* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download THE ROLE OF ISLAMIC MEDIA IN THE GLOBALIZATION ERA:
Islamic fashion wikipedia , lookup
Islamic terrorism wikipedia , lookup
LGBT in Islam wikipedia , lookup
Reception of Islam in Early Modern Europe wikipedia , lookup
Islamic democracy wikipedia , lookup
International reactions to Fitna wikipedia , lookup
Islamofascism wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of Islamism wikipedia , lookup
Islamic Golden Age wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Somalia wikipedia , lookup
Islam and Sikhism wikipedia , lookup
Muslim world wikipedia , lookup
Islam and violence wikipedia , lookup
Islamic missionary activity wikipedia , lookup
Islam and secularism wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Egypt wikipedia , lookup
Political aspects of Islam wikipedia , lookup
Schools of Islamic theology wikipedia , lookup
Islam and war wikipedia , lookup
Islam in the United Kingdom wikipedia , lookup
Liberalism and progressivism within Islam wikipedia , lookup
War against Islam wikipedia , lookup
Censorship in Islamic societies wikipedia , lookup
Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain wikipedia , lookup
Islamic socialism wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Bangladesh wikipedia , lookup
Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup
Islamic culture wikipedia , lookup
THE ROLE OF ISLAMIC MEDIA IN THE GLOBALIZATION ERA: BETWEEN RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES AND VALUES OF GLOBALIZATION, 1 THE CHALLENGES AND THE OPPORTUNITIES By Andi Faisal Bakti, Professor, the Faculty of Dakwah and Communication Studies, State Islamic University, Jakarta; Dean/Professor, the Faculty of Communication Studies, Pancasila University, Jakarta. Summary Islam is a religion full of principles, stemming from ethical, moral, legal, mystical, and philosophical teachings, with more than a billion followers across the globe. Muslims believe that because Muhammad received God’s final and complete revelation to humankind, they have a universal message and mission, to call the whole humankind to worship the one true God. However, these principles sometimes collide with modern principles, including the values brought along in the era of globalization. Islamic principles were initially introduced by the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century and have passed through a 14-century long process of (re)interpretations, based on new localities, system, and context of lives, encountered by Islam. These interpretations are not always welcomed by the proponents of the so-called Islamic traditions. But others, in particular the proponents of Islamic modernism, have no problem adopting the new meanings, as they believe that the Muslims should experience modernization or new life. Conversely, globalization principles can be perceived as clashing with the Islamic values. The question is how can Islamic media play a role in the era of globalization for dakwah? In other words, how do Muslim leaders or scholars perceive the role of Islamic media in the globalization era, and how do they bridge between the Islamic religious principles and globalization principles? What are the challenges and the opportunities for the Muslim world, in order to grasp the principles of globalization? What is the role of Islamic media in the era of digitalization? The role of Islamic media in the era of globalization on dakwah seems to be weak, as the concept is still debatable among the Muslims, and among the anti-globalization movements. While only few Muslims accept the media as part of the Islamic tools (wasilah) for dakwah, some believe it is not congruent with Islamic values, as the media is seen to be channeling the messages of globalization (Westernization). Even if they accept the concept, Muslims have a limited capability to maximize the media for their own dakwah purpose. Some are lacking in facilities and others are low in the knowhow. Most websites on Islam are limited, and there are websites that post negative information about Islam. Furthermore, many Muslims have not realized the importance, massiveness, and farreaching effects of the media for dakwah. Traditional and conventional dakwah remain the rule of conduct. Face-to-face dakwah is commonly and widely practiced by Muslims. Only a small number of Muslims, and only among the elites, have access to the Internet. External or global dakwah through webs has not been the main target of Muslims. 2 Muslims seem to identify three roles for Islamic media. First, modern media associated with globalization is dangerous as it will destroy the morality of Muslims, so one should keep away from it. The media can never be Islamized. Islam as a teaching of high dignity can never be associated with evil teachings. There is no such a thing of an Islamic media. Islam is sacred, media is profane. It seems that the majority have the same belief as Billig: that the processes of globalization are dealt in a heavily ideological structure. The hegemonic version stresses globalization as being: such an enormous process as to be irresistible; associated with instantaneous, global technologies which are simply baffling and therefore beyond most people’s control; related to theories which anyway urge that the world cannot be rationally and morally accounted for; implicitly an Americanizing process, for example in the ways that the words ‘new world order’ or ‘modernity’ are managed (see Billig, 1995). Such emphases encourage the (admittedly complex) processes of globalization to be seen as utterly beyond the control of human beings, as a force which renders us powerless. This, or course, is convenient for the corporate multinational companies benefitting from global power, since it tends to dampen