Download and Hotta`s contribution. Their elegant biochemical studies

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Transitional fossil wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Meiosis wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
REVIEWS
469
technique be devised to detect the transfer or exchange of minute quantities
of DNA between homologues at meiosis?
The firmest evidence of what goes on in meiosis was provided by Stern
and Hotta's contribution. Their elegant biochemical studies with Lilium
provide clear evidence for two important conclusions: (1) that each succeeding phase (prezygotene, zygotene, pachytene and postpachytene) has
its own characteristic set of metabolic processes apparently concerned with
commitment to meiosis, chromosome pairing, recombination, and chromosome segregation, respectively; and (2) that the DNA contains regions with
specifically meiotic functions. At present Lilium stands alone, but it would
seem to be a first priority to attempt to ascertain how far Stern and Hotta's
conclusions apply generally. Lindsley and Sandier's genetic studies with
meiotic mutants of Drosophila seem to be in agreement.
This publication is clearly essential reading for all who are interested
in any aspect of meiosis. Errors are few though it was a surprise to read
(p. 201 et seq.) that yeast and Chiamydomonas are prokaryotes! Thirty
excellent plates beautifully illustrate the cytological contributions—and no
doubt add considerably to the price of the work. But need this have been
set quite so high?
H. L. K. WHITEHOUSE
Botany School, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge
EVOLUTION. T. Dobzhansky, F. .1. Ayala, G. L. Stebbinc and J. W. Valentine. W. H.
Freeman, San Fransisco, 1977. Pp. 572. £116O.
This book follows in the tradition of the distinguished synoptic treaties on
evolution by Dobzhansky, Stebbins, Mayr and Simpson, which in the
modern idiom owes its origin to Julian Huxley's pioneering review, "Evolution The Modern Synthesis ", published 35 years ago. At that time Mendelian methods had uncovered sufficient of the relation between the gene and
the phenotype, both at the level of the organism and of the population, to
provide a coherent view of the processes of evolution. But the techniques
used to study the molecular nature of hereditary materials and the chemistry
of evolutionary responses are a recent introduction. It is the forte of the
present volume that these exciting developments are at the centre of the
synopsis. Thus, although much of the discussion on topics like, the genetic
structure of populations, the origin of hereditary variation and patterns of
speciation, has a very familiar ring, the supporting evidence has been so
carefully up-dated, and subjected to a rigorously contemporary interpretation
that readers will experience a stimulating degree of freshness throughout the
presentation.
The first half of the book covers the cytogenetic basis of the response of
individuals and populations to evolution: the most crucial details of microevolution including those uncovered by the authors, especially Dobzhansky
and Stebbins, are concisely documented in this section. The discerning
student will enjoy the introductory chapter on the nature of evolution and
on its status as a core, cultural concept in the life sciences; a theme that is
effectively developed in later chapters.
Chapter nine deals with phylogenetic relationships as revealed by analyses of the biologically important macromolecules. As befits the recent
470
REVIEWS
discontinuity in research outlook which arose from the impact of these new
methods, this chapter marks a suitable point of infiexion in the dissertation.
The techniques for studying the units of biochemical function in evolution are
documented accurately and in sufficient detail to provide a general understanding, even for a relatively non-specialist reader. DNA hybridisation,
DNA phylogenies, evolutionary trends based on homologies of enzymes and
of general protein patterns, on amino acid sequences, and on immunological
correspondences, are all discussed unambiguously, allowing the reader the
opportunity to develop an informed opinion on their validity. One is
naturally thankful for the sophistication and extraordinarily fine resolution
of these elegant methods, but if only to preserve a sound orientation in the
advancement of science, this should not be allowed entirely to suppress the
thought that the general understanding gained from these analyses is not very
different from that derived from coarser routines using very highly amplified
expressions, which were the basis of Darwin's methods and materials over a
century ago. Although it is reasuring to get confirmation, based on amino
acid sequencing of globin proteins, that man is closer to the Rhesus monkey
than to the soyabean, one is tempted to recall and paraphrase Oscar Wilde's
comment when he was asked for his impressions on seeing Niagara Falls, "it
would be a most interesting phenomenon if it went the other way ". Likewise, itwould add pungencyand inspiration to biology, if once in awhile such
refined methods as are now available in research, did upset the established
order just a little bit more than they seem to have done.
The last section, chapters 10-16, deals with the evolutionary record from
the origin of life through the prokaryotes to the evolution of mankind, includ-
ing the cultural and ethical aspects of human evolution. There is also a
fascinating, albeit brief, excursion into the future of evolution, while the final
chapter provides an acute introduction to some of the fundamental questions
surrounding the scientific method in studies on evolution and examines the
logical structure of the theory of evolution by natural selection. If F. J.
Ayala, the author of this chapter, could be persuaded to elaborate the analysis beyond relevances to evolutionary theory, the crucial awareness of
philosophical implications that it stimulates should be a required experience
for all students of biology.
This book is excellently produced and there can be little doubt that it is a
very significant and highly readable contribution on the most central theme
of biology.
WATKIN WILLIAMS
Department of Agricultural Botany, University of Reading, Reading.