Download Is Matter Made of Light? The Transluminal Energy Quantum (TEQ

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Electron wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Ionization wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Is Matter Made of Light?
The Transluminal Energy Quantum (TEQ)
Model of the Electron and the Photon
Richard Gauthier
Santa Rosa Junior College
Santa Rosa, CA
San Francisco Amateur Astronomers
February 18, 2009
www.superluminalquantum.org
1
Multiwavelength Milky Way
2
The 2.7K temperature of space
Data from COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer)
showed a near-perfect fit between the
theoretical blackbody radiation curve predicted
by the big bang theory and the curve observed
for the cosmic microwave background radiation
(CMBR) from space.
COBE data shows very slight temperature
differences between CMBR and the
theoretical blackbody radiation curve
3
The blackbody radiation curve above was first explained using the idea of the quantum
But what exactly is a quantum
(or a photon or an electron)?
A Brief History
of the Quantum
4
Stoney: Electric charge is quantized
George Johnstone Stoney
• introduced the term “electron” as a
fundamental quantity of electric charge in
1891 and first calculated a value of this
charge. But he didn’t introduce the term
“quantum”.
• contributed to the development of electron
theory
• helped lay the foundations for the eventual
discovery of the electron particle.
5
Thompson’s electron
carried a fixed (quantized)
amount of electric charge
and mass
J.J. Thompson discovered the electron as a sub-atomic particle in 1897. He
measured the charge to mass ratio of the electron. Later he measured the
charge of the electron and calculated its mass.
He concluded that electrons come from within atoms and so atoms are
divisible.
He also didn’t introduce the term “quantum”.
But… Thompson had no model of the electron.
6
Planck’s “energy quantum”
Max Planck proposed in 1900 that radiation (blackbody
radiation) is emitted from or absorbed by matter in discrete
amounts he called quanta (plural for quantum) (Quantum =
“how much?” in Latin.) h is now called Planck’s constant.
E  hf
E = radiation energy
emitted or absorbed by a
material oscillator
f = the frequency of
vibration of the oscillator
h is Planck’s constant
Blackbody spectrum of light at
different temperatures
7
Einstein’s “light quantum”
Albert Einstein proposed in 1905 that a corpuscle of light
(‘light quantum”, later named a photon) has an energy given by
E  hf
E = energy of light quantum
f = frequency of light quantum
h = Planck’s constant
He also proposed that a particle of matter like the electron
contains an amount of energy given by
E  mc
2
E = energy contained in a a
mass
m = the quantity of mass
.
c = the speed of light
But… Einstein had no model of the photon or the electron .
8
Rutherford’s planetary model
of the atom
Ernest Rutherford, based on experiments scattering alpha
particles (helium nuclei) from thin gold foil, proposed in 1909
that an atom has a positively charged nucleus that is very
small compared to the size of an atom and contains most of
the mass of an atom. In his model, negative electrons orbit
the nucleus like planets orbit the sun. BUT orbiting electrons
would emit radiation and quickly spiral into the nucleus of the
atom.
.
But… Rutherford had no model of the electron.
9
Bohr’s planetary model of the
atom
Neils Bohr proposed in 1913 an atom has stable orbits, and
photons are emitted or absorbed when an electron jumps from
one orbit to another
hf  E2  E1
The Bohr model of the
atom gave rises to the
expression “quantum jump”.
.
But… Bohr had no model of the photon or the electron .
10
Parson’s Magneton Model
of the Atom and the Electron
Alfred Lauck Parson proposed in 1915 that an electron
is formed of a helical vortex or circular ring of charged
filiments circulating at high speed along a common
continuous path in an atom. Also known as the "toroidal
ring model","magnetic electron", "plasmoid ring",
"vortex ring", or "helicon ring". Parson’s magneton
model for chemical bonding and electron sharing
influenced chemist Gilbert N. Lewis to propose chemical
bonding rules for atoms.
In the model, charge fibers are twisted an integer
number of times, to account for the quantum number of
angular momentum of an electron in an atom. The
helicity or handedness of the twist was later thought to
distinguish an electron from a proton.
Helical and toroidal models of the electron have taken several forms up to the
present day, though none has been scientifically accepted.
11
De Broglie’s electron
Louis de Broglie proposed in 1923 that the electron has
an internal frequency given by
hf  mc
2
This frequency gives rise to a wavelength for a moving
electron..
  h / mv
The wave nature of electrons was experimentally confirmed in 1927
by Davisson and Germer.
.
De Broglie proposed that electron orbits in
Bohr’s model of the atom are composed of a
whole number of wavelengths.
But… De Broglie had no model of the electron.
12
Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
Uhlenbeck and
Goudsmit’s
Quantized Spinning
Electron Model
In 1925, George Uhlenbeck and Samuel Goudsmit proposed that the electron is an
electrically charged particle spinning on its own axis, and whose spin value or
and its magnetic moment by
angular momentum is given by
h
s

4 2
e
B 
2m
1 Bohr magneton
But… this spinning electron model was later replaced by a point-like
model of the electron carrying an “intrinsic spin”.
13
Heisenberg and Schrodinger
Found Quantum Mechanics
Werner Heisenberg
Matrix Mechanics
Erwin Schrodinger
Wave Mechanics
In 1925, Werner Heisenberg introduced matrix mechanics to describe
what is observable about radiation from atoms – light frequencies and intensities.
In 1926, Erwin Schrodinger in introduced wave mechanics to predict
the observed energy levels of atoms based on electron wave properties.
The two theories seemed very different, but were shown by Schrodinger to be
mathematically equivalent, and both theories came to be called quantum mechanics.
But Heisenberg and Schrodinger each intensely disliked the other’s theory.
Heisenberg rejected all visual models, while Schrodinger’s model of the electron
based on his wave theory failed because the model didn’t hold together in space.14
Dirac’s Point-like Electron
Paul Dirac (1928) derived his relativistic equation for the electron
based on the relativistic particle energy formula E 2  p 2c 2  m2c 4 .
i     mc  0

