Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Jin Lab: Research Update 2.24.09 Stabilized Immunoliposomes for Targeted Drug Delivery Nwanyinma Nnodum Background Potential of Liposomes as Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers 1 – Traditional “plain” nanocarrier (a – drug loaded into carrier) 2 – Targeted nanocarrier or immunocarrier (b – mAb attached to carrier surface) 3 – Magnetic nanocarrier (c – magnetic particles loaded into carrier together with the drug) 4 – Long-circulating nanocarrier (d – surface-attached protecting polymer (usually PEG)) 5 – Contrast imaging nanocarrier (e – heavy metal atom (i.e. 111In) loaded onto the nanocarrier via the carrier-incorporated chelating moiety) 6 – Cell-penetrating nanocarrier (f – cell-penetrating peptide, CPP, attached to the carrier surface) 7 – DNA-carrying nanocarrier (g – DNA complexed by the carrier via the carrier surface positive charge) 8 –Multifunctional pharmaceutical nanocarrier combining the properties of the carriers # 1–7. Background Potential of Liposomes as Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers 1 – Traditional “plain” nanocarrier (a – drug loaded into carrier) 2 – Targeted nanocarrier or immunocarrier (b – mAb attached to carrier surface) 3 – Magnetic nanocarrier (c – magnetic particles loaded into carrier together with the drug) 4 – Long-circulating nanocarrier (d – surface-attached protecting polymer (usually PEG)) 5 – Contrast imaging nanocarrier (e – heavy metal atom (i.e. 111In) loaded onto the nanocarrier via the carrier-incorporated chelating moiety) 6 – Cell-penetrating nanocarrier (f – cell-penetrating peptide, CPP, attached to the carrier surface) 7 – DNA-carrying nanocarrier (g – DNA complexed by the carrier via the carrier surface positive charge) 8 –Multifunctional pharmaceutical nanocarrier combining the properties of the carriers # 1–7. Overview FITC Encapsulation • Floatation assay Cell Culture • HeLa: human cervical cancer cells • MDA-MB231: human breast cancer cells • MCF-7: human breast cancer cells • NIH 3T3: mouse fibroblast cells FACS • MAP-wGFP-His • 9R-wGFP-His • RGD • HER2 Protein Expression & Purification Methods FITC Encapsuation • FITC encapsulated during lipid hydration step (0.48 mg FITC/mL HBS) • Floatation assays using sucrose • Mix 500 µL sample + 500 µL 70% sucrose • Gently add 3mL of 20% sucrose to top • Ultracentrifuge for 2hrs at 35000 rpm, 8°C • Remove band (liposome + FITC) at top with 16g syringe & rest is free FITC • Bring fractions to 4mL & check absorbance with Nanodrop Cell Culture • alphaMEM+10%FBS+1%PenStrep for MDA-MB231, MCF-7, NIH-3T3 • Advanced DMEM+10%FBS+1%Glutamine for HeLa Methods (cont.) Flow Cytometry (FACS) Sample Prep • Spin down cells from tissue culture & remove supernatant • Resuspend in 1xPBS • Aliquot 100µL per sample, spin down, & remove sup. • Resuspend in 100µL of PBS+1%BSA+protein sample • Incubate for 1hr at 4°C • Spin down & remove sup. with free protein • Resuspend in 200µL of PBS+1%BSA X-wGFP Synthesis & Purification • Large scale production of MAP-, 9R-, wGFP • Purification with Ni-NTA-His column, SDS-PAGE, FPLC Results FITC Encapsulation • Less than 5% encapsulated FITC Encapsulation Absorbtion Original Abs average Free FITC Abs average FITC+Liposome Abs average 495nm Sample 1 Sample 2 0.168 0.168 0.176 0.176 0.182 0.182 0.175333333 0.17533333 0.166 0.128 0.155 0.136 0.1605 0.132 0.023 0.041 0.03 0.043 0.0265 0.042 Efficiency (%Encapsulated) 15.11406844 23.9543726 Efficiency (%Free) 91.53992395 75.2851711 0.5 0.48 0.5 0.48 volume (mL) Original Conc (mg/mL) FITC encapsulated (mg) 0.036273764 0.24mg 0.05749049 0.046882129 Results (cont.) Flow Cytometry (FACS) HeLA NIH-3T3 Results (cont.) Flow Cytometry (FACS) MDA-MB231 • • • • Noise! Minimal shift Incubation at 37°C More cells MCF-7 Future Plans • FACS • With proteins • With proteins plus liposomes • Confocal microscopy • Drug encapsulation References • Peer, Park, Morishita, Carman, Shimaoka. “Systemic Leukocyte-Directed siRNA Delivery Revealing Cyclin D1 as an Anti-Inflammatory Target”. Science. 319(2008): 627-630. • Ronny Ruger, Dafne Muller, Alfred Fahr, & Roland E. Kontermann. “In Vitro Characterization of Binding and Stability of Single-Chain Fv Ni-NTA-Liposomes”. Journal of Drug Targeting. 14.8 (2006): 576–582. Thanks for listening!