down enthusiasm for attempts to direct, or regulate, them differently (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 119). For many, “globalization means Westernization; for others it means Americanization. In both cases the globalization process is seen as acculturation; that is, the adopting of a new culture (Western or US culture)” (Roy, 2004, 258n). Second, Islam is a message that can use any kind of media to deliver its message across the globe. The most important point is that the media can deliver the message of Islam to a receiver in every nook and cranny of the world. Third, Muslims should be able to establish their own media, comparable to the secular media of the West today. Muslims should be able to compete and win the competition against the media that covers and disseminates non-Islamic (evil) messages from nonMuslim countries. Through this Islamic media, Muslims can control the content of messages to be sent through the channels created by Muslims. In Esposito’s words (2002, 63), “amidst increasing globalization, Muslims strive to survive and compete, often with limited resources, and to preserve their identity in a world dominated (culturally, as well as politically and economically) by the West.” Islam is more than a religion, it is a system of life (Esposito, 2002). However, Islam contains rich traditions and heritages which need to be protected (Hanafi, 1990). In order to be able to understand the sacred texts of Islam, one should engage in a process of reinterpretation, as the texts are culturally bound to where it was revealed. These interpretations might be incompatible with other localities (Zayd, 1992). Fazlur Rahman (1982), in addition, believes that the texts should be understood according to a textual approach, examining the reason behind their revelation, the structure of the words, and texts, and grammar. This should be coupled with a contextual approach, looking and relating them with the condition and situation of Muslims according to the times and era. The role of Islamic media in the era of digitalization is very crucial as it processes technologically the data on Islam, preserves it, and serves as a channel of information from the sender (dai) to the receiver (mad’u). Thus seekers of knowledge do not necessarily engage in face-to-face encounters anymore with their source of knowledge (the ulama). Other questions can also be addressed to the providers or website owners. The principles of Islamic dakwah are clear and well documented in the 3 Qur’anic verses and the texts of the traditions of the Prophet, along with the works of authoritative scholars uploaded on the web or the latter’s answers to questions about certain issues. The main values in Islam are the importance of worshipping the true one God, who has revealed his last messages through revelations (the Qur’an) to his last prophet (Muhammad), who showed the ideal behavior in his words and deeds (Hadith). Islam teaches the five principles of faith (belief in one God, His angels, messengers, scriptures, and the day of judgment), and encourages humankind to do good, to donate to the poor, orphans, and the needy, and to pray, fast in the month of Ramadan, pay almsgivings, go for hajj, keep one’s promises, be patient, not to commit crimes, adultery, fornication, not to steal, lie, commit slender, cheat; to respect human beings, care for one’s parents and elders, neighbors, family members, and others; not to destroy the environment, and to perform good and stay away from bad deeds. These are, among others, what a Muslim should do and not do. By respecting this teaching, a Muslim will be rewarded paradise in the hereafter. The deeds are precisely recorded by angels. Anything that prevents a Muslim from the above is seen as Satan’s, the enemy of God’s, work, which should be avoided. As Islam contains principles, globalization also includes values. It links power structures and activities which go beyond the national boundaries that have existed for centuries, such as the Chinese, Arab, Indian, Persian worlds, and Roman Empire, as well as the Roman church across medieval Europe and beyond. Globalization is rather different, and distinctively modern. It grew from the expansion of trade in the late Middle Ages which itself was accompanied and followed by the growth of Western imperialist and the post-imperialist powers throughout the world. Globalization has been said to occur when activities are taking place in the following conditions. First, they take place not on a national and regional arena but beyond. Second, they are deliberately organized on a global scale. Third, they involve some interdependency, so that local activities in different parts of the world are shaped by each other. Forth, they often involve technology which make possible instantaneous as opposed to simply speedy, communications. Both Islamic values and globalization principles need to be combined. As Islam is basically a universal religion, which needs to be addressed and delivered to all human beings, it is absolutely crucial to employ the media. The Muslims need to use this significantly for dakwah, and not see it as an evil tool. This is indeed just a tool, which is neutral, can be used for negative or positive purposes. By using media, the message of Islam can reach the remotest area, rural areas. They enable the message to cross the borders of countries without visas, passports or exit permits. The new media, such as “television … now escorts children across the globe even before they have the permission to cross the street,” says Meyrowitz (1985, 238). GLOBALIZATION ERA AND ISLAMIC VALUES Globalization occurs when: 4 1. Activities take place in a global, beyond the national and regional arena Technology of communications is responsible for this process that led