* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Generation of nonclassical states from thermal radiation
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Invited Paper Generation of nonclassical states from thermal radiation Valentina Parigia , Alessandro Zavattab and Marco Bellinia,b a LENS, b Istituto Università di Firenze, Via Nello Carrara 1, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; Nazionale di Ottica Applicata - CNR, Largo Enrico Fermi 6, Firenze, Italy ABSTRACT We show the experimental observation of quantum states of light exhibiting nonclassical features obtained by single photon excitation of a thermal state. Such single-photon-added thermal states are the result of the single action of the creation operator on a mixed state that can be fully described classically. They show different degree of nonclassicality depending on the mean photon number of the original thermal state. The generated state is characterized by means of ultra-fast homodyne detection which allows us to reconstruct its density matrix and Wigner function by quantum tomography. We demonstrate the nonclassical behavior of single-photon added thermal states by an analysis of the negativity of the Wigner function. Keywords: Nonclassical quantum states, quantum homodyne tomography, thermal light, single-photon Fock states, entanglement. 1. INTRODUCTION In the early works of Raymer and coworkers1 the possibility of reconstructing the quantum state of light was demonstrated by using optical homodyne tomography. Subsequently, this technique showed its great importance for the characterization and study of nonclassical field states in the continuous variable domain.2, 3 Nowadays, the generation and the analysis of nonclassical light is the starting point to generate even more nonclassical states,4, 5 or the entangled states which are essential to implement quantum information protocols with continuous variables.6, 7 As a general definition, a quantum state is said to be nonclassical when it cannot be written as a mixture of coherent states. In terms of the Glauber-Sudarshan P representation,8, 9 the P function of a nonclassical state is highly singular or not positive, i.e. it cannot be interpreted as a classical probability distribution. In general however, since the P function can be badly behaved, it cannot be connected to any observable quantity. A conceptually simple way to generate a quantum light state with a varying degree of nonclassicality consists in adding a single photon to any completely classical one. This is quite different from photon subtraction which, on the other hand, produces a nonclassical state only when starting from an already nonclassical one.10, 11 Here we report the generation and the analysis of single-photon-added thermal states (SPATSs), i.e., completely classical states excited by a single photon, first described by Agarwal and Tara in 1992.12 We use the techniques of conditioned parametric amplification recently demonstrated by our group3, 13 to generate such states, and we employ ultrafast pulsed homodyne detection and quantum tomography to investigate their character. The peculiar nonclassical behavior of SPATSs had been described in many theoretical papers11, 12, 14–17 and their experimental generation had already been proposed, although with more complex schemes,11, 15 but never realized. Thanks to their adjustable degree of quantumness, these states are an ideal benchmark to test the different experimental criteria of nonclassicality recently proposed, and to investigate the possibility of entanglement generation using linear optics. The nonclassicality of SPATSs is here analyzed by reconstructing their negative-valued Wigner functions. Further author information: (Send correspondence to M.B.) V.P.: E-mail: [email protected]fi.it, Telephone: +39 055 457 2215 A.Z.: E-mail: [email protected], Telephone: +39 055 457 2215 M.B.: E-mail: [email protected], Telephone: +39 055 457 2493 Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging IV, edited by Ronald E. Meyers, Yanhua Shih, Keith S. Deacon, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305, 63050Z, (2006) · 0277-786X/06/$15 · doi: 10.1117/12.680505 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-1 2. THEORY In order to describe the state generated in our experiment we give a general treatment of photon addition based on conditioned parametric amplification. By first-order perturbation theory, the output of the parametric amplifier when a pure state |ϕm is injected along the signal channel is given by |ψm = [1 + (gâ†s â†i − g ∗ âs âi )] |ϕm s |0i , (1) where g accounts for the coupling and the