* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 8, Lecture 1
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear Physics and Quantum Mechanics: Neutron Stars At the end of their lives, nucleosynthesis in stars stops and the stars collapse to white dwarfs. In white dwarfs, the gravitational force is balanced by “electron degeneracy”. [According to the Pauli-exclusion principle, no two electrons (fermions) can occupy the same quantum mechanical state.] If the star is too massive, M>1.4 Msun (the Chandrasekhar limit), the electrons become relativistic and P~n5/3 n4/3. The electron degeneracy pressure is no longer sufficient and the white dwarf collapses further. Here the reaction e + p n + νe takes place. The degeneracy of the neutrons (fermions) prevents further collapse up to the Oppenheimer-Volkov limit. Neutron stars. Pulsars: rapidly rotating neutrons stars with strong magnetic fields. The core of the neutron star is believed to be an unusual state of nuclear matter. A strange quark star may also be possible. (Area of current research) Today’s Plan Review Chapter 8: meson mixing and CP violation Schedule student presentations Schedule Final Exam (two options: Friday May 5 or Monday May 8). Fill out ECAFE forms. https://www.hawaii.edu/ecafe/ Review of Chapter 8 Question I: K 0 , K 0 are eigenstates of the (weak, strong, EM) interaction Question II: K10 , K20 are eigenstates of the (weak, strong, EM) interaction Answers: strong, weak Ans: Also called the K-short and Klong Question: Suppose you start with a pure K0 beam, what happens to it as a function of time ? Question: How do the lifetimes of the K1 and K2 compare ? QM: Anti-K0 spontaneously appears Question: How can one observe kaon mixing in experiment ? Hint: What are the weak semileptonic decays of neutral kaons to pions ? (remember the quark content of neutral kaons) Hint: How can one distinguish a neutral kaon and its antiparticle ? K 0 ® p -l +n l ; K 0 ® p +l - n l Gjesdal, S. et al. (1974); Phys. Lett. 52B 113 Question: What is δ in this plot of data ? Ans: ASL, semileptonic asymmetry d (t) º P + (t) - P - (t) = e -G st 2 cos(Dmt) Feynman diagrams for K0-anti K0 mixing Question: Are the top quark contributions significant ? Why or Why not ? Quantum Mechanics: Regeneration Murray Gell-Mann Start with a K0 beam in vacuum (produced by a pion beam hitting a target A). Question: What happens between the blue target and red target ? Abraham Pais Question: What happens after the red (regeneration target) ? Question: Consider two pairs of mutually perpendicular (crossed polarizers) linear polarization states of light rotated by 450 to each other. Consider the following analogy: let the K0, K0-bar system be analogous to the first pair of axes and then let the K1, K2 be analogous to the second pair. Is this analogy correct ? Design an experiment analogous to the experiment of Pais and Piccioni using linear polarizers. Review (strong and weak eigenstates) 1 | K >= (| K 0 > + | K 0 >) 2 1 0 | K 2 >= (| K 0 > - | K 0 >) 2 0 1 1 | K >= (| K10 > + | K 20 >) 2 0 1 0 0 | K >= (| K1 > - | K 2 >) 2 0 Analogy: +-45 polarized light (K0 and K0bar are crossed vertical and horizontal polarizers) What is the difference between KS,KL and K1, K2 ? | K S >= | K L >= 1 1+ | e |2 1 1+ | e |2 0 0 0 | K > + e | K > »| K ( 1 ) 1> 2 0 0 0 | K > + e | K > »| K ( 2 ) 2> 1 Question: What is ε ? And how large is it ? Ans: A measure of CP violation in mixing. The epsilon parameter is 2 x 10-3 in the kaon system. Question: How was ε first measured ? Christenson, J et al. (1964); Phys. Rev. ett. 13 338 © Nobel Foundation 1980 Cronin Fitch 1964: CP symmetry is violated CP=-1 CP=+1 B( K L ) (2.0 0.4) 103 • • • • Shocking but Alternative interpretations ruled out A new particle X: KL g KS + X A new long-range force Extra nonlinear terms in the Schrödinger equation (beyond quantum mechanics !) Regeneration of KS on an unfortunate fly trapped in the helium bag. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 138 (1964) There is a small difference between matter & antimatter CP Violation • There are small differences between matter and anti-matter observed in the weak interaction. • The small effect is seen only in particles containing strange quarks called “K-longs” Jim Cronin, University of Chicago Val Fitch, Princeton University Why is CP Violation Interesting ? • 1967: Andrei Sakharov (brilliant Russian physicist and dissident): the cosmic connection linking particle physics with the existence of the Universe. Early Universe Matter 10,000,000,000 Antimatter 10,000,000,000 Nobel Prizes from Surprising Discoveries about Weak Interactions of Quarks Maximal P violation 1957 T.D. Lee C.N. Yang Small CP violation 1980 J. Cronin V. Fitch O(1) CP violation and 3 generations 18 M. Kobayashi T. Maskawa 2008 What is the Feynman diagram for B0-anti B0 mixing ? Hint: What is the quark content of a B0 and anti-B0 ? Hint: Is this a first or second order weak process ? How to measure particle-antiparticle mixing ? Question: How does one determine whether mixing has occurred ? Hint: look at the charge of the second lepton ? Ans: Opposite Flavor tags versus Same Flavor tags (form an asymmetry). N.B. This is NOT CP violating. Abe, K. et al (Belle collab). (2005); Phys. Rev. D 71 072003 Question: Why is the x-axis, the modulus of t ? Diagrams for BJ/ψ KS Question: Why is this process CP violating ? Ans: The element Vtd is complex and the amplitudes interfere. How does one measure CP Violation ? Why is time dependence required ? Hint: What is the Charge conjugation for e+ e- ® ¡(4S) ® B0 B0 Another hint: C=-1 since the reaction proceeds through a single virtual photon. | y >=| B0 (t, f )B0 (t ' ,tag) > - | B0 (t ' ,tag)B0 (t, f ) > Ans: CP violating goes as sin(ΔmΔt) Time integrated CP asymmetries vanish at the 4S. Note also need “flavor tagging” Some history: Summer of 2001 Belle: BaBar: The first example of CP Violation outside of the kaon (strange quark) system. CP Violating Effects of O(1) rather than O(10-3) CP Violation from Belle and BaBar Adapted from Adachi, I. et al. (2012); Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 171802 Adapted from Aubert, B. et al. (2009); Phys. Rev. D79 072009 Review questions for Chapter 8 What are the three types of CP violation ? Ans: I CP violation due to mixing i.e. violation in the wavefunction (ΔS=2) Ans: II CP violation in the decay amplitude a.k.a. “direct CP violation”, “epsilon-prime’ (ΔS=1 or ΔB=1) Ans: III CP violation due to the interference between decays with and without mixing. (ΔB=2)