Download 070329Syl

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Genomic library wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Human–animal hybrid wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Human genome wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Human Genome Project wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
SYLLABUS
Anthropology 329: Human Evolutionary Genetics
~ Fall 2015
PROFESSOR:
Robert Trivers
Office Hours: Tuesdays 11 am to 1 pm or by appointment; office is BIO 209
Email: [email protected]
PRE-REQUISITE: 070:102 Introduction to Human Evolution or 119:101 & 102 General Biology
BOX 1
This course fills the Anthropological Genetics requirement of the Evolutionary Anthropology major.
CATALOG DESCRIPTION
This course presents the most recent work on human evolutionary genetics, e.g. selection in the past 10,000
years, the genome of Neanderthals, genomic imprinting, the importance of miRNAs and internal genetic
conflict, among others. Student discussion of assigned articles combined with lectures.
MATERIALS
All assigned readings will be available for downloading as PDFs on Sakai.
SPECIFIC COURSE LEARNING GOALS
Students are expected to master a series of assigned papers, both what the papers claim to show and the
methodology used to achieve the claimed results. A secondary aim is to teach students how to read scientific
papers and how most efficiently to describe them to others. Critical faculties are emphasized—is the work
on a firm foundation, where is the methodology weakest and so on.
GRADING AND ASSIGNMENTS
Grading will be based on performance on an oral exam (~50%), class participation (40%), and a presentation
of a particular paper (10%). The final exam will be a half-hour oral exam in which students will be asked to
give short summaries of assigned papers and answer direct questions on them and other course content.
For each class two students will be asked to read all of the assigned papers and possibly an additional one.
Each is then available to present the entire paper. Others are asked to read the assigned papers and may be
questioned but are not penalized for ignorance.
A standard way of reading and summarizing a paper will be emphasized—abstract first, then key results,
ideally with a key figure or table, followed by methodology, introduction and discussion, roughly in that
order.
DETAILED COURSE DESCRIPTION
The recent explosion of work on human genomics has produced an astonishing array of information once
thought impossible. We now have detailed data on natural selection acting on human beings 10,000 years
ago, the genetic structure of the Neanderthal genome with clear evidence of interbreeding with modern
European and Asians, Neanderthals having preferentially contributed parasite resistance and skin color
genes to our genome. We now know the exact genetic structure of the human and chimpanzee Y
chromosome, revealing the extraordinary evolution of huge palindromes covering large sections of the Y,
we have detailed evidence of variation in human recombination—individual, chromosomal and sexual—and
on the role of miRNAs in within-genome conflict, e.g. acting against transposable elements, the prevalence
and importance of imprinted genes, the possible role of selfish X action on the behavior of paternal
grandmothers and so on.
The purpose of this course is to introduce students to these topics. Form of the course will be a three-hour
seminar once a week, in which students will discuss assigned papers and I will lecture for about an hour—
often in preparation for the next week’s reading.
COURSE POLICIES
Academic Integrity: Cheating lowers the value of a Rutgers degree and in general will not be permitted,
plagiarism included, will be tolerated. But there is no opportunity for plagiarism or cheating in this course.
Students are encouraged to work with each other on understanding course assignments—and your only
chance for cheating is to fool me in class or in exam about your actual understanding of the material. Good
luck on that one.
Student Absences: Students are expected to attend classes, but all reasonable excuses are will be considered
and I am not rigid on this matter. If you fail to attend a class, the key is whether you otherwise master the
material—often easily done. So while class attendance will result in a more positive evaluation, it is in no
way decisive.
2
Course outline.
Origin of human genetic and linguistic variability in southern Africa and its decay with distance from
origin
Henn,B.M. et al. 2011. Hunter gatherer genomic diversity suggests a southern African origin for modern
humans. PNAS 108: 5154-5162.
Atkinson, Q.D. 2011. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from
Africa. Science 332: 346-349.
Jun Z. Li, et al. 2008. Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation.
