Download Workshop C - CEP Probation

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Feminist school of criminology wikipedia , lookup

Social disorganization theory wikipedia , lookup

Zero tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative methods in criminology wikipedia , lookup

Critical criminology wikipedia , lookup

Crime wikipedia , lookup

Offender profiling wikipedia , lookup

Crime hotspots wikipedia , lookup

Crime concentration wikipedia , lookup

History of criminal justice wikipedia , lookup

Criminalization wikipedia , lookup

Complicity wikipedia , lookup

Broken windows theory wikipedia , lookup

Intelligence-led policing wikipedia , lookup

Criminology wikipedia , lookup

Right realism wikipedia , lookup

Public-order crime wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Electronic Monitoring: what’s in it
for UK policing?
Chief Superintendent Dave Wharton
Senior Police Adviser, Centre for Applied Science &
Technology (CAST)
12th December 2014
Electronic Monitoring
• Just to be clear...
– Three kinds of EM – all involve offender wearing a tag
(generally ankle tag)
– EM curfews (coerced) – residence based – used within
England and Wales for last 15 years
– EM tracking (and exclusion) – coerced (Court order or
requirement of prison release) – not yet well
established within the UK
– EM tracking (and exclusion) – voluntary (today’s
presentation)
2
Electronic Monitoring
• UK policing current usage?
–
–
–
–
Most of 43 forces in England and Wales
Voluntary, not coerced use
Small cohorts of prolific and priority offenders
Partnership with others: probation, Crown Prosecution
Service, Courts, drug treatment, housing, education,
employers, voluntary sector etc...
– Nationwide number... 1,000+ cases at any one time?
– [Note: the daily caseload is in the region of 15.000 at
any one time]
3
Electronic Monitoring
• Benefits for the offender
–
–
–
–
–
–
Potential avoidance of custody
Less ‘police attention’
Protection from routine suspicion by professionals
Improved relationships with professionals
Reassurance to family and friends
Desistance from crime – physical and psychological
deterrent
– Easier separation from criminal associates
– Rehabilitation?
4
Electronic Monitoring
• Benefits for professionals/the public
– Less crime! Fewer victims of crime
– More efficient use of policing resources:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Focus on non-tagged suspects
Less investigation time against tracked subjects
Daily data comparisons against crime time/locations
Good evidence when they have committed crime...
Avoidance of needless arrests
Useful intelligence gathering on tracked subjects
Assists police/probation in day to day management
5
Electronic Monitoring
• Challenges...
– Tag on its own is not a panacea
– Deliberate damage to, or loss of tag
– Some changing of crime type, eg from burglary to
shoplifting or drug dealing
– Battery charging
• Establishing a routine
• Implications for coerced tracking
– Managing public expectation
6
Electronic Monitoring
– Contact details:
• [email protected]
• Office: 01727 816300
• Mobile: 07767 870500
7