Download Testing the Visual Soil Assessment tool on Estonian farm fields

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Erosion wikipedia , lookup

Arbuscular mycorrhiza wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Agroecology wikipedia , lookup

Entomopathogenic nematode wikipedia , lookup

Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Soil horizon wikipedia , lookup

Earthworm wikipedia , lookup

SahysMod wikipedia , lookup

Surface runoff wikipedia , lookup

Soil erosion wikipedia , lookup

Canadian system of soil classification wikipedia , lookup

Soil respiration wikipedia , lookup

Terra preta wikipedia , lookup

Crop rotation wikipedia , lookup

Cover crop wikipedia , lookup

Soil salinity control wikipedia , lookup

Soil compaction (agriculture) wikipedia , lookup

Soil food web wikipedia , lookup

No-till farming wikipedia , lookup

Sustainable agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Soil microbiology wikipedia , lookup

Tillage wikipedia , lookup

Pedosphere wikipedia , lookup

Soil contamination wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Geophysical Research Abstracts
Vol. 19, EGU2017-6953, 2017
EGU General Assembly 2017
© Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License.
Testing the Visual Soil Assessment tool on Estonian farm fields
Endla Reintam, Mihkel Are, and Are Selge
Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
([email protected])
Soil quality estimation plays important role in decision making on farm as well on policy level. Sustaining the
production ability and good health of the soil the chemical, physical and biological indicators should be taken into
account. The system to use soil chemical parameters is usually quite well established in most European counties,
including Estonia. However, measuring soil physical properties, such bulk density, porosity, penetration resistance,
structural stability ect is time consuming, needs special tools and is highly weather dependent. In that reason these
parameters are excluded from controllable quality parameters in policy in Estonia. Within the project “Interactive Soil Quality Assessment in Europe and China for Agricultural Productivity and Environmental Resilience”
(iSQAPER) the visual soil assessment (VSA) tool was developed for easy detection of soil quality as well the
different soil friendly agricultural management practices (AMP) were detected. The aim of current study was to
test the VSA tool on Estonian farm fields under different management practices and compare the results with laboratory measurements. The main focus was set on soil physical parameters. Next to the VSA, the undisturbed soil
samples were collected from the depth of 5–10 cm and 25–30 cm. The study revealed that results of a visually
assessed soil physical parameters, such a soil structure, soil structural stability, soil porosity, presence of tillage
pan, were confirmed by laboratory measurements in most cases. Soil water stable structure measurement on field
(on 1 cm2 net in one 1 l box with 4–6 cm air dry clods for 5–10 min) underestimated very well structured soil
on grassland and overestimated the structure aggregates stability of compacted soil. The slightly better soil quality
was detected under no-tillage compared to ploughed soils. However, the ploughed soil got higher quality points
compared with minimum tillage. The slurry application (organic manuring) had controversial impact – it increased
the number of earthworms but decreased soil structural stability. Even the manuring with slurry increases organic
matter amount in the soil, the compaction due to the use of heavy machinery during the application, especially on
wet soil, reduces the positive effect of slurry.