amplitude of the pump and â, ↠are the usual noncommuting annihilation and creation operators. For a generic signal input, the output state of the parametric amplifier can be written as Pm |ψm ψm | (2) ρ̂out = m where the input mixed state is ρ̂s = Pm |ϕm ϕm | and Pm is the probability for the state |ϕm . If we condition the preparation of the signal state to single-photon detection on the idler channel, we obtain the prepared state ρ̂ = Tri (ρ̂out |1i 1|i ) = |g|2 ↠ρ̂s â. (3) When the input state ρ̂s is a thermal state with mean photon number n̄, we obtain that the single-photon-added thermal state is described by the following density operator expressed in the Fock base: ρ̂ = n ∞ n̄ 1 n |n n|. n̄(n̄ + 1) n=0 1 + n̄ (4) The lack of the vacuum term and the rescaling of higher excited terms is evident in this expression. The P phase-space representation can be easily calculated and is given by (see also Ref. 12) P (α) = 2 1 [(1 + n̄)|α|2 − n̄]e−|α| /n̄ , πn̄3 (5) while the corresponding Wigner function reads as W (α) = 2 |2α|2 (1 + n̄) − (1 + 2n̄) −2|α|2 /(1+2n̄) e π (1 + 2n̄)3 (6) where α = x + iy. SPATSs have a well-behaved P function which is always negative around α = 0; this feature is also present in the Wigner function and assures their nonclassicality, however both P (0) and W (0) tend to zero in the limit of n̄ → ∞. 3. EXPERIMENT The main source of our apparatus is a mode-locked Ti:Sa laser which emits 1.5-ps pulses with a repetition rate of 82 MHz. The pulse train is frequency-doubled to 393 nm by second harmonic generation in a 13-mm long LBO crystal. The spatially-cleaned UV beam then serves as a pump for a 3-mm thick type-I BBO crystal which generates spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) at the same wavelength of the laser source. The SPDC crystal slightly tilted from the collinear configuration in order to obtain an exit cone beam with an angle of ∼ 3◦ thus the pairs of SPDC photons are emitted in two distinct spatial channels called signal and idler. In order to remotely select a pure state on the signal channel, idler photons undergo narrow spatial and frequency filtering before detection; indeed the remotely-prepared signal state will only approach a pure state if the filter transmission function is much narrower than the momentum and spectral widths of the pump beam generating the SPDC pair.18–21 Along the idler channel the photons are strongly filtered in the spectral and spatial domain by means of two etalon filters (total width ≈ 50 GHz) and by a single mode fiber (core/cladding 5/125 µm with collimation lens of 6.2-mm focal length) which is directly connected to the single-photon-counting module (Perkin-Elmer SPCM AQR-14), further details are given in Refs. 22 and 13. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-2 Loser HT SPCM Filters LBO N Pump Figure 1. Experimental setup. HR (HT) is a high reflectivity (transmittivity) beam splitter; all other symbols are defined in the text. When no seed field is injected in the SPDC crystal, conditioned single-photon Fock states are generated from spontaneous emission in the signal channel.22, 23 We have recently shown that, if the SPDC crystal is injected with a coherent state along the signal channel, stimulated emission comes into play and single-photon excitation of such a pure state is obtained.3, 13 However, a coherent state is still at the border between the quantum and the classical regimes; it is therefore extremely interesting to use a truly classical state, like the thermal one, as the input, and to observe its degaussification.10 In order to avoid technical problems connected to the handling of high-temperature thermal sources, we use a rotating ground glass disk (RD) inserted in a portion of the laser beam to inject the parametric amplifier (see Fig. 1). A superposition of diffracted contributions with random amplitudes and phases is thus realized which yields the photon distribution typical of a thermal source.24 The mean number of photons for the thermal state n̄ is varied by a controlled attenuation (not shown in figure, composed of a polarizer and a half-wave plate) of a small portion of the laser emission impinging the rotating round glass disk. Balanced homodyne measurements are performed on the signal output of the SPDC crystal: the signal output of the SPDC crystal is mixed with a strong local oscillator (LO) by means of a 50% beam splitter (BS). The LO is an intense coherent state obtained from a portion of the original laser pulses which is spatially mode-matched to the conditionally-prepared signal state by the insertion of appropriate lens combinations (not shown in the figure) along its path. In order to finely adjust the alignment and the synchronization between the signal and LO pulses, we use the stimulated beam produced by injecting a different seed pulse into the idler channel of the parametric crystal. Under appropriate conditions,19 the amplified seed beam appearing on the signal channel due to stimulated emission can spatially well simulate the target signal beam and can be used for alignment purposes. 