* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sustainable Development
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
FOR PUBLICATION Justice P.A. Mohammed, Former Judge, High Court of Kerala, ‘Sunshine’, Padma Jn, M.G.Road, Ernakulam, Cochin-682035 Phone:- Office-04842365876, Mob. 09446451188, 09895335011. [email protected] Sustainable Development The concepts of ‘environment’ and ‘development’ are found to be operating as against each other. When we say ‘degraded environment’ it forbids ‘development’ and when we say ‘sustainable development’ it forbids ‘environment’. So it is reasonably said that in both cases the mankind is affected either favourably or adversely. Hence, what the law suggest is a well built harmony between economic development and preservation of environment. 2. In the year 1972 a major change took place in the operation of these concepts as a result of United Nations Conference of the Human Environment at Stockholm in order to shape human actions according to their environmental effects. Principle I of the Stockholm declaration Ordained “man has the fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life in an environment of quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being and he bears a solemn responsibility to protect and improve the environment for the present and future generations”. What Rio de Janero Submit held in 1992 declared is “human beings are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature”. It is said that these two Declarations are anthropocentric (regarding mankind as the centre of existence) in their character. That means, human beings are placed at the centre of environmental concerns as against the wish of protagonists of ecological equilibrium. Needs and aspirations of humans ~2~ escalates day by day in parallel to the scientific and technological developments in the society. That necessarily affords greater opportunity to man to intrude in to the environmental balance. But when man is at the centre stage of universe, the duty is on him to galvanize the balance between the economic growth and environmental degradation. Therefore, the attempt has always been reconciliation and reapproachment between these two diverse forces. The promoters of the free market economy transmit the idea of having compatibility between economic growth and environmental degradation, see Nature Lovers Movement vs. State of Kerala & another (AIR 2000 Kerala 131) authored by me. 3. It is an admitted case that the scientific and technological development afforded greater opportunities to man to meet his needs and aspirations. It cannot also be denied that over industrialization and indiscriminate application of science and technology to economic development have been the principal cause for the impairment of the quality of the human environment. 4. The environmental degradation is a social problem and considering its impact on the society, the law courts have to dealt with the situation according to justice and fairness. Thus the courts power to harmonize between “danger to the environment” and “sustainable development” by applying appropriate directions is a concept which refers to the objective of continuing to develop economics of the world while protecting the environment for the benefit of all the present nations of the world and all future generations. The concept of ‘sustainable development’ was adopted by the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) and endorsed by 176 nations in the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. ~3~ 5. The “sustainable development” theory no doubt recognizes and avows “precautionary principle” and “polluter pays principle”. The State is no doubt having the rights flowing from their position as parents patriaeadopted in Bhopal gas leak disaster case. The forest conservation and ecomanagement are two inevitable obligations which are to be respected when the theory of sustainable development is put into operation. What is required is the insistence for ‘gun and guard’ approach in day to day supervisory functions of the Government. Principle 13 of the Rio declaration proclaims; “The State shall develop national law regarding liability and compensation for the victims of pollution and other environmental damage, States shall also co-operate in an expeditious and more determined manner to develop further international law regarding liability and compensation for adverse effects of environmental damage caused by activities within their jurisdiction or control to areas beyond their jurisdiction”. 6. The Supreme Court in various decisions dealt with the ‘polluter pays principle’ and ‘precautionary principle’ while fixing the quantum of compensation for degrading environment. The court also declared that these two principles are parts of the environmental law of the country. 7. In the afore mentioned decision namely; Nature Lovers Movement Vs. State of Kerala, the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court applied the ‘polluter pays principle’ for determining the quantum of injury and compensation payable by the occupants/ encroachers in the forest lands. The court observed that the fixation of the compensation ~4~ under ‘polluter pays principle’ shall be done by the state government in consultation with the forest and revenue department and all those concerned authorities for regularization of title deeds in respect of the lands in the possession of occupants. 8. One of the serious problems now facing the environment all over the world relates to ‘climate change’. The United Nations Frame work Convention on Climate change (UNFCC) is an international environmental authority. It is the only international climate policy venue with broad framework. The United Nations framework convention on climate change continued in the year 2009-2010. It was focused on the urgent need to reduce the emissions in industrialized countries. It was said that developing countries agreed to report Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) in accordance with the international objective. It is reported that in order to avoid the global disaster, the developing countries had agreed to reduce their emissions below minimum as usual as 2020. 9. The problem of climate change had signifies the day to day increase in emissions and it degrades environmental equilibrium. Therefore, what is now required is a Carbon neutral society. 10. It is reported that the Government of India recently submitted its Intended Nationality Determined Contributions (INDCS) to the UN Frame work Convention on Climate change (UNFCC) committing to cut emission intensity of GDP by 33-35% by 2030 from 2005 levels. It shows that India is taking a vigorous lead in reducing emissions in order to save environmental degradation. Sd/Justice P.A. Mohammed