* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Microsoft Word
Survey
Document related concepts
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Audience measurement wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Personal branding wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Council for Hospitality Management Education's (CHME) Annual Research Conference 16th-17th May 2013 Submission Type: Full Paper Track: Hospitality Management Title: Social media…is it critical toward sustaining event businesses in 2013 and beyond? Authors and affiliations: Mrs Nikki McQuillan and Ms Laura McKeown Abstract Economists claim that the current economic malaise comes as a direct result of the volatility in today’s global economy and the increasing on set of nationwide austerity measures (EIBTM 2012). Despite this, Davidson (2012) argues that the global events sector can still look forward to another period of moderate expansion in meetings, events and business travel volume and spending in 2013. Technology has evolved rapidly in a manner that supplies event businesses, venues and planners with novel resolutions to facilitate them need to work more efficiently at all stages in the planning lifecycle (Davidson 2011). With the significant rise of social media event attendees have engaged willingly in these platforms. Furthermore, the growing trend of social media has compelled event planners to re-think how to organise and market events effectively and consider how social media should be integrated into an event strategy. Shang et al (2011) highlighted that businesses need to have a good understanding of the information shared on social media and how to manage it for the business to remain competitive and sustainable. However, information on the implementation of social media within event businesses is in limited supply in academic literature. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to provide essential knowledge to current and potential events businesses in order to gain competitive advantage and sustain a successful events business model. It will review event marketing literature, explore the features of contemporary event marketing with a primary focus on social media and Web 2.0 technologies and evaluate their role within an integrated marketing strategy toward securing a sustainable business model for events companies. 1 The research was qualitative in nature, with the main data collection methods being in-depth interviews and focus groups. Focus groups enabled the researcher to observe and comprehend the context within which decisions and action occur mirroring the activities of social media where decisions and actions are taken after posts or comments have been made. Findings suggest that event planners are using social media at all stages of the event planning process: for promotion, awareness, engagement and feedback. It was evident that it is still a new tool within the industry and that many event planners have not fully embraced all of its features. However, interaction and engagement with event attendees is a particular element of social media that event planners are embracing to gain the trust of their consumers and secure audiences strategically. Bolan et. al (2012) emphasised that events revolve around communication and interaction and that social media is an essential element of successful event business models. The research also highlighted that social media enabled planners to promote and market events to thousands of people in seconds before, during and after the event and also more interestingly to non- attendees. The research recommends that event businesses embrace new technologies such as social media, become fully literate in their features and engage with event attendees at all stages of the event planning process toward securing a sustainable events business model for 2013 and beyond. Key Words: Social Media; Integrated Marketing Communications; Sustainable event businesses. 2 Introduction Only recently has the event industry been keen to utilise developments in technology in the planning of events. Consequently, the means used by event planners to plan events is an interesting , yet very under researched topic. In 2011, the event industry embraced the variety of technological advances that are available (Davidson, 2011a). Technology has evolved rapidly in a manner that supplies marketing organisations, venues and planners with novel resolutions to facilitate them to work more efficiently at all stages in the planning lifecycle. According to Hanser and McLeod (2011) technology was the most important trend within the event industry in 2011 and they highlighted thatsocial media was of utmost importance. In order for events to be successful there needs to be attendance from the correct target market. Marketing to the target market is an important element within event management and the essence of marketing has changed somewhat over the years. Factors which have changed the way marketing works include new technologies, consumer expectations and the way in which consumers communicate. Marketing communications have been recognised as being the main driver for the success of events (Getz, 2005; Masterman and Wood, 2005). Effective marketing relies on the sender and receiver both being involved in the communication process (Shimp, 1993; Kitchen and de Pelsmacker, 2004). Correspondingly, it is argued that traditional marketing methods such as advertising in print and broadcast media are losing their efficiency (Hede and Kellett, 2011). Perhaps the reasoning for this is due to the nature of new technologies which are more interactive with consumers, therefore allowing consumers to be involved in the entire communication process and much less costly. 