* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Innate responses of B cells
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
3304 David Gray et al. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 Mini-Review: Innate responses of B cells David Gray1, Mohini Gray2 and Tom Barr1 1 2 Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Labs, Edinburgh, UK MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK In this review, we describe the non-antibody-mediated functions of B cells within the immune system. In addition to antibody production, B cells also present antigen to T cells, programme T cell differentiation and regulate effector T cell responses and much of this is mediated by the cytokines they make. We focus on the potential of B cells to perform these functions simply as a result of activation via 'innate' receptors (e.g. Tolllike receptors) and often independently of BCR ligation. We feel an appreciation of these broad and often antigen-nonspecific functions is important at a time when there is an increasing use of B cell depletion as a therapy for autoimmune disease. Introduction B cells are best known as antibody producing cells. Antibodies are a first line defence against infection and most vaccines work because they elicit a protective antibody response. However, there is darker side to antibody production if the B cells have a BCR specificity that reacts with components of self. The autoantibodies they make can then precipitate the panoply of inflammatory responses leading to the whole range of autoimmune diseases. It is perhaps not surprising, therefore, that clinicians wishing to alleviate symptoms and possibly treat the cause of autoimmune diseases in man should identify B cell depletion as an attractive therapy. The biological reagent (e.g. Rituximab), binding to the B cell-specific molecule CD20, already existed Correspondence: Dr. David Gray, Institute of Immunology & Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Labs, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK Fax: +44-131-650-7322 e-mail: [email protected] Abbreviations: CIA: collagen-induced arthritis PRR: pattern recognition receptors f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Received 6/8/07 Revised 10/9/07 Accepted 16/10/07 [DOI 10.1002/eji.200737728] Key words: Antigen presenting cells B lymphocytes Cytokines Innate immunity Toll-like receptors and was tried and tested in the treatment of nonHodgkins lymphomas [1]. The results of B cell depletion in treating a number of diseases have been more than promising [2–4] and so far the predicted drawbacks have not materialised. The most obvious potential side effect is that the patient becomes immuno-compromised and, therefore, susceptible to infection. The audit of B cell-depleted patients does not indicate any increased rate of infection, however, it is early days and much of the data derive from lymphoma patients. Still, it may be that the observed maintenance of circulating antibodies specific for previous infections or vaccinations provides sufficient protection [5]. However, if we are to deplete B cells from people over long periods, we should be aware of the many non-antibody related functions of B cells and the potential ensuing effects if the B cell compartment is ablated. In this short review, we will demonstrate that B cell function in vivo is much more complex and diverse than simply making antibodies. B cells present antigen to T cells and then via mechanisms that involve both co-stimulation and cytokine production, they influence T cell differentiation and then, finally regulate the T cell response. www.eji-journal.eu Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 B cell activation As part of the adaptive immune system B cells carry somatically re-arranged receptors (BCR) that they use to recognise, bind and internalise specific antigen. In most B cells this means that they have a single specificity for antigen and can respond only to that antigen by initiating a signal transduced into the cell via BCRassociated molecules such as CD79a and b. However, B cells can also be activated by a range of stimuli, independently of the BCR. For mouse B cells the classic mitogenic stimulus is lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [6], that we now know activates cells via a complex binding to LPS-binding protein (LBP), CD14 and Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 [7]. Thus, LPS activation is a paradigm for the non-antigen-specific activation of B cells via innate receptors. Recently, it has become clear that B cells express most TLR and can respond to a variety of TLR ligands [8, 9], such as TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, TLR7 