to an international economy. It started with the introduction of the printing on papers in China, sold in Europe, where books and texts were distributed to wider areas between China and Europe. Underwater cable systems were invented in Europe and used by European imperial powers and companies such as Cable and Wireless, which remain the main tools of communication today. Telegraph systems were land-based and quite useful. By the 1870s, submarine cables had been laid in Southeast Asia and were linked to the African coast. Later on the link went beyond China and Europe, as far as Australia and South America. This first global communication system was successfully separated the sending and the need to ship them physically (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 405). These local and national boundaries, religions, laws, media institutions, taxation structures, etc., still exist, and have huge economic and ideological power. National identities seem transformed, but not obliterated, by globalization. This crossing-over of national and regional boundaries seems to have created global inequality. World economy is not global but is centered on regions and networks (see Tomlinson 1999) which can be categorized as follows: by areas of advanced consumer-capitalist power (North America, Europe, and East Asia), by language used (Spanish in Latin America, English in many countries), by religions and cultures (the Islamic Middle East), and by technological factors, such as the ‘footprint’ of a satellite (MTV in Europe, and Star TV in Asia) (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 417-8). The areas in the Middle East and Southeast Asia as well as South Asia where Muslims live seem to have been enjoying globalization in terms of religion and cultures, which more often than not tend to be referring to the temporal (past) elements, as opposed to spatial (present and future) creativities. As a result people in these areas entertain themselves with an exclusive understanding of human relations, as opposed to an inclusive comprehension of human communication. They would not struggle for advanced power, or an advance in technological factors as was the case in Europe/the West. According to Roy (2004, 24), “globalization has blurred the connection between a religion, a pristine culture, a specific society and a territory.” For him, “this objectification of Islam is not only a result of political pressure and events: it is also a mechanical consequence of the delinking of religion and culture.” Furthermore, he believes that “globalization is a good opportunity to dissociate Islam from any given culture and to provide a model that could work beyond any culture” (ibid, 25). 2. Activities are deliberately organized on a global scale These systems were coupled with the news agencies’ establishment (see Thompson 1997, 152-9). The four media giants ‒ Reuters, UPI, AP, and AFP soon became the main source of print media in the world. These news agencies likewise disseminated news well beyond the continents of America and Europe, and at last in 1869 agreed to split the world into mutually exclusive spheres of operation. These more or less related to the spheres of influence of the major European imperial powers. 5 Media studies on their own cannot alter these inequalities—but they can point out the images and words which help sustain them. On the outset the global spread of media corporations has been intimately related to the imperialist past. Furthermore, there is adequate evidence of a significantly profitable, mostly one-way flow of news, information and entertainment from the major Western counties, led by the United States, to the rest of the world. Significantly, there now exist more regional flows, often dependent on the global spread of imperial languages such as Spanish, English, French, and Arabic. For example, Mexico and Chili become important as producers and exporters of tele-novels or soap operas to the rest of Latin America, as well as parts of Europe and Southeast Asia (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 407-8). In the case of language, Muslims throughout history have experienced some forms of globalization, though travel, pilgrimage, or the widespread role of Arabic and of a common teaching curriculum. A ‘community of the learned’ existed, which transcended all linguistic and ethnic divides, using Arabic as its lingua franca, and traveling from Morocco to India to learn and teach in a network of comparable and homogenous institutions (akin to medieval European clerks, using Latin and travelling from universities to monasteries). “This pre-modern globalization was effectively connected with the attempt to revive, through the medium of Arabic, a common Muslim culture, although it is an elite phenomenon. The Muslim ‘community of the learned’ no longer circulates in a purely Arabo-Muslim context, and English is as important as Arabic, if not more so, outside the Arabic speaking world. In short, the earlier form of globalization did not borrow its linguistic and technical tools from another culture, as is the case nowadays” (Roy, 2004, 108). Arabic too seems to become further localized, as local Arabic as opposed to standard Arabic seems to be more commonly practiced in schools and university as is the case in Egypt. Let alone the Southeast Asia, South Asia and the Indian sub-continent. “Contemporary globalization is not an elite phenomenon but a mass one, and it has a backlash at the core of the countries of origin, while traditional society was left unchanged by medieval globalization” (Roy, 2004, 108). To theorize the media in fully political ways, the political economy approaches of Armand and Michelle Matelart, Janet Wasco, Toby Miller and in particular Herbert Schiller have argued that much of the