4. TIME-DOMAIN HOMODYNE MEASUREMENTS The two output beams of the BS are detected by two photodiodes (Hamamatsu S3883, with active area 1.7 mm2 ) whose difference signal is amplified and sent to a fast digital oscilloscope whose acquisition is triggered by the detection events in the idler channel. Each acquisition frame spans two consecutive LO pulses where only the first one is synchronized with the detection of an idler photon and contains the “information” about the desired state, while the second one can be used as a reference. If the seed thermal state is blocked, the single-photon Fock state |1s and the LO shot-noise distributions corresponding to the vacuum state |0s are measured (for further details see Refs. 25 and 22). About 5000 acquisition frames can be stored sequentially in the scope at a Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-3 Figure 2. Quadrature measurements: a) Vacuum; b) and c) Thermal state and SPATS with n̄ = 0.093, respectively. maximum rate of 160,000 frames per second. Each sequence of frames is then transferred to a personal computer where the areas of the pulses are measured and their statistic distributions are analyzed in real time. If a narrow temporal gate with the laser pulses is used, the typical rate of state preparation for vacuum input is about 300 s−1 , with less than 1% contribution from accidental counts. A typical sequence of about 5000 acquisition frames can thus be captured and analyzed in about 20-30 s when no thermal seed is fed in the signal mode. When the thermal states are injected into the parametric amplifier stimulated emission takes place and the count rate in the idler channel is proportional to n̂ = Tr(ρ̂out â†i âi ) = |g|2 (1 + n̄). The mean photon number values n̄ reported in the following are obtained from the ratio between the trigger count rates when the thermal injection is present (Ct ) and when it is blocked (Co ) as n̄ = Ct /Co − 1 (see Refs. 26 and 27). In Figs. 2 and 3 are shown some of the quadrature measurements for the vacuum state, thermal state and SPATS for n̄ = 0.093 and n̄ = 1.1, while the phase between the signal and LO is scanned. The Figures 2a) and 3a) relative to the vacuum are the quadrature measurements obtained from the integration of the homodyne signal relative to the second acquired pulse (reference) when the thermal seed is blocked. When the thermal seed is turned on – see Figs. 2b) and 3b) – the quadrature measurements relative to the second acquired pulse contain the thermal state which is present in the signal channel. Finally, both Figs. 2c) and 3c) show the quadrature measurements obtained from the synchronized pulse, i.e. when conditional measurements are performed on the SPATS. The variance increases when the single photon excitation of the thermal state takes place. It is also important to note that the analyzed states do not show any phase dependence as expected from Eq. (4). The full acquisitions for each fixed n̄ consist of about 5 × 105 quadrature values obtained with random phases. 5. QUANTUM STATE RECONSTRUCTION Balanced homodyne detection allows the measurement of the signal electric field quadratures x̂θ = x̂ cos θ+ ŷ sin θ as a function of the relative phase θ imposed between the LO and the signal, where the two orthogonal field quadratures x̂ and ŷ are defined as x̂ = 12 (â + ↠) and ŷ = 2i (↠− â) and [x̂, ŷ] = i/2. By performing a series of homodyne measurements on equally-prepared states it is possible to obtain the probability distributions p(x, θ) of the quadrature operator x̂θ = 12 (âe−iθ + ↠eiθ ) that are simply seen to correspond to the marginals of the Wigner quasi-probability distribution W (x, y):28 p(x, θ) = +∞ −∞ W (x cos θ − y sin θ, x sin θ + y cos θ)dy. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-4 (7) Figure 3. Quadrature measurements: a) Vacuum; b) and c) Thermal state and SPATS with n̄ = 1.1, respectively. Given a sufficient number of quadrature distributions at different values of the phase θ ∈ [0, π], one is able to reconstruct the quantum state of the field under study.29 We have performed the reconstruction of the diagonal density matrix elements using the maximum likelihood estimation.30 This method gives the density matrix that most likely represents the measured homodyne data. Firstly, we build the likelihood function contracted for a density matrix truncated to 15 diagonal elements (with the constraints of Hermiticity, positivity and normalization), then the function with 15 free parameters is maximized by standard numerical procedures over the experimental data. The Wigner function is then obtained from the density matrix elements using the straightforward transformation: ρnn Wnn (x, y), (8) W (x, y) = n where ρnn is the diagonal element of the density matrix and Wnn (x, y) is the Wigner function of the projector |n n|. The reconstructed Wigner functions for two thermal states with n̄ = 0.093 and n̄ = 1.1 detected in the signal channel using the reference (un-synchronized) pulse are shown in Fig. 4. When the trigger-synchronized homodyne measurements are used to reconstruct the state we expect to observe the single-photon excitation of the thermal state and the results are shown in the Fig. 5. From Eq. (6) the Wigner function of the SPATSs should be always negative. It is evident that for the SPATS of Fig. 5b) with n̄ = 1.1 the negativity of the Wigner function completely disappeared while it is still evident in the case with a lower n̄. Here the finite experimental efficiency in the preparation and detection of SPATSs results in a mixture of the prepared state with vacuum and with a portion of the injected thermal state (the latter arising from limited purity of the remote preparation and from the SPCM dark counts). The measured homodyne detection and preparation efficiency for the single-photon Fock state (n̄ = 0) is η = 0.64. In order to observe how the nonclassical character of the Wigner function disappears, we have performed different reconstructions of the SPATSs while gradually varying the n̄ of the injected thermal field. It is observed that the measured negativity of the Wigner function at the origin - see Fig. 6 - tends to vanish as the mean photon number of the input thermal state is increased. The nonclassical features of the final states are thus expected to get progressively weaker for large n̄ and be finally hidden by unwanted vacuum and thermal components. The negativity of the Wigner function is a sufficient but not necessary condition to prove the nonclassicality of a quantum state. Recently, several nonclassical criteria have been proposed17, 31–33 and the SPATSs can play the role of benchmark state to put such criteria to an experimental test. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-5 Figure 4. Wigner functions obtained by quantum homodyne tomography for thermal states: a) n̄ = 0.093; b) n̄ = 1.1. Figure 5. Wigner functions obtained by quantum homodyne tomography for SPATSs: a) n̄ = 0.093; b) n̄ = 1.1. 6. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated the generation of nonclassical light states by adding a single photon to a completely classical thermal field. We have used quantum homodyne tomography to reconstruct the Wigner function which shows negative values around the origin. The SPATSs show a tunable degree of nonclassicality that gives the possibility to compare several criteria of nonclassicality recently proposed. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge Koji Usami for giving the initial stimulus for this work and Milena D’Angelo for useful discussions. This work has been performed in the frame of the “Spettroscopia laser e ottica quantistica” project of the Department of Physics of the University of Florence and partially supported by Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze and MIUR, under the PRIN initiative and FIRB contract RBNE01KZ94. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-6 Figure 6. Sections of the reconstructed Wigner functions for the SPATSs for different values of the mean photon number of the injected thermal state. REFERENCES 1. D. T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani, “Measurement of the wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, pp. 1244–1247, 1993. 2. G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, “Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light,” Nature 387, pp. 471–475, 1997. 3. A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, “Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light,” Science 306, pp. 660–662, 2004. 4. A. P. Lund, H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim, “Conditional production of superpositions of coherent states with inefficient photon detection,” Phys. Rev. A 70, p. 020101(R), 2004. 5. H. Jeong, A. P. Lund, and T. C. Ralph, “Production of superpositions of coherent states in traveling optical fields with inefficient photon detection,” Phys. Rev. A 72, p. 013801, 2005. 