* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download integrated supervisor
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Moral hazard wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wikipedia , lookup
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup
Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Land banking wikipedia , lookup
Syndicated loan wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup
Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup
History of investment banking in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Systemically important financial institution wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of the Supervisory Function within the CNB Seminar marking the 20th anniversary of the Czech and Slovak Central Banks David Rozumek Executive Director Financial Market Supervision October 2nd, 2013 I. The Czech Financial Sector Czech Financial Sector • The Czech financial sector is dominated by banks 0,6% 78,5% 7,7% 4,4% 3,2% 5,5% Banks Credit unions Insurance Companies Pension funds Investment companies, investment and mutual funds Leasing companies and other lending institutions Capital Adequacy of Czech Banks • As of July 2013, capital adequacy was 17.6% (Tier 1 ratio 17.3%) Capital adequacy and leverage ratio (%) Capital and capital requirements for the banking risks (CZK billions) 20 400 350 16 300 12 250 . 200 8 150 4 100 50 0 1/09 7/09 1/10 7/10 1/11 7/11 Capital adequacy 1/12 7/12 1/13 7/13 0 06/08 06/09 06/10 06/11 06/12 Capital adequacy Tier 1 Operational and other risks Market risks Leverage ratio Credit risk Regulatory capital Source: CNB Source: CNB 06/13 Profitability of the Banking Sector • The Czech banking sector remains profitable during crisis despite the adverse economic conditions which feeds into capitalization Capital and capital adequacy in the Czech banking sector (CZK billions; %) Net profit in the Czech banking sector (CZK billions) 100 400 18 90 350 16 80 300 70 14 12 250 60 10 200 50 8 150 40 30 100 20 50 10 0 06/07 0 07/07 07/08 07/09 07/10 Net profit (3M annualised) 07/11 07/12 6 4 2 06/08 06/09 06/10 06/11 06/12 Regulatory capital 07/13 Capital adequacy (%, right-hand scale) Net profit (1M annualised) Capital adequacy Tier I (%, right-hand scale) Source: CNB Source: CNB 0 06/13 Profitability of the Banking Sector • RoE and RoA still rather high in international comparison Return on Assets (in %) Return on Equity (in %) 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 -0,5 2011 -1,0 CZ AT Source: IMF FSI 2011 2012 DE PT SI SK HU PL EA CZ AT Source: IMF FSI DE 2012 PT SI SK HU PL EA Czech Banks‘ Funding • Funding structure is sound • Key ratios have not change much over years … Liquidity ratios in the banking sector (%) 70 220 60 200 50 180 Deposit-to-loan ratio in selected economies (in %) 140 120 100 40 160 30 80 60 140 20 120 10 40 20 0 0 100 7/07 7/08 7/09 7/10 7/11 7/12 Quick liquid assets / total assets Liabilities on demand / total liabilities incl. credit institutions Quick liquid assets / clients' deposits Deposits / Loans (clients) (right-hand axis) Source: CNB CZ 7/13 Source: ECB SK DE PL EA AT HU PT SI Credit Risk Indicators • Non-performing loans (NPL) going up in the corporate segment while stable in the housing sector ... Non-performing loans to households Non-performing loans 14.0% 10.0% 9.0% 7,6 % 12.0% 8.0% 12,2 % 7.0% 6,0 % 6.0% 10.0% 8.0% 5.0% 5,1 % 4.0% 3.0% 5,1 % 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 3,4 % 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1/07 7/07 1/08 7/08 1/09 7/09 1/10 7/10 1/11 7/11 1/12 7/12 1/13 7/13 0.0% 1/07 7/07 1/08 7/08 1/09 7/09 1/10 7/10 1/11 7/11 1/12 7/12 1/13 7/13 Total loans Households Non-financial corporations Housing loans Households Consumer loans Credit Risk Indicators • NPL coverage has stabilized, but structure of NPL got worse ... Provisions and coverage of NPLs by provisions (%) 5,0 100 4,5 90 4,0 80 3,5 70 3,0 60 2,5 50 2,0 40 1,5 30 1,0 20 0,5 10 0 0,0 07/05 07/06 07/07 07/08 07/09 07/10 07/11 07/12 07/13 Loan loss provisions rate NPL coverage ratio (right-hand scale) Source: CNB Structure of NPLs (%) 05/04 06/04 Substandard Doubtful 07/04 2009 37.4 21.1 08/04 2010 39.2 13.4 09/04 10/04 2011 32.6 14.0 11/04 2012 27.1 14.3 12/04 Up to 3M past 01/05 Not past due due 02/05 03/05 2009 52.4 9.2 04/05 2010 51.6 9.9 05/05 2011 46.1 9.4 06/05 07/05 2012 43.7 9.5 08/05 Source: CNB, CNB calculation Loss NPLs, total 41.4 100.0 47.4 100.0 53.5 100.0 58.6 100.0 More than 3M NPLs, total past due 38.4 38.5 44.5 46.