* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011
Distributed morphology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive semantics wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Dependency grammar wikipedia , lookup
Musical syntax wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Focus (linguistics) wikipedia , lookup
American Sign Language grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sloppy identity wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Probabilistic context-free grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Junction Grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Language and Cognition Colombo, June 2011 Day 2 Introduction to Linguistic Theory, Part 4 Plan • Syntactic movement • Theta theory (syntax meets semantics) Transformational grammar • Chomsky (1957, 1965) – Two stages phrase structures for a sentence • Build Deep Structure – Build from phrase structure rules – One constituent at a time S --> NP VP VP --> V (NP) NP --> (A) (ADJ) N • Convert to Surface Structure – Built from transformations that operate on the deep structure » Adding, deleting, moving – Operate on entire strings of constituents Transformational grammar • 1 deep structure, 2 surface structures: – Active/passive sentences: • The man bit the dog. • The dog was bitten by the man. Passive transformation rule: NP1 + V + NP2 ---> NP2 + be + V + -en + by + NP1 • 2 deep structures, 1 surface structure: • Sherlock saw the man with binoculars Syntactic movement • The sailor is kissing the girl • Who is the sailor kissing? • The sailor is kissing who • Who is the sailor tis kissing tthe girl/who? Psycholinguistic evidence for trace • evidence for reactivation of moved constituent at the trace position Deep structure S NP Surface structure S VP NP VP The car VP NP PP was put the car in the garage NP PP was put (trace) in the garage probe Movement transformation VP Some “activation” of car Cross modal priming experiments I to C movement Bruce can play the didgeridoo. Can Bruce play the didgeridoo? He might annoy the neighbours. Might he annoy the neighbours? He has lost his mind. Has he lost his mind? The earplugs are helping. Are the earplugs helping? • In each of the derived questions above, the auxiliary verb {can, might, has, are}has moved from its original position to the front of the sentence • This kind of movement, previously referred to as ‘Subject-Auxiliary Inversion’, is now described as I to C movement I to C movement • Notice that S = IP • C is a functional head that has a projection higher than the level of the sentence • The moved element is shown with an arrow attached, linking it to its original position • The trace of movement is marked with a t Under the old system… What about empty Infl? • Insertion of a dummy auxiliary – a placeholder Multiple movements Let’s do one together…. • Using either PS rules or the X-bar style trees, draw diagrams for the following sentences, showing the movement: – The boy ate the apple – Did the boy eat the apple? – What did the boy eat? Introduction to theta theory • Sentence = predicate (an expression denoting an event or a state) and a set of arguments (the participants in the event) • The arguments of a verb = the subject and object • Complements of verbs = objects: they are positioned inside the first projection of the V, so they are called internal arguments • Subjects are positioned outside the verb’s first projection, so they are called external arguments • But arguments can be understood in different ways – they play different roles in the events denoted by the predicate • a typology of thematic roles Thematic roles • Theme or Patient: • Agent or Causer: • Experiencer: • Recipient or Possessor: • Goal: entity undergoing the effect of some action Mary fell over the instigator of some action John kissed Mary entity experiencing some psychological state Bill felt sad entity receiving or possessing something Mary got John a gift entity towards which something moves John went home Mapping • It’s not enough to “know” (implicitly) what the structure of a sentence is • We also have to know how to interpret the structure • So we need knowledge of thematic roles • Thematic roles are assigned in structural relations – e.g. the Verb assigns a thematic role (usually Theme) to its complement • Items in other positions get other thematic roles – Agent is usually in specifier position near the verb (sister to a higher projection) • Some lexical items assign specific thematic roles – e.g. prepositions like by Mapping • This all becomes very important when we look at grammatical knowledge in aphasia • Theta-roles: assignment of interpretive roles to syntactic objects subject verb object Grammatical roles John kissed Mary Theta roles Agent Patient • Non-canonical word order reliance on grammatical structure object verb subject John was kissed by Mary Agent?? • To be continued….. Patient??