globalization of communication has been driven, since World War II , by the commercial interests of the large US-based corporations, in particular those based on oil and arms manufacture. These often in collaboration with the US state as political and military interests, which have replaced the British, French, Dutch and other older empires. It is not a giant leap, then, to argue that US media power is a form of cultural or media imperialism. Traditional local cultures are argued to be destroyed in this process, and new forms of cultural dependency and colonilism are shaped which mirror older imperialist relations of power (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 408). Media conglomerates operate as oligopolies— a few large organizations together dominating the market. They often work together (like cartels) to co-operate on perpetuating ‘free trade’ treaties which will further their interests (see Klein 2001). (Though far from being ‘free’ or ‘deregulated,’ these depends on thousands of pages of regulations, and the co-operation of nation states to implement them) (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 411). 6 The media corporations that control the market are mostly owned by America, European and Japanese capital, though they are usually based in the U.S. and, importantly, tend to use U.S. stars, highly-paid personnel and consumerist imagery (Australian Rupert Murdoch has had to take on U.S. citizenship to be able to acquire larger U.S. interests). It is also worth pointing out that the term globalization makes the process seem like a force of nature’, spread right over the planet. In fact the multinational corporations divide the world into series of regional markets or territories: 1. North America (U.S. and Canada); Western Europe, Japan and Australia; developing economies and regional producers (India, China, and Brazil, and Eastern Europe), the rest of the world (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 412). The media in the Islamic world has been initiated by establishing IISNA (International Islamic News Agency) and the Isnet (Islamic Network), but by these, Muslims also are not able to create their media giants to counterbalance the four media giants in the West, as planned initially. Al-Jazeera, which quite shocked the Western media for its capability to provide a perception and coverage of the Gulf war different from that of Western media such as CNN. According to Esposito (2002, 135136), “globalization of communications has created a situation in which Arabs and Muslims around the world often see more than we see. Unlike in the past, today’s international Arab and Muslim media are no longer solely dependent on Western reporters and channels. While America’s overseas media presence (reporters and overseas posts) and coverage have waned over the past decade, television stations like Al-Jazeera and others provide daily coverage of the violence and acts of terror committed by both sides as well as the disproportionate firepower used against Palestinians by Israelis armed with American-supplied weapons, F-16s, and Apache helicopters.” However, despite all these, finally Al-Jazeera was weakened by the establishment of an Arabic language sub-division of CNN called Al-Arabiya. Finally Al-Jazeera was bought by CNN, and of course the news once again is controlled by the West. In a different sphere, “the rise of a business-minded Muslim middle-class, quite at home with free market and globalization (having benefitted from economic protectionism), but unhappy with the monopolization by non-productive ruling elites of access to international markets, is also a byproduct of this new modern and devout middle class, while legitimizing its wealth” (Roy, 2004, 142). Using a sociological approach would be to consider the religious market, where the commodities are, above all, meanings and symbols, such as: halal meat, travel agencies for hajj and umra, Islamic fashion, banks, tourism, even swimming pools, private schools, sports clubs, charities and undertakers. This religious market is globalized” (Roy, 2004, 172). Sufi orders too help to create Black transatlantic identity, which the creation of Liberia and the search for African roots among U.S. Blacks failed to achieve. Here a neo-brotherhood is part of a global neo-ethnicity. This is the case of Tijaniya tariqa, a Sufi order emerged in Senegal, and have followers all over the world. Globalization then turns traditional brotherhoods into neo-brotherhoods by changing the way they operate. 3. Activities are interdependent, so that local activities in different parts of the world are shaped by each other 7 Some reports of globalization classify it as a homogenizing process, “leading to McWorld” (see Herman and McChesney, 1997; Barber, 1995). Others believe that “local characteristics persist, sometimes in the form of fierce religious and ethnic loyalties; sometimes in the form of local foods (McDonald’s), costumes, customs and versions of history” (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 406). More often than not, there is an interplay of ‘global’ and ‘local’, especially given “the abiding importance of nation states and their legislation which is needed to help manage global capitalism. It is true that very often U.S. money and imagery are dominant, and increasingly taken for granted as part of the ‘local’” (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 407). The film industry is a good example of the interplay within globalized media. To get a big coproduction financed, there will usually need to be complex pre-production negotiations with television, video, cable, etc., funders sometimes based in the overseas market where the film will have to sell to recoup its profits. This means that the resulting film may have