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Developments in Credit • Recent data confirm just a slow loan growth Year-on-year growth rates of a bank loans in the Czech Republic (in %) Year-on-year credit growth to households (in %) 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 3,7% 15 15 3,6% 10 4,9% 10 3,7% 5 5 0 0 -5 -10 01/10 -0,8% 07/10 01/11 07/11 01/12 07/12 01/13 07/13 -5 01/10 07/10 01/11 07/11 01/12 07/12 01/13 -0,6% 07/13 Households Total loans Source: CNB Non-financial corporations Households Consumer loans Housing loans Consumer loans (after adjustment for one-off transfer) Source: CNB Stress Tests 2013: Results • The stress tests and other analyses demonstrate that the Czech financial sector is well prepared for potential stresses. • Banks have a large capital buffer which enables them • to absorb adverse shocks and • maintain the sector’s overall capital adequacy sufficiently above the regulatory threshold of 8% even in a very unfavorable scenario. • To maintain high public and investor confidence in the stability of the Czech banking sector in the current adverse economic environment, banks must maintain a high capacity to absorb potential credit and market losses. • No acute risks to financial stability requiring immediate action are identified. II. Supervision of the Czech Financial Sector Integration of Supervision • Supervisory institutions – till 1.4.2006 • CNB – banks • Office of State Inspection in the Insurance and Pension (Ministry of Finance) – Insurance companies and Pension funds • Office for Supervision of Credit Unions – credit unions • Czech Securities Commission – investment funds, mutual funds, stock exchange, brokers and intermediaries, etc. • Supervisory institution – integrated supervisor – since April 2006 till now • CNB is the only one supervisor • banks, foreign bank branches, credit unions • insurance companies, foreign insurance company branches, reinsurance company, pension funds depositories • securities companies, investment funds, investment companies, mutual funds, brokers and intermediaries • payment institutions Functional Model of Supervision • Functional model – since January 2008 • Financial Market Regulation and Analyses Department • Licensing and Enforcement Department • Financial Market Supervision Department Financial Market Supervision Department Credit Institutions Supervision Division Insurance Sector Supervision Division Capital Market Supervision Division Risk Management Control Division Proceedings Rules and Professional Care Control Division Cross-sector Functional Model • Since March 2011 • Financial Market Supervision Dpt. Off-site On-site Prudential supervision Prudential Supervision Division Prudential Inspection Division Conduct of business supervision Conduct of Business Supervision Division Conduct of Business Inspection Division CNB – Integrated Supervisor • • • • • • • • • Easy day-to-day communication + information-sharing synergies Easier communication with supervised entities, foreign supervisors Stronger position in the crisis situation Enables to monitor the whole financial market (financial stability perspective) Ability to analyze the impact of development in one sector to other sectors or the whole economy Strong technical and professional support Unification of reporting formats for different sectors where suitable Unification of supervisory techniques for different sectors where suitable Faster development of supervisory methods, internal procedures etc. Integrated Supervisor in Independent Central Bank • Easy sharing information from money market, payment system (existence of Chinese walls) – crucial for banking supervision • Combination of financial stability and supervisory point of views – common working groups (stress testing exercises for banks and insurance companies) • Independent and apolitical decision-making process • Allows to focus on systemic risk • Adequate financial sources enable hiring experienced staff and using necessary technical support Cooperation • Colleges • Technical assistance to third countries (Egypt, etc.) • Active participation in EBA • Board of Supervisors • Management Board • CNB representative member of the first EBA mediation panel • SCRePol • Standing Committee on Regulation and Policy • Mediation Panel • CNB representative member of the first EBA mediation panel Challenges posed by Banking Union • Regulatory area • EBA regulatory role even more important (draft BTS) • No major challenge (formal double simple majority voting in EBA, but established practice of reaching decisions on consensual basis and level of harmonization reached so far makes decision-making easier) • Supervisory area • Might face some challenges concerning Q&A and SSH (Single Supervisory Handbook) in relation to individual supervisors and SSM • Concerns implementation practice and colleges • Up to now weights of individual authorities were balanced • Newly one supervisor (ECB) will be much stronger and bigger than any other • Risk of a wrong set-up with regard to the SSM • • • • Two-speed Europe Tensions between two blocks (participating and non-participating MSs) For one block it will be easier to over-rule the other block Instead of single market we will end up with more fragmented markets within the EU Lessons To Be Learned • Importance of having • Conservative financial sector • Dominated by banks which are • well capitalized and • have sound funding structure • Integrated supervision • Alignment of supervisory techniques, methods and procedures across sectors • Information sharing, communication and reporting advantages • Supervisory and financial stability synergies Thank you for your attention www.cnb.cz David Rozumek Executive Director Financial Market Supervision Department [email protected] The CNB disclaims responsibility for any private publication or personal statements of any CNB employee. The views in this presentation are the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the CNB.