* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Characterization of the RNase A active site by Phage Panning
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Protein (nutrient) wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Peptide synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Cell-penetrating peptide wikipedia , lookup
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Self-assembling peptide wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Bottromycin wikipedia , lookup
Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides wikipedia , lookup
Characterization of the RNase A active site by Phage Panning Jeremy Kitchen, Neville Forlemu, and James Nolan School of Science and Technology, Georgia Gwinnett College, Lawrenceville, GA 30043 ABSTRACT We used the Phage Display technique to identify peptide sequences that bind to a protein target. A library of bacteriophages, each expressing a different segment of seven random amino acids at the beginning of the capsid protein on its exterior was allowed to bind to the immobilized target protein; in this case the RNAse A enzyme was immobilized on small petri plates. The eluted phage were propagated by replication in the host bacteria and the process was repeated for three rounds to select for sequences that bind the RNAse A active site with highest affinity. Individual phage plaques from the last round of purification were amplified and used to prepare DNA samples for sequence analysis. We analyzed the predicted amino acid sequences of active molecules for common features in order to develop hypotheses about how these proteins may interact with their target. We used Autodock molecular docking software to predict interaction affinities, identify the binding domains and interaction mechanism between RNase A and sample peptide sequences. This project was performed as a lab module of the Advanced Biochemistry course at Georgia Gwinnett College during the Fall 2014 and Spring 2015 semesters. INTRODUCTION The Phage Display technique is a method to identify peptides which can bind a target protein with high affinity. (1) A library of M13 bacteriophage are constructed with a randomized 7 amino acid sequence attached to the N-terminal sequence of the gpIII coat protein. These randomized phages are then given a chance to bind with a given protein (Figure 1A) with the unbound phage washed away. The phage with the peptide sequence that binds tightly to the protein will stay bound until it is outcompeted by a ligand known to bind to a specific site. The target protein in this experiment is RNase A and the ligand used to displace the phage from the active site is a vanadyl ribonucleoside complex (VRC) (2), a ligand known to bind to the active site. This quality allows for specific selection of the phage that best match to the active site. Because the phage each contain the genetic code for their unique protein sequence, they can be amplified in host bacteria to allow for multiple rounds of binding ensuring that the phage with the peptide sequence that best fits the active site will be the ones sequenced in the end. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Scott, JK and Smith GP. (1990) Science 249, 386-390. Berger SL, Birkenmeier CS. Biochemistry. (1979) Nov 13;18(23):5143-9. New England Biolabs E8100 Manual (2012). BigDye-Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit protocol. Waterhouse, A.M.et al. (2009) Bioinformatics 25 (9) 1189-1191 http://www.jalview.org Mandava, S L. Makowski, J. Uzubell, S. Devarapalli and DJ Rodi (2004). Proteomics 4; 1439-1460. Morris, GM., Huey, R, Lindstrom, W, Sanner, MF, Belew, RK, Goodsell, DS, and Olson, AJ (2009) J. Comput. Chem., 30: 27852791. http://www.pdb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1RUV 1A Phage population expressing different random peptides incubate with immobilized RNaseA 1B 2A Unbound phage washed away VRC used to displace phage peptides bound to active site 2B Eluted phage amplified and selection repeated twice more Figure 1. A. Phage Panning Method. RNase A was bound to a petri dish and a phage library expressing random 7-mer peptide surface sequences was added. Unbound phage were then washed away. The VRC enzyme inhibitor was then used to displace the phage bound to the active site. These phage were amplified and the process was repeated. The resulting phage were then sequenced. B. Aligned and Clustered Sequences. DNA sequence was determined from 24 random phage plaques. The translated sequences were clustered into groups using Jalview nearest-neighbor analysis. (5) The * and the ** sequences were found to each have three residue combinations in common through the Motif 2 program. (6) 2C Figure 2. A. RNase A with VRC Complex. The crystal structure (8) of RNase A is shown. The protein is shown in surface representation and the inhibitor VRC can be seen as a spacefilling model, which binds in the active site cleft of the enzyme. B. RNase A with docked peptides. RNase A is shown as in A with peptide sequences from Group 2 bound near the active site as directed by the Autodock modeling software. Peptides are represented in wireframe with different colors representing each sequence. Other sequence groups showed similar distributions. C. Docking with a representative peptide. Sequence SC5.1 from Group 2 shown in space-filling representation as in 2A. The peptide appears to bind in the active site cleft as well as surrounding area. MATERIALS AND METHODS DISCUSSION RNase A (25 ug/ml) was bound to petri dishes overnight at 4°C. 1X1011 plaque forming units (pfu) from the Ph.D-7 phage library (3) were incubated with the dishes for 30 minutes, then washed ten times with TBST. The phage bound to the active site were then eluted with 1mL of 0.5mM VRC. These eluted phage were then amplified back to the 1X1011 pfu/mL in ER2738 E. Coli for the next round of selection. After 3 rounds of selection, individual plaques were picked and sequenced (4), then analyzed at the UGA Georgia Genomics Facility. The translated sequences were then clustered by similarities using the Jalview and Motif 2 programs (5, 6) (Figure 1B). The sequences were then input into the Autodock molecular docking software to further characterize their possible interactions with the active site (7), based upon previous descriptions of the enzyme structure (8). The output from Jalview (Figure 1A) showed five different groups of similar peptides. Additional sequence analysis with the RELIC motif search programs identified two possible binding motifs: in group 1, a SLxxQ motif was identified in two of the four (*) suggesting a similar mode of binding to the target protein. Group 2 also included two members with a different motif, VRL, identified by motif search. Groups 2 and 3 also share a positively charged residue in the 5 position in several of the sequences. Groups 3,4, and 5 share a proline, which might indicate a particular bend is required for binding to the active site. Autodock analysis of the binding of the peptides to the known 3D structure of the RNase A enzyme has just begun, but should help to identify how the peptides interact with their target. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This project was supported by the GGC School of Science and Technology and by a STEM minigrant from the GA BOR to GGC..