* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Psy 202 – Lecture 14 (11/15/05)
Interpersonal attraction wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
System justification wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Have you ever… - accepted a free sample and then bought something you really didn’t need? - done something silly or dangerous with a group of friends that you would never have done while alone? - seen a stranded motorist while driving down a busy highway and not stopped to help? - made negative remarks about members of another group after a member of that group got a job, a spot on a sports team, or a scholarship you wanted? Social Psychology: How do other people* and social situations* affect individual behavior*, attitudes, perceptions and motives? * Ordinary people * Social variables * Everyday behavior Power of situation - but social situations sometimes “blend” into background. Birds of feather flock together - Similarity - in trivial stuff (same b-day) - In more important stuff (political view) Birds of feather flock together OR Opposites attract? Usually similarity wins, although in some traits (dominance), complementary would make us happier Categorization: How similar to me is she? - ‘Us’ vs. ‘them’ Categorization: ingroup: group which we identify with outgroup: group with which we do not identify minimal groups: meaningless groups formed by grouping strangers on the basis of trivial criteria (paintings) Results: – I like ‘us’ better, – I share more of my money 1) We like members of our in-group better and are nicer to them than members of out-groups. sororities - not so highly respected groups especially likely to put down out-group members. 2) out-group homogeneity: perception that members of out-group are all alike-- more similar to each other than they really are, and more similar to each other than members of the in-group are to each other. Also, more likely to recall distinguishing information about members of our in-group stereotype: generalization about a group of people - Frenchmen are good lovers - Chinese are good at math Stereotype threat - concern among members of a negatively stereotyped group about confirming a negative stereotype. contact hypothesis: prejudice will be reduced if different groups have a chance to interact with each other. conditions under which contact works: - equal status (white supervisor, black worker) - personal interactions (not just TV) - cooperative activities - social norms in favor of reducing prejudice