Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Roman economy wikipedia , lookup
History of the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Roman Senate wikipedia , lookup
Romanization of Hispania wikipedia , lookup
The Last Legion wikipedia , lookup
Slovakia in the Roman era wikipedia , lookup
Constitution of the Late Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
History of the Constitution of the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Sociological Perspective Paper The Gladiator movie was showed on cinemas last May 5, 2000, that cost $103 million to produce and grossed $188 million in cinemas (Gladiator, 2010). It was directed by Ridley Scott, written by David Franzoni, and featured Russell Crowe as the gladiator. In many scenes, it presented a story that is within another story. There is a major conflict between the optimistic schemes of the senate and the emperor and the minor role of the gladiator as a device in their community. Majority of the film presented various topics in sociology and the conflict between the society and its government is always the major concept in the modern world. Karl Marx was specifically fond of one’s domination at the price of others and how this domination guides the redeployment of resources within the community. In addition, the gladiatorial matchups themselves showed an obvious purpose which is entertainment for the society as well as concealed purpose which is killing of members of the society that are lowly and deprived without the need for execution. Sections of this paper will discuss the sociological devices and functions showed in the movie and discuss those devices within the frame of the conflict viewpoint and functionalist viewpoint of sociology. Gladiator: The Film The film started during the Roman war for Germania and land of Barbarians. The Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius witnessed the glory of his General Maximus Decimus Meredias in defeating the barbarians to take the land for their colonization (Scott, 2000). During the night of their celebration, the emperor told in private that Maximus would be the next emperor in case the former died. On the other hand, during the emperor’s sleep his son Marcus Aurelius killed his own father and succeeded as the new emperor. The new emperor offered the service of Maximus but he declines causing the new emperor to execute him but Maximus successfully run away and became a slave as a gladiator after he falls short to save his family from the Emperor. He fought as an unpopular gladiator and later on named as “The Spaniard”. He was successful in attaining the privilege of fighting the Emperor himself in the Roman Coliseum. Subsequently, he was able to kill the emperor but he sustained a fatal injury. After he was victorious he was named as the new Roman Emperor and declared that the power be brought back to the senate which is the wish of the late Marcus Aurelius before he died. Maximus died and then went to see his family in the afterlife. It is a glorious story of virtuous retribution, the fight between the good and the bad, and the ability of the human soul to hurdle any difficulty. In the end, the courageous general died but gave the Roman society stability and consistency. Conflict Perspective Karl Marx was greatly fascinated in the conflict between the stages of societies and how the lower members of a society are oppressed for the advantage of the higher class. He described the lower classes as the proletariat. In its simplicity, the conflict viewpoint of sociology discusses that, “…social activities is best comprehended in terms of quarrel or disagreement between groups” (Schaefer, 2006, p. 15). In the course of the film Gladiator there is one query that infused every scene:”Emperor or Senate?” Rome was established as a republican government or Senator Gracus would have us think. In the course of the movie, the government is subjugated by the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and his son Commidus right after him. It is obvious that these Roman Leaders are tyrants. They rule the military, the government institution, and the society simultaneously. On the other hand, before the death of Marcus Aurelius he grieves this system and explains that he desires the power of the government and military to revert back into the senate’s hand totally. The concept is that the senate is chosen by the people, from the people, to converse for the people. In this idea, Marcus Aurelius was suggesting that the working group should govern themselves through the means of a chosen, representative government aside from an unelected Emperor that is through power of heritage. In the Emperor’s view this would lighten the gap between the ruling group and the working group and therefore, would provide equality to the Roman Empire. Functionalist Perspective The Gladiator, as an instrument of society is best described by the slave owner Promixo: Eventually, we’re already dead…plunge this into another man’s flesh, and they will cheer and admire you for that. You may even start to admire them” (Scott, 2000). As Proximo view it, the obvious goal of the gladiator was a recurring relationship of entertainment between the Roman Society and the gladiator themselves. The gladiator would fight and kill each other for the satisfaction of the public and the public would cheer and love the gladiators that survived. On a different stage though, the concealed purpose of the gladiatorial matchups was to avoid the Roman culture of the lowest members of the community. The prisoners, homeless, and the slaves were utilized first in the gladiatorial matchups. In this view, the gladiatorial matchups were used as an innovative device that brings the feeble and ill members of the society to their deaths while at the same time giving worship and glory to those that could survive the game. Conclusion In conclusion, it would appear that the conflict viewpoint and functionalistic viewpoint of sociology find to clarify two sides of the same coin. On the other side, the conflict of class stages exemplified in the Emperor or senate query defines the large-scale events of the Roman Empire, while the purpose of the gladiator within that society struggle as a microcosm. The concealed purpose of the gladiator aside from the obvious purpose of the gladiator intrinsically is under the lowest stages of society to the service of the ruling group. It’s obvious that the suggested solution to this group inequality is to provide the power of government to the senate which is chosen by the working group. References Gladiator. (2010). The Internet Movie Database. Retrieved November 9, 2010, from IMDB Web site: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0172495/ Scott, R. (2000). Gladiator [Motion Picture]. United States: Universal Pictures. Schaefer, R. T. (2006). Sociology: A brief introduction (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.