Download Part 1 - OoCities

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Digestion wikipedia , lookup

Drug design wikipedia , lookup

Lipid signaling wikipedia , lookup

Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Peptide synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Specialized pro-resolving mediators wikipedia , lookup

15-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid wikipedia , lookup

Butyric acid wikipedia , lookup

Hepoxilin wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
CASE STUDY #2
GROUP T - PART I
November 15, 2001
Group Members:
James Morton
Minhchau Nguyen
Mariela Passarelli
Shaun Riley
Urhoy Tarzi
Nhi Tran
Hoa Vu
Page 1 of 6
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
Physicochemical Properties of Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid
We have chosen amoxicillin as our -lactam antibiotic and clavulanic acid as our -lactamase
inhibitor. The amoxicillin molecular formula is C16H19N3O5S and the molecular weight is
365.14. Chemically, amoxicillin is (2S,5R,6R)-6-[(R)-(-)-2-(p-hydroxyphenyl)acetamido]-3,3dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid. The clavulanic acid
molecular formula is C8H9NO5 and the molecular weight is 199.16. Chemically, clavulanic acid
is (Z)-(2R,5R)-3-(2-hydroxyethylidene)-7-oxo-4-oxa-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]-heptane-2-carboxylate.
Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid may be represented structurally as:
HO
HO
O
O
OH
O
O
H
H
N
N
NH2
N
S
H H H
O
O
HO
Clavulanic Acid
Amoxicillin
Amoxicillin contains the following six functional groups:
phenol
amine
amide
O
HO
-lactam
HO
O
N
N
H
NH2
carboxylic acid
thiozole ring
N
O
S
Clavulanic acid contains the following four functional groups:
ene
primary alcohol
-lactam
carboxylic acid
OH
O
N
HO
O
Amoxicillin has three ionizable groups. Hammet-Taft calculations were performed to estimate
the pKas of these groups. Our results were then compared with experimentally derived values
(ref. 1). Table 1 below compares these values.
Table 1: pKas of Amoxicillin Ionizable Functional Groups
Ionizable Functional
Groups
Carboxylic Acid
Amine
Phenol
Hammet-Taft
Experimental
2.7
6.6
9.9
2.87
7.28
9.65
The calculated pKa (Hammet-Taft) for the carboxylic acid group of clavulanic acid is 3.9.
Development of Resistance to -Lactam Antibiotics (ref. 2-5)
The classification of -lactam antibiotics includes penicillin derivatives such as amoxicillin,
which is found in the prescription drug Augmentin. These antibiotics inhibit bacterial enzymes
Page 2 of 6
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
known as penicillin-binding-proteins (PBP), which synthesize the bacterial cell wall layer. A
great problem encountered through the years is antibiotic resistance. One of the major causes is
the production of -lactamases by bacteria, which inactivate the administered antibiotic by the
hydrolysis of the amide bond in the -lactam ring of the drug, thereby, creating resistance to the
antibiotic. -lactamases can be plasmid or chromosomally mediated. Several details, such as the
amount of -lactamase produced, the rate of breakdown of the antibiotic, and the affinity of lactamases for the drug, influences the mechanism of inactivation. Also, there could be problems
penetrating the bacterial wall. Lipopolysaccharides and porin proteins such as OmpF which
make up the membrane, undergo alterations and reduce the permeability of the drug, this leads to
an increase in resistance with an increase in the expression of -lactamases and their efflux,
having a greater effect on antibiotic resistance all together. Sometimes, the PBPs present on the
outer membrane of the bacteria have a decreased affinity for the drug. This may be due to an
increase in the quantity of PBPs, the presence of resistant to PBPs, or just the low affinity for
PBPs. Antibiotic resistance has been known to be occurring for billions of years, this is what has
led to the development of more specific antibiotics and man-made derivatives of already known
antibiotics. With the help and education of health care providers as well as patients we can fight
this problem by prescribing antibiotics only when needed and in moderation.
Properties Affecting Drug Absorption in the Gastrointestinal Tract
Solubility
Plots of solubility versus pH for both amoxicillin and clavulanic acid were generated by
ACD/Aqueous Solubility (v5.0) and obtained using the ACD/I-Lab service. To estimate the pH
dependence of solubility, melting points of the drugs were required. The melting point (mp) of
amoxicillin was found in literature to be 212˚C (ref. 6), while for clavulanic acid the mp is
165.0˚C (ref. 7). Plots of the resulting solubility data at 25˚C are in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
