Download Immune complex formation in IgA nephropathy

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Herd immunity wikipedia , lookup

Immunocontraception wikipedia , lookup

Anti-nuclear antibody wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup

Antibody wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Autoimmunity wikipedia , lookup

Social immunity wikipedia , lookup

Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup

Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Immune system wikipedia , lookup

Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Complement system wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup

IgA nephropathy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
News & Views
Glomerular disease
Sugars and immune complex formation in IgA
nephropathy
Jonathan Barratt and Frank Eitner
In vitro evidence suggests that immune complex formation in IgA nephropathy is
determined by the sugar content of the IgA1 hinge region. The absence of
galactose residues at the IgA1 hinge seems to render the IgA molecule
immunogenic and results in the production of anti-IgA IgG autoantibodies.
Mesangial deposition of IgA is the principal trigger for the development of
glomerulonephritis in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Recurrence of IgA deposition in the
majority of recipients of renal allograft suggests that this IgA is derived from a
circulating pool of pathogenic IgA molecules. Serum levels of IgA do not correlate,
however, with disease activity or severity, which gave rise to the belief that only a
small percentage of serum IgA carries IgAN pathogenic potential.1 Two of the
principal factors thought to contribute to IgA pathogenic potential are the composition
of O-linked sugars in the IgA1 hinge region and the variable propensity of IgA1 to
form large immune complexes and.2 Hitoshi Suzuki and colleagues present evidence
that the composition of IgA1 hinge region sugars directly influences immune complex
formation by determining the immunogenicity of the IgA1 molecule and the
generation of anti-IgA1 IgG autoantibodies.3
News & Views
IgA1 is one of the very few serum proteins to posses O-linked sugars. The fact that
these O-linked sugars are clustered within a relatively short segment of the IgA1
protein backbone (the so-called hinge region) means they might have a considerable
effect on IgA1 function.4 Furthermore, the composition of O-glycans can vary widely
among IgA1 molecules, which results in a variety of IgA1 O-glycoforms with
potentially different biological characteristics. Suzuki et al.3 have obtained in vitro
data showing that IgG produced by B cells isolated from patients with IgAN binds
poorly galactosylated IgA1 and is capable of triggering the formation of IgA1-IgG
immune complexes. The researchers suggest that the anti-IgA1 IgG autoantibodies
they identified in the serum of patients with IgAN are the principal driver for IgAimmune complex formation in IgAN.
An increase in the proportion of serum IgA molecules that are poorly Ogalactosylated has been one of the most consistent findings in studies of IgAN over
the past decade.1,2 Perhaps more importantly, mesangial IgA eluted directly from
glomeruli comprises predominantly these poorly galactosylated IgA1 O-glycoforms,
which strongly implicates the composition of glycans in IgA1 hinge region in the
mechanism of mesangial IgA1 deposition.5 Consistent with these observations, poorly
galactosylated IgA1 O-glycoforms are more likely to bind to mesangial matrix
proteins and activate mesangial cells and complement than their heavily
galactosylated counterparts.2 Evidence from Suzuki et al. suggests also that hinge
region O-glycans protect IgA1 from recognition by the immune system and that IgA1
O-glycoforms with low levels of galactose have increased immunogenic potential.
News & Views
Why patients with IgAN have excess amounts of poorly galactosylated IgA1 Oglycoforms in their serum remains unknown. A number of explanations have been put
forward, including an enzymatic defect in IgA1 O-glycosylation that is at least in part
inherited.6 One alternative explanation is that poorly O-galactosylated IgA1 is in fact
‘normal’ IgA that should have been secreted at mucosal surfaces but has mistakenly
found its way into the circulation. In fact, the pattern of O-glycosylation is different
between mucosal and serum IgA1 in the same individual and IgA1 directed against
mucosal pathogens is poorly O-galactosylated compared with IgA1 against systemic
antigens.7 These findings combined with reduced IgA1-secreting plasma cell numbers
at mucosal sites and increased numbers in the bone marrow in patients with IgAN
suggests that in these patients there is a shift in IgA production from mucosal to
systemic sites.8 The result of this shift is secretion into the circulation of high levels of
