* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Influence of different water saturation levels for mobility of Antimony
Survey
Document related concepts
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup
Soil horizon wikipedia , lookup
Soil erosion wikipedia , lookup
Soil respiration wikipedia , lookup
Terra preta wikipedia , lookup
Crop rotation wikipedia , lookup
Canadian system of soil classification wikipedia , lookup
Surface runoff wikipedia , lookup
Soil food web wikipedia , lookup
Soil compaction (agriculture) wikipedia , lookup
No-till farming wikipedia , lookup
Soil microbiology wikipedia , lookup
Soil salinity control wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
P12 MOBILITY OF ANTIMONY (Sb) IN SHOOTING RANGE SOIL: ROLE OF WATER SATURATION ON FE-STABILIZED SOIL Herzel, H.1, Okkenhaug, G.2 1 2 Institute of Geosciences, Burgweg 11, Friedrich-Schiller University, 07749 Jena, Germany Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, P.O. Box 3930 Ullevaal Stadion, NO-0806 Oslo, Norway e-mail: [email protected] Shooting range soil is potentially contaminated by Sb, copper (Cu), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn). These elements are released due to weathering of spent bullets. The bullet core consists of 2-5 wt% Sb for getting hard lead alloys. A potential soil remediation method is to add Febased sorbents, which are good sorbents for Antimony and other metals. This may represents a feasible stabilization of shooting range soil prior landfilling. However, common anoxic bottom condition in the landfill may interfere with the stability of iron oxides, and a possible subsequent release of Sb and other metals. In our experiments the impact of different water saturation, and thus the redox conditions, on shooting range soil stabilized with two different Fe-based sorbents was studied. Two different water saturation levels (half and fully water saturation) were simulated for stabilized shooting range soil from Steinsjøen in southern Norway. The soils with both 1 and 5 wt% TOC, were treated by 2 wt% iron hydroxide and 2 wt% zero-valent iron granulate (Fe0) respectively. The soil pore water for these different treatments is sampled at week 1, 3, 5, 8, 12 und 16 analyzed by ICP-OES (Fe, Cu, Pb and Zn) and hydride generation ICP-OES (Sb). During the first 5 weeks of monitoring high Fe release in the iron-granulate sorbent treated soil was observed due to incompletely oxidizing of Fe0 presumably. Much higher Fe release in the organic rich soil under fully water saturated condition indicates reduced conditions. This was supported by redox potential measurements (ca 200 mV). Despite the increased Fe solubility, no increased release of Sb, Cu, Pb and Zn in any of the treatments could be observed after 5 weeks. The experiment is still running and will continue until 16 week of monitoring. Fig. 1 Antimony concentration [µg/l] in pore water of organic rich shooting range soil (5 wt% organic matter) under half and fully water saturation; treated with iron hydroxide or zero-valent iron sorbent