and TLR9. Their response to these stimuli can be to proliferate, to differentiate into antibody secreting cells, to become more efficient antigen-presenting cells (APC), or to secrete cytokines. Clearly, the responses of B cells to antigens in their environment are not solely mediated through the BCR. Crucially, B cells, as with all other APC, can respond to broad classes of antigen (pathogen) via innate, pattern recognition receptors (PRR) and as a result influence immune activation in the vicinity. This means that the response of the one of the major lymphocyte populations in secondary lymphoid tissues (up to 50% of cells) to pathogens expressing combinations of PRR ligands is initially driven, not by Ag-specific stimuli, but rather by the activation of PRR. TLR activation of B cells and antibody secretion The idea, mentioned above, that B cells when activated via TLR differentiate to become antibody-producing plasma cells (T-independent responses) is not a controversial one. However, in the last year or two, studies have been published, indicating that T-dependent antibody responses also require TLR activation of B cells [10, 11]. The prevailing view prior to this had been that antigen-specific signals, through the BCR, in conjunction with help from T cells (CD40 ligand + cytokines) were sufficient for B cells to make antibodies to T-dependent antigens. The fact that T-dependent antibody responses are impaired in mice deficient in MyD88 (a TLR signalling adaptor protein) was thought to be due to a failure of T cell priming in association with dendritic cells (DC). Now, Pasare and Medzhitov [10] have suggested that MyD88-signalling is required also in B cells. This conclusion has not been met with universal f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Highlights approval. Nemazee and colleagues [12] have produced equally puzzling data to indicate that T-dependent antibody responses proceed quite normally in MyD88/ TRIF double knockout mice that cannot transduce any TLR signal. They propose that PRR stimuli other than TLR are at work. The truth may lie somewhere in between, with particular subclasses of antibody being more or less dependent on TLR signals to B cells. For instance, several papers show that switching to the IgG2a isotype (IgG2c in C57BL/6 mice) is determined by and may require TLR9 signalling [13–15]. Our own data on this from chimeras in which the B cell compartment is MyD88-deficient, also show that the IgG2a response to a variety of antigens is severely impaired and interestingly so is the IgM response (TB and DG, unpublished data), while all other IgG subclass responses are normal. TLRmediated IL-6 production may be a significant driver of the IgM response [16]. TLR have been proposed to sustain long-lived serum antibody responses by stimulating (intermittently) differentiation of memory B cells into the long-lived bone marrow plasma cell pool [17]. Again, this is controversial as it circumvents the need for T cell help for antibody secretion, with the attendant check on production of autoantibodies by somatically mutated, self-reactive memory cells. An alternative explanation may be provided by the observation of Drner, Radbruch and colleagues [18, 19] that the antigennonspecific plasma cells seen on boosting are the result of mobilization of plasma cells from the bone marrow and not the bystander activation of memory cells. The absolute need for T cell help in the initiation of autoantibody production has also been called into question by Marshak-Rothstein [20] and Shlomchik [21] who have shown that co-ligation of BCR and TLR by autoantigen (e.g. DNA or RNA containing complexes) can cause autoantibody to be made, which in turn enhances delivery of Ab-autoAg complexes to TLRcontaining processing compartment in plasmacytoid DC [22]. This will initiate autoreactive T cell activation and so amplify the autoantibody response. Interestingly, the development of autoimmunity (lupus), including autoantibodies in BAFF-transgenic mice proceeds in the absence of any T cells [23]. B cells as APC in vivo The dogma that most B cells possess just a single antigenspecificity has led to the notion that B cells are only effective APC for the antigen to which their BCR binds. This is largely true in vitro when B cells are given a protein antigen for which they have no BCR specificity; they present it very poorly, especially in comparison to DC [24]. On the other hand they are just as efficient as www.eji-journal.eu 3305 3306 David Gray et al. DC when their BCR recognises the antigen [24]. This has led to the perception that B cells do not contribute as APC in primary responses, as there are too few antigenspecific B cells available. The role