3 Literature Review The potential for the use of Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) in event marketing is crucial, given that it is being described as a “strategic imperative”, rather than simply a tactical method of communication (Hede and Kellett, 2011, p. 990). IMC involves the use of three key fundamentals; tools, media and messages. This novel, media focused approach to marketing has been described by Duncan (2002) as ‘‘orchestration’’ and ‘‘seamless’’ communication. The rationale for IMC is to create and grow ‘relationships’ between businesses and their customers that are of common value (Fill, 2002). In order to fulfil this, IMC insists on companies organising their range of strategies, assets and messages so that they can connect with their target audience in a way that is coherent and meaningful (Prakash & Sharma, 2010). An example of a company using this type of marketing is Bushmills Whiskey Ltd. As a company they were trying to re-brand their product and appeal to the younger generation as previously it was seen as a drink for more mature people. They held a festival, ‘Bushmills Live’ in August 2012. Tickets for this event could not be bought and could only be obtained through the companies Facebook Page. Those wishing to win tickets were required to post a picture of them along with a reason why they should win on the Facebook page (Owen, 2012). This technique is a clever way for brands to grow and promote their name. Furthermore, by doing this the company were enabling themselves to connect and feed information to their customers through this popular tool among their target audience. Furthermore, they revamped their website to ensure it was aimed to the younger generation by making it quirky and eye-catching. The aim of this was to broaden their consumer base and as social media is used extensively with the younger generation, Bushmills recognised an opportunity to enhance their 4 product to a new target market. Hence, providing evidence that when used correctly, the use of an IMC can be a priceless tool for businesses. For IMC to have its required result, it needs to be a strategic mix of the appropriate communication methods such as advertising, promotion, direct marketing and public relations (PR). Additionally the message needs to be carefully selected along with the correct media mix for the IMC to be successful. The success is also dependent upon careful planning, implementation and control of the entire strategy (Prakash & Sharma, 2010). A key factor of IMC is the promotion of stability and regularity of the marketing communication and management of the fundamentals within the marketing mix, the rationale for this being that they are all essential to the success of the entire marketing communications (Crowther, 2011). By combining the fundamentals of the marketing mix and integrating them into an IMC strategy additional competitive advantage can be gained by a company (Kitchen, 2005). Competitive advantage can be gained as the company are able to target a significantly larger number of people compared to only using one or two marketing strategies therefore broadening their consumer base. Strategic IMC is dependent on the situation and is circumstance explicit (Eagle et al. 2007) therefore giving more consideration for the use of IMC for the marketing of events. Understandably, it is thought that event attendees take pleasure in high levels of participation before, during and after their event experience (Pitta et al., 2006). Very relevant to this participation is word-of-mouth and viral marketing. Communication strategies such as E-communications have surfaced as part of the IT-revolution (Holm, 2006) and are allowing word-of-mouth marketing to happen on a worldwide scale. However, it is understood that currently there is very limited knowledge available surrounding how event organisers are communicating with their target audience and 5 market. Further to this, information is scarce on how consumers make use of novel media and innovative technologies, for instance Web 2.0 tools. Particularly, the initiation of Web 2.0 assists e-based communities and social networking prospects by means of platforms such as Facebook and Twitter (Ellison et al., 2007). Tools such as these are very relevant to events, knowing that the aspirations of many events are to generate a feeling of community (Hede and Kellett, 2011). Web 2.0 and Social Media The exposure given by correspondents towards social media would put forward the impression that we are in the middle of a completely new communication scene (Kietzmann, 2011). Today’s population are emerging as one which is embracing the ability to record and share their personal experiences by submitting them to their friends and online communities for appraisal, thus to allow their reputations and names be spread through forms of social media. According to Shang et. al (2011, p. 178) “Web 2.0 is a network