mucosal-type (poorly galactosylated) IgA1 molecules with biological properties illsuited to the systemic circulation.
Irrespective of the reasons for the high circulating levels of poorly galactosylated
IgA1 O-glycoforms, little data exist to explain why IgG autoantibodies should
develop in IgAN. One intriguing possibility put forward by Suzuki and colleagues is
that anti-IgA1 IgG autoantibodies could in fact be antibodies specific for bacterial and
viral surface glycoproteins and that recognition of poorly galactosylated IgA1 Oglycoforms by IgG is an unfortunate incident of ‘molecular mimicry’. Such a link
between microbial infection and IgA immune complex formation might help explain
the association of mucosal infection with macroscopic hematuria in IgAN. During a
normal response to infection, serum levels of microbial-specific IgG rise, a proportion
of this IgG will be specific for microbial cell surface sugars. In individuals with
News & Views
persistently high serum levels of poorly galactosylated IgA1 O-glycoforms, a sudden
rise in glycan-specific IgG might therefore precipitate IgA immune complex
formation. A sudden increase in immune complex levels might then lead to rapid
glomerular IgA deposition, mesangial cell and complement activation and glomerular
hematuria. An increase in circulating IgA immune complex levels has been reported
during episodes of macroscopic hematuria.9
With the identification and characterization of anti-IgA1 IgG autoantibodies we have
a better appreciation of the interrelationship between IgA1 O-glycosylation and
immune complex formation in IgAN. However, to fully understand the implications
of these data, the pathogenic importance of IgA1–IgG immune complexes in IgAN
must be clarified. The relative paucity of mesangial IgG staining in most biopsy series
of IgAN does raise questions over the pathological role in vivo of such complexes.
Suzuki et al. have already suggested that measurement of anti-IgA IgG autoantibodies
might in the future be the basis of a non-invasive diagnostic test for IgAN. They have
also published work supporting an ELISA-based method of measuring the proportion
of serum IgA that is poorly galactosylated, and an assay combining both of these
measurements could be a powerful diagnostic tool for IgAN.10 However, studies need
to confirm these findings in different patient cohorts and need to validate the
diagnostic specificities, sensitivities and predictive values of these assays. Finally,
convincing evidence that IgG-driven IgA immune complex formation has a
pathological role in vivo in IgAN needs to be presented.
Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester,
UK (J. Barratt) and Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology,
RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany (F. Eitner).
News & Views
Correspondence: J. Barratt, Johns Walls Renal Unit, Leicester General
Hospital, Leicester LE4 5PW, UK
[email protected]
doi:10.1038/
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests
1.
Barratt, J., Smith, A. C., Molyneux, K. & Feehally, J. Immunopathogenesis of
IgAN. Semin. Immunopathol. 29,.427–443, (2007).
2.
Novak. J., Julian, B. A., Tomana, M. & Mestecky, J. IgA glycosylation and
IgA immune complexes in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Semin.
Nephrol. 28, 78–87, (2008).
3.
Suzuki, H. et al. Aberrantly glycosylated IgA1 in IgA nephropathy patients is
recognized by IgG antibodies with restricted heterogeneity. J. Clin. Invest.
119, 1668–1677 (2009).
4.
Bonner, A., Furtado, P. B., Almogren, A., Kerr, M. A. & Perkins, S. J.
Implications of the near-planar solution structure of human myeloma dimeric
IgA1 for mucosal immunity and IgA nephropathy. J. Immunol. 180, 1008–
1018 (2008).
5.
Allen, A. C. et al. Mesangial IgA1 in IgA nephropathy exhibits aberrant Oglycosylation: observations in three patients. Kidney Int. 60, 969–973. (2001).
6.
Gharavi, A. G. et al. Aberrant IgA1 glycosylation is inherited in familial and
sporadic IgA nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 19, 1008–1014 (2008).
7.
Smith, A. C., Molyneux, K., Feehally, J. & Barratt, J. O-glycosylation of
serum IgA1 antibodies against mucosal and systemic antigens in IgA
nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 3520–3528 (2006).
News & Views
8.
Harper, S. J., Allen, A. C., Pringle, J. H. & Feehally, J. Increased dimeric IgA
producing B cells in the bone marrow in IgA nephropathy determined by in
situ hybridisation for J chain mRNA. J. Clin. Pathol. 49, 38–42 (1996).
9.
Novak, J. et al. IgA1-containing immune complexes in IgA nephropathy
differentially affect proliferation of mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 67, 504–513
(2005).
10.
Moldoveanu, Z. et al. Patients with IgA nephropathy have increased serum
galactose-deficient IgA1 levels. Kidney Int. 71, 1148–1154 (2007).