of B cells in priming T cells has long been controversial with data from B celldeficient mice both for [25–27] and against [28, 29]. Recently, data have appeared suggesting that B cells may contribute surprisingly early. First, bone marrow chimeric mice, in which the B cell compartment lacks MHC class II, exhibit an impairment of T cell activation that can be seen at very early time points (day 3) following immunization [30]. Secondly, in studies using an mAb to detect specific peptide-MHC class II complex on the surface of APC, the appearance of presumably immunogenic material on B cells is within hours [31] or even minutes [32] after intradermal injection of the antigen. Pape et al. [32] go on to show that follicular B cells acquire soluble antigen diffusing from the subcapsular sinus in lymph nodes draining sites of immunization, in a process that does not require intermediary DC. This stimulates them to move to the follicular-T zone border where cognate interaction with T cells occurs [32]. The groups of Batista [33] and Cyster [34] have since shown that particulate (bacterial) antigens [33] and immune complexes [34] are also picked up by B cells in the region of the subcapsular sinus. In the spleen, marginal zone B cells have long been implicated in this process [35–37]; there are B cells in lymph nodes that resemble marginal zone B cells [38]. It may also be significant that marginal zone B cells are demonstrably the most efficient B cell APC [39]. None of this usurps the role of DC in initial priming of T cells; naive B cells are still generally thought of as tolerogenic in their interaction with naive T cells [40, 41]. However, it does suggest that very soon after infection/immunization (within hours, not days), B cells are actively contributing to the antigen-presenting/T cell programming activity. How can this be if frequencies of antigen-specific B cells are so low? Several possibilities spring to mind. (i) Antigen-specific or cross-reactive B cells exist at higher frequencies than we currently appreciate. (ii) The lymphoid organs (especially the lymph nodes) are designed to allow the antigen-specific cellular interactions at very low frequency for the production of antibody responses (proposed by Jenkins and colleagues [32]). (iii) B cells can take up and present antigen via receptors other than the BCR. Thus, antigens that carry PRR (e.g. TLR) may be more effectively taken up by B cells. Antigen-nonspecific B cells have been shown, in vivo, to acquire soluble protein, process and present it [42]. Furthermore, TLR ligands on the same particle and in the same endocytic compartment of APC enable efficient presentation to and activation of CD4 T cells [43]. This evidence does not address whether this is f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 related to enhanced Ag uptake, however, TLR11 and/or associated molecules do seem to be involved in the uptake of the Toxoplasma gondii antigen, profilin [44]. Interestingly, the recent demonstration of antigen capture by B cells in the subcapsule of lymph nodes and subsequent transport to the follicle is an antigennonspecific process, requiring the B cells to express complement receptor 2 (CR2); however, there is no indication that the antigen is taken up, processed and presented to T cells [34]. The basis in physiological reality of these possibilities needs much more investigation. We have not considered here B cell presentation in the establishment and perpetuation of autoimmune disease; unfortunately it is beyond the scope of this brief review; see the reviews [5, 45] for a proper treatment of the topic. B cell cytokines and T cell programming B cells, like other APC, have a programming function in T cell differentiation and this is mediated by the secretion of cytokines. B cells are known to make a wide range of cytokines [46, 47]. Lund and colleagues [46] have characterised cytokine-secreting B cells into subsets similar to Th1 and Th2, so-called Be1 (making IFN-c and IL-12) and Be2 (making IL-4) (Be = B effector); both subsets make IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 [46]. The cytokine production by B cells, however, needs to be distinguished as either “primary” or “secondary”. Primary production is elicited by primary stimuli, such as TLR, while secondary production requires the interaction of activated B cells with activated helper T cells. For instance, we can find no primary stimuli that elicit IL-4 production by B cells; however, if they are allowed to interact with IL-4-secreting, activated Th2 cells, they too will begin to make IL-4 [48]. In vivo this may be important for the establishment of Th2 immunity during infection [49]. We have found that TLR ligands