Download Single Cell Methyl-Seq Abstract Accel-NGS

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Genomic library wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Mir-92 microRNA precursor family wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A novel method for achieving single cell resolution
of epigenomic status
Laurie Kurihara1, Chongyuan Luo2,3, Eran A. Mukamel4, Rosa Castanon3, Jacinta Lucero5, Joseph R. Nery3, Christopher L. Keown4,
Cassie Schumacher1, Tim Harkins1, M. Margarita Behrens5 and Joseph R. Ecker2,3
1. Swift Biosciences Inc., Ann Arbor, MI; 2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA; 3.
Genomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA; 4. Department of Cognitive Science, University of
California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA; 5. Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA
Abstract
Single Cell Methyl-Seq
When performing whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), highly efficient conversion of DNA fragments
into library molecules is necessary when input quantity is limited. To meet this need, we developed an efficient
library preparation using Adaptase™ for NGS adapter ligation to single-stranded, bisulfite-converted DNA
fragments. This method significantly improves library complexity compared to existing commercially available
methods. Since comprehensive methylome coverage was achievable from low DNA inputs, this method was
modified and applied to single cells for classification of mammalian brain cell types based on methylation
pattern. Approximately 20% of the mouse genome contains differential methylation that allows neuronal cell
types to be distinguished by low pass WGBS. For example, >200,000 differentially methylated regions were
identified among three cortical excitatory and inhibitory neuron types. Starting from single neuronal nuclei
isolated from mouse frontal cortex that had undergone lysis and bisulfite conversion, NGS adapters were
incorporated onto DNA fragments using a single cycle of random priming followed by Adaptase. The resulting
low pass WGBS sequence demonstrated robust neuron type classification, readily separating excitatory and
inhibitory cells, and further identified distinct populations of inhibitory cells. This method enabled unbiased
characterization of brain epigenomic diversities without the need for the isolation of specific cell populations.
Compared to other single cell bisulfite sequencing methods, the Adaptase workflow was faster and produced a
higher percentage of aligned reads that increased the per cell data output. This method will meet the need of
large-scale single cell methylome profiling of thousands of cells to enable discovery of single cell epigenomic
variation.
Methyl-Seq
G35-cre driven INTACT
labeling of excitatory
neurons
Dissection of top and
bottom frontal cortex
FACS of G35+/- NeuN+
excitatory and inhibitory
neurons
The first adapter is incorporated during a single
random priming synthesis, followed by a
purification.
The second adapter is efficiently attached to
extension products using Adaptase.
Library amplification introduces dual indexing
for multiplexed sequencing.
This enables a higher mapping rate and longer
inserts for improved data output compared to
other methods, see below.
Accel-NGS® Methyl-Seq
The first adapter is efficiently attached to sheared, bisulfite
converted ssDNA fragments using Adaptase.
• 17 minutes
Achieve Higher Mapping Rate
Tail
Primer extension produces a non-uracil containing
complementary strand.
Truncated adapter 1’
Extension
• 8 minutes
Conventional ligation introduces the second adapter to the
bottom strand.
Truncated adapter 1 primer
Library amplification introduces single or dual indexing for
multiplexed sequencing.
Ligation
•
15 minutes
Truncated adapter 2’
This enables a high conversion rate of bisulfite converted
fragments compared to other methods that produce broken
library molecules when preparing the library prior to
bisulfite conversion (see Traditional method below), or
methods with inefficient adapter attachment (see 3’ Tagging
method below).
Truncated adapter 2
Indexing PCR
• Time varies
Full-length adapters
Library
SuperiorIndexed
Performance
Compared to Other Kits
Traditional
Accel-NGS Methyl-Seq
Library
preparation
For this modified Methyl-Seq workflow:
Bisulfite Converted
ssDNA Fragment
Adaptase™
Lysis and bisulfite
conversion
3’ Tagging
Single cell
Mapping rate to
mm10 (mouse)
Mapping rate to
hg19 (human)
mouse
40.00%
0.40%
mouse
40.40%
0.30%
human
0.10%
44.00%
human
0.10%
44.20%
mouse
34.50%
0.50%
mouse
36.30%
0.60%
human
0.10%
36.90%
human
0.10%
38.50%
mouse
38.00%
0.30%
mouse
37.30%
0.40%
human
0.10%
40.80%
human
0.00%
40.40%
mouse
37.80%
0.40%
mouse
37.30%
0.80%
human
0.50%
2.20%
human
0.00%
42.60%
To assess mapping efficiency and workflow quality
(avoidance of cross-contamination), FACS mouse and
human single neurons were processed simultaneously.
WGBS was performed on a HiSeq® 4000 to an average
4M read depth and aligned to both reference genomes.
