Download Analysis of dinosaur bone cells confirms ancient protein

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup

Hematopoietic stem cell wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Chemical biology wikipedia , lookup

Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Transformation (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup

Cryobiology wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Bio-MEMS wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Analysis of dinosaur bone cells confirms
ancient protein preservation
23 October 2012
and atmospheric sciences with a joint appointment
at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences,
first discovered what appeared to be preserved soft
tissue in a 67-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus Rex
in 2005. Subsequent research revealed similar
preservation in an even older (about 80-million-yearold)Brachylophosaurus canadensis. In 2007 and
again in 2009, Schweitzer and colleagues used
chemical and molecular analyses to confirm that
the fibrous material collected from the specimens
was collagen.
Schweitzer's next step was to find out if the starshaped cellular structures within the fibrous matrix
were osteocytes, or bone cells. Using techniques
including microscopy, histochemistry and mass
spectrometry, Schweitzer demonstrates that these
cellular structures react to specific antibodies,
including one – a protein known as PHEX – that is
found in the osteocytes of living birds. The findings
appear online in Bone and were presented last
week at the annual meeting of the Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology.
"The PHEX finding is important because it helps to
rule out sample contamination," Schweitzer says.
"Some of the antibodies that we used will react to
T.rex (B), B. canadensis (E) and ostrich osteocytes (H)
proteins found in other vertebrate cells, but none of
showing positive response to propidium iodide, a DNA
intercalating dye. Credit: Dr. Mary Schweitzer, NC State the antibodies react to microbes, which supports
University
our theory that these structures are surviving
osteocytes. Additionally, the antibody to PHEX will
only recognize and bind to one specific site only
found in mature bone cells from birds. These
A team of researchers from North Carolina State
antibodies don't react to other proteins or cells.
University and the Palo Alto Research Center
Because so many other lines of evidence support
(PARC) has found more evidence for the
the dinosaur/bird relationship, finding these proteins
preservation of ancient dinosaur proteins, including helps make the case that these structures are
reactivity to antibodies that target specific proteins dinosaurian in origin."
normally found in bone cells of vertebrates. These
results further rule out sample contamination, and Schweitzer and her team also tested for the
help solidify the case for preservation of cells – and presence of DNA within the cellular structures,
possibly DNA – in ancient remains.
using an antibody that only binds to the "backbone"
of DNA. The antibody reacted to small amounts of
Dr. Mary Schweitzer, professor of marine, earth
material within the "cells" of both the T. rex and the
1/2
B. canadensis. To rule out the presence of
microbes, they used an antibody that binds histone
proteins, which bind tightly to the DNA of everything
except microbes, and got another positive result.
They then ran two other histochemical stains which
fluoresce when they attach to DNA molecules.
Those tests were also positive. These data strongly
suggest that the DNA is original, but without
sequence data, it is impossible to confirm that the
DNA is dinosaurian.
"The data thus far seem to support the theory that
these structures can be preserved over time,"
Schweitzer says. "Hopefully these findings will give
us greater insight into the processes of evolutionary
change."
Provided by North Carolina State University
APA citation: Analysis of dinosaur bone cells confirms ancient protein preservation (2012, October 23)
retrieved 12 August 2017 from https://phys.org/news/2012-10-analysis-dinosaur-bone-cells-ancient.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2/2
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)