are the most potent stimuli for production of cytokine by B cells and that this can be augmented by T cell-derived costimuli such as CD40L [8]. Although B cells do make cytokines when both BCR and CD40 are stimulated, we find that the cross-linking of BCR on TLRactivated B cells is often an inhibitor of cytokine production [8]. Several models have provided evidence for the programming role of B cells in the development of Th2 responses [50, 51]. The basis of this might be related to IL-4 production [48], to delivery of co-stimuli such as OX40L [26, 52] or ICOSL [53, 54] or their production of IL-10 (down-regulating Th1 responses) [47]. The role of B cells in the induction of other types of response has received less attention. In relation to Th1 differentiation, B cells make very little IL-12; on a per cell basis, they www.eji-journal.eu Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 make 1000-fold less than DC [8], although one could argue that this might be important if large numbers of B cells are making it after polyclonal activation. B cells also make IFN-c in response to combinations of TLR ligands (e.g. TLR2, 4 and 9), but not to single stimuli [8]. It has been noted by Mastroeni and colleagues [55] that B cell-deficient mice do not mount protective Th1 responses to Salmonella typhimurium. Th1 development is also impaired in chimeras in which B cells do not express MyD88 and so is related to the TLR-mediated activation of B cells; however, it does not require them to make IFN-c (TB and DG, unpublished observations). B cells make significant amounts of IL-6 in response to a variety of stimuli and exhibit TGFb message, although the stimuli required for secretion of active TGFb have not been defined. Any role for B cells delivering these two cytokines in Th17 generation [56] remains to be investigated. B cells are not homogenous and there are differences in the propensity of different subsets to make cytokines. In relation to subsets, IL-10 has been most intensively studied. B1 B cells were the first to be recognised as IL-10 producers [57] and this is reflected in the role of neonatal CD5+ B cells in dampening acute inflammation in new born mice, by producing IL-10 [58, 59]. In adult mice, we find that marginal zone (MZ) B cells and B1 cells produce most IL-10 in response to TLR ligands (TLR2, 4 and 9), while, in comparison, follicular cells make very little [8], an observation supported by other labs [60]. Other workers have suggested that transitional T2 B cells are the main IL-10 producers [61], although how this fits with their transient, differentiating nature is unclear. Interestingly, in our hands, a dichotomy in cytokine production exists as MZ B cells make IL-10 and no IFN-c, while follicular B cells make IFN-c but no IL-10 [8]. B cells and regulation B cells make both IL-10 and TGFb and thus could conceivably be involved in the development of one of the regulatory T cell subsets. Dealing first with CD25+ FoxP3+ Tregs: the data in this area are limited, fragmentary and often contradictory; for instance in B cell–deficient mice there is no alteration in the numbers or function of CD25+ FoxP3+ Treg [62], while in Rituximab/B cell-depleted patients the numbers of these cells rise [63]. In some disease models evidence points to a positive role for B cells in the Treg control of colitis [64] and of EAE [65], in anterior chamber (of the eye) immune deviation (ACAID) [66] and in transplant tolerance [67]. In this last example, the authors raise the possibility that B cells render T cells (potential effectors) unresponsive and so, receptive to suppression by donorf 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Highlights specific Tregs. Thus, the involvement of B cells in Treg function is not necessarily an inductive one, but might involve a collaboration bringing about regulation or, recruitment of Treg to sites of inflammation, e.g. CNS [65]. It should be remembered that each model has its own idiosyncrasies; for instance, in the NOD thyroiditis model, B cell-deficient mice are resistant to disease induction and the role of B cells in Treg function seems to be negative. It is proposed that B cells sustain a persistent presentation of autoantigen (in B cell-sufficient NOD mice) that renders effector T cells resistant to suppression by Tregs [62]. As discussed above the presentation of antigen by naive/resting B cells is thought to render naive T cells tolerant [40, 41]. Recent data suggest that this tolerance may result from the generation of Tregs [68, 69] with an unusual phenotype, (CD25+, CD62L+ and FoxP3–) [69]. During the in vitro culture with naive T cells, the B cells make IL-10 although this is not required for the