Science 319: 1100-1104.
Positive selection in the recent human past
Tishkoff, S. A., et al. 2006. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa
and Europe. Nature Genetics 39: 31-40.
Perry, G.H. et al. 2007. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nature
Genetics 39: 1256-1260.
Positive selection in the distant past as inferred from the genome
Hawks, J., et al. 2007. Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. PNAS 104: 20753-20758.
Pritchard, J.K. 2010. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps and polygenic adaptation.
Current Biology 20: R206-215.
Genetics of recent human forms such as Neanderthals and Denisovans
Green, R. 2010. A draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome. Science 328: 710-722.
Laurent Abi-Rached et al. 2011. The shaping of modern human immune systems by multiregional admixture
with archaic humans. Science 334: 89-94.
Huerta-Sanchez, E. et al, 2014. Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by
introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature: doi:10.1038/nature13408
mtDNA and Y diversity across space and within societies
3
Carvalho-Silva, D.R. et al. 2001. The phylogeography of Brazilian Y-chromosome lineages. Am. J. Hum.
Genet. 68: 281-286.
Seielstad, M.T. et al. 1998. Genetic evidence for a higher female than male migration rate. Nature Genetics
20: 278-280.
Oota, H. et al. 2001. Human mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation in correlated with matrilocal versus
patrilocal residence. Nature Genetics 29: 20-21.
Selfish elements and the structure of the human genome
Kazazian, H.H. 2004. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303: 1627-1632.
Chen, K. and Rajewsky, N. 2007. The evolution of gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs.
Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 93-103.
Doolittle, W.F. 2013. Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE. PNAS 110: 5296-5300.
The importance of imprinted genes
Garfield, A.S. et al. 2011. Distinct physiological and behavioural functions for parental alleles of imprinted
Grb10. Nature 469: 534-540.
Montero, I. et al. 2013. Paternal imprinting of mating preferences between natural populations of house mice
(Mus musculus domesticus). Molecular Ecology 22: 2549-2562.
Haig, D. Imprinted green beards: a little less than kin and more than kind. Biology Letters 9: 1-3.
Haig, D. 2014. Does microchimerism mediate kin conflicts? Chimerism 5: 1-3.
Imprinted genes and pediatric growth disorders
Arnaud, P. and Feil, R. 2005. Epigenetic deregulation in genomic imprinting in human disorders and
following assisted reproduction. Birth Defects (C): 75-97.
Ubeda, F. 2008. Evolution of genomic imprinting with biparental care: implications for Prader-Willi and
Angelman Syndromes. PLoS Biology 6: 1678-1692.
Do paternal Xs in grandmothers bias behavior toward granddaughters?
Fox, M., Sear, R., Beise, J., Ragsdale, G., Voland, E., Knapp, L.A. 2009. Grandma plays favourites: Xchromosome relatedness and sex-specific childhood mortality? Proc R Soc B 277: 567-573.
4
Johaw, J., Fox, M., Knapp, L.A., Voland, E. 2011. The presence of a paternal grandmother lengthens interbirth interval following the birth of a granddaughter in Krummhoern (18th and 19th centuries). Evolution
Human Behavior 32: 315-325.
The evolution of human sex chromosomes (dimorphic, Y palindromes. X inactivation)
Lahn, B.T. et al. 2001. The human Y chromosome, in the light of evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 2:
207-216.
Hughes, J.F. 2010. Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene
content. Nature 463: 536-539.
Wu, H. et al. 2014. Cellular resolution maps of X chromosome inactivation: implications for neural
development, function, and diseases. Neuron 81: 103-119.
Sex differences in recombination
Kong, A. et al. 2002. A high-resolution map of the human genome. Nature Genetics 31: 241-247.
Broman, K.W. 1998. Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in
recombination. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63: 861-869.
Final Exam Time: please see http://scheduling.rutgers.edu/index.shtml#]
5