platform on which peers contribute to the development of tools, content, and communities on the Internet.” A platform such as this can lead to innovative and further intricate information. The phrase was anticipated to differentiate actions from conventional web pages as a theory of energetic and networking understanding which evolved from the Internet. It was imagined that users of the platform would have the ability to extract and supply information in a simultaneous fashion (Shang et. al, 2011). As Web 2.0 is hugely interactive and enables user contribution in numerous means in real time there have been a number of Internet based applications such as Facebook which have been built on the technological foundations of Web 2.0 (Berthon et. al, 2012). Known as a social networking site, sites such as Facebook enables communication and information to flow in both directions, even better it can be triggered and accessed by individuals in any place at any time 6 (Shang et. al, 2011). Interactive sites provide a richer context and wealth of knowledge to users through easy to use interfaces which promote and assist involvement (Berthon et. al, 2012). The variety of online applications available through Web 2.0 supply marketers with a series of novel prospects but also a number of substantial obstacles. Web 2.0 has been described by O’Reilly (2005) as a collection of values and systems that consist of viewing the web as a “platform” with the ambition of “harnessing collective intelligence”. Perhaps the popularity of these innovative platforms is due to the exciting new experience that gives users the power to communicate and share their lives in real time with people and brands across the globe. Davidson (2011b, p. 119) explains there are numerous types of applications (apps) classified to be within the Web 2.0 platform: Blogs- meaning “Web logs”, are one of the rapidly increasing Web 2.0 apps. They are a personal website or space that can be customised and enable the author to post entries as regular or irregular as they wish. These entries are displayed in sequential order for fans of the page to read. More often than not Blogs are an interactive tool as readers have the ability to leave comments. Common types of Blogs include fashion, sport and celebrity Blogs. Social networking services enable users to make a personal web space, which indeed is combined within a main website. This personal web space is known as a profile which is presented to other users of the site. By adding or liking “friends” users can connect with those who share similar activities or interests. Facebook is one type of Social network, which is currently and constantly amid the largely visited sites on the World Wide Web. 7 It is now common for some sites to be made up of a combination of these categories, such as Twitter. Twitter is a micro-blogging and social networking service whereby users can send and read other users messages known as tweets. Tweets are made up of 140 characters which are then presented on the user’s personal profile (Davidson, 2011b). In the past number years, social media has grown to develop into conceivably the trendiest communication channels (Pelling and White 2009) and furthermore has grown into a powerful tool attracting millions of users (Kwon and Sung, 2011). The vast amounts of users logging on to social media have integrated these forms of magnitude communication into their lives on a daily basis (Boyd and Ellison 2007). Initially the first users to embrace the communication tool were mostly teenagers. However, there is an increasing quantity of new social media users in the 25-34 age range who are adopting the social media craze by building and maintaining relationships through social media (Haythornthwaite 2005). A study by Protalinski (2012) found that around a quarter of time spent on the Internet is on social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. In the UK 64% of adults are involved in User-Generated Content (UGC) based endeavour in some way or another. Between them, Facebook and Twitter possess in excess of 900 million regular active users. Indeed, at the end of March 2012 Facebook had reached a staggering 901 million monthly active users, with a further 526 million users being active daily users. Additionally, on 20th April 2012 there were more than 500 million monthly users accessing Facebook from their mobile devices. Moreover, Facebook holds a collection of over 900 million objectives such as pages and groups, this figure would suggest that the average Facebook user would be a 8 member and participates in around 80 pages, groups and events (Facebook.com 2011, cited Chu, 2011). Groups within the Facebook community are an extensive and well-liked app which is the foundation for a unique form of social interaction between people who have the same interests and hobbies (Casteleyn et. al, 2009; Park et. al, 2009). Joining a group on Facebook gives users the chance to interact and connect with other group members as well as share and receive information and knowledge about that particular topic quickly and efficiently. In turn, advertisers are seeking an opportunity as such to create a viral-driven, multidirectional communication with consumers (Holzner 2008). Although there are many benefits to Facebook, there are some issues associated with it. This is demonstrated