* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Random Matrix Theory
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Feynman diagram wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Ising model wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
21 To accomplish this we expand the exponential function to leave only the term that contains a complete set µâ1 µ1 ...µân µn of Grassmann variables and apply the table of integration Eq.(142). The corresponding integral over the usual complex variables would give the following result: " # Z Y X Y Ï â â . (144) dÏi dÏi exp â Ïn an Ïn = ai n i i We see a remarkable property: the product of the two integrals is equal to 1. This property remains true for any Gaussian integrals of commuting and anti-commuting variables. In particular, Z Z â1 = Dµâ Dµ exp [iS± [µ]] . (145) Now the Greenâs functions can be represented without the denominator: Z GR/A = âi DÏ Ïn Ïâm exp [iS± [Ï]] , nm (146) where S± [Ï] = S± [Ï] + S± [µ] = ± X Ïiâ [E± δij â Hij ] Ïj . (147) i,j Here we introduced the super-vectors Ï and Ï â : â â â Ï = (Ï , µ ), Ï Ï= µ (148) and the super-measure: DÏ = DÏâ DÏ Dµâ Dµ. (149) The action Eq.(147) and the integration measure Eq.(149) are super-symmetric, i.e. the commuting and anticommuting variables enter in a fully symmetric way. The super-symmetry is however broken in the pre-exponent in Eq.(146), as it depends only on the commuting variables. Now when the problem of denominator is solved by the supersymmetry trick, the next step is to average over the Gaussian ensemble of Hij . To this end we write: X â âi X â âi Ïi Ïj Hij = Ïi Ïj Hij + Ïjâ Ïi Hji 2 ij ij Averaging of the r.h.s. is done independently for each pair of i, j using the identity: 1 1 i i Aij â r.h.s. â |Hij |2 = â Hij ± Aij Ïiâ Ïj Ï Ïj Ïjâ Ïi . Hji ± Aij Ïjâ Ïi â Aij Aij 2 2 4 i From now on for simplicity we will consider the case β = 2. Then Z Z 1 Aij â â â â exp â 1 |HË |2 |Hij |2 = dHËij dHËij exp â Ï dHij dHij exp r.h.s. â Ï Ï Ï ij j j i , Aij Aij 4 i where i HËij = Hij ± Ïiâ Ïj . 2 The simplicity of the case β = 2 is that HËij belongs to the same manifold of complex numbers as Hij , so that one may replace in the integral over the entire manifold HËij â Hij . Thus on the right hand side we obtain the normalization integral for the random matrix ensemble averaging. So we obtain for the disorder average:  +   * X â X 1 exp ï£âi Ïi Ïj Hij  = exp ï£â Aij Ïiâ Ïj Ïjâ Ïi  . (150) 4 ij ij