* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ppt - Pavel Stránský
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Basil Hiley wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
INTERPLAY BETWEEN REGULARITY AND CHAOS IN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SYSTEMS Pavel Stránský European Centre for theoretical studies in nuclear physics and related areas Trento, Italy Complexity and multidiscipline: new approaches to health 18 April 2012 Physics of the 1st kind: CODING Complex behaviour → Simple equations Physics of the 2nd kind: DECODING Simple equations → Complex behaviour Hamiltonian It describes (for example): Motion of a star around a galactic centre, assuming the motion is restricted to a plane (Hénon-Heiles model) 1. Classical physics Collective motion of an atomic nucleus (Bohr model) 2. Quantum physics 1. Classical physics 1. Classical chaos Trajectories (solutions of the equations of motion) y x 1. Classical chaos Trajectories We plot a point every time when a trajectory crosses a given line (y = 0) (solutions of the equations of motion) vx y x vx chaotic case – “fog” (hypersensitivity of the motion on the initial conditions) Section at y=0 ordered case – “circles” x Poincaré sections Coexistence of quasiperiodic (ordered) and chaotic types of motion 1. Classical chaos Trajectories We plot a point every time when a trajectory crosses a given line (y = 0) (solutions of the equations of motion) vx y Phase space x 4D space comprising coordinates and velocities vx chaotic case – “fog” (hypersensitivity of the motion on the initial conditions) Section at y=0 ordered case – “circles” x Poincaré sections Coexistence of quasiperiodic (ordered) and chaotic types of motion 1. Classical chaos Fraction of regularity Measure of classical chaos Surface of the section covered with regular trajectories Total kinematically accessible surface of the section vx REGULAR area CHAOTIC area freg=0.611 x 1. Classical chaos Complete map of classical chaos chaotic Phase transition Totally regular limits Veins of regularity regular control parameter Highly complex behaviour encoded in a simple equation P. Stránský, P. Hruška, P. Cejnar, Phys. Rev. E 79 (2009), 046202 2. Quantum Physics 2. Quantum chaos Discrete energy spectrum Spectral density: smooth part oscillating part given by the volume of the classical phase space Gutzwiller formula (the sum of all classical periodic trajectories and their repetitions) The oscillating part of the spectral density can give relevant information about quantum chaos (related to the classical trajectories) Unfolding: A transformation of the spectrum that removes the smooth part of the level density Note: Improved unfolding procedure using the Empirical Mode Decomposition method in: I. Morales et al., Phys. Rev. E 84, 016203 (2011) 2. Quantum chaos Spectral statistics Nearestneighbor spacing distribution P(s) Poisson s REGULAR system Brody Wigner CHAOTIC system distribution parameter w - Artificial interpolation between Poisson and GOE distribution - Measure of chaoticity of quantum systems 2. Quantum chaos Quantum chaos - examples Billiards They are also extensively studied experimentally Schrödinger equation: (for wave function) Helmholtz equation: (for intensity of el. field) 2. Quantum chaos Quantum chaos - applications Riemann z function: Prime numbers Riemann hypothesis: All points z(s)=0 in the complex plane lie on the line s=½+iy (except trivial zeros on the real exis s=–2,–4,–6,…) GUE Zeros of z function 2. Quantum chaos Quantum chaos - applications GOE Correlation matrix of the human EEG signal P. Šeba, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), 198104 2. Quantum chaos Ubiquitous in the nature (many time signals or space characteristics of complex systems have 1/f power spectrum) 1/f noise - Fourier transformation of the time series constructed from energy levels fluctuations dn = 0 dk d4 Power spectrum d3 k d2 d1 = 0 a=2 a=2 a=1 CHAOTIC system REGULAR system Direct comparison of 3 measures of chaos A. Relaño et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 244102 (2002) E. Faleiro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 244101 (2004) a=1 J. M. G. Gómez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 084101 (2005) 2. Quantum chaos Peres lattices A tool for visualising quantum chaos (an analogue of Poincaré sections) Lattice: energy Ei versus the mean value of a (nearly) arbitrary operator P Integrable lattice always ordered for any operator P nonintegrable B=0 partly ordered, partly disordered B = 0.445 <P> <P> regular E E regular chaotic A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1711 (1984) 2. Quantum chaos Peres lattices in GCM Small perturbation affects only a localized part of the lattice (The place of strong level interaction) B=0 B = 0.005 B = 0.05 B = 0.24 Narrow band due to ergodicity <L2> Peres lattices for two different operators Remnants of regularity <H’> E Integrable Increasing perturbation Empire of chaos P. Stránský, P. Hruška, P. Cejnar, Phys. Rev. E 79 (2009), 066201 2. Quantum chaos Dependence on the classicality parameter <L2> Zoom into the sea of levels E Dependence of the Brody parameter on energy 2. Quantum chaos Classical and quantum measures - comparison B = 0.24 Classical measure B = 1.09 Quantum measure (Brody) 2. Quantum chaos 1/f noise Mixed dynamics A = 0.25 regularity a-1 Calculation of a: Each point – averaging over 32 successive sets of 64 levels in an energy window 1-w freg E Appendix. sin exp x Appendix Fourier transform Fourier basis Signal Fourier transform calculates an “overlap” between the signal and a given basis How to construct a signal with the 1/f noise power spectrum? (reverse engineering) 1. Interplay of many basic stationary modes … Appendix 2. sin exp x Features: • A very simple analytical prescription • An Intrinsic Mode Function (one single frequency at any time) Enjoy the last slide! Summary Thank you for your attention 1. Simple toy models can serve as a theoretical laboratory useful to understand and master complex behaviour. 2. Methods of classical and quantum chaos can be applied to study more sophisticated models or to analyze signals that even originate in different sciences http://www-ucjf.troja.mff.cuni.cz/~geometric http://www.pavelstransky.cz