1)Dirac assumed that the electron is point-like.
The Dirac Equation
2) Gives the correct electron spin 1
2
3) Gives the nearly correct electron magnetic moment e / 2m (pre-QED)
Predicts the electron’s theoretical Jittery Motion (zitterbewegung):
4) Frequency 2mc 2 / h
5) Amplitude 12 / mc
6) Speed c
7) Predicts the electron’s antiparticle (positron)
8) Predicts an electron with a quantum rotational periodicity of 720 degrees or
4.
15
But… Dirac had no model of the electron to go with his equation.
The proposed transluminal energy quantum electron model has all 8 of these properties.
Solvay conference 1927 –
“Electrons and Photons”
16
Towards the future
17
The Transluminal Energy Quantum (TEQ):
a new unifying concept for a photon
and an electron
A transluminal energy quantum
* is a helically moving point-like object having a
frequency and a wavelength, and carrying energy
and momentum.
* can pass through the speed of light.
* can generate a photon or an electron depending
on whether the energy quantum’s helical trajectory
is open or closed.
18
TEQ Model of the Photon
For a photon, the quantum
travels a 45-degree helical
path.
The quantum produces an
angular momentum (spin)
of 1unit and is uncharged.
The quantum’s speed
along the helical trajectory
is 1.414c.
The quantum is point-like and
has energy and momentum but
not mass.
19
Parameters of the
TEQ Photon model
Photon Parameter
Photon Model Parameter
Detected particle
Uncharged point-like quantum
Energy
hf
Momentum
Frequency along helix
h/
Pitch of helix

f
 / 2
Spin h / 2
Radius of helical axis
Polarization left or right
Helicity of helix left or right
Speed
c
Longitudinal velocity component
c
20
TEQ Model of the Electron
A charged transluminal quantum moves in a closed
double-looped helical trajectory with its wavelength
equal to one Compton wavelength
.
C  h / mc  2.43 10 m
12
The Compton wavelength is the wavelength of a photon whose energy is
the same as the energy contained in the mass of an electron at rest.
21
TEQ Model of the Electron
22
Red trajectory: quantum is superluminal. Blue trajectory: quantum is subluminal.
TEQ Model of the Electron
Superluminal (red) and
subluminal (blue)
portions of electron
quantum’s trajectory
23
TEQ electron model trajectory:
Distance and Time Ratios
• Superluminal distance: 76%
• Subluminal distance: 24%
• Superluminal time: 57%
• Subluminal time: 43%
24
TEQ Model of the Electron
Along the quantum’s trajectory:
o The maximum speed is 2.515c .
o The minimum speed is 0.707c .
The small circle is the axis of the double-looped helical trajectory.
25
Speed of electron's quantum
versus distance from z-axis
26
TEQ Model of the Electron
27
Parameters of the
TEQ model of the Electron
Electron
Parameter
TEQ Electron Model
Parameter
mc
1.
Mass/energy
2.
Charge
3.
Spin
4.
Magnetic moment
5.
Electron or positron
2
e
1
2
Compton wavelength
e
Point-like charge
e
2m
Radius of helical axis
Radius of helix
h / mc
2
2
1
2
/ mc
/ mc
Helicity of helix L,R
28
Experimental support for the TEQ
model of the electron
• Electron Channeling experiment:
P. Catillon et al, A Search for the de Broglie Particle
Internal Clock by Means of Electron Channeling,
Foundations of Physics (2008) 38: 659–664
• Found experimental evidence for twice the Broglie
frequency as an “internal clock” in an electron. The de
Broglie frequency is the frequency of a photon of light
having the electon’s mass:
De Broglie frequency:
2
20
hf  mc
f B  1.24 10 cycles / sec
from
• The de Broglie frequency, as well as twice this frequency - the zitterbewegung (jitter) frequency -- are contained in29
the TEQ model of the electron.
Electron channeling experiment
From: Gouanere et al, Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume
33, no 1-2, 2008
30
Electron channeling through silicon
– experimental results
The dip in counts at
electron momentum
81.1 MeV/c
corresponds to an
electron clock
frequency of two
times the de Broglie
frequency
From: Catillon et al, Foundations of Physics (2008) 38: 659–664
DOI 10.1007/s10701-008-9225-1
31
Further Testing the TEQ Model
Predicting the electron’s charge? Another (not superluminal) electron model
with toroidal topology similar to the TEQ electron model predicts the
electron’s charge to be about .91e* Can the TEQ model do better?
*Williamson and van der Mark, “Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?”, p.9,
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 22, no.2, 133 (1997).
Available at http://members.chello.nl/~n.benschop/electron.pdf
32
Conclusions
• The transluminal energy quantum (TEQ) models
of the photon and the electron contain quantitative
experimental and theoretical properties of the
electron and the photon based on superluminal
and transluminal quantum trajectories.
• While superluminal and transluminal quanta are
point-like, the continuous internal structure of
photon and electron models generated by the
quantum can be modeled and visualized in 3D.
• The model can be subjected to experimental tests
using electron channeling through thin crystals.
33