CLAVULANIC ACID Solubility at Differnet pHs
900
1300
800
1200
700
1100
600
1000
Solubility (g/L)
Solubility (g/L)
FIGURE 1
AMOXICILLIN Solubility at Different pHs
500
400
900
800
300
700
200
600
100
500
400
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
pH
pH
For clavulanic acid (Fig. 2), the solubility greatly increases when its carboxylic acid group
becomes ionized (pKa = 3.9, Hammet-Taft calculation). Note that even when clavulanic acid is
predominately uncharged (pH < 1), it is still intrinsically soluble (438 g/L). For amoxicillin at
Page 3 of 6
14
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
pH less than 9 , the ionic charges of the carboxylic acid (negative, pKa = 2.87) and the amine
(positive, pKa = 7.28) will counteract each other (i.e., zwitterion ion effect), causing the
antibiotic to be less soluble. At pH 9 and higher, the effect of the negative charge of the
carboxylic acid can predominate since the amine will mostly be deprotonated and uncharged.
Additionally, at pH 11, amoxicillin’s phenol will become predominately ionized, yielding yet
more negative charge, adding to the solubility of amoxicillin.
Rate of Solution
Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate that the solubility of amoxicillin in pHs corresponding to the
stomach (pH 1 – 2) and small intestine (pH 6 – 7) is quite low (< 1 g/L). On the other hand,
clavulanic acid, at these same pHs, is quite soluble (> 438 g/L), especially at pHs > 3 (solubilty >
1150 g/L). Because of the low solubility of amoxicillin, it will intrinsically have a low rate of
solution. According to Saismaa, et. al. (ref. 8), the dissolution rate constant of amoxicillin
trihydrate was experimentally found to be 1 x 10-6 mol*cm2/minute at 37C and pH 6 (intestinal
conditions). In contrast, clavulanic acid at the similar physiological conditions will have a higher
rate of solution due to a significantly higher solubility (see Figure 2). Therefore, the ratelimiting step of the absorption of amoxicillin in the GI tract is its dissolution, while the ratelimiting step for clavulanic acid in its absorption into plasma membrane. It is also known that, in
part, the rate of solution can be influenced by the particle size before dissolution begins; the
smaller the particle size, the faster the rate of solution due to the increased amount of drug
exposed to the diluent (i.e., much larger surface area).
Degradation Properties
Since amoxicillin and clavulanic acid are both -lactams, they are susceptible to acid- and basecatalyzed hydrolysis of the four-membered -lactam ring. According to Zia (ref. 1),
amoxicillin’s maximum stability has been measured at 35C to be at pH 5.77, with a rate
constant of 55 hours-1. It is noted that amoxicillin is more stable at lower pH conditions because
at these pHs the amine group is protonated, thereby utilizing the free electron pair of the
nitrogen. When the amine is deprotonated at higher pH (pH > 8), a pair of free electrons is
available for nucleophilic attack of the cyclic amide (-lactam) and generates a tri-cyclic
compound identified in an article by Bundgaard (ref. 9):
HO
O
NH
HN
S
N
H
COOH
Partition Coefficients
The Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC) has produced a program on their website
(esc.syrres.com) that calculates log P (or log Ko/w). Log P results were obtained for the
compounds in Table 1 by entering the indicated CAS RN.
It is apparent that uncharged amoxicillin, P = 9.33 (i.e., 9.33 times more likely to be in
hydrophobic environment than in water), is quite soluble is hydrophobic media such as the
Page 4 of 6
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
plasma membrane of intestinal epithelial cells. This calculated result is the intrinsic partition
coefficient, which does not account for ionic charges arising from ionization of the carboxylic
acid, amine and phenol groups. On the other hand, clavulanic acid yields P = 0.00912, which
indicates that intrinsically it is not lipophilic (i.e., will not dissolve well in hydrophobic
environments).
Table 2: Estimated Partition Coefficients
Drug
Amoxicillin
Clavulanic Acid
Ampicillin
Ampicillin Sodium
Penicillin G Sodium
CAS RN
26787-78-0 (1)
58001-44-8
69-53-4
69-52-3
69-57-8
Log P
0.97 (2)
-2.04 (3)
1.45
-3.41
-3.01
P
9.33
9.12 x 10-3
28.2
3.89 x 10-4
9.77 x 10-4
(1) Another CAS RN for amoxicillin, 61336-70-7, yields the same Log P results.
(2) An experimental amoxicillin result, log P = 0.87 (P = 7.41), was identified in Sangster,
1994 by the SRC partition coefficient software.
(3) Log P for clavulanic acid of –2.23 (P = 5.88 x 10-3) was also calculated from a 2nd
source (ACD/LogP, v5.0, using the ACD/I-Lab serive).
The salt of amoxicillin could not be found, but the sodium salts of ampicillin, an antibiotic
