Download Suggestion from clinicians

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Toxicodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Biosimilar wikipedia , lookup

Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup

Hormesis wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Stimulant wikipedia , lookup

Medication wikipedia , lookup

NK1 receptor antagonist wikipedia , lookup

Prescription drug prices in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Discovery and development of beta-blockers wikipedia , lookup

Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup

Ofloxacin wikipedia , lookup

Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup

Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup

Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Discovery and development of angiotensin receptor blockers wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Losartan vs Candasartan vs Valsartan
Replacement to the List
Peer Feedback:
“candasartan or valsartan - losartan has flat dose response curve, other effective ARB are
available”
Literature Review Question:
What is the most effective ARB of Losartan, Candasartan, and Valsartan?
Literature Search:
eCPS – Hypertension; Cochrane
Pubmed – “angiotensin receptor blockers AND losartan AND (candesartan OR valsartan) AND
(effect OR efficacy) AND meta-analysis/review”
Candesartan and losartan in essential hypertension (2011)
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed 12 studies that compared the effects
and safety of candesartan versus losartan. Comparing the common therapeutic dose of the two
agents, candesartan showed a superior lowering of SBP and DBP compared with losartan at
trough after a 24 h dose. When comparing double dosage or titration to double dosage of the two
agents, similar results were found at trough and peak after administration. Nevertheless, the
response and blood pressure-controlling efficacy of candesartan in follow-up was superior to that
of losartan.
The results of this meta-analysis indicate that candesartan is more effective than losartan in
reducing blood pressure. There was no evident difference in their common adverse events
profiles. Candesartan seems to cause fewer serious adverse events than losartan.
Zheng, Zhenfeng, et al. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of candesartan and losartan in the management of
essential hypertension."Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (2011): 1470320310391503.
Candesartan compared to other ARBs (2011)
Clinical trials have demonstrated that candesartan cilexetil is an effective agent in reducing the
risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, heart failure, arterial stiffness, renal failure, retinopathy,
and migraine in different populations of adult patients including patients with coexisting type 2
diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or kidney impairment. Clinical evidence confirmed that
candesartan cilexetil provides better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan and is at least as
effective as telmisartan and valsartan. Candesartan cilexetil, one of the current market leaders in
BP treatment, is a highly selective compound with high potency, a long duration of action, and a
tolerability profile similar to placebo.
Cernes, Relu, Margarita Mashavi, and Reuven Zimlichman. "Differential clinical profile of candesartan compared to other angiotensin
receptor blockers."Vascular health and risk management 7 (2011): 749.
Valsartan Meta-analysis (2009)
In all, 31 RCTs (n = 13,110 patients) were included in the analysis. This meta-analysis
demonstrates that valsartan at doses of 160 and 320 mg is more effective in reducing BP than
losartan at the 100 mg dose. At comparable doses, valsartan achieves comparable
antihypertensive efficacy to the other ARBs. Findings confirm that valsartan has a strong dose–
response relationship when increasing from 80 to 160 mg and 320 mg and that further head-tohead trial are warranted. The clinical application of these results should take into consideration
the limitations discussed in this analysis
Nixon, R. M., et al. "Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta‐analytical
approach." International journal of clinical practice 63.5 (2009): 766-775.
ARBs Cochrane (2008)
Is there a difference in the magnitude of BP lowering effect between individual drugs in the ARB
class?
This review provides a reasonable amount of data to assess the trough BP lowering effect of 9
different ARBs. When the different ARBs are compared, there is a similarity in their BP lowering
effects at trough. When the best estimate of the near maximal BP lowering efficacy of these 9
drugs is compared, they range from -6/-3 mm Hg to -10/-7 mm Hg. For many of the drugs, there
are insufficient data for a full range of doses. Therefore it remains possible that there could be
differences between some of the drugs. However, the data are most consistent with the near
maximum BP lowering effect of each of the drugs being the same. It would require head-to-head
trials of different ARBs at equivalent BP lowering doses to assess whether or not there are
differences in the BP lowering efficacy between different drugs. This review provides useful doseresponse information for estimating equivalent doses and thus designing trials to compare
different ARBs.
Heran, Balraj S., et al. "Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for
primary hypertension." The Cochrane Library (2008).
eCPS (2015)
Table 6: Drugs Used for Hypertension
Class
Drug
Dosage
Angiotensin
Receptor
Blockers
(ARB)
candesartan
Initial: 8
mg/day
Usual: 8–16
mg/day
Once daily po
Angiotensin
Receptor
Blockers
(ARB)
losartan
Angiotensin
Receptor
Blockers
Atacand, gen
erics
Cozaar, gener
ics
valsartan
Diovan, gener
Initial: 50
mg/day
Usual: 25–100
mg/day
Maximum:100
mg/day
Once daily or
divided BID po
Initial: 80
mg/day
Usual: 80–320
mg/day
Adverse Effects
Drug
Interactions
Comments
Costa
$
Hyperkalemia.
Can precipitate renal
failure in susceptible
patients (bilateral
renovascular
disease, those with
volume depletion or
with concurrent
NSAID use).
Angioedema has
been reported, but a
causal association
has not been
established.

Marked increase
in serum K+ in
patients receiving

K+supplements
and/or K+-sparing
diuretics.
May elevate
Li+levels (monitor
Li+levels, adjust
dose).
Contraindicated in pregnancy—caution when
prescribing to women of child-bearing
potential.7
$
Use lower initial doses in patients who are
volume depleted or on diuretics (increased risk
of hypotension in hypovolemia).
Hyperkalemia usually occurs only in those on
K+ supplements or drugs that cause K+retention,
those with renal impairment or diabetics with
high serum K+ levels. Assess SCr and K+ after a
few days, then regularly.
$
Class
(ARB)
Drug
Dosage
ics
Once daily po
Legend: $<$20
Adverse Effects
$-$$ <20–40
Drug
Interactions
$$ 20–40
Costa
Comments
$$$ 40–60
$$$$ 60–80
Cardiovascular Disorders: Hypertension; Norm R.C. R. C. Campbell, MD, FRCPC, Paul Gibson,
MD, FRCPC, and Ross T. Tsuyuki, PharmD, MSc, FCSHP, FACC; Date of Revision: March 2015
Medication
losartan
Uses
hypertension,
delay diabetic
nephropathy
Contraindications (CI), drug
interactions (DI) or cautions
CI: bilateral artery stenosis or kidney
stenosis if only 1 kidney),
angioedema, pregnancy(T2 and T3)
DI: increases lithium and potassium,
fluconazole, rifampin (decrease
efficacy)
Adverse Effects
(common and severe)
hypotension, cough, headache,
dizziness, fatigue, angioedema,
hyperkalemia
Initial dose; typical
dose
25mg; 25100mg one time a
day
Monitoring
electrolytes, renal
function (SCr, BUN,
electrolytes)