Alignment to the corresponding reference achieved an
average of ~39% mapped, compared to alignment to
the non-reference at ~0.30% mapped.
This is a two-fold increase in mapping rate compared
to a single cell workflow that demonstrated an average
of 20.1% mapping rate (Smallwood et al., Nature
Methods 2014).
The larger insert size of these libraries (>400 bp) also
improved per cell data recovery compared to a 3’
tagging single cell method (data not shown).
Bisulfite Conversion
dsDNA Fragment
Unfragmented dsDNA
End Repair, Tailing
and Ligation Reactions
Bisulfite Conversion
Unconverted Library
Molecules
Random Primed
DNA Synthesis
Bisulfite Conversion
AdaptaseTM, Extension
and Ligation Reactions
NNNNNN
Randomly Primed Fragment
Loss of un-tagged
fragments
Loss of broken
Library Molecules
3’ Tagging
NNNNNN
NNNNNN
Functional
Library Molecule
% READS
ALIGNED
GENOME
COVERAGE
Methyl-Seq
89.6
22X
1.9
100 ng
Arabidopsis
Traditional
80.2
21X
3’ Tagging
71.4
Methyl-Seq
10 ng
Arabidopsis
1 ng
Arabidopsis
NNNNNN
Functional
Library Molecule
% CpX
MISSING
% CpX COVERED
> 10X
714
0.56
92.2
2.7
604
0.57
88.1
16X
22.1
48
7.70
39.4
87.8
22X
2.7
406
0.58
90.4
Traditional
76.7
19X
11.9
70
0.57
83.9
3’ Tagging
71.9
16X
22.2
45
5.20
45.2
Methyl-Seq
83.3
18X
18.2
38
0.59
77.1
Traditional
80.7
10X
62.3
6
2.00
17.0
METHOD
3’ Tagging
73.4
12X
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Bulk samples
NNNNNN
Converted Library
Molecule
Functional
Library Molecules
14 bulk samples, 411 single cells, 373 single cells with >50% coverage
23397 genes used
dsDNA Fragment
% of genes covered by at least 50 CH basecalls
Single cellRobust
methylome
analysis methods
Neuron
Type Classification
% DUPLICATE EST. LIBRARY SIZE
READS
(MILLIONS)
46.1
12
6.60
Single cell
batches
As shown above, coverage metrics for 373/411 single cells indicate >50% of genes had at least 50 CH calls.
single cells
+ 14 bulk methylomes
This data •wasCombine
profileddata
for from
total373
non-CG
methylation
(mCH) in the gene bodies of 1,183 select genes, and the
bulk methylomes
to (mCH)
equalize
total downsampled
non-CG methylation
in allcoverage
gene bodieswith single cells.
• Profilewere
•
Include genes with ≥ 50 CH base calls (1,183 genes)
The data was Down-sample
analyzed using
dimensional
reduction,
clustering
and beta-binomial likelihood ratios to classify
bulk
methylomes
~200x
to
equalize
coverage
with
• >200,000 previously identified DMRs among three cortical excitatory and inhibitory neuron
cell type usingsingle
cells
types.
Analyze using dimensional reduction (PCA, tSNE), clustering, and •
beta-binomial likelihood ratios
The cell clusters generated were in agreement with known cell type marker genes, as well as known layerspecific marker genes, indicating robust and unbiased neuron classification, without the need for cell-type
specific isolation methods. We have modified this workflow and applied to a large scale study (in progress).
31.3
Using Arabidopsis thaliana, a small genome model organism for methylation analysis, the Swift AccelNGS Methyl-Seq kit constructed higher complexity libraries and provided comprehensive coverage of
CpX (CpG + CpH) sites, making it an ideal choice for developing a single cell method.
©2016,SwiftBiosciences,Inc.TheSwiftlogoandAdaptase aretrademarksandAccel-NGSisaregisteredtrademarkofSwiftBiosciences.SPRIisatrademarkofBeckmanCoulter, Inc.HiSeq isaregisteredtrademarkofIllumina,Inc 16-1205,10/16
Attend Our Exhibitor Event to Learn More
Advancing Epigenetics NGS Sequencing and Analysis to the Single-Cell Level
Thursday October 20 at 1:00 to 2:30 PM
Room 8/15, Convention Centre East Building
Dr. Joseph Ecker, Salk Institute for Biological Studies
“Single Cell Methylomes Distinguish Brain Cell Types”
Dr. Ecker will present results of a large scale study in progress using the Single Cell Methyl workflow.
Dr. Adam Blattler, Active Motif
“New Tools for Studying the Epigenomes of Clinical Samples”
Dr. Blattler will present a novel workflow for low input ChIP-Seq using molecular identifiers (MIDs).
www.swiftbiosci.com