similar in structure to amoxicillin, and penicilllin G, another aminopenicillin, illustrate the fact
that the presence of ionic charge (negative in these two cases) greatly reduces the drugs ability to
absorb into hydrophobic environments. Ampicillin (uncharged) has P = 28.2, but decreases to P
= 0.000389 when charged (ampicillin sodium), a 72,000-fold decrease! Penicillin G yields a
similar result of P = 0.000977. Therefore, based upon these two examples, amoxicillin would
also follow the same trend when having an overall net charge, as when the pH > 9.5.
There is an inverse relationship between the solubility of a drug and its partition coefficient.
When highly soluble in water, a drug will have little solubility in hydrophobic media such as
plasma membrane. Take amoxicillin as an example. When it has little overall charge (net
charge), the solubility is quite low (between pH of 2.0 and 8.0) and the partition coefficient is
rather high (P = 9.33). But when it is has a substantial net charge (pH > 9.5), amoxicillin
becomes quite soluble in water and insoluble in a hydrophobic environment (P = 10 -4).
According to Goodman & Gilman (ref. 10), amoxicillin has “excellent” absorption in the GI tract
relative to other antibiotics, especially ampicillin, which has “good” absorption.
Active Transport
According to Bretschneider, et. al. (ref. 11), many -lactam antibiotics are transported by the
peptide transporter, PEPT1. This is a rather general transporter. It recognizes naturally
occurring dipeptide and tripeptide substrates. -lactam antibiotics possess peptide-like structures
such as the amino group and the carboxylic acid group. -lactam antibiotics resemble the
backbone of physiologically occurring tripeptides, and is therefore, recognized and actively
transported by PEPT1. This transporter is driven by a transmembrane H+ gradient, and it
catalyzes the simultaneous transport of its substrates with H+. Although the PEPT1 actively
transports many -lactam antibiotics, it has not been specifically established as an active
transport mechanism for amoxicillin.
Page 5 of 6
Group T
Case Study #2, Part I
According to Westphal, et. al. (ref. 12), an active transport mechanism does exist for amoxicillin
because its intestinal absorption kinetics follows a zero-order process. Also, the existence of a
transporter helps to explain the efficiency of amoxicillin absorption despite its physiochemical
properties. Amoxicillin and other aminopenicillins have been shown to by transported by a
dipeptide carrier-mediated process in vitro. This transport process is energized by an inward
pumping of protons across the membrane. This gradient is induced by the exchange of sodium
ions and protons, and calcium ions are involved in the control of this gradient. Using calcium
channel blockers, like nifedipine, has been shown to significantly enhance absorption of
amoxicillin.
References
1. Zia, H. Shalchian, N. and Borhanian, F. Kinetics of amoxicillin degradation in aqueous
solutions. Can. J. Pharm. Sci. 12(3): p 80-83 (1977).
2. Essack S. The Development of B-Lactam Antibiotics in Response to the Evolution of BLactamases. Pharmaceutical Research. Vol. 18, No. 10, October 2001.
3. Abrutyn E, Fraimow H, and Kaye S. Pathogens Resistant to Antimicrobial Agents. Infectious
Disease Clinics of North America. Vol. 14, No. 2, June 2000. W.B. Saunders Company.
4. Rosenbloom H. Drug-Resistant Pathogens. RT Magazine. The Journal of Respiratory Care
Practitioners. June 2000. CurAnt Communications, Inc.
5. http://www.rtmagazine.com/
6. Patent: Dobfar, DE 2755903, 1978; Chemical Abstracts, Vol. 89, #146896.
7. Patent: Beecham Group, LTD. DE 2733230, 1978; Chemical Abstracts, Vol. 88, #136605.
8. Saismaa, T. and Totterman, A.M. Dissolution Studies on Ampicillin Embonate and
Amoxycillin Embonate. Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 1
(1990), pages 61 – 65.
9. Bundgaard H. Polymerization of penicillins. II. Kinetics and mechanism of dimerization and
self-catalyzed hydrolysis of amoxycillin in aqueous solution.
Acta Pharmaceutica
Suecica,14(1):47-66 (1977).
10. Petri, W.A., Jr. Chapter 45: Antimicrobial Agents (Continued); Penicillins, Cephalosporins,
and Other -Lactam Antibiotics. Goodman & Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of
Therapeutics, Tenth Edition (2001).
11. Bretschneider, B., Brandsch, M., Neubert, R. “Intestinal transport of -lactam antibiotics:
analysis of the affinity at the H+/Peptide symporter (PEPT1), the uptake into caco-2 cell
monolayers and the transepithelial flux.” Pharmaceutical Research. 16(1): 55-61, 1999.
12. Westphal, J., Trouvin, J., Deslandes, A., Carbon, C. “Nifedipine enhances amoxicillin
absorption kinetics and bioavailability in humans.” Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics. 255(1):312-17, 1990.
Page 6 of 6