development of this Treg population [69]. It will be interesting to know if TGFb is involved as small resting B cells express this cytokine [47]. In contrast, several slightly older studies, showed that B cell-derived IL-10 was crucial for the resolution of EAE [70], the delayed progression of inflammatory bowel disease [71], and the prevention of induction of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) [72]. In all these cases the B cells involved were activated and consequently produced IL-10. How this B cell-derived IL-10 production mediates these effects has not been determined but the induction of a Treg population seems most likely. In relation to this, Gray et al. [73] have recently linked the immune suppressive activity of apoptotic cells on the development of CIA, with IL-10 production by B cells. The injection of apoptotic cells prevented development of CIA, a protection that was dependent on both B cells and on IL-10 [73]. A dissection of the cell interactions indicated that apoptotic cells had a direct effect on B cells, which augmented their IL-10 production, which in turn caused the differentiation of a population of IL-10-producing T cells. B cells it seems induce Tr1 cells. It is worth noting that in these experiments the amount of IL-10 made by B cells (stimulated via TLR + apoptotic cells) is of a similar magnitude to that made by the effector T cells and thus the B cell-derived IL-10 is also likely to have effects independent of Tr1 cells. The unexpected link between B cell regulation and apoptotic cells raises the question of whether the recognition of apoptosis during inflammation is a common feature in triggering a resolving B cell cytokine response. www.eji-journal.eu 3307 3308 David Gray et al. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 3 Leandro, M. J., Edwards, J. C., Cambridge, G., Ehrenstein, M. R. and Isenberg, D. A., An open study of B lymphocyte depletion in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2002. 46: 2673–2677. 4 Pitashny, M. and Shoenfeld, Y., B cell depletion in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2005. 4: 436–441. 5 Martin, F. and Chan, A. C., B cell immunobiology in disease: evolving concepts from the clinic. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2006. 24: 467–496. 6 Quintans, J. and Lefkovits, I., Clonal expansion of lipopolysaccharidestimulated B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 1974. 113: 1373–1376. 7 Akira, S. and Takeda, K., Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004. 4: 499–511. 8 Barr, T., Brown, S., Ryan, G., Zhao, J. and Gray, D., TLR-mediated stimulation of APCs: Distinct cytokine responses of B cells and dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3040–3053. Figure 1. Roles of TLR in B cell responses. TLR activation alone can lead to antigen/BCR-independent antibody production, but most meaningful T-independent antibody responses in vivo involve Ag recognition by BCR. Note also that while cytokine production by B cells can be BCR independent, it may be enhanced by CD40 or modulated/altered by BCR signals. 9 Genestier, L., Taillardet, M., Mondiere, P., Gheit, H., Bella, C. and Defrance, T., TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J. Immunol. 2007. 178: 7779–7786. 10 Pasare, C. and Medzhitov, R., Control of B-cell responses by Toll-like receptors. Nature 2005. 438: 364–368. 11 Ruprecht, C. R. and Lanzavecchia, A., Toll-like receptor stimulation as a third signal required for activation of human naive B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006. 36: 810–816. Concluding remarks We are only beginning to understand the mechanisms by which B cells modulate T cell responses. At one extreme we may come to accept that innate (TLR?), non-BCRmediated activation of B cells gives them the potential to be a dominant APC population following infection with organisms that carry TLR ligands. At the very least we can be certain that TLR-mediated cytokine production by B cells both drives T cell differentiation and regulates its excesses (inflammation). We have highlighted here the many non-antibody-mediated functions of B cells and have focused mainly on their positive roles (see summary in Fig. 1). In the light of these lessons, one might be reluctant to ablate B cells from patients, but in autoimmune disease the balance is dramatically tipped towards the very deleterious effects of B cell autoantibody production and/or autoantigen presentation and, therefore, such drastic action is certainly warranted. However, these patients need to be followed carefully as they may well tell us a more complete story of the way that B cells contribute in the round to immune responses and their modulation. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no financial or commercial conflicts of interest. References 1 Grillo-Lopez, A. J., White, C. A., Varns, C., Shen, D., Wei, A., McClure, A. and Dallaire, B. K., Overview of the clinical development of rituximab: first monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of lymphoma. Semin. Oncol. 1999. 26: 66–73. 2 Edwards, J. C. and Cambridge, G., Sustained improvement in rheumatoid arthritis following a protocol designed to deplete B lymphocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001. 40: 205–211. f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 12 Gavin, A. L., Hoebe, K., Duong, B., Ota, T., Martin, C., Beutler, B. and Nemazee, D., Adjuvant-enhanced antibody responses in the absence of Tolllike receptor signaling. Science 2006. 314: 1936–1938. 13 Ehlers, M., Fukuyama, H., McGaha, T. L., Aderem, A. and Ravetch, J. V., TLR9/MyD88 signaling is required for class switching to pathogenic IgG2a and 2b autoantibodies in SLE. J. Exp. Med. 2006. 203: 553–561. 14 Jegerlehner, A., Maurer, P., Bessa, J., Hinton, H. J., Kopf, M. and Bachmann, M. F., TLR9 signaling in B cells determines class switch recombination to IgG2a. J. Immunol. 2007. 178: 2415–2420. 15 Liu, N., Ohnishi, N., Ni, L., Akira, S. and Bacon, K. B., CpG directly induces T-bet expression and inhibits IgG1 and IgE switching in B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003. 4: 687–693. 16 Yi, A. K., Klinman, D. M., Martin, T. L., Matson, S. and Krieg, A. M., Rapid immune activation by CpG motifs in bacterial DNA. Systemic induction of IL-6 transcription through an antioxidant-sensitive pathway. J. Immunol. 1996. 157: 5394–5402. 17 Bernasconi, N. L., Traggiai, E. and Lanzavecchia, A., Maintenance of serological memory by polyclonal activation of human memory B cells. Science 2002. 298: 2199–2202. 18 Odendahl, M., Mei, H., Hoyer, B. F., Jacobi, A. M., Hansen, A., Muehlinghaus, G., Berek, C. et al., Generation of migratory antigenspecific plasma blasts and mobilization of resident plasma cells in a secondary immune response. Blood 2005. 105: 1614–1621. 19 Radbruch, A., Muehlinghaus, G., Luger, E. O., Inamine, A., Smith, K. G., Dorner, T. and Hiepe, F., Competence and competition: the challenge of becoming a long-lived plasma cell. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006. 6: 741–750. 20 Leadbetter, E. A., Rifkin, I. R., Hohlbaum, A. M., Beaudette, B. C., Shlomchik, M. J. and Marshak-Rothstein, A., Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature 2002. 416: 603–607. 21 Lau, C. M., Broughton, C., Tabor, A. S., Akira, S., Flavell, R. A., Mamula, M. J., Christensen, S. R. et al., RNA-associated autoantigens activate B cells by combined B cell antigen receptor/Toll-like receptor 7 engagement. J. Exp. Med. 2005. 202: 1171–1177. 22 Marshak-Rothstein, A., Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006. 6: 823–835. 23 Groom, J. R., Fletcher, C. A., Walters, S. N., Grey, S. T., Watt, S. V., Sweet, M. J., Smyth, M. J., Mackay, C. R. and Mackay, F., BAFF and MyD88 signals promote a lupuslike disease independent of T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2007. 204: 1959–1971. 24 Sallusto, F. and Lanzavecchia, A., Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage www.eji-journal.eu Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J. Exp. Med. 1994. 179: 1109–1118. 25 Kurt-Jones, E. A., Liano, D., HayGlass, K. A., Benacerraf, B., Sy, M. S. and Abbas, A. K., The role of antigen-presenting B cells in T cell priming in vivo. Studies of B cell-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 1988. 140: 3773–3778. 26 Linton, P. J., Bautista, B., Biederman, E., Bradley, E. S., Harbertson, J., Kondrack, R. M., Padrick, R. C. and Bradley, L. M., Costimulation via OX40L expressed by B cells is sufficient to determine the extent of primary CD4 cell expansion and Th2 cytokine secretion in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2003. 197: 875–883. Highlights 45 Shlomchik, M. J., Craft, J. E. and Mamula, M. J., From T to B and back again: positive feedback in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2001. 1: 147–153. 46 Harris, D. P., Haynes, L., Sayles, P. C., Duso, D. K., Eaton, S. M., Lepak, N. M., Johnson, L. L. et al., Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2000. 1: 475–482. 47 Skok, J., Poudrier, J. and Gray, D., Dendritic cell-derived IL-12 promotes B cell induction of Th2 differentiation: a feedback regulation of Th1 development. J. Immunol. 1999. 163: 4284–4291. 27 Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Ramarathinam, L., Guo, Y., Huszar, D., Trounstine, M. and Zhao, M., Gene-targeted B-deficient mice reveal a critical role for B cells in the CD4 T cell response. Int. Immunol. 