by the continual drop in Facebook’s shares since they were available from 18th May 2012. Recent reports by Rushe (2012) state that Facebook shares have hit a new low and have dipped to under half of their original public price and in turn, halving the fortune of Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook. This raises an issue that people do not trust in Facebook as much as they would have when the site originally started becoming a huge trend. According to Pring (2012) in February 2012 there were 500 million registered users on Twitter with approximately 200 million of these active users, with around 175 million tweets being sent each day. With the growing rise in Smartphone’s alongside the continuous level of Internet and mobile networks, Twitter is on the brink of further expansion (Wauters 2010). As a real time information network, Twitter joins consumers to the most up-to-date information about subjects that are of interest to them. This makes it possible for marketers to correspond with their customers who are enthused to connect with and 9 follow their brand. Moreover, Twitter facilitates marketers to represent brands and aid the forming and preservation of consumer relationships by connecting through conversations (Kwon and Sung, 2011). Business’s are now realising these benefits of Twitter and are increasingly following the trend. Twitter (2012) recognises and promotes the use of Twitter in business as they state: “Twitter connects businesses to customers in real time and businesses use Twitter to quickly share information with people interested in their products and services, gather real-time market intelligence and feedback, and build relationships with customers, partners and influencers. From brand lift to CRM to direct sales, Twitter offers businesses an easy way to reach an engaged audience”. As an evaluation tool this is very useful as they are receiving instant feedback and if positive they can broadcast this to all of their followers by ‘re-tweeting’ the post. Furthermore, they also used Twitter to post videos, pictures and media reports of the event which enables those who couldn’t make it to the event engage. It is clear that Twitter is a very powerful tool which can help businesses in a number of areas and in relation to the events industry it is highly constructive in each stage of the event process. Twitter has integrated a smart feature which allows users to see what topics people are talking about or what is ‘trending’. It enables users to enter into conversations of interest to them centred on a particular topic using hashtags, for example #trends #SocialMedia, which appears before the word or phrase which is trending (Boyd et. al, 2010). This is a useful technique for promotion of events and also for monitoring conversations amongst consumers (Chang, 2010). 10 Although Twitter provides many benefits for businesses, a report within the Marketing Magazine by Cowlett (2011) revealed that FreshMinds Research found that people respond differently face-to-face compared to when they are using Twitter, which can cause many trust problems for businesses. Further to this it was proposed that people try to project a particular persona on Twitter, whether in aiming to amuse their followers or by positioning themselves as experts in a particular area. Therefore, although Twitter has values which cannot be denied it is also important for businesses to be aware that ‘tweets’ can be from unreliable sources and consequently are not of true value to the business. Social media and the event planner Literature on the use of social media by event planners and organisers is limited. Nonetheless, some authors such as Davidson (2011b) have found that the decision making process of event planners has been made more difficult due to the variety of resources extending through the arrival of Web 2.0 applications such as social media, which in turn persuades their buying activities. Social media has given planners the ability to access content and information not only from venues and their colleagues but also from planners and organisers globally who have staged a similar event before them. The main ways in which event planners should use social media to promote an event should be through blogging at all stages; pre-event, during the event and post-event. In addition the event should be marketed on Facebook by inviting users and posting statuses about the event to generate a buzz and exciting environment surrounding the event. Tweeting about the event should be utilized by the planners to try and spread awareness and get the event trending. Other social media means which could be used 11 include, YouTube to give a snapshot of the event in video form and also live stream the event on the web for those who could not attend. Success will be amplified by using all of these social media platforms compared to just one or two as it is making full use of the tools which are available and reaching a larger volume of people (Bolan et. al, 2012). Bolan et. al (2012) highlight that as events revolve around communication and interaction with people it would be a shame and loss if social media was not used to identify and grow events. Event planners and those within the event industry need to embrace social media and be aware of all the aspects and assistance it can give. Defying