Download Solid State NMR Investigation of Toxic Particles Formed

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Protein folding wikipedia , lookup

Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Cyclol wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Alpha helix wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Solid State NMR Investigation of Toxic Particles
Formed by the Alzheimer’s Amyloid-β Protein
Robert Wallace, Wakulla High School, Crawfordville, FL 32327
Joel Falk, Acquia Madre Elementary School, Sante Fe, NM 87505
Dr. Anant Paravastu, Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, FSU-FAMU, Tallahassee, FL 32323
Alzheimer's Disease is Terrible and Costly
Aβ40 Amino Acid Sequence
Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects 5.4 million Americans today and may affect some 16
million by 2050. Its worst symptom is dementia, which includes loss of memory,
intellectual capacity, and personality. It has risen to the 6th leading cause of death in the
US. Deaths related to AD have increased 66% from 2000 to 2008 while deaths from the 5
leading causes of death have decreased in that same time period (Figure 1). AD’s
effects far outreach just those afflicted with this mind altering ailment. For each AD patient
there are nearly 3 caregivers providing 17 billion unpaid hours of care with an estimated
value of nearly $203 billion. The total cost to the health care system could reach $1.1
trillion by 2050. This will cost the US taxpayers, through Medicare and Medicaid, $130
billion in 2011; increasing to $706 billion by 2050.
DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQKLVFFAEDVGSNKGAIIGLMVGGVV
Figure 1. Percentage changes in selected
causes of death (all ages) between 2000 and
2008. Created from data from the National
Center for Health Statistics. Deaths: final data
for 2000. National vital statistics reports.
National Center for Health Statistics; 2002
[80] and from data from Mini~no et al.
Deaths: preliminary data for 2008. National
vital statistics reports. National Center for
Health Statistics; 2010 [75].
Aβ42 Amino Acid Sequence
DAEFRHDSGYEVHHQKLVFFAEDVGSNKGAIIGLMVGGVVIA
Hypotheses: Proposed oligomer structures from the literature
NMR research led Smith, et. al. to propose the following structure for self-assembly of
Aβ42. They suggest that F19 is very close to L34 and would create a molecule folded
onto itself (Figure 3). Since the C-terminus of each monomer is hydrophobic they would
tend to accumulate toward the center of the oligomer (Figure 4).
Alternatively, Olejniczak,
E., et. aI. show a close
proximity of F19 to I31
suggesting the more
hairpin shape seen here
(Figure 5). The coupling
of other amino acids in
their results led to a
model of two Aβ42
molecules assembling
toward the C-terminus
with the hairpin sections
pointing away from one
another. As with the
previous model, the
hydrophobic C-termini
would aggregate toward
the center of an oligomer.
Alzheimer’s is a Molecular Disease
The mechanism by which AD results in cognitive
deterioration is currently unknown, but there is strong
evidence that the amyloid-β protein (Aβ) is a key
player. An understanding of the molecular structure
of Aβ molecules associated with AD would lead to
cures and/or preventative agents. For the past 30 or
so years much of the study of AD has been directed
by the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (Figure 2). This
hypothesis states that the main cause of AD is the
accumulation of Aβ proteins to form cell destroying
plaques. Dr.’s Hardy, Selkoe and others suggest that
there are numerous observations that support this
hypothesis, including that the genetic code for Aβ
precursor protein (APP) is located on chromosome
21. This same chromosome is involved with Down’s
Syndrome and many Down’s patients develop
amyloid plaques with accompanying AD dementia.
Conversely, the number of amyloid plaques does not
correlate with the presence of AD. A subsequent
idea, the Oligomer Hypothesis, states that oligomers
(a formation of several Aβ42 peptides) are the toxic
agents in AD.
Figure 4.
Figure 3.
Future Research: Test predictions of Olejniczak et. al.
• Use an isotopic dilution experiment to see if F19 to I31 is intramolecular.
• Label amino acids within the C-terminal region to identify intermolecular
dipolar coupling.
• Label only A21 carbonyl carbon to try to prove the molecules in a beta sheet
are lined up parallel, not anti-parallel.