unexpected elements in it which are far from being local, even local to the U.S. However, this limited degree of diversity will tend to go along with the need for at least one U.S. star, though, again, this may be someone like Catherine Zeta Jones, or Sean Connery, originally coming from outside the U.S. Then in production, the global-local logic of selling big-budget blockbusters tends to mean that films, however local the subject matter, are shot and made globally, across the world. But this is far from a global uniform process: the global locations of such movies are often used at the cost of some damage to local environments; damage which is unlikely done at a First World location like Time Square, New York, for example (see Branston 2000, Chapter 3, and Miller et al. 2001, 197). Muslim food seems to be unable to become a globally enjoyed meal. Some Arab food, such as shawarma, baklawa and shish taouk, but these types of food cannot be as popular as McDonald’s hamburger, Pizza Hut’s pizzas, KFC’s chicken, etc. These Western foods, though originally local, are unique, and children and adults alike enjoy them throughout the world. Similarly, Chinese food, and Chinese noodles are found everywhere, more so than Arab food. The movie industry in the Muslim world is also poor and weak compared to Hollywood. In fact Bollywood is becoming more popular in some parts of the world as opposed to Arab or Iranian films. The music industry is also in the same situation. CD’s of Maria Carey, Celine Dion, Brian Adams are preferred by youths in Southeast Asia as opposed to Arab singers, such as Ummu Kalthum, etc. In fact, after the latter artist, no Arab singer is probably as widely known in the music industry. 4. Activities often involve technologies which make possible instantaneous, as opposed to simply speedy, communications. The electronic demands of supermarket shoppers are scanned instantaneously at checkouts and relayed to the shop’s storerooms. This has abolished the independence of local growth and harvesting circle—for some people. For others, agribusiness means near constant labor, oppressive contracts with supermarket chains, and water dependency. Salads picked and washed in Kenya, on estates using huge amount of precious water, are air-freighted in forty-eight hours to save time for British consumers. 8 Big news items are now broadcast instantaneously, twenty-four hours each day, globally. They often have direct, international effects on jobs and sometimes governments, e.g. news of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the U.S. led to stock market collapses, huge job losses, especially in the air travel and tourism industries, and so on (Branston and Stafford, 2003, 405). The electronic demands of supermarket shoppers and chains have been dominated by Western businessmen, as opposed to Muslim traders. Products might be from the Muslim world, as in Southeast Asia or in Pakistan, or North Africa or Turkey, but the electronic demands and the supermarket chains are owned by the advanced consumer capitalist countries. In fact they set prices for the benefits of the wealthy countries. DEBATES ABOUT GLOBALIZATION Debates on the issue of globalization revolve around the following. First, in addition to the media imperialism model, its ownership emphasis can imply that all U.S. television, for example, unavoidably express only consumerist values, both in programs themselves and via the advertizing which finances them. This ignores image, theme, and information diversities. How can the U.S. television also express production values and Islamic teaching, or how can the Muslim world create their own programs—which are in accordance with Islamic values and also are interesting for the West, and finance them? This the fist challenge for Muslims. Second, the very power of global media, which is actually centralized. Branding can work against the interest of their owners. Global branding of sports people wearing Nike shoes and others, but simultaneously ‘high news profile’ of the stories of child labor in Indonesia and Pakistan by the same corporations (see Klein, 2001). How can the global media cover Islamic issues positively, and remain decentralized? How can branding of Muslim products be liked globally as with Nike, but not exploit child labor, among others? This is the second challenge for Muslims. Third, it is widely believed that consumers make purchases simply as a result of watching such programs. But Roger Silverstone’s metaphor of translation: ‘globalization is a process of translation.’ We believe that Disney and the news of the world are the same everywhere. ‘But we know that it is not’ (Silverstone, 1999, 109). How can Muslims become active receivers, so that they can make their own translation? Thus the meanings are created by the watchers, spectators, and the listeners and the readers. According to Thayer (1987), the audiences are active; the source cannot control the meanings it intends to impart. This is supported by Barker, while global television is a form of cultural power it was suggested that audiences are active creators of meanings and not ‘cultural dopes.’ … “Television does not operate as a hypodermic injection of meaning (because audiences are active) and global television is not best thought of as a form of cultural imperialism. Rather, in contributing to the dislocation of cultural identities from specific places, television is a source for increasingly complex multiple identities and competing discourses of power” (Barker, 1999, 171). Thus, McLuhan’s Global Village (1964), which ‘we’ are now living in, is only rhetoric, as who is the ‘we’ that has access to literacy, telephones, let alone the Internet. One, this inequality applies to part of the First World versus the majority worlds. Thus, how can Muslims play the role of the ‘we’ 9 as well? How can the Muslim world struggle to become the first world, in order to create the best technology and develop science? Two, who controls the agenda of which entries come up first when one types a particular category into a search engine, for example? Of course it is the Western world. Thus, how can Muslims control their own Islamic values agenda, so that which pops up first is about Islamic teachings? So Muslims should create their own search engine, similar to yahoo.com or google.com. Three, active audiences across the world are argued to be able to construct resistant meanings no matter what is on their screens. But what about audiences which seem able to be influenced by unexpected news images, or their favorite fiction? So, Muslims are challenged to make their own news images, or their favorite stories. Four, local and national boundaries, religions, laws, media institutions, taxation structures etc., still exist, and have a huge economic and ideological power. National identities seem transformed, but not obliterated, by globalization. Then, the challenge for Muslim countries is to embody this truly global yet great economic and ideological power, without limiting it to the West, but including also the Muslim world. Five, some critics of globalization call the third world underdeveloped, i. e. deliberately starved of investment, and exploited for few materials (food, oil, minerals which are now key to information technologies) needed by Western powers. Most development always means a move towards Western capitalist standards of inequality, stress, competiveness, damage to the planet, job insecurity? How then can the Muslim world exploit/use its own natural resources for its own benefit, so that development can mean progress towards the Muslim world as well? REFLECTION According to Biddle and Thomas (1996), the role theory deals with actors, action/behavior, the position of the actors, the relation between actors and behavior. In relation to this issue of globalization and Islamic values, there are four possibilities: first, the actors are Muslims who serve as recipients, and Westerners as the sources of globalization. However, it can also be the reverse, as the second possibility: Muslims become the senders, and Westerners are the receivers of Islamic values. Third, another probability: Muslims are sending the message of globalization, and Westerners are sending the message of Islamic tenets. The Fourth possibility is that Muslims and Westerners can serve both the issue of globalization and the Islamic teachings at the same time. Based on the discussion above, we can conclude that the first possibility is the most commonly practiced now in the global world. This means that Muslims become ‘victims’ of the message, when we refer to the dependency theory approach to development, and they become colonized by the 10 imperial rulers, when we refer to cultural imperialism theory (Schiller, 1996). Muslims serve as targets of domination, when we refer to the theory of dominated code of Hall (1981). The second possibility seems to be rare, as the messages of Islam are related to religion in the narrow sense, despite the fact that some non-Muslims have converted to Islam, after reading the website on Islam. The third possibility seems to be in fact not yet touched, despite the fact that Islam is a global religion, and that, from seventh to the 14th century, Muslims contributed to the development of science and philosophy. But this remains a thing of the past. In addition, some Westerners are sending the message of Islam on the web. However, some convey a negative interpretation of Islam or basically an academic critical work on Islam, including some reference work, which are not intended for dakwah. The fourth possibility seems to be the ideal role of both actors. This is what Lee Thayer (1987) calls an interactivity of the senders-receivers. Each can play both roles. The world then will experience an equilibrium. In terms of behavior, using Biddle and Thomas (1996), there are five elements: expectation, norm, performance, evaluation, and sanction. These elements can be seen from the following understanding about the issue of and their reaction to globalization: First, those who believe that globalization is dangerous for Muslims: it will destroy Islamic values. They seem to be controlled by the opinion that globalization is a Western attack on Muslims and Islam. Since Muslims are weak, they are just victims of globalization. These groups cannot do anything, but admit they are defeated. They are sometimes victims of globalization. They have no expectation and admit the norm brought along by Western principles of globalization. They admire the performance of globalization, do no evaluate let alone sanction it. These are lay persons. Second, those are from academics, who tend to react critically to globalization, by trying to express their opinions through writing or speaking. Of course they are not violent, as they are also using an academic approach to criticism, using data and evidence to back up their arguments. They expect that the Western globalization should be fair to Muslims, and that Muslims should be selective in receiving the Western media messages. They are critical about the Western norm and performance that come along with globalization. They are also worried about the first above. They see (evaluate) the West being central in destroying the belief of Muslims. And warn Muslims to be critical and creative of their own media. They call for a sanction of Western domination over Muslims and the rest of the world. In Roy’s words, what is new in the current wave of globalization is that the making of Muslim minorities is carried out through a process of deculturation, in which none of the previous cultural markers is retained” (Roy, 2004, 108). More specifically, ”they fear forces of a globalization will lead to greater Western economic penetration of Muslim countries. The result, they fear, will be continued in a Muslim dependence on the West and a free market economy that is geared only toward maximizing profits, which may increase the growing gap between rich and poor. Finally, they fear a contagious Western culture whose retail stores, advertising, music, media, and dress can erode traditional Muslim religious ideals and threaten the identity and values of Muslim youth” (Esposito, 2002, 162). 