the risks associated with not being socially active on the web in an evergrowing competitive market is a concern which should be felt by planners not using social media. What is more, if a business adopts social media and are under no doubt that they are fully literate in how to use the platforms correctly and effectively to interact and connect with their customers regularly, whilst making great effort to drive more customers to their website, then there is a high likelihood that the impact will be very successful in regard to current and future events. On the other hand, a study conducted by IBM (Prodhan, 2011) established that marketers are anxious about the degree of data now available and how to use it in an effective and efficient manner. In addition, marketers felt unprepared on how to make full use of social media platforms even though they were very aware of the benefits of using it. A further concern for businesses established by Davidson (2011b) is the notion of getting bad press and comments made about their products and services with the people who write them remaining anonymous. On top of this Gilllin (2007) rightfully 12 explains that when comments are negative towards a product or service the damage can be enormous. In light of this Gillin (2007, p.4) remarks that; “Conventional marketing wisdom has long held that a dissatisfied customer tells ten people. . . In the new age of social media, he or she has the tools to tell 10 million consumers virtually overnight.” Event businesses need to be aware of the downfalls associated with social media. Not having a good understanding of social media can be as fatal to a business as not being connected on social media. It has been established that social media is a very powerful and useful tool for businesses and can add great value but this can only be achieved through understanding and consideration of various aspects, including how consumers behave and respond on these sites. Methodology The methods used for this research were unstructured interviews with event planners and a focus group made up of event attendees. The fact that there is very limited information in this area of study and to facilitate exploration, non-standardised interviews were used to encourage deeper discussion and better quality outcomes. The sample size consisted of six event planners selected on a basis that they were within the UK and also those companies that used social media such as Facebook and Twitter for their events. The interview aim was to analyse to what extent current event planners integrate social media to organise and promote events. The focus group was made up of seven event attendees of The Fashion Souk, a shopping event held in Belfast. The event attendees were invited on the day of the event to join the focus group. The focus groups were made up of three males and 13 four females, all between the ages of 14 and 45. The focus group will enable the research to discover in-depth information about how attendees use social media and respond to social media used by event planners to promote an event. Results and Discussion The current use of social media applications by the six event planners are mainly focused on Facebook and Twitter. Bolan et. al (2012) remarked, event planners should use social media at all stages of the event process to create a buzz around the event, also live streaming the event for those not in attendance. Astonishingly, over half of the event planners have received no training in social media and have utilised learning on the job, trial and error. Moreover, these event planners were the sole developers of the social media. Interestingly, of the event attendees involved, all had an account on Facebook, whereby over half logged on once a day. Surprisingly only three out of the seven attendees had a Twitter account. This indicates how vital it is for event planners to use more than one social media platform in order to reach their target market. The main use of social media from all of the event planners interviewed was advertising and promotion. Events NI Ltd acknowledges social media “ helps build the event because it means somebody that didn’t go can see it and will perhaps attend the next event, so it’s all word of mouth really”. Event attendees mirrored this “if you miss an event and see pictures on Facebook or Twitter, it makes you feel like you have missed out and makes you want to go to the next event”. Thus, event organisers who upload pictures will have a competitive benefit over those who don’t, seeing that it is a competent marketing technique to attract people to events. When asked about what they would like to see posted on social media sites event 14 attendees responded saying “Encouraging people to tag their location and receiving free entry”, “Using the check in and adding photos to encourage more people to attend” and “any information as it is a good reminder that the event is actually happening!”