1995. 7: 1353–1362. 48 Harris, D. P., Goodrich, S., Mohrs, K., Mohrs, M. and Lund, F. E., Cutting edge: the development of IL-4-producing B cells (B effector 2 cells) is controlled by IL-4, IL-4 receptor alpha, and Th2 cells. J. Immunol. 2005. 175: 7103–7107. 28 Epstein, M. M., Di Rosa, F., Jankovic, D., Sher, A. and Matzinger, P., Successful T cell priming in B cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 1995. 182: 915–922. 49 Lund, F. E., Schuer, K., Hollifield, M., Randall, T. D. and Garvy, B. A., Clearance of Pneumocystis carinii in mice is dependent on B cells but not on P. carinii-specific antibody. J. Immunol. 2003. 171: 1423–1430. 29 Topham, D. J., Tripp, R. A., Hamilton-Easton, A. M., Sarawar, S. R. and Doherty, P. C., Quantitative analysis of the influenza virus-specific CD4+ T cell memory in the absence of B cells and Ig. J. Immunol. 1996. 157: 2947–2952. 50 Macaulay, A. E., DeKruyff, R. H., Goodnow, C. C. and Umetsu, D. T., Antigen-specific B cells preferentially induce CD4+ T cells to produce IL-4. J. Immunol. 1997. 158: 4171–4179. 30 Crawford, A., Macleod, M., Schumacher, T., Corlett, L. and Gray, D., Primary T cell expansion and differentiation in vivo requires antigen presentation by B cells. J. Immunol. 2006. 176: 3498–3506. 31 Catron, D. M., Itano, A. A., Pape, K. A., Mueller, D. L. and Jenkins, M. K., Visualizing the first 50 hr of the primary immune response to a soluble antigen. Immunity 2004. 21: 341–347. 32 Pape, K. A., Catron, D. M., Itano, A. A. and Jenkins, M. K., The humoral immune response is initiated in lymph nodes by B cells that acquire soluble antigen directly in the follicles. Immunity 2007. 26: 491–502. 33 Carrasco, Y. R. and Batista, F. D., B cells acquire particulate antigen in a macrophage-rich area at the boundary between the follicle and the subcapsular sinus of the lymph node. Immunity 2007. 27: 160–171. 34 Phan, T. G., Grigorova, I., Okada, T. and Cyster, J. G., Subcapsular encounter and complement-dependent transport of immune complexes by lymph node B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2007. 8: 992–1000. 35 Ferguson, A. R., Youd, M. E. and Corley, R. B., Marginal zone B cells transport and deposit IgM-containing immune complexes onto follicular dendritic cells. Int. Immunol. 2004. 16: 1411–1422. 51 Stockinger, B., Zal, T., Zal, A. and Gray, D., B cells solicit their own help from T cells. J. Exp. Med. 1996. 183: 891–899. 52 Flynn, S., Toellner, K. M., Raykundalia, C., Goodall, M. and Lane, P., CD4 T cell cytokine differentiation: the B cell activation molecule, OX40 ligand, instructs CD4 T cells to express interleukin 4 and upregulates expression of the chemokine receptor, Blr-1. J. Exp. Med. 1998. 188: 297–304. 53 Dong, C., Juedes, A. E., Temann, U. A., Shresta, S., Allison, J. P., Ruddle, N. H. and Flavell, R. A., ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature 2001. 409: 97–101. 54 Tafuri, A., Shahinian, A., Bladt, F., Yoshinaga, S. K., Jordana, M., Wakeham, A., Boucher, L. M. et al., ICOS is essential for effective T-helpercell responses. Nature 2001. 409: 105–109. 55 Mastroeni, P., Simmons, C., Fowler, R., Hormaeche, C. E. and Dougan, G., Igh-6(-/-) (B-cell-deficient) mice fail to mount solid acquired resistance to oral challenge with virulent Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and show impaired Th1 T-cell responses to Salmonella antigens. Infect. Immun. 2000. 68: 46–53. 56 Stockinger, B. and Veldhoen, M., Differentiation and function of Th17 T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007. 19: 281–286. 36 Gray, D., Kumararatne, D. S., Lortan, J., Khan, M. and MacLennan, I. C., Relation of intra-splenic migration of marginal zone B cells to antigen localization on follicular dendritic cells. Immunology 1984. 52: 659–669. 57 O'Garra, A., Stapleton, G., Dhar, V., Pearce, M., Schumacher, J., Rugo, H., Barbis, D. et al., Production of cytokines by mouse B cells: B lymphomas and normal B cells produce interleukin 10. Int. Immunol. 1990. 2: 821–832. 37 Whipple, E. C., Shanahan, R. S., Ditto, A. H., Taylor, R. P. and Lindorfer, M. A., Analyses of the in vivo trafficking of stoichiometric doses of an anticomplement receptor 1/2 monoclonal antibody infused intravenously in mice. J. Immunol. 2004. 173: 2297–2306. 58 Sun, C. M., Deriaud, E., Leclerc, C. and Lo-Man, R., Upon TLR9 signaling, CD5+ B cells control the IL-12-dependent Th1-priming capacity of neonatal DCs. Immunity 2005. 22: 467–477. 38 Stein, H., Bonk, A., Tolksdorf, G., Lennert, K., Rodt, H. and Gerdes, J., Immunohistologic analysis of the organization of normal lymphoid tissue and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1980. 