11 Third, those who are trying to react to globalization by demonstrating, bringing groups of people to gather in front of Western embassies, or the World Bank, IMF, WTO, APEC conference, and UN offices. They expect globalization to be stopped, as the norm and principles are not fair to the rest of the world. They judge (evaluate) the performance of globalization to be enriching themselves while the rest of the world is poorer and poorer. They see “globalization as de-ethnicizing Islam.” … “The endeavor to build a community whose sole criterion is religious faith presupposes the negation of any specific culture and ethnicity” (Roy, 2004, 146). These are usually from among activists of the civil society organization. Fourth, small of people who claim to be representing Muslims but they are basically hijacking the Muslims, by attacking the Western center of power and economy, such as the World Trade Centre, the Pentagon. The same norm is believed as in the third above, but adding it a fierce sanction with violence and with a narrow interpretation of Islamic norms, different from the mainstream majority on the beliefs of Muslims. These minority groups are from al-Qaeda and the like (see Williams, 2002). For Roy, “this jihadist discourses and targets often overlap those of the leftist antiglobalization movement. A Saudi sheikh who supported Osama Bin Laden, al-Hilali, called for attacks on major symbols of US interest — McDonald’s, a favorite target of anti-globalization militants.” The means are different but the target — anti imperialism are similar. Halal McDonald’s is fine but not otherwise (Roy, 2004, 46; Barber, 1995). In addition, for Roy, “neo-fundamentalism, which goes along with a distrust of state and nationalism, is better adapted to economic globalization and the free market. A good example for this is again, the Bin Laden family business, which was built on a close patronage relationship with the Saudi royal family that allowed to develop a supranational holding)” (Roy, 2004, 173). Fifth, there is also a group of people who try to compete with the West by trying to master science and technology, including ICT and nuclear power for human welfare. They act very peacefully, and expect to be able to compete with the West in making another alternative of globalization that brings along Islamic values. The norm they are struggling for is science and technology. They believe that they have to perform well. They tend to adopt self-criticism, by sanctioning themselves to invent and search for new science. In Roy’s words (2004, 26), “globalization can be accommodated through a liberal reformist view of Islam, a charismatic and spiritual approach, or a neofundamentalist stress on law and rituals.” For this group, he continues, “globalization is an opportunity, not a loss. It may also provide an antidote against cultural Westernization, because when Muslims are cut off from pristine cultures that were for them largely influenced by non-Islamic customs and traditions, an opportunity presents itself to reconstruct a Muslim community based solely on Islamic tenets. … The quest for AN explicit formulation is part of individualization” (Ibid, 2002, 29-30). These people are mostly scientists and researchers (see Ramadan, 1999). Regarding the position of the actors of Islamic values and globalization principles, there are three factors: first are the characteristics, such as sex, tribe, and nation. In this case, the characteristics are related to the nation, with the advanced nations on one side and the Muslim countries on the other. Second is the profession, such as athlete, leader, and villain. In this case Muslims see the West as the source of negative elements (villains) and as the leader of globalization, and the West sees Muslims as the source of Islamic values, with leaders are often portrayed as violent and fundamentalists. Third is the reaction of an actor to another actor. In this regard, Muslims may react to the West, and 12 the West also reacts to Muslims negatively, such as after acts of terrorism and the Western ‘invasion’ into Muslim countries. Actors and behaviors have similarities and differences. Both Muslims and the West are different in their values. However, we can also see some similarities, for example: both tend to be global, and want to spread the values and principles of their own to other parts of the world. Interdependency of both actors is also at work. Thus, Muslims are dependent on the West in the latter’s ICTs, and the West also is dependent on Muslims to use these ICTs, or to learn their know-how. To do all these, each needs adjustments, and accuracy. We also notice that each of the movements is rooted in a particular cultural tradition, and often in local conditions: they share some features: One, the movements are reactions to the secularization and the world economy and domination resulting from the expansion of colonial powers. Two, each is historically oriented and interprets contemporary global events (debt, crisis, war, ethnic strife, and disease) as divine portents that validate their central doctrines. Each fears decline and lack of faith in whatever religious principles it espouses. Three, each