. All event planner companies said they would set up an event page on Facebook but commented “it is not a definite source to gather an attendance list.” This indicates that whilst event planners are keen to use social media channels for the benefits they offer, they still have to use other traditional communication channels, as social media channels are simply not reliable sources. According to Hede and Kellett (2011) due to the diverse market that events fall into there are challenges for event managers and planners to create marketing communication strategies which work in the present market. The event planning companies generally commented that, “most companies don’t really have a choice now, it’s the way marketing is going so you’re either in or you’re out and if you’re out you are behind”. Thus those who don’t use social media are seen to be lacking competitive edge within the industry. Mencap NI made a very valid and interesting remark “it is not why do social media it’s why not do social media?” As noted by Pelling and White (2009) social media had developed into the trendiest communication channels and if businesses wish to have a competitive advantage, they need to be engaging in the latest trend. Thackeray et. al (2008) and Borges (2009) expressed the underlying difficulties businesses face of measuring the success social media. When asked the event planners each had different ways and opinions on this issue. Mencap NI also commented on analytics as a device for measuring success. The purpose and 15 advantages for them to measure the success of social media, was that “it was great to know that it worked. It is about quantity with Twitter because everything moves so quickly”. Overall, the use of analytical applications is the most popular method for measuring success in the event planning companies. Measuring success without setting an expectation and objective from the beginning, serves no purpose. It was unanimously felt within the companies that social media is “definitely a success”. Events NI commented, “it increases our return on investment as we are able to continue publicising the event after it ends”. Therefore the organisation is generating new business for forthcoming events from the success of the previous event. Mencap NI summed up the importance of interaction; “the more you tweet and the more you post on Facebook the more likes and followers you get. If you stop posting for a week people will start to unlike you and not follow you”. Hence, keeping ahead, interacting and monitoring what people say so that they don’t lose interest and ‘unfollow’ or ‘unlike’ the page are key to successful social media management. Authors such as Russel (2007) are very positive towards the engagement and involvement of event attendees to build lasting connections. Events NI has a similar view “the purpose of using social media is that it gives people information and encouraging people to feel involved”. Blick Studios added another element into the mix by stating “the whole purpose of an event is networking”. Consequently, event planners are embracing the fact and knowledge of this suggestion and finding that it works. Events NI explains that “it is nice to be able to engage verbally but in writing with people and people like that”. Event Amplifier backs up this opinion by saying that “it is better to be fairly friendly and human, people really like a human voice, they like to 16 have a joke and to know a person is there”. Events NI remarked that it was particularly important as “it’s all about bringing people in, people feeling involved”. Event attendees are very keen to feel involved particularly with the event planner, as one attendee stated “it is good to speak to the event planner” another commented “if they re-tweet me, I’m more inclined to go back”. Engagement of this type was important because “they can give you direct answers and it feels more personal”. The research indicated that attendees like to be “involved and part of the event”, achieved by interaction through social media. One respondent mentioned “if I built a strong relationship with an event planner, I would be more likely to attend their events as they would value my opinion”. Therefore, event planners need to commit to their attendees and interact with them through social media platforms. When asked about the importance of engagement, Mencap NI replied “yes engagement is up there; all our strategies are about engagement. We need to get a lot more people involved”. The research found that it was not only important to engage with event attendees but also with other organisations and have powerful collaboration with stakeholders. Mencap NI commented, “Victim support were fantastic by retweeting and talking about the events, that was a really good linkage. That was a really good way of getting interaction with other good organisations, as people like to see that you are working together”. Events NI suggested that interacting with other organisations is beneficial “as it builds that relationship and its sharing information and supporting each other as well as resources as they might have something that we don’t and vice versa”. Davidson (2011b) highlighted that social media gives event planners the opportunity to access information from other planners on a global scale. 