consumer cultural perspective. Product placement refers in this research to
the inclusion of or reference to branded products or services in scripts or plots in any form of
non-advertising mediated entertainment for promotional purposes. In Thai there is no precise
translation for product placement. It is known as ‘implicit advertising’ or ‘kod-sa-na-faeng’.
Television studios are seeking new revenue streams to offset the decline in conventional
paid-for advertising revenues, while branding and advertising agencies are moving towards
more ‘experiential’ marketing tools to access consumers ‘under the radar’. Questions arise
about the implications of this practice for international managerial practice and consumer
experience, with attendant issues concerning ethics, public policy and regulation in a climate
of increasing globalisation of brands. To date, with a small number of exceptions, research in
the area has focussed largely on single-country studies measuring the attitudes of nonsegmented audiences towards placements in movies.
Product placement has played an important role as a relatively new emerging tool of
integrated marketing communications (IMC) for several decades. Brand marketing
organisations have typically been content with seeing brand exposure in mediated
entertainment as an add-on, but many are now putting resources into the technique. One of its
perceived advantages over traditional advertising is the access it affords to consumers’ daily
experiences. Through placements in television soap operas, situation comedies, quiz shows,
and other genres, brands can be featured as meaningful artefacts in narrative contexts which
have a powerful resonance for consumers. This popular culture phenomenon blurs the
boundaries between entertainment and promotion. The meanings of the media and
promotions, as a result, are intertwined through the postmodern practice of intertextuality by
which consumers engage in endless cross-referencing (Jansson, 2002; Gould and Gupta,
2006). In other words, consumers bring an intertextual network of meanings through which
they interpret and react to the placements to the product placements and media that brands are
embedded in.
Although some literature (e.g. Fazio and Zanna, 1978; Smith and Swinyard, 1988)
suggests that “attitudes formed through lived experience are stronger, more accessible, held
more confidently, and more predictive of behaviour than those derived from mediated
experience through advertising” (Wattanasuwan, 2003, p.72), in postmodernity mediated
experiences of, for example advertising, product placement and television programmes, may
be as powerful as lived experiences in forming attitudes relevant to ‘the symbolic project of
the self’ (ibid). Branded goods are consumed not only for their utility but also for their
symbolic value (Elliott and Wattanasuwan, 1998). Media representations of brands in
advertising and entertainment can be powerful in suggesting particular meanings in
association with marketed products and brands. Effectively, products become commodity
signs (Baudrillard, 1981).
Product placement in movies has been studied by academic researchers, usually from
a neo-positivist perspective which measures the brand recall, attitudes of consumers, and
purchase intention to the practice. There are some robust findings but more studies are
needed which take into account several other dimensions. Firstly, television is potentially a
more powerful channel than movies for reaching into consumers’ lives because the consumer
engagement with favourite soap operas or dramas or other genres of the television show is
more intimate and more regular than visits to the movies. Secondly, this quality of
engagement cannot easily be accessed through quantitative data gathering methods. Thirdly,
the strategies and rationalisations behind product placement practices need to be understood
to complete the overall picture, since consumer interpretations are only one half of the
process. In particular, the managerial strategies are important not only in making assessments
about the contribution of product placement to the marketing management of brands but also
in making judgements about the attendant ethical and public policy implications.
Furthermore, product placement seems to carry features consistent with the ‘interpretive’ or
‘postmodern’ turn in consumer and marketing research, especially with regard to the
symbolic role brands may play as resources for the production of self and social identity. In
this regard it is important to consider product placement from an interpretive consumer
cultural perspective, a perspective not yet evident in the literature. Finally, much is made
today of the globalisation of brands and the emergence of consumer communities separated
by ethnicity, nationality and religion yet linked through brand allegiance. It is therefore useful
to examine the cross-cultural context. Consumers under forty constitute a useful group in this
research as they are typically fully engaged with media and brand culture and are known to
use brands in their self-identification processes.
This study, then, uses qualitative data gathering methods to explore television
programme product placement from the subjective perspective of young consumers in the UK
and Thailand. This perspective is supplemented by a detailed account of managerial practices
of product placement offered by leading agencies in the field. In-depth interviews with
agency practitioners, and discussion groups and elicited auto-ethnographic passages with
consumers were the main data-gathering methods. All data were fully translated and
transcribed. Data were then subject to an interpretive thematic analysis which, drawing on
elements of discourse analysis, focussed on the ‘interpretive repertoires’ which seemed to
constitute the major themes drawn upon in articulating experiences of product placement.
The UK and Thailand were chosen because the UK is an advanced economy with a
relatively immature television product placement industry while Thailand is a developing
economy in which television product placement is a well-established practice. The intention
of the study is not to compare the respective cultures as such, since culture is not a fixed
entity which allows direct comparison, although it is important to consider product placement
within its local media infrastructure and consumer culture. Rather, the intention is to
juxtapose two contrasting contexts in order to add contrast and shade to the respective
findings.
The findings offer a thematic interpretation of some 40,000 words of transcribed data
with consumers and practitioners focusing on three main areas: 1) the managerial practices
and strategies surrounding the use of television product placement as an aspect of marketing
communications management 2) the ways in which consumers engage with, understand and
interpret brand placements in television shows and 3) the ways in which these interpretations
feed into ideas of self identity and consumer culture. The study concludes that product
placement on television is a sophisticated managerial practice which constitutes a powerful
discourse of brand consumption. Consumers are highly attuned to this discourse and draw on
it reflexively in their expressions of self-concept.
References
Baudrillard, J. (1981), For a critique of the political economy of the sign, St Louis MI: Telos
Press.
Elliott, R., and Wattanasuwan, K. (1998), Brands as symbolic resources for the construction
of identity, International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, p. 131-144.
Fazio, R., and Zanna, M.P. (1978), On the predictive validity of attitudes: the role of direct
experience and confidence, Journal of Personality, Vol. 46, Iss. p. 228-243.
Gould, S. J., and Gupta, P.B (2006), "Come on down" How consumers view game shows and
the products placed in them, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, p. 65-81.
Jansson, A. (2002), The mediatisation of consumption: towards an analytical framework of
image culture, Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, p. 5-31.
Smith, R. E., and Swinyard, W.R. (1988), Cognitive response to advertising and trial: belief
strength, belief confidence and product curiosity, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, p. 314.
Wattanasuwan, K. (2003), The young nouveau riche and luxury-brand consumption, Journal
of Commerce and Accountancy, Thammasat University, Thailand, Vol. 97, Iss. JanuaryMarch, p. 61-86.