28: 746–760. 39 Attanavanich, K. and Kearney, J. F., Marginal zone, but not follicular B cells, are potent activators of naive CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 2004. 172: 803–811. 40 Eynon, E. E. and Parker, D. C., Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens. J. Exp. Med. 1992. 175: 131–138. 41 Fuchs, E. J. and Matzinger, P., B cells turn off virgin but not memory T cells. Science 1992. 258: 1156–1159. 42 Zhong, G., Reis e Sousa, C. and Germain, R. N., Antigen-unspecific B cells and lymphoid dendritic cells both show extensive surface expression of processed antigen-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes after soluble protein exposure in vivo or in vitro. J. Exp. Med. 1997. 186: 673–682. 43 Blander, J. M. and Medzhitov, R., On regulation of phagosome maturation and antigen presentation. Nat. Immunol. 2006. 7: 1029–1035. 44 Yarovinsky, F., Kanzler, H., Hieny, S., Coffman, R. L. and Sher, A., Tolllike receptor recognition regulates immunodominance in an antimicrobial CD4+ T cell response. Immunity 2006. 25: 655–664. f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 59 Zhang, X., Deriaud, E., Jiao, X., Braun, D., Leclerc, C. and Lo-Man, R., Type I interferons protect neonates from acute inflammation through interleukin 10-producing B cells. J. Exp. Med. 2007. 204: 1107–1118. 60 Lenert, P., Brummel, R., Field, E. H. and Ashman, R. F., TLR-9 activation of marginal zone B cells in lupus mice regulates immunity through increased IL-10 production. J. Clin. Immunol. 2005. 25: 29–40. 61 Evans, J. G., Chavez-Rueda, K. A., Eddaoudi, A., Meyer-Bahlburg, A., Rawlings, D. J., Ehrenstein, M. R. and Mauri, C., Novel suppressive function of transitional 2 B cells in experimental arthritis. J. Immunol. 2007. 178: 7868–7878. 62 Yu, S., Maiti, P. K., Dyson, M., Jain, R. and Braley-Mullen, H., B celldeficient NOD.H-2h4 mice have CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells that inhibit the development of spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis. J. Exp. Med. 2006. 203: 349–358. 63 Vallerskog, T., Gunnarsson, I., Widhe, M., Risselada, A., Klareskog, L., van Vollenhoven, R., Malmstrom, V. and Trollmo, C., Treatment with rituximab affects both the cellular and the humoral arm of the immune system in patients with SLE. Clin. Immunol. 2007. 122: 62–74. 64 Wei, B., Velazquez, P., Turovskaya, O., Spricher, K., Aranda, R., Kronenberg, M., Birnbaumer, L. and Braun, J., Mesenteric B cells centrally inhibit CD4+ T cell colitis through interaction with regulatory T cell subsets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005. 102: 2010–2015. www.eji-journal.eu 3309 3310 David Gray et al. 65 Mann, M. K., Maresz, K., Shriver, L. P., Tan, Y. and Dittel, B. N., B cell regulation of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells and IL-10 via B7 is essential for recovery from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2007. 178: 3447–3456. 66 Ashour, H. M. and Niederkorn, J. Y., Peripheral tolerance via the anterior chamber of the eye: role of B cells in MHC class I and II antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 2006. 176: 5950–5957. 67 Deng, S., Moore, D. J., Huang, X., Lian, M. M., Mohiuddin, M., Velededeoglu, E., Lee, M. K. t. et al., Cutting edge: transplant tolerance induced by anti-CD45RB requires B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2007. 178: 6028–6032. 68 Chen, X. and Jensen, P. E., Cutting edge: primary B lymphocytes preferentially expand allogeneic FoxP3+ CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 2007. 179: 2046–2050. f 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Eur. J. Immunol. 2007. 37: 3304–3310 69 Reichardt, P., Dornbach, B., Rong, S., Beissert, S., Gueler, F., Loser, K. and Gunzer, M., Naive B cells generate regulatory T cells in the presence of a mature immunologic synapse. Blood 2007. 110: 1519–1529. 70 Fillatreau, S., Sweenie, C. H., McGeachy, M. J., Gray, D. and Anderton, S. M., B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002. 3: 944–950. 71 Mizoguchi, A., Mizoguchi, E., Takedatsu, H., Blumberg, R. S. and Bhan, A. K., Chronic intestinal inflammatory condition generates IL-10-producing regulatory B cell subset characterized by CD1d upregulation. Immunity 2002. 16: 219–230. 72 Mauri, C., Gray, D., Mushtaq, N. and Londei, M., Prevention of arthritis by interleukin 10-producing B cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003. 197: 489–501. 73 Gray, M., Miles, K., Salter, D., Gray, D. and Savill, J., Apoptotic cells protect mice from autoimmune inflammation by the induction of regulatory B cells. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007. 104: 14081–14085. www.eji-journal.eu