17 On a less positive view of the use of social media in events companies Events NI noted the main disadvantage for social media is time and trust issues, commenting “it’s very time consuming. You would get a lot of people who would waste your time on it as well”. Mencap NI agreed “time is a big disadvantage”. This was an issue Cowlett (2011) established, that people respond differently face-to-face compared to when they are using Twitter. Other disadvantages of social media include “ensuring that we are using other means of communication because you can’t isolate people who don’t have computers.” Mencap NI felt this was a downfall of the social media tool. Blick Studios commented “it’s not taken as seriously as some other forms of promotion and not everyone can be bothered to feedback on an event.” An interesting statement, that it wasn’t taken as seriously as other forms, when asked why Blick Studios commented “it’s not the same as having a leaflet, a physical or personal kind of exchange of information. It seems less credible”. Mencap NI have a similar view on this and thus contradicting authors such as Hede and Kellett (2011) and Davidson (2011b) who stated that traditional marketing tools such as advertising and direct marketing are being abolished because of the phenomenon that is social media as these types of communication are still essential to those who don’t use social media. Event Amplifier responded “It can go horribly, horribly wrong”. In relation to a Twitter fall being placed behind a speaker, Event Amplifier expressed “John Snow from Channel 4 was the keynote speaker for an audience of journalism students, the hashtag got so much interest and it got spammed. Every time he turned around to see what people were saying on Twitter there was a whole line of pictures of naked women spamming the hashtag”. It is therefore vital for event planners to think their social 18 media strategy through to ensure situations like this do not occur. Mencap NI found that their Twitter fall on TV’s worked exceptionally well but their audience was made up of professionals, whereas this audience were students. Therefore, the importance lies with event planners, to take into consideration their audience and how they will react to certain forms of social media. Events NI comment “people are talking about negative things being put on Twitter about the organisation”, this was an issue explored by Gillin (2007) who established that when negative comments are made towards a business the damage can be huge, especially with the use of social media as a dissatisfied customer can tell over 10 million people instantly. However, in light of this issue Events NI express “it’s definitely a possibility but I think the benefits outweigh the risks, in terms of that”. The disadvantages of social media have been clearly identified but event planners are not put off. Our Events NI remarked “yes there are negatives but it’s how you counteract the negatives and how you deal with them when they happen. I think the benefits far outweigh the negatives”. Event attendees expressed that they would give negative feedback if necessary. They also suggested that “because one person has a bad experience it can put other off” like a domino effect also “if they have a bad experience people are less likely to give the event another go, even if the planner has tried to rectify the problems”. The research suggests that negativity is something that attendees are not afraid to express, also mentioned was the current issue of “trolling” whereby “people are just hiding behind computers and being abusive”, which in turn can have a very bad effect on event attendance because of one bad review. 19 Conclusion and Recommendations It is of great significance for event companies to have a presence on a number of social media platforms, especially the main sites such as Facebook and Twitter in order to reach a vast number of people. It is recommended that social media should be used at all stages of the event process to engage with event attendees. Further to this, social media requires planning and should be an integrated marketing strategy to ensure that relevant information is posted at regular intervals. An integrated marketing strategy will ensure that social media is not the sole focus of event companies and all forms of marketing communications should be evaluated to ensure that those event attendees who do not use social media are not discriminated against. It is evident from this research that there is some negativity toward the use of social media in event planning. However to omit social media from an integrated marketing strategy would lead to nothing less than commercial suicide for event companies in 2013 and beyond. Word Count (including abstract) 5805 20 References: Berthon, P.R., Pitt, L.F, Plangger, K. and Shapiro, D. (2012) Marketing meets Web 2.0, social media, and creative consumers: Implications for international marketing strategy. Business Horizons, 55, 261-271. Bolan, P., Kearney, M. and Smyth, I. (2012) The impact of social media on tourism events: exploring and harnessing the Web 2.0 landscape to maximise success. Conference paper at: International Conference on Tourism and Events: Opportunities, Impacts and Change, June 20-22, 2012, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Boyd, M. and Ellison, N. (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-30. Boyd, D., Golder, S. and Lotan, G. (2010) Tweet, tweet, re-tweet: conversational aspects of re-tweeting on twitter. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on Social Systems. HI: Kauai. Casteleyn, J., Mottart, A. and Rutten, K. (2009), How to use facebook in your market research. International Journal of Market Research, 15 (4), 439-47. Chang, Hsia C. (2010), A new perspective on twitter hashtag use: diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47 (1), 1-4. Cowlett, M. (2011) A social insight (A special report on market research). Marketing Magazine, 31-34. 