Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
COST Action BM1007 Mast Cells and Basophils – Targets for Innovative Therapies 2nd Training School The Search for Mast Cell and Basophil Models – Are We Getting Closer to Pathophysiological Relevance? January 20-21, 2014 – Jerusalem, Israel Abstract Group 4 Mast cell deficient mouse models Trainer: Francesca Levi-Schaffer Trainees: Yu Fang, Hans Juergen Hoffmann, Ofir Klein, Desiree Ludwig, Carolin Sieber In the field of mast cell and basophil research, the most used experimental tools are based on murine models. Regarding basophils not much research on animal models has been carried out as yet. In general, we can distinguish between two types of mast cell deficient mouse models: c-Kitdependent models and c-Kit-independent models. Until recently the c-Kit dependent models were the most commonly. However, these models have been shown to be not only depleting mast cells, but also impair many other immune cells thus possibly affect a broad range of physiological mechanisms. Therefore, new mouse models have been created that do not depend on c-Kit mutations in order to avoid a broad effect on other immune cells. In our presentation we focus on three different mast cell deficient mouse models and a basophil deficient mouse model. C57BL/6-Kitw-sh / C.B6-Kit w-sh mouse model For many years, the mouse models used for allergy research were mouse exhibiting a pronounced Th1 phenotype (C57Bl). However, human allergic reaction exhibits a pronounced Th2 phenotype. In order to better understand the human allergic reaction, Becker et al. generated a BALB/c mouse carrying the Kitw-sh inversion mutation, termed C.B6 w-sh. Surprisingly, while C.B6 w-sh do not develop a passive cutaneous reaction in the ear, the C.B6 w-sh mouse develop airway hypersensitivity response in the absence of mast cells, and in contrast to the common model mouse – C57BL/6-Kitw-sh. Mas-TRECK and Bas-TRECK mouse model Another newly established mast cell-deficient mouse model is the Mas-TRECK and Bas-TRECK mouse, based on Diphtheria toxin (DT) conditional deletion system using IL4 enhancer elements previously shown to be specific for IL-4 transcription in mast cells or basophils. DT treatment of Bas-TRECK mice resulted in specific deletion of basophils, whereas both mast cells and basophils were deleted in Mas-TRECK mice. These selectively conditional mast cell or basophil depletion models enable the researchers to better distinguish the role of mast cells and basophils in several pathological processes induced by IgE, including passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) and systemic anaphylaxis, and also in a non-adjuvant-induced chronic asthma model. Results generated from this model clearly show that mast cells are responsible for the immediate type I allergic response that 1 may lead to anaphylaxis, while basophils play a role in the late phase response. Mast cells but not basophils are involved in development of chronic airway hypersensitivity. Cre-Master mouse model The Cre-Master mouse model is a mast cell deficient mouse model based on Cre mediated genotoxicity. By expression of Cre under the mast cell specific Cpa3 promoter, mast cells undergo apoptosis when they start to express Cpa3. This model does not depend on c-kit dependent mutations or on the injection of DT toxin. So far there is only a minor reduction of basophils observed and no other described defects of other immune cells by the Cpa-dependent Cre deletion mechanism in these mice. Therefore this is an excellent model for a constitutive deletion model of mast cells. Conclusion During the last years several new mouse models have been created that to not dependent on c-kit mutations and therefore offer a more regulated deletion of mast cells. Not only constitutive but also inducible mouse models for mast cell deficiency are now available to allow detailed analysis of mast cell functions in vivo. Although these models exhibit less off target changes in the immune system compared to c-kit dependent models there are still differences especially concerning the number of basophils. It is worthwhile to analyse better this model to ensure that the model is only mast cell deficient and does not affect other cells like innate lymphoid cells or other innate immune cells involved in Th-2 and other responses. Also the influence of the microbiota should be addressed in these mice. Moreover the induction of apoptosis of mast cells within the tissue may also influence the outcome of the results. Not all disease models are transferable from human to mouse. Therefore the use of humanized mouse models or the expansion of human experimentation should also be considered. To sum up for every experimental setup the possibility of either using an inducible or constitutive mast cell deficient mouse model as well as the number and role of basophils and additional cells that may influence your settings should be considered. Not only the mast cell deficient mouse model should be carefully chosen but also the disease model and the experimental set up should be appropriate to the experimental question. 2