6. M. S. Kim, W. Son, V. Bužek, and P. L. Knight, “Entanglement by a beam splitter: Nonclassicality as a prerequisite for entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A 65, p. 032323, 2002. 7. S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, pp. 513–577, 2005. 8. R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,” Phys. Rev. 131, pp. 2766–2788, 1963. 9. E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, pp. 277–279, 1963. 10. J. Wenger, R. Tualle-Brouri, and P. Grangier, “Non-gaussian statistics from individual pulses of squeezed light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(15), p. 153601, 2004. 11. M. S. Kim, E. Park, P. L. Knight, and H. Jeong, “Nonclassicality of a photon-subtracted gaussian field,” Phys. Rev. A 71, p. 043805, 2005. 12. G. S. Agarwal and K. Tara, “Nonclassical character of states exhibiting no squeezing or sub-poissonian statistics,” Phys. Rev. A 46, pp. 485–488, 1992. 13. A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, “Single-photon excitation of a coherent state: Catching the elementary step of stimulated light emission,” Phys. Rev. A 72, p. 023820, 2005. 14. C. T. Lee, “Theorem on nonclassical states,” Phys. Rev. A 52, pp. 3374–3376, 1995. 15. G. N. Jones, J. Haight, and C. T. Lee, “Nonclassical effects in the photon-added thermal state,” Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 9, pp. 411–418, 1997. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-7 16. L. Diósi, “Comment on nonclassical states: An observable criterion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, p. 2841, 2000. 17. W. Vogel, “Nonclassical states: An observable criterion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, pp. 1849–1852, 2000. 18. Z. Y. Ou, “Parametric down-conversion with coherent pulse pumping and quantum interference between independent fields,” Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 9, pp. 599–614, 1997. 19. T. Aichele, A. I. Lvovsky, and S. Schiller, “Optical mode characterization of single photons prepared by means of conditional measurements on a biphoton state,” Eur. Phys. J. D 18, pp. 237–245, 2002. 20. M. Bellini, F. Marin, S. Viciani, A. Zavatta, and F. T. Arecchi, “Nonlocal pulse shaping with entangled photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, p. 043602, 2003. 21. S. Viciani, A. Zavatta, and M. Bellini, “Nonlocal modulations on the temporal and spectral profiles of an entangled photon pair,” Phys. Rev. A 69, p. 053801, 2004. 22. A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, “Tomographic reconstruction of the single-photon fock state by high-frequency homodyne detection,” Phys. Rev. A 70, p. 053821, 2004. 23. A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, “Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon fock state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, p. 050402, 2001. 24. F. T. Arecchi, “Measurement of the statistical distribution of gaussian and laser sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, pp. 912–916, 1965. 25. A. Zavatta, M. Bellini, P. L. Ramazza, F. Marin, and F. T. Arecchi, “Time-domain analysis of quantum states of light: noise characterization and homodyne tomography,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, pp. 1189–1194, 2002. 26. D. N. Klyshko, “Utilization of vacuum fluctuations as an optical brightness standard,” Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 7, pp. 591–595, 1977. 27. G. K. Kitaeva, A. N. Penin, V. V. Fadeev, and Y. A. Yanait, “Measurement of brightness of light fluxes using vacuum fluctuations as a reference,” Sov. Phys. Dokl. 24, pp. 564–566, 1979. 28. K. Vogel and H. Risken, “Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase,” Phys. Rev. A 40, pp. 2847–2849(R), 1989. 29. U. Leonhardt, Measuring the quantum state of light, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997. 30. K. Banaszek, G. M. D’Ariano, M. G. A. Paris, and M. F. Sacchi, “Maximum-likelihood estimation of the density matrix,” Phys. Rev. A 61, p. 010304(R), 1999. 31. J. K. Asboth, J. Calsamiglia, and H. Ritsch, “Computable measure of nonclassicality for light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, p. 173602, 2005. 32. T. Richter and W. Vogel, “Nonclassicality of quantum states: A hierarchy of observable conditions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, p. 283601, 2002. 33. T. Richter and W. Vogel, “Observing the nonclassicality of a quantum state,” Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5, pp. 371–380, 2003. Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6305 63050Z-8