21 Chu, S. (2011) Viral advertising in social media: participation in facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of interactive advertising, 12 (1), 3043. Crowther, P. (2011) Marketing event outcomes: from tactical to strategic. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 2 (1), 68-82. Davidson, R. (2011a) EIBTM 2011 Industry trends and market share report. Spain. Available from: http://www.eibtm.com/files/2011_eibtm_industry_report.pdf [Accessed 16 February 2013]. Davidson, R. (2011b) Web 2.0 as a marketing tool for conference centres. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 2 (2), 117-138. Davidson, R. (2012) EIBTM 2012 Industry Trends and market share report. Spain. Available from: http://www.eibtm.com/page.cfm/link=268 [Accessed 16 February 2013] Duncan, T. (2002), IMC: Using advertising and promotion to build brand. International edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. Eagle, L., Kitchen, P.J. and Bulmer, S. (2007), Insights into interpreting integrated marketing communications: a two-nation qualitative comparison. European Journal of Marketing, 41 (7), 956-970. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2007) The benefits of facebook friends: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1143-1168. 22 Fill, C. (2002), Marketing communications: contexts, strategies and applications, 3rd ed., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice-Hall. Getz, D. (2005), Event management and event tourism, communication corporation. New York: Elmsford. Gillin, P. (2007), The New Influencers: A marketer’s guide to the new social media. California: Quill Driver Books. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005) Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication and Society, 8 (2), 125-47. Hede, A. and Kellett, P (2011) Marketing communications for special events: analysing managerial practice, consumer perceptions and preferences. European journal of marketing, 45 (6), 987-1004. Holm, O. (2006) Integrated marketing communications: from strategy to tactic. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11 (1), 23-33 Holzner, S. (2008) Facebook marketing: leverage social media to grow your business. Indianapolis: Que. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P. & Silvestre, B. S. (2011) Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media, Business Horizons, 54 (3), 241-251. Kitchen, P.J. and Pelsmacker, P. (2004) Integrated marketing communications: a Primer. London: Routledge. Kwon, E.S and Sung, Y. (2011) Follow me! Global marketers’ twitter use. Journal of interactive advertising, 12 (1), 4-16. 23 Masterman, G. and Wood, E. (2005), Innovative marketing communications: strategies for the events industry. Oxford: Elsevier. Owen, E. (2012) Bushmills runs facebook competition for distillery festival. Marketing Magazine. Available from: http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/news/1121408/Bushmills-runs-Facebookcompetition-distillery-festival/ [Accessed 14 February 2013]. Prodhan, G. (2011) Marketers struggle to harness social media. IBM survey. Protalinski, Emil (2012). Facebook has over 845 million users. ZDNet. Available fromhttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/facebook/facebook-has-over-845-millionusers/8332 [Accessed 14 February 2013]. O’Reilly, T. (2005), What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available from: http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-isweb-20.html [Accessed 14 February 2013]. Pelling, E. and White, K. (2009) The Theory of planned behaviour applied to young people's use of social networking websites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12 (6), 755-59. Pitta, D.A., Weisgal, M. and Lynagh, P. (2006), Integrating exhibit marketing into integrated marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23 (3), 5666. Prakash, K. and Sharma, R. (2010) Megamarketing an event using integrated marketing communications: the success story of TMH. Business strategy series, 11 (6), 371-382. 24 Pring, C. (2012) 100 Social media, mobile and internet statistics for 2012 (March). Available from: http://thesocialskinny.com/100-social-media-mobile-and-internet- statistics-for-2012/ [Accessed 14 February 2013]. Rushe, D. (2012) Facebook shares drop to less than half their initial stock price. The Guardian, 20 August. Russel, S.(2007). Experiential joins the marketing party. BandT Weekly, 57 (2604), 8. Shang, S. S.C, LI, E.Y, Wu, Y and Hou, O.C.L., (2011) Understanding Web 2.0 service models: a knowledge creating perspective. Information and Management, 48, 178-184. Shimp, T.A. (1993) Promotion management and marketing communications. TX: The Dryden Press, Fort Worth. Thackeray, R., Neiger, B.L., Hanson, C.L. & McKenzie, J.F. (2008) Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice, 9 (4), 338-343. Twitter (2012) About. Available from: http://twitter.com/about [Accessed 4 July 2012]. Wauters, R. (2010), Twitter growth: happening all over the globe. Available from: http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/23/twitter-internationalgrowth/. February 2013]. 25 [Accessed 27