* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Attaining thought leadership and making it income
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Resource-based view wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Sales process engineering wikipedia , lookup
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
First-mover advantage wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Perfect competition wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Attaining thought leadership and making it income-generation tool The second meeting of the MPF Communications Panel was held at Eversheds on 2 March 2007. The Bloom Group’s Robert Buday, who has 20 years experience in professional services and the development and marketing of thought leadership, explored the best ways to capture the thoughts or intellectual capital (IC) of a professional firm’s experts. Robert revealed the results of a new study his firm conducted on the IC development and marketing practices of more than 300 North American and European consulting, law, accounting, IT services, training and other professional services firms. The study addressed the role of thought leadership in professional services marketing; how professional firms regard the quality of the intellectual capital that they market; the most effective ways to develop and capture that intellectual capital; and the most effective ways to market it. The Bloom Group created an online survey with 28 questions. The data was sliced and diced into US v Europe, marketing vs non-marketing respondents, size and type of professional firm and “IC leaders” vs “IC laggards.” (Definition: IC leaders were survey respondents who said the quality of the IC their firms market was far superior to that of their competitors. IC laggards said the quality of their IC was inferior or far inferior to the competitions.’) The key findings of the study were as follows: the key to building new business in professional services is compelling intellectual capital – strong ideas from firm experts that can be promoted through articles, speeches, books and other educationally oriented marketing activities. the executives surveyed (both marketing and non-marketing managers) said strong intellectual capital trumped other factors considered crucial to marketing effectiveness: having a strong brand and marketing image, a solid sales force, a sound marketing strategy and even a big marketing budget. “IC leaders” spend more of their resources in developing ideas and less in marketing. “IC laggards” the opposite. Firm marketing events/seminars and speaking at outside conferences are the most effective way of marketing intellectual capital, as the spoken word is regarded as being very powerful. Advertising and sales brochures were seen as the least effective ways of marketing IC. “High-bandwidth, low-bias vs low-bandwidth, high-bias marketing channels”. Highbandwidth, low-bias marketing activities include articles, books, and conference presentations. They allow a professional firm to impart a great deal of information on a given business issue, and in an educational (not promotional) way. A Harvard Business Review article written by a professional firm is the epitome of a high-bandwidth, low-bias marketing activity. Low-bandwidth, high-bias marketing channels include advertisements, trade show booths, and telemarketing. Such channels don’t allow a professional firm to show the depth of its expertise on any issue. In addition, they appear to the target audience to be blatantly promotional – i.e., prospects know that an advertisement is trying to sell them something. Bylined articles in third-party publications were more effective than articles in a professional firm’s own publications. Robert said the reason is that far many ore people typically read such third-party publications. In addition, a third-party publication is COMM LIT/EJXH(D012718) LN:253FAAB_21(1) considered to have tougher publishing standards – and thus greater authority -- than any professional firm publication. PR is often more used as a way to get professionals quoted rather than for submitting articles. Professional services PR people should focus on both. the majority of firms in Europe and the USA said their IC is of average effectiveness in creating leads and awareness. Even law firm clients believe that thought leadership is important. A recent European survey found that “individual lawyer expertise” was the deciding factor in choosing a legal advisor. In addition to the findings, Robert stated the following points with regard to thought leadership in professional services: many professional firms admit that the intellectual capital they market is anything but compelling. Marketers often blame firm experts for lacking novel and compelling ideas, whilst firm practice leaders often blame marketers for failing to capture their wisdom. publishing in outside journals is very important (those which target groups read) as this provides good leads and awareness. (A good example given was the Harvard Business Review as it is regarded as a leading publication with high readership). it is worth making your firm’s professionals -- whether lawyers, accountants, consultants, financial advisors or others -- being seen as the thought leaders in their own domain. If successful, the press will approach them because they perceive them as being at the top of their field in their areas and should be quoted. in addition to marketers, the firm’s professionals need to get involved in the process of developing IC. This process should be viewed as an R&D process that requires specialized skills organized in a department that works closing with marketing but does not report to marketing. The reason is that IC R&D must serve two roles: providing content to marketing, and providing content to a professional firm’s practice/service development. When IC R&D reports to marketing, the firm’s professionals will view its output strictly as marketing content. When marketing reports to IC R&D, marketing becomes a slave to only promote the R&D function. Marketing and R&D both must report to the same executive, preferably the firm’s managing director. IC R&D, done well, generates new services, new approaches to doing work for existing services, and ultimately new clients (if marketed well). Professional firms typically spend very little on IC R&D and far more on marketing. They need to spend at least on IC R&D as they do on marketing to get solid results. The second speaker was David Champion, European editor of Harvard Business Review (HBR), the world’s leading management journal. Many of the most influential management ideas were introduced to the world (or made famous) through HBR articles: e.g., marketing guru Ted Levitt’s “Marketing Myopia”; strategy professor Michael Porter’s “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy,”; emotional intelligence pioneer Daniel Goleman’s “What Makes a Leader,” to name just a few. David explained the editorial mission of HBR, the influential concepts that it has published over the years, and how to get published in the magazine. COMM LIT/EJXH(D012718) 2 LN:253FAAB_21(1) HBR’s editorial mission can be explained in one phrase: “improving the practice of management.” The publication strives to change the way managers of organizations around the world make decisions and the way the work of organizations is conducted. Thirdly, David said, HBR is chartered to help executives better understand the world in which they work. The publications readers can be categorized in three groups: Business strategists: Managers who use HBR articles to drive their companies’ strategy. Idea enthusiasts: managers who want to be on the leading edge of new management concepts. Practitioners: managers seeking a “concise, step-by-step guide on how to implement management techniques.” David explained the editorial sections or features of the publication: a section of shorter articles upfront called “Forethought”; fictional case studies illustrating a managerial dilemma, and articles from experts providing advice on how to resolve the dilemma; features (articles written by academics, consultants, executives and others on some business issue); and departments. As a publication for managers of organizations, HBR focuses on topics of widespread appeal to those managers. David categorized those topics into three categories of descending priority: Priority I Topics: leadership, managing people, organizational issues, change management, strategy. Priority II Topics: innovation, negotiation and decision making; customers and marketing; manage people (compensation, HR, diversity); operations; finance and control, managing technology; “strategy II” (i.e., globalization). Priority III: entrepreneurship, political economy (ethics and society, governance, government and law, environmental and corporate social responsibility); “big picture” (demographics); non-profit management. When trying to get published in the HBR, it is worth remembering that the article should not be about something which people already know about (the ideas should be new and surprising -aha! -- and useful to a wide readership). Article submissions also shouldn’t provide what David referred to as a “black box” – an approach or formula for solving some managerial issue that the authors say is too complex to explain. Authority is another criteria HBR editors use to judge submissions: Are the authors established in their field and, thus, seen as credible on the topic? The speakers demonstrated that if used effectively and to its full potential, professional service firms can market and capitalise on the thought leadership. Thought leadership has proven to generate substantial income and market eminence for many professional firms. Elizabeth Hibbard Simmons & Simmons COMM LIT/EJXH(D012718) 3 LN:253FAAB_21(1)