has designs on state power and have adopted political structures to attain that end, either to gain control over a nation state, or to establish their own, independent state (see Hayanes, 1998). Four, all insist that while converting others to their own, believers should keep themselves separate from non-believers. Five, each makes a strong appeal to young people, particularly college students, and have developed organization to reach them. Six, each has a militant segment that challenges the power of the secular state by disobeying secular laws, a call to higher law. Seven, most stress the importance of family in social life. Some emphasize that women should stay home. Eight, they feel that the economic problems of today are caused by moral degeneration (Robbins, 2002, 347). CONCLUSION As it is a religion of global audiences, and indeed, it proved to be true in the pre-modern globalization, Islam should be able to play an important role once again in a global context. Not only in terms of language (Arabic) and other major Islamic languages, such as Malay-Indonesian, Urdu, Persian, Turkish, and Swahili, but also in terms of culture and civilization, Islam should be able to compete in the positive sense with other religions, area, and regions. Now is the time for Muslims to the comprehensive elements of communication. They see the media as a tool or channel (wasilah) for Islamic messages. They should be serving as a good source (da’i) of information about Islam. They should create their own search engines, providers, satellites, blogs or websites with an excellent performance, attractive, comprehensive information, at least in the form of mailing lists. The information should be covering all aspects of Islamic messages (madda/maudu’)), such as philosophy, law, theology, mysticism, arts, humanities, education, and the modern development of Muslims. Classical, medieval, and modern references should be accessible. Recent publications should be available. Face-book and Twitter and the like should be used maximally for the purpose of Islamic dakwah and education. As a result, effective (athar) dakwah will be achieved. All these elements of Harold Lasswell model of communication (1960) should be sponsored sufficiently by the Muslims philanthropist and governments. 13 Muslims should develop their own film industries, videos, music and arts, which are attractive to the global audience. Not only to Muslims, but also to anyone interested to access Islamic messages. By so doing, the negative information about Islam or inappropriate human behavior posted on several websites should be corrected by these positive postings. As for being a receiver, the active reception model is more relevant to Muslims, as the effective message depends on the receivers, who is the one constructing the meanings. Muslims should be able to use the Western media facilities and know-how to channel their Islamic teachings for dakwah and education. Thus globalization should be grasped, rather than hated and avoided. Globalization is indeed an opportunity, a challenge for Muslims to develop their creativity. Creativity should thus be highly sponsored, not only in broadcasting networks, as the original Al-Jazeera, but also in other types of media. References Barber, Benjamin R. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld, Terrorism Chanllenge to Democracy. New York, Ballantine Books. Barker, Chris (1999). Television, Globalization, and Cultural Identities. Buckingham: Open University Press. Biddle, B. J. and E. J. Thomas, eds. (1996). Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York: Wiley. Billig, Michael (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage. Branston, Gill (2000). Cinema and Cultural Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press. Branston, Gill and Roy Stafford (2003). The Media Student’s Book. London: Routledge. Esposito, John L. (2002). What Everyone Needs to Know about Islam. Oxford: University Press. Hall, Stuart (1991). “The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity,” in A. King, ed. Culture, Globalization and the World System. London: Macmillan. Hall, Stuart (1981). “Encoding/Decoding.” In Stuart Hal et al., eds. Culture, Media, and Language. London: Hutchinson. Hayanes, Jeff (1998). Religion in Global Politics. London: Longman. Herman, Ed and Robert McChesney (1997). The Global Media: The New Visionaries of Corporate Capitalism. London: Cassell. Klein, Naomi (2001). No Logo. London: Famigo. Lasswell, H. W. (1960). “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society.” In Scramm, W., ed. Mass Communication. Illinois: University of Illinois. 14 McLuhan, Marshall (1964). Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. London: Routledge. Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York. Oxford University Press. Miller, et al. (2002). Global Hollywood. London: Arnold. Rahman, Fazlul (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ramadan, Tariq (1999. To Be a European Muslim: A Study of Islamic Sources in the European Context. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation. Robins, Richard H. (2002). Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Roy, Oliver (2004). Globalized Islam, The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press. Silverstone, Roger (1999). Why Study the Media? London: Sage. Schiller, Herbert I. (1996). Information Inequality. London: Routledge. Thayer, Lee (1987). On Communivation: Essays in Understanding. Newood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Company. Thomlison, John (1999). Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity. Thompson, John B. (1997). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity. Williams, Paul L. (2002). Al-Qaeda Brotherhood of Terror. Alpha, a Pearson Education Company. 15