• Label selectively at N-terminal region to show intermolecular intra-chain
distance.
References
Figure 5.
DR. Paravastu’s Experimental Approach: Solid State NMR
Solid State NMR can show intermolecular distances thus predicting the structural
design of a protein. By labeling certain amino acids with carbon-13 a 2D spectrum is
created and the amino acid interactions can be identified (Figure 6). The colored line
patterns each represent the carbon atom chain in a labeled amino acid, and indicate
the assignments of off-diagonal NMR peaks amino acids.
The present work is guided by the
following observations:
• Two disease-related isoforms exist in the brain:
Aβ40, Aβ42
• Aβ42 associated with oligomer (particle formed by
2-50 protein molecules) formation
Figure 2. The sequence of pathogenic
events leading to AD proposed by the
amyloid cascade hypothesis.
We want to know Aβ oligomer structure and why Aβ42 is more likely to
form oligomers.
The difference between Aβ40 and Aβ42 is the addition of two amino acids – isoleucine
and alanine, seemingly a small difference. Yet, they act very differently. When they self
assemble and aggregate with other like peptides, 42 tends to form oligomers while 40
aggregates into sheets. AD patients have elevated plasma Aβ42 levels relative to Aβ40
levels . These two observations lead to the question: What is the molecular structural
basis for oligomer formation by Aβ42?
Figure 6. Aβ42 Full Spectrum
Figure 7.
In Figure 7 the 2D RAD spectrum (left graph) shows that F19 has more
peaks associated with interactions among neighboring amino acids. In the
center graph the orange, dotted, vertical lines represent proximity
interactions between F19 and I31 and leads us to the hypothesis that the
structure of Aβ42 is closer to Olejniczak’s model (Figure 5). However, the
green, dotted line shows interaction between F19 and A30 suggesting a
closer relation than in Olejniczak’s model . We believe that the intra-chain
from D23 through V18 by flipped so that F19 is on the inside of the curve. It
should be noted that this lab is using solid state NMR and more dense Aβ42
samples so the other hypotheses discussed in this paper could be accurate
for their samples.
Aβ42 Aliphatic Region
Sample
Amino Acids
Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2011. 2011 Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Chicago, IL: Alzheimer’s Association. http://
www.alz.org/downloads/Facts_Figures_2011.pdf
Hardy, J., Selkoe, D. J. 2002. The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road
to Therapeutics, Science 297: 5580.
Smith, S., et al. 2010. Structural Conversion of Neurotoxic Amyloid-β1–42 Oligomers to Fibrils. Nature Structural &
Molecular Biology 17(5): 561-568.
Olejniczak, E., et. aI. 2009. Structural Characterization of a Soluble Amyloid β-Peptide Oligomer. Biochemistry. 48(9):
1870-1877.
Paravastu, A.K., et. aI. 2008. Molecular Structural Basis for Polymorphism in Alzheimer’s Amyloid Fibrils. PNAS
105(47): 18349-18354
Rosenberry, T.L, et al. 2007. Amyloid-β (1-42) Rapidly Forms Protofibrils and Oligomers by Distinct Pathways in Low
Concentrations of Sodium Dodecylsulfate. Biochemistry. 46: 12451-12462.
Tycko, R. 2007. Symmetry-based Constant-time Homonuclear Dipolar Recoupling in Solid State NMR. The Journal of
Chemical Physics. 126: 064506.
Acknowledgments
Thank you:
Dr. Anant Paravastu (FSU/FAMU College of
Engineering) for accepting us into his lab this
summer and the endless hours he spent
patiently guiding us and explaining the
intricacies of his work.
Dr. Paravastu’s students, especially Sarah
Leonard, Max Zimmerman and Serena
Danting Huang, for letting us observe and use
their work and helping explain concepts.
Pat Dixon (Director), Jose Sanchez (Asst.
Director) and the other members of CIRL for
putting together the RET program and helping
us cope with the learning curve, pedagogy,
housing and entertainment.
Joel tuning the magnet.
Dr. Paravastu and Bob working on
amino acid spectrum assignments.