Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Gene Expression Measurement of Immuno-Oncology Targets in a Single FFPE Section Using a Novel Targeted Sequencing Assay Monica Reinholz, Debrah Thompson, James Cooley, Xiao-Bo Chen, Iris Howlett, John Luecke, Qian Liu, Patrick Roche. HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. | Tucson, AZ; Abstract 2237 Sample Input Dynamic Range Abstract HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay Background: The field of immuno-oncology (IO) covers a broad set of research disciplines and presents a highly varied set of experimental requirements. Experimental challenges include sample types of varying quality and quantity of material (including small fixed samples and blood products) as well as an expanding multiplicity of targets to assay for immunological response. The HTG EdgeSeq system combines HTG Molecular Diagnostics’ (HTG) proprietary quantitative nuclease protection assay chemistry with next-generation sequencing (NGS) to enable semi-quantitative analysis of hundreds to thousands of targeted genes in a single assay. Biological relevance is presented for two HTG EdgeSeq assays, the HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay and the HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel. Survival Analysis Assay Comparison of Gene Expression of Immune Markers HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel CD20 (MS4A1) Pearson Correlations Methods: Assay performance characteristics including sample input titration and reproducibility are presented in brief. Examples of the biological relevance of this data are provided by qualitative examination of expression from subject samples each profiled using a single 5 µm FFPE section. Twenty-three FFPE tissue samples from DLBCL patients with progression-free survival (PFS) outcome data were evaluated using the HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay and the HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel. Optimal cut-points for a set of immune markers (CD68, CD8A, CTLA4, LAG3, CD20, CD56, PDCD1, PDCD1LG2, CD274) were obtained by maximizing expression using PFS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are shown for a representative set of these genes. Average expression for each of the immune genes were tabulated for progressors and non-progressors by assay and further stratified by ABC/GCB status. FFPE: 0.78 mm2-12.5 mm2 Cells: 234 cells-7500 cells uRNA: 0.78 ng-12.5 ng PAXgene: Neat (32 µl-1:16) Results: Correlative expression across the dynamic range was obtained within each of the sample types tested (Pearson correlations ranging between 0.96 to 0.99 shown for HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay). High reproducibility was observed across technical replicates and across platforms (r ≥ 0.94) and days (median r > 0.93; data not shown) for both assays. In two melanoma tumors, the lymphocyte infiltrates appear to be similar, whereas one tumor appears to be mounting a significant type I interferon response, which is not as apparent in the other tumor. In the series of DLBCL samples, gene expression distribution was consistent between the two panels for most of the examined markers. Statistically significant differences in PFS by CD20, CD8, PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD68 and CTLA4 (not shown) expression were observed using the HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay and the HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel. Gene Name A ligand for PD-1. Activated T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells, to modulate activation or inhibition CD68 Myeloid cells (macrophages) CD8; Leu2; MAL; p32 Cytotoxic T cell receptor (TCR). Binds to MHC1 protein. CTLA4 CD152 Expressed on the surface of Helper T cells and transmits an inhibitory signal to T cells LAG3 CD223 A cell surface molecule with diverse biologic effects on T cell function CD20 Expressed on B-cells; enables optimal B-cell immune response against T-independent antigens NCAM Neural Cell Adhesion Marker CD56 A homophilic binding glycoprotein expressed on the surface of neurons, glia, skeletal muscle and natural killer cells PDCD1 PD-1 CD279 A cell surface receptor that belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily and is expressed on T cells and pro-B cells PD-L2; CD273 A second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation CD68 CD8A Conclusions: The HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay and the HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel provide valuable tools for researchers exploring the host immune response to tumors across a wide variety of tissue types. Combining highly reproducible results with very small sample input allows the assays to be utilized for the limited specimens available to researchers. MS4A1 HTG EdgeSeq System Workflow mm2-12.5 mm2 FFPE: 0.39 Cells: 234 cells-7500 cells CD8 Function PD-L1 CD274 HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel Immune Marker PDCD1L2 PD-L1 (CD274) Gene Expression Cutoff mm 2 : 0.39 cells: 250 0.78 500 1.56 1000 3.13 2000 6.25 4000 12.5 8000 log2cpm Reproducibility HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay Extraction-free method Proprietary lysis buffer Amenable to small FFPE and blood samples Nuclease protection chemistry Minimal hands-on time Rapid sequencing library preparation methods Coupled with NGS Intra-run Inter-processor uRNA Equivalent to size of 1.5 mm diameter TMA core Methods HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay: § 549 genes § Sample input evaluated through a 5-point titration curve using Pearson Correlation § Reproducibility for intra-run, inter-day/run, and inter-processor evaluated using SUDHL6 cell line and universal RNA (uRNA) through Pearson Correlation HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel Marker cut-off N High N Low cut-off N High N Low CD274 8.45 20 3 9.51 18 4 CD68 10.87 20 3 12.17 18 4 CD8A 10.45 9 14 10.68 14 8 CTLA4 6.54 20 3 6.96 20 2 LAG3 9.02 19 4 11.66 11 11 MS4A1 9.92 9 14 14.81 11 11 NCAM1 8.27 5 18 9.48 4 18 PDCD1 8.27 14 9 8.69 16 6 PDCD1LG2 7.44 19 4 8.07 18 4 PD-1 (PDCD1) Example of Cutoff Determination: MS4A1, PFS HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel LAG3 HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel: § 93 genes § Linearity evaluated through a 5-point titration curve using R2 § Reproducibility intra-run, inter-day/run, and inter-processor evaluated using SUDHL6 cell line through Pearson Correlation Biological Significance: § Optimal cut-points for a set of immune markers (CD68, CD8A, CTLA4, LAG3, CD20, CD56, PDCD1, PDCD1LG2, CD274) obtained by maximizing expression using PFS (log-rank statistic) from 23 patients with DLBCL § Kaplan-Meier survival curves § Average expression for each of the immune genes tabulated for progressors and non-progressors by assays and further stratified by ABC/GCB status Differential Gene Expression of Immune Markers in Melanoma Samples (HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay) Similar immune cell compositions evaluating traditional markers 3500 3000 10000 NK cells 8000 CPMs CPMs 2500 Interferon-like response 6000 1500 4000 1000 500 0 Helper T-cell Cytotoxic T-cells CD3D Interleukin Melanoma 13 antigen 2000 Broad T-cell B cells 0 CD4 CD8A Melanoma 1 CD68 Menanoma 2 CD79A FCGR3A (CD16) HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay Tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase 12000 IFNA2 IFNAFamily IFI27 Melanoma 1 IL13RA2 Menanoma 2 MAGEC1 TIMP1 Conclusions HTG EdgeSeq Immuno-Oncology Assay and HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel: Different tumor immune response seen evaluating novel markers Myeloid cells (macrophages) 2000 Mean (Standard Deviation) Expression By ABC/GCB and Progression and Assay ABC HTG EdgeSeq Lymphoma Panel GCB ABC § Do not require RNA extraction from samples tested. GCB No Progression Progression No Progression Progression No Progression Progression No Progression Progression CD68 12.45(0.73) 11.84(0.82) 11.84(0.46) 11.72(0.95) 14.01(1.12) 13.48(0.85) 13.3(0.48) 12.68(1.58) CD8A 11.14(0.51) 9.74(0.92) 10.19(0.65) 9.58(1.23) 12.71(0.65) 10.76(1.05) 11.25(0.61) 10.91(1.94) CTLA4 8.3(0.69) 7.9(1.91) 8.53(1.02) 7.97(1.53) 10.03(0.67) 9.25(1.8) 10.17(1.06) 9.2(2.79) LAG3 10.74(0.41) 10.55(1.66) 9.96(0.42) 9.26(1.69) 12.43(0.58) 12.37(1.49) 11.41(0.72) 10.53(2.23) MS4A1 9.29(0.9) 8.34(1.34) 10.74(0.74) 9.47(0.38) 14.86(0.83) 14.52(0.64) 15.82(0.71) 14.1(0.48) NCAM1 6.75(1.43) 7.04(2.58) 7.12(1.34) 7.46(0.61) 7.93(1.82) 6.56(4.47) 8.63(2.42) 8.64(1.29) PDCD1 9.51(0.34) 7.92(1.28) 9.06(0.79) 7.77(1.89) 10.51(0.85) 8.88(1.05) 9.86(0.68) 8.28(2.52) PDCD1LG2 8.38(0.59) 8.25(0.71) 8.3(0.51) 7.26(1.26) 9.93(0.56) 9.28(1.16) 9.13(0.37) 8.49(2.22) CD274 9.57(0.33) 8.93(0.92) 9.33(0.92) 9.28(1.04) 11.12(0.53) 9.68(1.59) 10.65(0.73) 10.38(1.65) § Are amenable to small clinical specimens – requires very little sample input (~1-2 mm2 FFPE tissue). § Detect expression of several hundreds of genes in different sample types tested. § Have excellent technical and instrument to instrument reproducibility (r > 0.93). § Are linear over wide range of sample inputs. § Display similar biological results (e.g., PFS outcome correlation) while measuring genes with different assays. § Identify differential gene expression within tumor types. § Identify differential gene expression between progressors and non-progressors. HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. | 3430 E. Global Loop | Tucson, AZ 85706 | (877) 289-2615 | htgmolecular.com | Presented at AACR Annual Meeting 2016 For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. HTG EdgeSeq, HTG Edge and qNPA are trademarks of HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. Any other trademarks or trade names used herein are the intellectual property of their respective owners. Work supported by NIH grants R44HG005949 and R43HG005949